切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (07) : 511 -515. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2018.07.008

所属专题: 文献

腹部超声影像学

经瘘管超声造影在复杂性肛瘘术前诊断中的应用价值
吴盛正1, 吕发勤1,(), 闻巍2, 乔璐1, 任柳琼1, 刘艳慧1, 姚蒙洁2, 刘志为2   
  1. 1. 572013 三亚市,解放军总医院海南分院超声科
    2. 572013 三亚市,解放军总医院海南分院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-12-26 出版日期:2018-07-01
  • 通信作者: 吕发勤
  • 基金资助:
    三亚市医疗卫生科技创新项目(2017YW22、2017YW13)

Application of trans-fistula contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the preoperative diagnosis of complex fistula-in-ano

Shengzheng Wu1, Faqin Lyu1,(), Wei Wen2, Lu Qiao1, Liuqiong Ren1, Yanhui Liu1, Mengjie Yao2, Zhiwei Liu2   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Hainan Branch of PLA General Hospital, Sanya 572013, China
  • Received:2017-12-26 Published:2018-07-01
  • Corresponding author: Faqin Lyu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Lyu Faqin, Email:
引用本文:

吴盛正, 吕发勤, 闻巍, 乔璐, 任柳琼, 刘艳慧, 姚蒙洁, 刘志为. 经瘘管超声造影在复杂性肛瘘术前诊断中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2018, 15(07): 511-515.

Shengzheng Wu, Faqin Lyu, Wei Wen, Lu Qiao, Liuqiong Ren, Yanhui Liu, Mengjie Yao, Zhiwei Liu. Application of trans-fistula contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the preoperative diagnosis of complex fistula-in-ano[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2018, 15(07): 511-515.

目的

探讨经瘘管超声造影在复杂性肛瘘术前诊断中的应用价值。

方法

选取24例经手术证实的复杂性肛瘘患者,术前经体表常规超声检查,并采用血池造影剂行瘘管超声造影,观察瘘管的内、外口,主管及支管的走行、数量,是否存在脓腔。以手术结果为"金标准",采用χ2检验或Fisher精确检验进行统计学分析,比较常规经体表超声检查及常规超声联合瘘管超声造影2种方法的诊断准确率。

结果

常规经体表超声联合经瘘管超声造影对内口、支管的诊断准确率分别为83.3%,86.7%,均显著高于常规超声(分别为33.3%、40.0%),差异均有统计学意义(χ2=12.343、7.033,P均<0.01),对主管、脓腔的诊断准确率分别为100.0%、100.0%,均高于常规超声(分别为87.5%、62.5%),差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。

结论

经瘘管超声造影为复杂性肛瘘提供丰富的诊断依据,提高术前诊断准确率,有助于手术方案的制定;其最大优势在于显著提高对复杂性肛瘘内口及支管的诊断能力,对提高主管及脓腔的显示率也有一定作用。

Objective

To explore the value of trans-fistula contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) using blood pool contrast agent in the preoperative diagnosis of complex fistula-in-ano.

Methods

Twenty-four cases of complex fistula-in-ano confirmed by surgery were retrospectively analyzed. Conventional ultrasonography and trans-fistula CEUS were both applied before operation. The internal and external opening of fistula were observed, and the number and tract of primary fistula and secondary fistula were detected. The existence of abscess was also observed. Statistical analysis was performed to compare the diagnostic efficacy between these two methods.

Results

The diagnostic accuracy of internal opening and secondary fistula using conventional ultrasonography combined with CEUS were 83.3%, 86.7%, respectively. They were significantly higher than those of conventional ultrasound (33.3%, 40%, respectively; χ2=12.343, 7.033, all P>0.01). Although the diagnostic accuracy of primary fistula and abscess using conventional ultrasonography combined with CEUS were higher than those of conventional ultrasound (100% vs 87.5%, 100% vs 62.5%, respectively), no significant difference was found (all P>0.05).

Conclusions

Trans-fistula CEUS provides abundant diagnostic information for complex fistula-in-ano, improves the accuracy of preoperative diagnosis, and is beneficial to surgical procedures. The greatest advantage of CEUS is the indication of the internal opening and secondary fistula of complex fistula-in-ano.

