切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (03) : 268 -274. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2024.03.004

妇产科超声影像学

超声O-RADS分类和临床特征对不同病理类型卵巢浆液性肿瘤的诊断价值
张焱1, 刘春媚1, 姚瑾1, 陈苗苗1, 徐雯1, 黄品同1,()   
  1. 1. 310009 杭州,浙江大学医学院附属第二医院超声医学科
  • 收稿日期:2023-02-03 出版日期:2024-03-01
  • 通信作者: 黄品同
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省自然科学基金(LQ20H180011)

Value of ultrasound O-RADS classification and clinical characteristics in diagnosis of ovarian serous tumors of different pathological types

Yan Zhang1, Chunmei Liu1, Jin Yao1, Miaomiao Chen1, Wen Xu1, Pintong Huang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasonography, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310009, China
  • Received:2023-02-03 Published:2024-03-01
  • Corresponding author: Pintong Huang
引用本文:

张焱, 刘春媚, 姚瑾, 陈苗苗, 徐雯, 黄品同. 超声O-RADS分类和临床特征对不同病理类型卵巢浆液性肿瘤的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(03): 268-274.

Yan Zhang, Chunmei Liu, Jin Yao, Miaomiao Chen, Wen Xu, Pintong Huang. Value of ultrasound O-RADS classification and clinical characteristics in diagnosis of ovarian serous tumors of different pathological types[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(03): 268-274.

目的

探讨卵巢浆液性肿瘤不同病理类型之间的卵巢-附件影像报告和数据系统(O-RADS)超声特征及临床特征的差异,并分析超声O-RADS分类和临床特征在诊断不同病理类型卵巢浆液性肿瘤方面的应用价值。

方法

回顾性分析2021年1月至2022年6月浙江大学医学院附属第二医院经病理证实为卵巢浆液性肿瘤的病例57例,共76个附件肿块,记录患者的临床资料及超声图像。依据组织病理学类型将卵巢浆液性肿瘤患者分为良性肿瘤组(20例)、交界性肿瘤组(16例)和恶性肿瘤组(21例)。采用单因素方差分析3组患者年龄、体质量指数及肿瘤最大径的差异;采用秩和检验对3组患者糖类抗原125(CA125)水平、病灶血流评分、病灶内乳头状突起数目及病灶O-RADS分类进行两两比较;采用χ2检验分析3组患者主诉的差异;采用Bonferroni χ2分割法对患者是否合并有腹水和(或)腹膜增厚/结节、病变发生部位、病灶性质、病灶内有无分隔进行两两比较;绘制受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线评价CA125、O-RADS分类对卵巢浆液性肿瘤的诊断效能。

结果

临床特征上,良性肿瘤组、交界性肿瘤组和恶性肿瘤组病变位于双侧[15.0%(3/20)vs 18.7%(3/16)vs 61.9%(13/21)]、合并出现腹水和(或)腹膜增厚/结节[0%(0/20)vs 0%(0/16)vs 57.1%(12/21)]及血清CA125水平[15.8(7.8,21.7)U/ml vs 43.3(29.4,105.6)U/ml vs 1229.2(142.9,2222.7)U/ml]比较,差异具有统计学意义(χ2=12.271,P=0.003;χ2=18.321,P<0.001;H=38.393,P<0.001),血清CA125水平截断值为293.0 U/ml(曲线下面积=0.917),诊断恶性肿瘤的敏感度为71.43%,特异度为100%。超声特征方面,良性肿瘤组、交界性肿瘤组和恶性肿瘤组病变呈多房囊性含实性成分及实性/实性样变[13.1%(3/23)vs 21.0%(4/19)vs 91.2%(31/34)]、病灶血流评分≥2分[0%(0/23)vs 68.4%(13/19)vs 82.4%(28/34)]、囊性病灶内含乳头状数目>3个[0%(0/23)vs 68.4%(13/19)vs 8.7%(2/23)]、囊性病灶呈多房[34.8%(8/23)vs 21.1%(4/19)vs 87.0%(20/23)]比较,差异具有统计学意义(χ2=89.998,P<0.001;H=35.407,P<0.001;H=26.210,P<0.001;χ2=19.477,P<0.001)。ROC曲线分析显示,O-RADS 4-5类诊断交界性肿瘤或恶性浆液性肿瘤的敏感度为92.45%,特异度为82.61%。

结论

不同病理类型的卵巢浆液性肿瘤具有不同的超声特征及临床特征,超声O-RADS分类(病灶性质、病灶内有无分隔、病灶血流评分、病灶内乳头状突起数目)和临床特征(患者CA125水平、病变部位)可有效区分不同病理类型的卵巢浆液性肿瘤。

Objective

To investigate the differences in ultrasound features according to the ovarian-adnexal reporting and data system (O-RADS) and clinical characteristics among ovarian serous tumors of different pathological types, and to analyze the application value of ultrasonic O-RADS characteristics and clinical characteristics in the diagnosis of ovarian serous tumors of different pathological types.

