切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (05) : 451 -456. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2020.05.011

所属专题: 文献

妇产科超声影像学

自动容积导航技术与二维超声获取胎儿颅脑正中矢状面的对比研究
尚宁1, 黄汉林2,(), 郭爽萍1, 林慧娟1, 安思微1, 郑丽1   
  1. 1. 511400 广州,广东省妇幼保健院超声诊断科
    2. 511400 广州,广东省妇幼保健院儿童中毒救治中心
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-09 出版日期:2020-05-01
  • 通信作者: 黄汉林
  • 基金资助:
    广东省省级科技计划项目(2016A020249001)

Application of automatic volumetric navigation technology versus two-dimensional ultrasound in obtaining of the fetal brain median sagittal plane

Ning Shang1, Hanlin Huang2,(), Shuangping Guo1, Huijuan Lin1, Siwei An1, Li Zheng1   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Guangdong Women and Children′s Hospital, Guangzhou 511400, China
    2. Children Poisoning Treatment Center, Guangdong Women and Children′s Hospital, Guangzhou 511400, China
  • Received:2019-12-09 Published:2020-05-01
  • Corresponding author: Hanlin Huang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Huang Hanlin, Email:
引用本文:

尚宁, 黄汉林, 郭爽萍, 林慧娟, 安思微, 郑丽. 自动容积导航技术与二维超声获取胎儿颅脑正中矢状面的对比研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2020, 17(05): 451-456.

Ning Shang, Hanlin Huang, Shuangping Guo, Huijuan Lin, Siwei An, Li Zheng. Application of automatic volumetric navigation technology versus two-dimensional ultrasound in obtaining of the fetal brain median sagittal plane[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2020, 17(05): 451-456.

目的

评估三维超声自动容积导航技术(Smart Planes)与二维超声在获取胎儿颅脑正中矢状面(MSP)以及测量胎儿胼胝体及小脑蚓部参数的一致性和可重复性。

方法

选取2017年10月至2017年12月在广东省妇幼保健院行产前超声检查的单胎妊娠孕妇168名作为研究对象。采用二维超声获取胎儿颅脑MSP并手动测量胼胝体前后径,测量小脑蚓部前后径、上下径及面积。随后应用三维容积探头获取胎儿颅脑容积数据,利用Smart Planes技术自动分析并测量胼胝体和小脑的相应数据。采用组内相关系数(ICC)及Bland-Altman法比较二维超声与Smart Planes技术对胎儿胼胝体以及小脑蚓部的测量的一致性和可重复性。对比不同操作者间测量的一致性及同一操作者采用两种方法测量的用时差异。

结果

采用Smart Planes技术与二维超声获取胎儿颅脑MSP的成功率分别为97.0%(163/168)、79.8%(134/168),差异有统计学意义(χ2=24.40,P<0.001)。其中76.8%(129/168)胎儿通过二维超声及Smart Planes技术均获得颅脑MSP并测量相关参数。比较二维超声与Smart Planes技术测量胼胝体前后径以及小脑蚓部前后径、上下径、面积的一致性,ICC分别为0.972、0.968、0.946、0.967。比较同一位操作者采用Smart Planes技术2次测量的一致性,ICC分别为0.995、0.987、0.962、0.993。比较不同操作者间采用Smart Planes技术测量的一致性,ICC分别为0.986、0.966、0.972、0.955。采用Smart Planes技术获取胎儿颅脑MSP所需时间[(13.49±5.38)s]明显短于采用二维超声所需时间[(89.99±113.42)s],差异有统计学意义(U=587.50,Z=-12.915,P<0.001)。

结论

三维超声自动容积导航技术可快速获取胎儿颅脑MSP,测量所得胼胝体及小脑蚓部的参数与二维超声测量所得结果一致性较好,有助于超声医师对胎儿中线结构做出快速准确的识别和测量。

Objective

To evaluate the consistency and reproducibility of the automatic volumetric navigation technology (Smart Planes) of three-dimensional ultrasound compared with two-dimensional ultrasound in obtaining the median sagittal plane (MSP) of the fetal brain and cerebellum, and in measuring the parameters of the fetal corpus callosum and cerebellar vermis.

