切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (05) : 441 -446. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2020.05.009

所属专题: 文献

妇产科超声影像学

经阴道三维超声对不孕不育患者宫腔病变的诊断价值
李梅1, 刁飞扬1, 吴春香1, 蔡令波1, 刘嘉茵1,()   
  1. 1. 210029 南京医科大学第一附属医院生殖医学中心
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-31 出版日期:2020-05-01
  • 通信作者: 刘嘉茵
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(2016YFC1000703); 江苏省妇幼课题(FYX201917、FYX201901)

Value of transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound in diagnosing uterine cavity lesions in infertile patients

Mei Li1, Feiyang Diao1, Chunxiang Wu1, Lingbo Cai1, Jiayin Liu1,()   

  1. 1. Reproductive Medicine Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China
  • Received:2019-12-31 Published:2020-05-01
  • Corresponding author: Jiayin Liu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Liu Jiayin, Emaill:
引用本文:

李梅, 刁飞扬, 吴春香, 蔡令波, 刘嘉茵. 经阴道三维超声对不孕不育患者宫腔病变的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2020, 17(05): 441-446.

Mei Li, Feiyang Diao, Chunxiang Wu, Lingbo Cai, Jiayin Liu. Value of transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound in diagnosing uterine cavity lesions in infertile patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2020, 17(05): 441-446.

目的

探讨三维超声在不孕不育患者宫腔病变中的诊断价值。

方法

选取2017年1月至2018年12月在南京医科大学第一附属医院生殖医学中心的不孕不育患者行经阴道三维超声检查,将428例诊断为不同类型宫腔病变患者的三维超声结果与宫腔镜或病理组织学结果进行比较分析,以宫腔镜或病理组织学结果为"金标准",采用四格表计算三维超声诊断各类宫腔病变的敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及准确性。

结果

三维超声诊断宫腔病变患者428例,其中包括宫腔粘连235例(54.9%),子宫内膜息肉153例(35.7%),子宫黏膜下肌瘤40例(9.4%)。将428例患者的三维超声结果与宫腔镜或病理组织学结果相比较,诊断结果一致为404例(94.4%),误诊24例(5.6%),其中,宫腔粘连误诊14例,子宫内膜息肉误诊7例,子宫黏膜下肌瘤误诊3例。三维超声与宫腔镜或病理组织学结果相比,其诊断各种类型宫腔病变的准确性分别为:宫腔粘连96.73%,子宫内膜息肉96.96%,子宫黏膜下肌瘤98.83%。

结论

三维超声对各种宫腔病变有较高的诊断准确性,可作为不孕不育患者排除宫腔病变的首选检查方法。

Objective

To evaluate the diagnostic value of three-dimensional ultrasound for uterine cavity lesions in infertile patients.

Methods

Infertility patients who underwent three-dimensional ultrasound from January 2017 to December 2018 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University were collected. Three-dimensional ultrasound results of 428 patients diagnosed with different types of uterine cavity lesions were compared with those of hysteroscopy or histopathology. The four grid table was used to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of three-dimensional sonography.

Results

Three-dimensional ultrasound detected uterine cavity lesions in 428 patients, including 235 (54.9%) cases of intrauterine adhesion, 153 (35.7%) cases of endometrial polyps, and 40 (9.4%) cases of submucosal myoma. Compared with hysteroscopy or histopathology results, the three-dimensional ultrasound had consistent results in 404 cases (94.4%), and 24 (5.6%) cases were misdiagnosed, of which 14 were misdiagnosed as intrauterine adhesions, 7 misdiagnosed as endometrial polyp, and 3 as submucosal myoma. The accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasonography in diagnosing various types of uterine cavity lesions was 96.73% for intrauterine adhesion, 96.96% for endometrial polyps, and 98.83% for submucosal myoma.

Conclusion

Three-dimensional ultrasound has a high diagnostic accuracy for various types of uterine cavity lesions, which can be used as the first choice for infertile patients to exclude uterine cavity lesions.