Methods

A total of 57 patients diagnosed with ovarian serous tumors, containing 76 adnexal masses, by pathological examination at The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine from January 2021 to June 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The clinical data and ultrasound images of the patients were recorded. The patients were divided into benign serous tumor group (n=20), serous borderline tumor group (n=16), and malignant serous tumor (serous carcinoma) group (n=21) according to the histopathological type. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare the differences in age, body mass index, and maximum tumor diameter among patients of the three groups. The rank sum test was used to compare the CA125 level, blood flow, number of papillary projections, and O-RADS characteristics between any two groups of the three groups. The chi-square test was used to analyze the differences in chief complaints among patients of the three groups. The chi-square test with Bonferroni correction was used to compare peritoneal thickening/nodules and (or) abdominal effusion, lesion location, composition, and complete separation between any two groups of the three groups. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was used to assess the diagnostic performance of CA125 and O-RADS classification for ovarian serous tumors.

Results

In terms of clinical characteristics, the percentage of bilateral lesions in the benign, borderline, and malignant tumor groups was 15.0% (3/20) vs 18.7% (3/16) vs 61.9% (13/21), the percentage of patients accompanied by peritoneal thickening/nodules and (or) abdominal effusion was 0% (0/20) vs 0% (0/16) vs 57.1% (12/21), and the percentage of patients with high serum CA125 levels was 15.8 (7.8, 21.7) U/ml vs 43.3 (29.4, 105.6) U/ml vs 1229.2 (142.9, 2222.7) U/ml; the differences among the three groups were statistically significant (χ2=12.271, P=0.003; χ2=18.321, P<0.001; H=38.393, P<0.001). The cut-off value of serum CA125 level for diagnosing malignant serous tumors was 293.0 U/ml (area under the curve [AUC]=0.917), with a sensitivity and specificity of 71.43% and 100%, respectively. In terms of ultrasound features, the percentage of multilocular cyst lesions with solid component(s) in the benign, borderline, and malignant tumors groups was 13.1% (3/23) vs 21.0% (4/19) vs 91.2% (31/34), the percentage of lesions with blood flow score ≥2 was 0% (0/23) vs 68.4% (13/19) vs 82.4% (28/34), the percentage of cystic lesions with the number of papillary projections >3 was 0% (0/23) vs 68.4% (13/19) vs 8.7% (2/23), and the percentage of multilocular cystic lesions was 34.8% (8/23) vs 21.1% (4/19) vs 87.0% (20/23); the differences were statistically significant among the three groups (χ2=89.998, P<0.001; H=35.407, P<0.001; H=26.210, P<0.001; χ2=19.477, P<0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of O-RADS 4-5 in diagnosing borderline or malignant serous tumors were 92.45% and 82.61%, respectively.

Conclusion

There are different ultrasonic O-RADS characteristics and clinical characteristics in ovarian serous tumors of different pathological types. They can be effectively distinguished by the clinical characteristics (CA125 level and lesion location) and ultrasonic O-RADS characteristics (composition, complete separation, blood flow, and number of papillary projections ) of the patients.