Methods

This study, conducted at the Department of Ultrasound of Guangdong Women and Children′s Hospital from October 2017 to December 2017, enrolled 168 patients with singleton pregnancy undergoing routine pregnancy examination. Two-dimensional ultrasound was used to obtain the MSP of fetal brain and cerebellum, and four parameters including the anteroposterior diameter of the corpus callosum and the anteroposterior diameter, craniocaudal diameter, and area of the cerebellar vermis were measured manually. Then, a three-dimensional volume probe was used to obtain fetal brain volume data, and Smart Planes technology was used to automatically measuring those four parameters. The consistency and reproducibility between the two methods were assessed by interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland–Altman plots, and the difference in the measurements of fetal corpus callosum and cerebellar vermis acquired by the two methods was also compared. Furthermore, the interobserver variability of Smart Planes technology measurement was calculated and the acquisition time difference between the two methods was compared.

Results

The MSP of the fetal brain and cerebellum was successfully reconstructed in 97.0% (163/168) of the fetuses by Smart Planes technology, and in 79.8% (134/168) by two-dimensional ultrasound, which showed a statistical difference (P<0.001). The fetal MSP of the brain and cerebellum as well as the relevant parameters were obtained successfully by both methods in 76.8% (129/168) of fetuses. Comparing the measurements of Smart Planes with two-dimensional ultrasound, ICCs of the anteroposterior diameter of the corpus callosum and the anteroposterior diameter, craniocaudal diameter, and area of cerebellar vermis were 0.972, 0.986, 0.946, and 0.967, respectively. The ICCs of intraobserver variability for measurements of Smart Planes were 0.995, 0.987, 0.962, and 0.993, respectively, and the corresponding values for measurements of Smart Planes were 0.986, 0.966, 0.972, and 0.955, respectively. The acquisition time of the MSP by Smart Planes was (13.49±5.38) s, which was significantly shorter than that of two-dimensional ultrasound [(89.99±113.42) s; U=587.50, z=-12.915, P<0.001).

Conclusion

Smart Planes allows to obtain the MSP of fetal brain and cerebellum in a shorter time. The measurements of the corpus callosum and cerebellar vermis obtained by Smart Planes show a good agreement with those of two-dimensional ultrasound, which will result in faster and more accurate recognition and measurement of fetal midline structure by sonographers.

