切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (07) : 516 -521. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2018.07.009

所属专题: 文献

浅表器官超声影像学

常规超声及超声造影联合诊断甲状腺微小乳头状癌
张丽娟1, 刘春蕊2,(), 卢晓玲3, 杨斌3, 黄鹏飞3   
  1. 1. 210031 南京市浦口医院功能科
    2. 210008 南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院超声科
    3. 210016 南京军区南京总医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2017-12-14 出版日期:2018-07-01
  • 通信作者: 刘春蕊

Diagnosis value of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma by conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound

Lijuan Zhang1, Chunrui Liu2,(), Xiaoling Lu3, Bin Yang3, Pengfei Huang3   

  1. 1. Department of Function, Nanjing Pukou Hositital, Nanjing 210031, China
    2. Department of Ultrasound, Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, China
    3. Department of Ultrasound, Nanjing General Hosipital, Nanjing 210016, China
  • Received:2017-12-14 Published:2018-07-01
  • Corresponding author: Chunrui Liu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Liu Chunrui, Email:
引用本文:

张丽娟, 刘春蕊, 卢晓玲, 杨斌, 黄鹏飞. 常规超声及超声造影联合诊断甲状腺微小乳头状癌[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2018, 15(07): 516-521.

Lijuan Zhang, Chunrui Liu, Xiaoling Lu, Bin Yang, Pengfei Huang. Diagnosis value of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma by conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2018, 15(07): 516-521.

目的

探讨常规超声(US)与超声造影(CEUS)在甲状腺微小乳头状癌(PTMC)的诊断价值。

方法

收集2013年2月至2017年5月南京市浦口医院、南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院及南京军区南京总医院甲状腺结节患者158例,手术切除的结节最大直径<1 cm,其中74例甲状腺小乳头状癌(PTMC组),84例腺瘤(TA组)。术前均行US和CEUS检查,对PTMC组和TA组的边缘、纵横比和增强方式、均匀性和强度等变量先进行χ2检验或Mann-Whitney U检验,再采用Logistic回归分析筛选甲状腺微小癌的危险因素。

结果

TA组和PTMC组在边缘、纵横比、钙化、包膜连续4项US检查参数方面比较,差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.01),CEUS的强化方式、强度和均匀性定性分析以及Peak、Grad、Area定量分析显示,差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.01)。US诊断甲状腺癌的敏感度、特异度和准确性分别为82.1%(69/84)、66.2%(49/74)、74.7%(118/158)。Logistic回归分析显示纵横比≥1、包膜不连续和低强化是影响PTMC超声征象的危险因素(P<0.05)。以Logistic回归模型判断甲状腺恶性结节概率的预测值绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,曲线下面积为0.887,敏感度、特异度分别为81.7%和84.2%。

结论

US联合CEUS对小于1 cm的甲状腺肿瘤的鉴别诊断具有重要价值。

Objective

To evaluate the combination of conventional ultrasound (US) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the differential diagnosis of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC) and thyroid adenoma (TA).

Methods

From February 2013 to May 2017, 158 patients with single thyroid lesions (74 PTMC, 84 TA) in Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University and Nanjing General Hospital were enrolled in this retrospective study. Before operation, all the patients were examined by conventional US and CEUS. The ultrasonic data and pathologic findings were available. The margin, microcalcification, the degree and homogeneity of enhancement of the TA and PTMC, and other variables were subjected to Fisher′s exact test or Mann-Whitney U analysis. The risk factors of thyroid microcarcinoma were screened by logistic regression analysis.

Results

There were statistically significant differences in edge, aspect ratio, calcification and four consecutive US examination parameters in group TA and group PTMC (P<0.01). Qualitative analysis of CEUS intensification, intensity and uniformity, and quantitative analysis of Peak, Grad and Area showed that the differences were statistically significant (all P<0.01). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of US in diagnosing thyroid cancer were 82.1% (69/84), 66.2% (49/74) and 74.7% (118/158), respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that the risk factors of PTMC in ultrasonography were A/T ratio≥1, invasion and low enhancement (P<0.05). The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) of predictive value of Logistic regression model to determine the probability of thyroid malignant nodules was drawn, and the area under the curve was 0.887, and the sensitivity and specificity were 81.7% and 84.2% respectively.

Conclusion

Conventional US combined with CEUS is of great value in the differential diagnosis of thyroid tumors less than 1cm.

