切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (02) : 131 -135. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2020.02.007

所属专题: 文献

妇产科超声影像学

超声造影对不同类型子宫发育异常及其输卵管通畅性的评估
陈欣1, 罗红1,()   
  1. 1. 610041 成都,四川大学华西第二医院超声科 出生缺陷与相关妇儿疾病教育部重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2019-07-01 出版日期:2020-02-22
  • 通信作者: 罗红
  • 基金资助:
    四川省科技厅重点研发项目(2018SZ0178)

Hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography for assessment of uterine malformations and patency of fallopian tube

Xin Chen1, Hong Luo1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Ministry of Education, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
  • Received:2019-07-01 Published:2020-02-22
  • Corresponding author: Hong Luo
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Luo Hong, Email:
引用本文:

陈欣, 罗红. 超声造影对不同类型子宫发育异常及其输卵管通畅性的评估[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2020, 17(02): 131-135.

Xin Chen, Hong Luo. Hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography for assessment of uterine malformations and patency of fallopian tube[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2020, 17(02): 131-135.

目的

探讨经阴道实时三维子宫输卵管超声造影(RT-3D-HyCoSy)评估不同类型子宫发育异常及输卵管通畅性的方法与应用价值。

方法

选取2015年1月至2019年4月于四川大学华西第二医院就诊,经RT-3D-HyCoSy诊断为子宫发育异常的不孕症患者34例。应用RT-3D-HyCoSy评估子宫发育异常的不同类型及输卵管通畅性,对子宫畸形类型及无法评估输卵管通畅性的原因进行分析。

结果

34例患者中,纵隔子宫13例(38.2%),单角子宫12例(35.3%),双子宫6例(17.7%),弓形子宫3例(8.8%)。34例患者中,输卵管缺如4条;输卵管通畅34条,输卵管通而不畅6条,输卵管阻塞9条;无法评估结果的输卵管15条,分别为8例单角子宫合并残角子宫、4例双子宫、3例完全纵隔子宫患者的一侧输卵管无法评估,其主要原因为宫腔置管失败。

结论

对合并子宫发育异常的不孕症患者而言,RT-3D-HyCoSy既能明确子宫发育异常的类型,也能较准确地评估输卵管通畅性,不失为一种筛查不孕症原因的重要和有效方法。但仍有部分输卵管因宫腔置管失败而无法评估。

Objective

To investigate the practical value of real-time three-dimensional hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography(RT-3D-HyCoSy) in fertile patients with uterine malformation.

Methods

Thirty-four patients with uterine malformations diagnosed by RT-3D-HyCoSy were selected at the West China Second University Hospital from January 2015 to April 2019. The patients were examined by RT-3D-HyCoSy to evaluate uterine malformations and the patency of fallopian tubes. The types of uterine malformations and the causes of failure to evaluate the patency of fallopian tubes were analyzed.

Results

A total of 34 patients were diagnosed withuterine malformations, including 13 (38.2%) cases of septate uterus, 12 (35.3%) cases of unicornuate uterus, 6 (17.7%) cases of didelphus, and 3 (8.8%) cases of arcuate uterus. Among the 34 cases included, there were 4 missing fallopian tubes, 34 unobstructed fallopian tubes, 6 partially obstructed fallopian tubes, and 9 obstructed fallopian tubes; 15 fallopian tubes could not be evaluated, of which 8 were unicornuate uterus with residual horn uterus, 4 were didelphus, and 3 were complete septate uterus with one fallopian unevaluable. The main reason for not being evaluable was the failure of uterine catheterization.

Conclusion

For infertility patients with uterine malformation, RT-3D-HyCoSy can not only identify the types of uterine malformation, but also accurately assess the patency of fallopian tubes, representing an important and effective means to screen the causes of infertility. However, some fallopian tubes can not be evaluated due to the failure of uterine catheterization

