切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (07) : 511 -515. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2018.07.008

所属专题: 文献

腹部超声影像学

经瘘管超声造影在复杂性肛瘘术前诊断中的应用价值
吴盛正1, 吕发勤1,(), 闻巍2, 乔璐1, 任柳琼1, 刘艳慧1, 姚蒙洁2, 刘志为2   
  1. 1. 572013 三亚市,解放军总医院海南分院超声科
    2. 572013 三亚市,解放军总医院海南分院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-12-26 出版日期:2018-07-01
  • 通信作者: 吕发勤
  • 基金资助:
    三亚市医疗卫生科技创新项目(2017YW22、2017YW13)

Application of trans-fistula contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the preoperative diagnosis of complex fistula-in-ano

Shengzheng Wu1, Faqin Lyu1,(), Wei Wen2, Lu Qiao1, Liuqiong Ren1, Yanhui Liu1, Mengjie Yao2, Zhiwei Liu2   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Hainan Branch of PLA General Hospital, Sanya 572013, China
  • Received:2017-12-26 Published:2018-07-01
  • Corresponding author: Faqin Lyu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Lyu Faqin, Email:
引用本文:

吴盛正, 吕发勤, 闻巍, 乔璐, 任柳琼, 刘艳慧, 姚蒙洁, 刘志为. 经瘘管超声造影在复杂性肛瘘术前诊断中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2018, 15(07): 511-515.

Shengzheng Wu, Faqin Lyu, Wei Wen, Lu Qiao, Liuqiong Ren, Yanhui Liu, Mengjie Yao, Zhiwei Liu. Application of trans-fistula contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the preoperative diagnosis of complex fistula-in-ano[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2018, 15(07): 511-515.

目的

探讨经瘘管超声造影在复杂性肛瘘术前诊断中的应用价值。

方法

选取24例经手术证实的复杂性肛瘘患者,术前经体表常规超声检查,并采用血池造影剂行瘘管超声造影,观察瘘管的内、外口,主管及支管的走行、数量,是否存在脓腔。以手术结果为"金标准",采用χ2检验或Fisher精确检验进行统计学分析,比较常规经体表超声检查及常规超声联合瘘管超声造影2种方法的诊断准确率。

结果

常规经体表超声联合经瘘管超声造影对内口、支管的诊断准确率分别为83.3%,86.7%,均显著高于常规超声(分别为33.3%、40.0%),差异均有统计学意义(χ2=12.343、7.033,P均<0.01),对主管、脓腔的诊断准确率分别为100.0%、100.0%,均高于常规超声(分别为87.5%、62.5%),差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。

结论

经瘘管超声造影为复杂性肛瘘提供丰富的诊断依据,提高术前诊断准确率,有助于手术方案的制定;其最大优势在于显著提高对复杂性肛瘘内口及支管的诊断能力,对提高主管及脓腔的显示率也有一定作用。

Objective

To explore the value of trans-fistula contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) using blood pool contrast agent in the preoperative diagnosis of complex fistula-in-ano.

Methods

Twenty-four cases of complex fistula-in-ano confirmed by surgery were retrospectively analyzed. Conventional ultrasonography and trans-fistula CEUS were both applied before operation. The internal and external opening of fistula were observed, and the number and tract of primary fistula and secondary fistula were detected. The existence of abscess was also observed. Statistical analysis was performed to compare the diagnostic efficacy between these two methods.

Results

The diagnostic accuracy of internal opening and secondary fistula using conventional ultrasonography combined with CEUS were 83.3%, 86.7%, respectively. They were significantly higher than those of conventional ultrasound (33.3%, 40%, respectively; χ2=12.343, 7.033, all P>0.01). Although the diagnostic accuracy of primary fistula and abscess using conventional ultrasonography combined with CEUS were higher than those of conventional ultrasound (100% vs 87.5%, 100% vs 62.5%, respectively), no significant difference was found (all P>0.05).

Conclusions

Trans-fistula CEUS provides abundant diagnostic information for complex fistula-in-ano, improves the accuracy of preoperative diagnosis, and is beneficial to surgical procedures. The greatest advantage of CEUS is the indication of the internal opening and secondary fistula of complex fistula-in-ano.