图1~6 甲状腺微小乳头状癌的常规超声及超声造影表现。图1为常规超声图像,右叶上极低回声结节,大小约0.9 cm×0.8 cm,形状欠规则,边缘不光整,纵横比>1,内可见点状强回声;图2为彩色多普勒超声图像,周边及内部可见彩色血流信号;图3~6为超声造影图像,均呈向心性低增强,强化不均匀;图4为造影18 s;图5为造影37 s,图6为造影88 s
图7~12 甲状腺腺瘤的常规超声及超声造影表现#图7为常规超声图像,左叶中极的低回声结节,大小约0.7 cm×0.5 cm,形状欠规则,边界光整,纵横比<1,内未见强回声;图8为彩色多普勒超声图像,周边及内部可见彩色血流信号;图9~12为超声造影图像,均呈弥漫性高增强,强化均匀;图9为造影17 s;图10为造影37 s;图11为造影47 s;图12为造影97 s
表1 158例甲状腺结节患者的超声和病理资料
表2 158例甲状腺结节患者的常规超声结果(例)
表3 158例甲状腺结节患者的超声造影定性诊断(例)
表4 158例甲状腺结节的超声造影定量诊断(±s
图13 ROC曲线分析模型评价甲状腺良恶性结节的效能
表5 影响甲状腺微小乳头状癌超声征象的多因素Logistic回归分析
1
Bartolotta TV, Midiri M, Galia M, et al. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of solitary thyroid nodules with contrast-enhanced ultrasound: initial results [J]. Eur Radiol, 2006, 16(10): 2234-2241.
2
Chen HY, Liu WY, Zhu H, et al. Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma [J]. Exp Ther Med, 2016, 11(5): 1555-1562.
3
Yuan Z, Quan J, Yunxiao Z, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of solitary thyroid nodules [J]. J Cancer Res Ther, 2015, 11(1): 41-45.
4
McLeod DS, Jonklaas J, Brierley JD, et al. Reassessing the NTCTCS staging systems for differentiated thyroid cancer, including age at diagnosis [J]. Thyroid, 2015, 25(10): 1097-1105.
5
Ma JJ, Ding H, Xu BH, et al. Diagnostic performances of various gray-scale, color Doppler, and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography findings in predicting malignant thyroid nodules [J]. Thyroid, 2014, 24(2): 355-363.
6
Nemec U, Nemec SF, Novotny C, et al. Quantitative evaluation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound after intravenous administration of a microbubble contrast agent for differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid nodules: assessment of diagnostic accuracy [J]. Eur Radiol, 2012, 22(6): 1357-1365.
7
Badea R, Ciobanu L. Contrast enhanced and Doppler ultrasonography in the characterization of the microcirculation. Expectancies and performances [J]. Med Ultrason, 2012, 14(4): 307-317.
8
董海英, 李萍, 宁春平, 等. 超声造影定量分析在甲状腺良恶性结节鉴别诊断中的应用价值[J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2013, 10(2): 110-114.
9
Wendl CM, Janke M, Jung W, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound with perfusion analysis for the identification of malignant and benign tumours of the thyroid gland [J]. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc, 2015, 63(2): 113-121.
10
张波, 徐景竹, 吴琼. 2015年美国甲状腺学会《成人甲状腺结节与分化型甲状腺癌诊治指南》解读:超声部分[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2016, 26(1): 19-24.
11
刘春蕊, 黄鹏飞, 谢迎东, 等. 超声造影定性分析鉴别诊断甲状腺良恶性结节的价值[J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2017, 14(3): 220-225.
[1] 王亚红, 蔡胜, 葛志通, 杨筱, 李建初. 颅骨骨膜窦的超声表现一例[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(11): 1089-1091.
[2] 章建全, 程杰, 陈红琼, 闫磊. 采用ACR-TIRADS评估甲状腺消融区的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 966-971.
[3] 罗辉, 方晔. 品管圈在提高甲状腺结节细针穿刺检出率中的应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 972-977.
[4] 杨忠, 时敬业, 邓学东, 姜纬, 殷林亮, 潘琦, 梁泓, 马建芳, 王珍奇, 张俊, 董姗姗. 产前超声在胎儿22q11.2 微缺失综合征中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 852-858.
[5] 汪洪斌, 张红霞, 何文, 杜丽娟, 程令刚, 张雨康, 张萌. 低级别阑尾黏液性肿瘤与阑尾黏液腺癌超声及超声造影特征分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 865-871.
[6] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[7] 宋勇, 李东炫, 王翔, 李锐. 基于数据挖掘法分析3 种超声造影剂不良反应信号[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 890-898.
[8] 史学兵, 谢迎东, 谢霓, 徐超丽, 杨斌, 孙帼. 声辐射力弹性成像对不可切除肝细胞癌门静脉癌栓患者放射治疗效果的评价[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 778-784.
[9] 王博冉, 乔春梅, 李春歌, 王欣, 王晓磊. 超声造影评估类风湿关节炎亚临床滑膜炎疾病进展的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 802-808.
[10] 刘畅, 蒋洁, 胥雪冬, 崔立刚, 王淑敏, 陈文. 北京市海淀区医疗机构甲状腺超声检查及TIRADS分类基线调查[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 693-697.
[11] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[12] 孙莲, 马红萍, 吴文英. 局部进展期甲状腺癌患者外科处理[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 112-114.
[13] 麻紫月, 王贞文, 张强, 赵代伟, 张翊伦. 右侧喉不返神经1例报告[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 115-116.
[14] 顾雯, 凌守鑫, 唐海利, 甘雪梅. 两种不同手术入路在甲状腺乳头状癌患者开放性根治性术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-690.
[15] 郑大雯, 王健东. 胆囊癌辅助诊断研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 769-773.
阅读次数
全文


摘要