图1 Ⅱ型单角子宫宫腔水造影及超声造影图像。图a为推注0.9%的氯化钠溶液后,单角子宫(偏左侧)可见宫腔积液,残角子宫侧宫腔未见分离;图b为推注造影剂后,可见单角子宫呈单侧羊角状,与单角相连的输卵管通畅
图2 双子宫超声造影图像。图a为分别向双侧宫腔插入造影管,先向右侧宫腔推注造影剂,可见宫腔呈单侧羊角状,显示右侧输卵管近端阻塞;图b为向左侧宫腔推注造影剂,可见宫腔呈单侧羊角状,显示左侧输卵管积水
图3 不全纵隔子宫超声造影图像。图示推注造影剂可见宫腔呈"Y"字形,双侧输卵管通畅
表1 应用RT-3D-HyCoSy无法评估输卵管通畅性的子宫畸形类型及原因
1
华克勤,丰有吉. 实用妇产科学 [M]. 3版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2013: 633.
2
韩文莉,马乐. 子宫畸形与妊娠结局的关系及处理 [J]. 医学综述, 2017, 23(2): 286-289.
3
Marana R, Ferrari S, Merola A, et al. Role of a mini-invasive approach in the diagnosis and treatment of tubo-peritoneal infertility as an altenative to IVF [J]. Minerva Ginecol, 2011, 63(1): 1-10.
4
张新玲,古健,黄泽萍, 等. 经阴道实时三维超声造影评价输卵管通畅性的初步研究 [J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2013, 22(11): 970-973.
5
The American Fertility Society. The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, müllerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions [J]. Fertil Steril, 1988, 49(6): 944-955.
6
Ludwin A, Pityński K, Ludwin I, et al. Two- and three-dimensional ultrasonography and sonohysterography versus hysteroscopy with laparoscopy in the differential diagnosis of septate, bicornuate, and arcuate uteri [J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 20(1): 90-99.
7
Ludwin A, Ludwin I, Kudla M, et al. Reliability of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology/European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy and American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification systems for congenital uterine anomalies detected using three-dimensional ultrasonography [J]. Fertil Steril. 2015, 104(3): 688-697.
8
Grimbizis GF, Camus M, Tarlatzis BC, et al. Clinical implications of uterine malformations and hysteroscopic treatment results [J]. Hum Reprod Update, 2001, 7(2): 161-174.
9
Yuna Z, Yuhuab S, Zijiangb C, et al. Effect of Mullerian duct abnormalities on fertility outcomes and mutation of HOXA13 gene [J]. Prog Obstet Gynecol, 2012, 21 (3): 197-199, 204.
10
朱兰,郎景和. 子宫发育异常的病因学研究 [J]. 国外医学妇产科学分册, 2003, 30(5): 287-289.
11
Chan YY, Jayaprakasan K, Zamora J, et al. The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review [J]. Hum Reprod Update, 2011, 17(6): 761-771.
12
蔡爱露,刘炜,赵丹, 等. 三维超声成像技术与子宫输卵管碘油造影术诊断先天性子宫畸形的比较 [J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2008, 24(8): 745-748.
13
梁娜,吴青青,高凤云, 等. 经阴道三维子宫输卵管超声造影诊断先天性子宫畸形的应用价值 [J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2015, 31(6): 543-545.
14
Lo Monte G, Capobianco G, PivaI, et al. Hysterosalpingo contrast sonography (HyCoSy): let's make the point! [J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2015, 291(1): 19-30.
15
Liang N, Wu QQ, Li JH, et al. Causes of misdiagnosis in assessing tubal patency by transvaginal real-time three-dimensional hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography [J]. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992), 2019, 65(8): 1055-1060.
16
Gao YB, Yan JH, Yang YD, et al. Diagnostic value of transvaginal four-dimensional hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography combined with recanalization in patients with tubal infertility [J]. Niger J Clin Pract, 2019, 22(1): 46-50.
17
Wang W, Zhou Q, Gong Y, et al. Assessment of Fallopian Tube Fimbria Patency With 4-Dimensional Hysterosalpingo-Contrast Sonography in Infertile Women [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2017, 36(10): 2061-2069.
18
石富文,杨敏,顾小宁, 等. 经阴道四维超声子宫输卵管造影评估不孕症患者输卵管通畅性 [J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2019, 35(5): 730-734.
[1] 王金萍, 王佳佳, 李燕, 王琴, 张靖, 陈晓艺, 林欣. 新型锥头式宫腔输卵管造影管在“一站式”输卵管超声造影中的初步应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(03): 272-277.
[2] 葛丹, 涂美琳, 欧斐. 四维输卵管超声造影形态对不孕症患者输卵管通畅度的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2021, 18(01): 68-73.
[3] 崔琪, 梁喜, 李莹. 四维子宫输卵管超声造影在辅助生殖技术孕前筛查中的临床价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2020, 17(11): 1103-1107.
[4] 古梅, 何玉梅, 宁荣萍, 倪姣, 陈忠英, 陈红坚. 酮咯酸氨丁三醇在子宫输卵管超声造影中的超前镇痛作用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2020, 17(02): 136-139.
[5] 邹彦, 彭成忠, 吕亚儿, 孙娟, 陈双喜, 徐子宁, 崔艾琳, 彭彦卿. 子宫输卵管超声造影联合盆腔水造影在输卵管通畅性及伞端评估中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2020, 17(02): 124-130.
[6] 汪璐赟, 李红, 顾怡栋, 邓学东. 经阴道动态三维超声输卵管造影在不孕症诊断中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2017, 14(04): 302-306.
[7] 郑芳媛, 周毓青, 隋龙, 任芸芸, 戴蓓蓓, 林如. 三维超声对弓形子宫与纵隔子宫的诊断价值及诊断指标研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2017, 14(02): 127-133.
[8] 郑芳媛, 周毓青, 隋龙, 任芸芸, 戴蓓蓓, 林如. 超声不同成像方法诊断子宫畸形的比较研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2016, 13(05): 353-360.
[9] 马黔红. 生殖医学中的宫腔镜应用[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 17(05): 620-.
[10] 李林双, 章汉旺. 子宫内膜异位症患者的不孕机制和助孕策略研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2020, 16(03): 272-277.
[11] 边锦霞, 侯静, 白宝艳, 陈延平, 王胜利. 实时三维子宫输卵管超声造影术对女性不孕因素分析的临床价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2019, 15(06): 716-720.
[12] 陈欣. 子宫输卵管超声造影术对于临床诊断输卵管堵塞所致不孕症的研究进展[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2016, 12(04): 479-483.
[13] 汪泉, 周英妹, 何颖. p27、cyclin-E在子宫内膜异位症中的表达及其临床意义[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 546-552.
[14] 张雨, 苗杰. 子宫输卵管造影对输卵管积水的诊断及相关研究[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 336-340.
[15] 中国医师协会介入医师分会妇儿介入专委会, 中华医学会放射学分会介入学组泌尿生殖专业委员会. 输卵管介入治疗中国专家共识[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2019, 07(03): 175-177.
阅读次数
全文


摘要