图1,2 某复杂性肛瘘患者经瘘管注入声诺维超声造影后基波/谐波融合成像。图1为瘘管主管呈高增强(白色箭头所示),内口开口于肛管壁(黄色箭头所示);图2为连续追踪扫查发现1条与肛管平行走行的支管,呈高增强,为盲道(箭头所示),直肠腔内可见少量造影剂弥散
图3,4 某复杂性肛瘘患者肛周脓肿合并马蹄形瘘管超声图像(动态图)。图3为凸阵探头经肛门口检查,探头标志为截石位12点方向;肛周脓肿呈高增强的造影剂浓聚区,动态观察发现其通过一高增强的瘘管绕行肛管侧壁,开口于对侧肛管壁;图4为凸阵探头经腹壁横切检查,探头标志为右侧腹壁;肛管后方的肛周脓肿呈高增强的造影剂浓聚区,瘘管绕行肛管左侧壁至前列腺后方,开口于肛管前壁
表1 常规超声与常规超声联合超声造影检查方法诊断复杂性肛瘘准确率的比较[以手术为"金标准",例(%)]
1
Visscher AP, Schuur D, Slooff RAE, et al. Predictive factors for recurrence of cryptoglandular fistulae characterized by preoperative three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound [J]. Colorectal Dis, 2016, 18(5): 503-509.
2
Heydari A, Attinà GM, Merolla E, et al. Bioabsorbable synthetic plug in the treatment of anal fistulas [J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2013, 56(6): 774-779.
3
Siddiqui MR, Ashrafian H, Tozer P, et al. A diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis of endoanal ultrasound and MRI for perianal fistula assessment [J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2012, 55(5): 576-585.
4
Visscher AP, Felt-Bersma RJ. Endoanal ultrasound in perianal fistulae and abscesses [J]. Ultrasound Q, 2015, 31(2): 130-137.
5
Sirikurnpiboon S, Phadhana-anake O, Awapittaya B. Comparison of endoanal ultrasound with clinical diagnosis in anal fistula assessment [J]. J Med Assoc Thai, 2016, 99 Suppl 2: S69-S74.
6
Garcés-Albir M, García-Botello SA, Espi A, et al. Three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound for diagnosis of perianal fistulas: Reliable and objective technique [J]. World J Gastrointest Surg, 2016, 8(7): 513-520.
7
王小乐, 马松华, 顾峰, 等. MRI检查中幽闭恐惧症患者的临床表现和干预评价 [J]. 中国中西医结合影像学杂志, 2016, 14(1): 114-115.
8
张晓飞, 闫山英, 张艳峰, 等. 过氧化氢造影增强经直肠超声在肛瘘术前的应用 [J]. 宁夏医科大学学报, 2016, 38(2): 217-218.
9
Nagendranath C, Saravanan MN, Sridhar C, et al. Peroxide-enhanced endoanal ultrasound in preoperative assessment of complex fistula-in-ano [J]. Tech Coloproctol, 2014, 18(5): 433-438.
10
Kołodziejczak M, Santoro GA, Obcowska A, et al. Three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound is accurate and reproducible in determining type and height of anal fistulas [J]. Colorectal Dis, 2017, 19(4): 378-384.
11
Liang C, Lu Y, Zhao B, et al. Imaging of anal fistulas: comparison of computed tomographic fistulography and magnetic resonance imaging [J]. Korean J Radiol, 2014, 15(6): 712-723.
12
Soker G, Gulek B, Yilmaz C, et al. The comparison of CT fistulography and MR imaging of perianal fistulae with surgical findings: a case-control study [J]. Abdom Radiol (NY), 2016, 41(8): 1474-1483.
13
银浩强, 王嵩. 复杂性肛瘘的影像学诊断进展 [J]. 中国中西医结合影像学杂志, 2015, 13(5): 572-574.
14
Chew SS, Yang JL, Newstead GL, et al. Anal fistula: Levovist enhanced endoanal ultrasound: a pilot study [J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2003, 46(3): 377-384.
15
邹大中, 俞一峰, 颜丹萍, 等. 超声造影术前诊断肛瘘的临床价值 [J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2010, 19(12): 1051-1053.
[1] 魏淑婕, 惠品晶, 丁亚芳, 张白, 颜燕红, 周鹏, 黄亚波. 单侧颈内动脉闭塞患者行颞浅动脉-大脑中动脉搭桥术的脑血流动力学评估[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1046-1055.
[2] 张璇, 马宇童, 苗玉倩, 张云, 吴士文, 党晓楚, 陈颖颖, 钟兆明, 王雪娟, 胡淼, 孙岩峰, 马秀珠, 吕发勤, 寇海燕. 超声对Duchenne肌营养不良儿童膈肌功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1068-1073.
[3] 朱连华, 费翔, 韩鹏, 姜波, 李楠, 罗渝昆. 高帧频超声造影在胆囊息肉样病变中的鉴别诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 904-910.
[4] 张梅芳, 谭莹, 朱巧珍, 温昕, 袁鹰, 秦越, 郭洪波, 侯伶秀, 黄文兰, 彭桂艳, 李胜利. 早孕期胎儿头臀长正中矢状切面超声图像的人工智能质控研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 945-950.
[5] 陈舜, 薛恩生, 叶琴. PDCA在持续改进超声危急值管理制度中的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 974-978.
[6] 周钰菡, 肖欢, 唐毅, 杨春江, 周娟, 朱丽容, 徐娟, 牟芳婷. 超声对儿童髋关节暂时性滑膜炎的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 795-800.
[7] 刘欢颜, 华扬, 贾凌云, 赵新宇, 刘蓓蓓. 颈内动脉闭塞病变管腔结构和血流动力学特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 809-815.
[8] 郏亚平, 曾书娥. 含鳞状细胞癌成分的乳腺化生性癌的超声与病理特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 844-848.
[9] 张丽丽, 陈莉, 余美琴, 聂小艳, 王婧玲, 刘婷. PDCA循环法在超声浅表器官亚专科建设中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 717-721.
[10] 罗刚, 泮思林, 陈涛涛, 许茜, 纪志娴, 王思宝, 孙玲玉. 超声心动图在胎儿心脏介入治疗室间隔完整的肺动脉闭锁中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 605-609.
[11] 黄佳, 石华, 张玉国, 胡佳琪, 陈茜. 胎儿左头臂静脉正常与异常超声图像特征及其临床意义[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 610-617.
[12] 陈旭渊, 罗仕云, 李文忠, 李毅. 腺源性肛瘘经手术治疗后创面愈合困难的危险因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 82-85.
[13] 孔博, 张璟, 吕珂. 超声技术在复杂腹壁疝诊治中的作用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 670-673.
[14] 廖梅, 张红君, 金洁玚, 吕艳, 任杰. 床旁超声造影对肝移植术后早期肝动脉血栓的诊断价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 630-634.
[15] 杨天池, 韩威, 邱枫, 祁佳慧. 术中胰腺超声弹性成像在胰腺质地评估中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 646-650.
阅读次数
全文


摘要