图1,2 某复杂性肛瘘患者经瘘管注入声诺维超声造影后基波/谐波融合成像。图1为瘘管主管呈高增强(白色箭头所示),内口开口于肛管壁(黄色箭头所示);图2为连续追踪扫查发现1条与肛管平行走行的支管,呈高增强,为盲道(箭头所示),直肠腔内可见少量造影剂弥散
图3,4 某复杂性肛瘘患者肛周脓肿合并马蹄形瘘管超声图像(动态图)。图3为凸阵探头经肛门口检查,探头标志为截石位12点方向;肛周脓肿呈高增强的造影剂浓聚区,动态观察发现其通过一高增强的瘘管绕行肛管侧壁,开口于对侧肛管壁;图4为凸阵探头经腹壁横切检查,探头标志为右侧腹壁;肛管后方的肛周脓肿呈高增强的造影剂浓聚区,瘘管绕行肛管左侧壁至前列腺后方,开口于肛管前壁
表1 常规超声与常规超声联合超声造影检查方法诊断复杂性肛瘘准确率的比较[以手术为"金标准",例(%)]
1
Visscher AP, Schuur D, Slooff RAE, et al. Predictive factors for recurrence of cryptoglandular fistulae characterized by preoperative three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound [J]. Colorectal Dis, 2016, 18(5): 503-509.
2
Heydari A, Attinà GM, Merolla E, et al. Bioabsorbable synthetic plug in the treatment of anal fistulas [J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2013, 56(6): 774-779.
3
Siddiqui MR, Ashrafian H, Tozer P, et al. A diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis of endoanal ultrasound and MRI for perianal fistula assessment [J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2012, 55(5): 576-585.
4
Visscher AP, Felt-Bersma RJ. Endoanal ultrasound in perianal fistulae and abscesses [J]. Ultrasound Q, 2015, 31(2): 130-137.
5
Sirikurnpiboon S, Phadhana-anake O, Awapittaya B. Comparison of endoanal ultrasound with clinical diagnosis in anal fistula assessment [J]. J Med Assoc Thai, 2016, 99 Suppl 2: S69-S74.
6
Garcés-Albir M, García-Botello SA, Espi A, et al. Three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound for diagnosis of perianal fistulas: Reliable and objective technique [J]. World J Gastrointest Surg, 2016, 8(7): 513-520.
7
王小乐, 马松华, 顾峰, 等. MRI检查中幽闭恐惧症患者的临床表现和干预评价 [J]. 中国中西医结合影像学杂志, 2016, 14(1): 114-115.
8
张晓飞, 闫山英, 张艳峰, 等. 过氧化氢造影增强经直肠超声在肛瘘术前的应用 [J]. 宁夏医科大学学报, 2016, 38(2): 217-218.
9
Nagendranath C, Saravanan MN, Sridhar C, et al. Peroxide-enhanced endoanal ultrasound in preoperative assessment of complex fistula-in-ano [J]. Tech Coloproctol, 2014, 18(5): 433-438.
10
Kołodziejczak M, Santoro GA, Obcowska A, et al. Three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound is accurate and reproducible in determining type and height of anal fistulas [J]. Colorectal Dis, 2017, 19(4): 378-384.
11
Liang C, Lu Y, Zhao B, et al. Imaging of anal fistulas: comparison of computed tomographic fistulography and magnetic resonance imaging [J]. Korean J Radiol, 2014, 15(6): 712-723.
12
Soker G, Gulek B, Yilmaz C, et al. The comparison of CT fistulography and MR imaging of perianal fistulae with surgical findings: a case-control study [J]. Abdom Radiol (NY), 2016, 41(8): 1474-1483.
13
银浩强, 王嵩. 复杂性肛瘘的影像学诊断进展 [J]. 中国中西医结合影像学杂志, 2015, 13(5): 572-574.
14
Chew SS, Yang JL, Newstead GL, et al. Anal fistula: Levovist enhanced endoanal ultrasound: a pilot study [J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2003, 46(3): 377-384.
15
邹大中, 俞一峰, 颜丹萍, 等. 超声造影术前诊断肛瘘的临床价值 [J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2010, 19(12): 1051-1053.
[1] 章建全, 程杰, 陈红琼, 闫磊. 采用ACR-TIRADS评估甲状腺消融区的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 966-971.
[2] 罗辉, 方晔. 品管圈在提高甲状腺结节细针穿刺检出率中的应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 972-977.
[3] 杨忠, 时敬业, 邓学东, 姜纬, 殷林亮, 潘琦, 梁泓, 马建芳, 王珍奇, 张俊, 董姗姗. 产前超声在胎儿22q11.2 微缺失综合征中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 852-858.
[4] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[5] 宋勇, 李东炫, 王翔, 李锐. 基于数据挖掘法分析3 种超声造影剂不良反应信号[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 890-898.
[6] 史学兵, 谢迎东, 谢霓, 徐超丽, 杨斌, 孙帼. 声辐射力弹性成像对不可切除肝细胞癌门静脉癌栓患者放射治疗效果的评价[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 778-784.
[7] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[8] 洪玮, 叶细容, 刘枝红, 杨银凤, 吕志红. 超声影像组学联合临床病理特征预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗完全病理缓解的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 571-579.
[9] 项文静, 徐燕, 茹彤, 郑明明, 顾燕, 戴晨燕, 朱湘玉, 严陈晨. 神经学超声检查在产前诊断胼胝体异常中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 470-476.
[10] 胡可, 鲁蓉. 基于多参数超声特征的中老年女性压力性尿失禁诊断模型研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 477-483.
[11] 张妍, 原韶玲, 史泽洪, 郭馨阳, 牛菁华. 小肾肿瘤超声漏诊原因分析新思路[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 500-504.
[12] 席芬, 张培培, 孝梦甦, 刘真真, 张一休, 张璟, 朱庆莉, 孟华. 乳腺错构瘤的临床与超声影像学特征分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 505-510.
[13] 胡安丽, 黄建, 王建平, 王晓培, 陈宏亮, 陈虹羽. 分期施方熏洗对肛瘘术后患者创面肉芽组织生成的影响[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 402-410.
[14] 陈意志. 核磁共振钆造影剂导致的肾源性系统性纤维化[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 358-358.
[15] 张琛, 秦鸣, 董娟, 陈玉龙. 超声检查对儿童肠扭转缺血性改变的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 565-568.
阅读次数
全文


摘要