图1 卵巢浆液性肿瘤患者超声声像图。图a箭头所示为囊内完整分隔;图b箭头所示为囊内实性成分;图c箭头所示为囊壁乳头状突起;图d为实性肿块,血流评分为3分
表1 卵巢浆液性恶性肿瘤组、交界性肿瘤组及良性肿瘤组的临床资料比较
图2 血清CA125水平区分卵巢浆液性恶性肿瘤组和交界性肿瘤组的受试者操作特征曲线
表2 卵巢浆液性恶性肿瘤组、交界性肿瘤组及良性肿瘤组的超声O-RADS分类比较[个(%)]
图3 超声卵巢-附件影像报告和数据系统分类区分卵巢浆液性非良性肿瘤组和良性肿瘤组的受试者操作特征曲线
表3 卵巢浆液性恶性肿瘤组、交界性肿瘤组及良性肿瘤组的超声特征比较[个(%)]
1
WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. WHO classification of tumours: female genital tumours [M]. Lyon (France): IARC Publications, 2020: 1‐632.
2
De Leo A, Santini D, Ceccarelli C, et al. What is new on ovarian carcinoma: integrated morphologic and molecular analysis following the new 2020 World Health Organization classification of female genital tumors [J]. Diagnostics (Basel), 2021, 11(4): 697.
3
王青娟, 梁茜, 郑剑, 等. 超声造影联合卵巢-附件超声报告和数据风险分层系统的临床应用价值 [J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2022, 31(3): 220-225.
4
陈程, 戴晴. 美国放射学会卵巢-附件影像报告和数据系统超声风险分层与管理共识指南的解读[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2020, 17(11): 1051-1060.
5
张丹, 王茜, 王佳颖. IOTA共识与O-RADS共识指南的解读与分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(2): 105-113.
6
Andreotti RF, Timmerman D, Strachowski LM, et al. O-RADS US risk stratification and management system: a consensus guideline from the ACR Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Committee [J]. Radiology, 2020, 294(1): 168-185.
7
Abramowicz JS, Timmerman D. Ovarian mass-differentiating benign from malignant: the value of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis ultrasound rules [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2017, 217(6): 652-660.
8
Andreotti RF, Timmerman D, Benacerraf BR, et al. Ovarian-adnexal reporting lexicon for ultrasound: a white paper of the ACR Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Committee [J]. J Am Coll Radiol, 2018, 15(10): 1415-1429.
9
Moro F, Baima Poma C, Zannoni GF, et al. Imaging in gynecological disease (12): clinical and ultrasound features of invasive and non-invasive malignant serous ovarian tumors [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2017, 50(6): 788-799.
10
Taylor EC, Irshaid L, Mathur M. Multimodality imaging approach to ovarian neoplasms with pathologic correlation [J]. Radiographics, 2021, 41(1): 289-315.
11
漆玖玲, 陆蓓蕾, 樊韵玲, 等. 卵巢浆液性交界性肿瘤与卵巢浆液性囊腺瘤超声特征对比分析 [J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2020, 36(10): 934-937.
12
Zhang M, Cheng S, Jin Y, et al. Roles of CA125 in diagnosis, prediction, and oncogenesis of ovarian cancer [J]. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer, 2021, 1875(2): 188503.
13
Karlan BY, Thorpe J, Watabayashi K, et al. Use of CA125 and HE4 serum markers to predict ovarian cancer in elevated -risk women [J]. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2014, 23(7): 1383-1393.
14
Basha MAA, Metwally MI, Gamil SA, et al. Comparison of O-RADS, GI-RADS, and IOTA simple rules regarding malignancy rate, validity, and reliability for diagnosis of adnexal masses [J]. Eur Radiol, 2021, 31(2): 674-684.
15
张曼, 吴曼丽, 曲恩泽, 等. 超声卵巢-附件报告和数据系统评估附件肿物风险等级的重复性研究 [J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2022, 31(9): 797-801.
16
李晏杰, 朱熠, 张国楠. 卵巢-附件影像报告和数据系统(O-RADS)研究进展 [J]. 肿瘤预防与治疗, 2022, 35(5): 462-468.
17
甘雅端, 吕国荣, 杨舒萍, 等. 卵巢上皮性肿瘤超声鉴别特征及预测模型 [J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2020, 29(6): 534-539.
[1] 曾晴, 文华轩, 袁鹰, 廖伊梅, 秦越, 罗丹丹, 梁美玲, 彭桂艳, 林毅, 谭莹, 温昕, 黄文兰, 李胜利. 胎儿颅脑五横切面法的临床应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(03): 243-250.
[2] 尹宏宇, 吴青青, 李晓菲. 颈后透明层和头臀长在妊娠11~13+6周双胎心脏畸形筛查中的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(03): 251-256.
[3] 朱惠娟, 邝海燕, 骆迎春, 邓光祁, 蒋凌晖, 汪圣, 王政, 孔一凡, 龙煜. 胎儿脐-门-体静脉系统异常分流的产前超声诊断及产后结局[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(03): 257-267.
[4] 王莹, 王亚红, 赵瑞娜, 韦瑶, 王红燕, 蔡胜, 李建初, 杨萌. 网络教学与传统教学在超声规培医师血管超声检查理论学习中的比较研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(02): 163-166.
[5] 张胜男, 苗雅敬, 周虹, 韩高洁, 王静, 仝巧立, 张旭倩, 尹洪宁. 左心耳三维经食管超声测量与Watchman左心耳封堵器大小的相关性研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(02): 107-113.
[6] 刘韩, 王胰, 舒庆兰, 彭博, 尹立雪, 谢盛华. 基于深度学习的超声心动图三尖瓣反流严重程度智能评估方法研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(02): 121-127.
[7] 刘昌盛, 江思, 童娟. 可视化超声引导下针刀治疗狭窄性腱鞘炎的疗效分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 310-316.
[8] 金从稳, 陈霖霖, 刘浩, 余有声, 陈本鑫. 超声联合细针穿刺定位在乳腺微小病灶切除中的应用研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 423-426.
[9] 邢益民, 张天飞, 戴慧勇. 胃肠充盈超声造影检查在反酸、嗳气患者临床诊断中的应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 303-306.
[10] 高佳, 姜吉询, 王鑫, 吴婷, 向江明. 病理性乳头溢液单中心临床分析附168例报告[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 323-326.
[11] 颜晓敏, 崔嵘嵘. 23例乳腺佩吉特病的经验交流[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 353-354.
[12] 路长贵, 唐维兵. 新生儿及小婴儿先天性胆管扩张症临床特征分析及微创治疗[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 76-82.
[13] 王伟利, 唐流康, 陈明政, 谢峰. 超声检查在肝胆外科中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 265-269.
[14] 焦莉莉, 周芊池, 凌梦芸, 魏红玲, 徐缨. 血清SAA、CA19-9结合超声内镜对结直肠癌术前分期的诊断价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(02): 146-150.
[15] 莫鹏, 郭杏春, 梁秀娟, 王耀明. 超声引导与CT引导射频消融治疗肝细胞癌患者疗效及预后比较[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(02): 151-154.
阅读次数
全文


摘要