图1 不同类型宫腔病变二维、三维超声图像。图a为正常子宫;图b为宫腔粘连;图c为子宫内膜息肉;图d为子宫黏膜下肌瘤(0型);图e为子宫黏膜下肌瘤(Ⅰ型);图f为子宫黏膜下肌瘤(Ⅱ型)
表1 428例宫腔病变患者的三维超声与宫腔镜或病理组织学结果比较结果
表2 三维超声诊断各种宫腔病变的统计学指标分析(%)
1
Hooker AB, Lemmers M, ThurkowAL, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of intrauterine adhesions after miscarriage: Prevalence, risk factors and long-term reproductive outcome [J]. Hum Reprod Update, 2014, 2(2): 262-278.
2
AlansariLM, Wardle P. Endometrial polyps and subfertility [J]. Hum Fertil(Camb), 2012, 3(3): 129-133.
3
Pritts EA, Parker WH, Olive DL. Fibroids and infertility: an updated systematic review of the evidence[J]. Fertil Steril, 2009, 91(4): 1215-1223.
4
马彩虹, 杨艳.宫腔病变与不孕症[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2013, 9(29): 703-707.
5
AlChami A, Saridogan E. Endometrial Polyps and Subfertility [J]. J Obstet Gynaecol India, 2017, 67(1): 9-14.
6
Wang X, Yi J, Xie X, et al. Factors affecting pregnancy outcomes following the surgicalremoval of intrauterine adhesions and subsequent in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer [J]. Exp Ther Med, 2019, 18(5): 3675-3680.
7
Levine EM, Fernandez CM, Miller D, et al. Clinical value of 3-Dimensional ultrasound in gynecology [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2018, 37(10): 2445-2450.
8
李梅, 陈慧平, 刘嘉茵. 经阴道三维超声对先天性子宫畸形的诊断价值[J]. 中国妇幼健康研究, 2018, 29(11): 14
9
Kougioumtsidou A, Mikos T, Grimbizis GF, et al. Three-dimensional ultrasound inthe diagnosis and the classification of congenital uterine anomalies using the ESHRE/ESGE classification: a diagnostic accuracy study [J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2019, 299(3): 779-789.
10
丽珍, 毛韧.经阴道二维超声联合经阴道三维超声对官腔粘连的诊断价值[J]. 医学影像学杂志, 2016, 26(1): 180-182.
11
翟林, 张丹, 孟焱. 宫腔粘连宫腔形态的三维超声观察 [J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2017, 33(2): 157-159.
12
Van den Bosch T, Valentin L, van Schoubroeck D, et al. Detection of intracavitary uterine pathology using offlineanalysis of three-dimensional ultrasound volumes: interobserver agreement and diagnostic accuracy[J]. UltrasoundObstet Gynecol, 2012, 40(4): 459-463.
13
Grimbizis GF, Tsolakidis D, Mikos T, et al. A prospective comparison of transvaginal ultrasound, saline infusion sonohysterography and diagnostic hysteroscopy in the evaluation of endometrial pathology [J]. Fertil Steril, 2010, 94(7): 2720-2725.
14
Nieuwenhuis LL, Hermans FJ, Bij de Vaate AJM, et al. Three-dimensional saline infusion sonography compared to two-dimensional saline infusion sonography for the diagnosis of focal intracavitary lesions [J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2017, 5(5): CD011126.
[1] 刘丹妮, 敖梦, 冉海涛, 李世玉, 秦芳. 三维超声心动图及二维斑点追踪成像对持续性心房颤动复律后双心房逆向重构的评估[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 827-835.
[2] 李颖, 潘绍卿, 丁明岩, 孙丹丹, 曲海波, 侯培培, 朱芳. 实时三维超声心动图对高度房室传导阻滞伴射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者左束支区域起搏后左心室功能及同步性的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(04): 430-436.
[3] 高艳多, 朱霞, 范建华, 戢秀勤, 赵胜, 谢磊. 产钳助产术后女性盆底机能的三维超声评估[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(12): 1361-1365.
[4] 包雨微, 朱英, 郑康超, 周玮, 刘娅妮, 邓又斌. 基于人工智能的三维超声心动图定量评估右心室功能的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(12): 1329-1335.
[5] 袁华, 赵博文, 解左平, 华琪琪, 周佳梅, 郭河清, 陈燕, 潘美. eSTIC技术与STIC技术显示胎儿心脏诊断切面的对比研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(09): 926-932.
[6] 朱霞, 高艳多, 许彩, 唐婉, 谢磊, 葛倩, 陈芬芳, 赵胜. 盆底三维超声评价产次及分娩方式对肛提肌裂孔面积的影响[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(09): 920-925.
[7] 孔凡鑫, 刘硕, 王永槐, 赵斓婷, 杨军, 马春燕. 三维超声全自动动态容积定量技术对双心室收缩功能的评估[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(04): 342-349.
[8] 刘如玉, 姜玉新, 赵瑞娜, 王莹, 赖兴建, 朱沈玲, 杨筱, 张晓燕, 高璐滢, 席雪华, 高琼, 张波. 三维超声与二维超声对甲状腺结节恶性风险分级评估的对比研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(04): 317-324.
[9] 温小多, 姚惠敏, 陈纳泽, 唐军, 耿京. 常规超声与超声造影对宫腔病变的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(02): 128-132.
[10] 郑康超, 包雨微, 朱英, 周玮, 刘娅妮, 邓又斌. 基于机器学习的三维超声心动图全自动测量左心室容积与功能的可行性研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2021, 18(12): 1140-1146.
[11] 陈昌钊, 吴汤娜, 符叶柳, 林芳艳. 女性基础性激素、抗苗勒管激素水平联合经阴道三维超声在卵巢储备功能评估中的作用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2020, 17(12): 1208-1212.
[12] 李楠, 唐杰, 王一茹, 田晓琪, 梁舒媛, 林林, 李秋洋, 费翔, 罗渝昆. 基于三维超声构建糖尿病肾病诊断预测模型的初步研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2019, 16(09): 702-708.
[13] 杨忠, 邓学东, 殷林亮, 姜纬, 梁泓, 潘琦, 王珍琦, 马建芳, 苟中山, 凌晨. 二维超声及三维超声多种成像技术在胎儿唇腭裂畸形诊断中的联合应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2019, 16(07): 526-534.
[14] 代雯荣, 赵丽娟, 李智慧. 细胞外囊泡对胚胎着床影响的研究进展[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 616-620.
[15] 滕敏, 何萍, 黄国兰, 覃捷, 黄泰帅. 定向差异性护理干预对不孕不育症患者社交状态、认知状态及心理弹性的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 268-273.
阅读次数
全文


摘要