图1 采用Smart Planes技术自动获取的4个切面,左下方为正中矢状切面
图2 三维Smart Planes技术获取的胎儿颅脑正中矢状面。图a为胼胝体的"C"形结构清晰显示,测量胼胝体系部最前方和压部最后方的直线距离作为胼胝体的前后径;图b为胼胝体显示不清晰,仅显示接近无回声的胼胝体-透明隔腔复合体,测量无回声的最前方至最后方的直线距离作为胼胝体前后径,注意不应包括其周边高回声的扣带回
图3 Bland-Altman法分析二维超声与Smart Planes技术测量胎儿颅脑参数的一致性图像。图a为胼胝体前后径;图b为小脑蚓部前后径;图c为小脑蚓部上下径;图d为小脑蚓部面积
1
Pilu G, Perolo A, Falco P, et al. Median anomalies of the brain [M]// Tritsch TI, Monteagudo A. Ultrasonography of the prenatal and neonatal brain, 2nd ed. New York: Mc-Graw-Hill, 2001: 259.
2
Pilu G, Segata M, Ghi T, et al. Diagnosis of midline anomalies of the fetal brain with the three-dimensional median view [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 27(5): 522-529.
3
Correa FF, Lara C, Bellver J, et al. Examination of the fetal brain by transabdominal three-dimensional ultrasound: potential for routine neurosonographic studies [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 27(5): 503-508.
4
Plasencia W, Dagklis T, Borenstein M, et al. Assessment of the corpus callosum at 20-24 weeks′ gestation by three-dimensional ultrasound examination [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2007, 30(2): 169-172.
5
Viňals F, Muňoz M, Naveas R, et al. Transfrontal three-dimensional visualization of midline cerebral structures [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2007, 30(2): 162-168.
6
DeMyer W. Classification of cerebral malformations [J]. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser, 1971, 7(1): 78-93.
7
Fitz CR. Midline anomalies of the brain and spine [J]. Radiol Clin North Am, 1982, 20(1): 95-104.
8
Wang LW, Huang CC, Yeh TF. Major brain lesions detected on sonographic screening of apparently normal term neonates [J]. Neuroradiology, 2004, 46(5): 368-373.
9
Moutard ML, Kieffer V, Feingold J, et al. Agenesis of corpus callosum: prenatal diagnosis and prognosis [J]. Childs Nerv Syst, 2003, 19(7-8): 471-476.
10
Shevell MI. Clinical and diagnostic profile of agenesis of the corpus callosum [J]. J Child Neurol, 2002, 17(12): 896-900.
11
Rapoport M, van Reekum R, Mayberg H. The role of the cerebellum in cognition and behavior: a selective review [J]. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci, 2000, 12(2): 193-198.
12
Shevell MI, Majnemer A. Clinical features of developmental disability associated with cerebellar hypoplasia [J]. Pediatr Neurol, 1996, 15(3): 224-229.
13
Courchesne E, Yeung-Courchesne R, Press GA, et al. Hypoplasia of cerebellar vermal lobules VI and VII in autism [J]. N Engl J Med, 1988, 318(21): 1349-1354.
14
郭爽萍, 黄汉林, 马小燕, 等. 三维超声自动容积导航技术在胎儿颅脑结构测量中的应用 [J]. 实用医学杂志, 2019, 35(15): 2460-2464.
15
Rizzo G, Pietrolucci ME, Capponi A, et al. Assessment of corpus callosum biometric measurements at 18 to 32 weeks′ gestation by 3-dimensional sonography [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2011, 30(1): 47-53.
[1] 曾晴, 文华轩, 袁鹰, 丁妍, 罗丹丹, 廖伊梅, 梁美玲, 秦越, 彭桂艳, 林毅, 邹于, 李胜利. 二维横切面新方法对胎儿胼胝体结构异常的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(09): 899-907.
[2] 李沁园, 董常峰, 冯程, 李志艳, 刘李, 何秉昊, 姜伟, 田文硕, 杨帅. 基于弹性成像多模态法评估慢性乙型肝炎肝纤维化程度[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(09): 976-982.
[3] 刘如玉, 姜玉新, 赵瑞娜, 王莹, 赖兴建, 朱沈玲, 杨筱, 张晓燕, 高璐滢, 席雪华, 高琼, 张波. 三维超声与二维超声对甲状腺结节恶性风险分级评估的对比研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(04): 317-324.
[4] 李帅, 樊秀齐, 康春松, 薛继平, 苗俊旺. 甲状腺结节杨氏模量最大值的影响因素及其对结节性质的鉴别诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2021, 18(12): 1185-1190.
[5] 郑美玉, 文华轩, 汪兵, 廖伊梅, 刘阳, 曾晴, 秦越, 李胜利. 胎儿透明隔腔异常产前诊断与妊娠结局分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2021, 18(07): 670-675.
[6] 吴梦洁, 孙浩然, 胡彧, 彭晓静, 李奥. 血管内乳头状内皮增生的高频超声表现[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2021, 18(03): 272-277.
[7] 曾晴, 文华轩, 袁鹰, 丁妍, 罗丹丹, 廖伊梅, 彭桂艳, 林毅, 官勇, 邹于, 梁美玲, 秦越, 李胜利. 中晚孕期胎儿胼胝体观察新方法:二维颅脑横切面法[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2019, 16(07): 495-503.
[8] 李静, 聂芳, 魏佳琪, 董甜甜, 卜岚, 汪延芳, 李琪, 杨丹. 超声评价新生儿胼胝体发育及影响因素[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2018, 15(07): 530-533.
[9] 兰为顺, 夏薇, 刘芳, 余旭东, 袁先宏, 李琳, 苏永学, 杨文忠, 陈欣林, 杨小红. 胎儿胼胝体缺如产前超声及磁共振诊断的应用分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2015, 12(05): 374-378.
[10] 吴长东, 侯铭, 杨嵘, 张静, 范蕾, 梁玥, 王萍, 贺艳, 姜兴, 薛克栋. 联合检测二维超声心动图、BNP、6MWT、MMRC对慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期患者右心功能不全的诊断意义[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2019, 12(04): 441-444.
[11] 李文德, 陈立华. 经纵裂-胼胝体-穹隆间入路颅咽管瘤切除术[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2018, 04(06): 382-384.
[12] 陈立华, 徐如祥, 张丽, 李文德, 于斌, 高进宝. 经胼胝体-透明隔-穹窿间入路的临床应用[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2018, 04(02): 89-97.
[13] 周林强, 王晓军, 路阳, 于涛, 石磊, 任峰, 曹海波, 卞杰勇. 内镜辅助经胼胝体入路显微手术治疗重度丘脑出血伴脑室铸型[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2017, 03(05): 264-267.
阅读次数
全文


摘要