切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (04) : 386 -390. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2021.04.008

所属专题: 文献

浅表器官超声影像学

甲状腺滤泡型乳头状癌的超声及临床特征
倪晓枫1, 詹维伟1,(), 周伟1, 刘娟1   
  1. 1. 200025 上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-27 出版日期:2021-04-01
  • 通信作者: 詹维伟
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然基金资助项目(82071923)

Sonographic and clinical features of follicular variant papillary thyroid carcinoma

Xiaofeng Ni1, Weiwei Zhan1,(), Wei Zhou1, Juan Liu1   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
  • Received:2018-03-27 Published:2021-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Weiwei Zhan
引用本文:

倪晓枫, 詹维伟, 周伟, 刘娟. 甲状腺滤泡型乳头状癌的超声及临床特征[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2021, 18(04): 386-390.

Xiaofeng Ni, Weiwei Zhan, Wei Zhou, Juan Liu. Sonographic and clinical features of follicular variant papillary thyroid carcinoma[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2021, 18(04): 386-390.

目的

评估甲状腺滤泡型乳头状癌(FVPTC)的超声表现及临床特征。

方法

回顾性分析2007年1月至2017年10月于上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院手术并经病理证实为FVPTC的127个结节。超声评估指标包括:最大径、边缘、纵横比、内部结构、回声水平、钙化、后方衰减、声晕、血供程度,将超声指标纳入甲状腺超声影像报告和数据系统(TI-RADS),并与经典型PTC相比较。同时分析FVPTC超声引导下细针穿刺抽吸活检结果(US-FNAB)及淋巴结转移率。采用t检验比较FVPTC和经典型PTC组结节大小的差异;采用χ2检验比较FVPTC和经典型PTC组的淋巴结转移和TI-RADS分类的差异。

结果

(1)FVPTC结节大小为(23.47±12.75)mm,大于经典型PTC的大小[(10.84±6.10)mm],差异具有统计学意义(t=10.077,P<0.001);大部分FVPTC结节表现为边缘规则、纵横比≤1、实性、低回声、无钙化、无后方衰减、无声晕、中等血供。TI-RADS分类在FVPTC与经典型PTC之间差异具有统计学意义(χ2=28.891,P<0.001),在非腺瘤样FVPTC与经典型PTC之间差异无统计学意义(χ2=3.988,P=0.125)。(2)US-FNAB诊断FVPTC良性6例,滤泡性病变6例,可疑恶性及恶性15例,符合率55.56%(15/27)。(3)FVPTC淋巴结转移率低于经典型PTC(10.68% vs 29.92%;χ2=12.560,P=0.001)。

结论

FVPTC的超声表现多样,淋巴结转移率低,加深认识能有效提高诊断的准确性。

Objective

To investigate the sonographic and clinical features of follicular variant papillary thyroid carcinoma (FVPTC).

Methods

One hundred and twenty-seven FVPTC nodules that were confirmed by pathology at Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University from January 2007 to October 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The sonographic features assessed included maximum diameter, margin, orientation, composition, echogenicity, calcification, posterior attenuation, halo, and vascularization. The indexes were incorporated into the thyroid ultrasound imaging report and data system (TI-RADS), and the TI-RADS classification of FVPTC was then compared with that of classic PTC. At the same time, ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (US-FNAB) and lymph node metastasis of FVPTC were analyzed. The t-test was used to compare the difference in size and the χ2 test was used to compare the difference in lymph node metastasis and TI-RADS classification between FVPTC and classic PTC groups.

Results

The mean size of FVPTC nodules was (23.47±12.75) mm, which was significantly larger than that of classic PTC [(10.84±6.10) mm; t=10.077, P<0.001]. Most of FVPTCs had sonographic features of smooth margin, aspect ratio ≤1, being solid, hypoechoic echogenicity, no calcification, no posterior attenuation, no sound halo, and medium blood supply. TI-RADS classified showed that FVPTC and classic PTC were statistically different (χ2=28.891, P<0.001), but between non-adenomas-like FVPTC and classical PTC there was no difference (χ2=3.988, P=0.125). The coincidence rate of US-FNAB with pathological diagnosis in FVPTC was 55.56% (15/27). The lymph node metastasis rate of FVPTC was lower than that of classic PTC (10.68% vs 29.92%; χ2=12.560, P=0.001).

Conclusion

FVPTCs have different sonograms and low lymph node metastasis rate. A deeper understanding of FVPTCs can effectively improve the accuracy of diagnosis.

表1 FVPTC与经典型PTC临床特征比较
表2 甲状腺滤泡型乳头状癌超声表现
图1 甲状腺滤泡型乳头状癌恶性超声图像。超声显示甲状腺内低回声结节,实性,水平位,边缘不规则,内见微钙化,后方衰减,无声晕,甲状腺影像报告和数据系统分类为5类
表3 FVPTC与经典型PTC的TI-RADS分类比较(例)
图2 甲状腺滤泡型乳头状癌腺瘤样结节超声图像。超声显示甲状腺腺瘤样结节,中等回声,实性,水平位,边缘规则,周边见细声晕,甲状腺影像报告和数据系统分类为3类
1
Yoon JH, Kim EK, Hong SW, et al. Sonographic features of the follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2008, 27(10): 1431-1437.
2
Hughes NM, Nae A, Barry J, et al. Sonographic differences between conventional and follicular variant papillary thyroid carcinoma [J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2017, 274(7): 2907-2913.
3
Jeon EJ, Jeong YJ, Park SH, et al. Ultrasonographic characteristics of the follicular variant papillary thyroid cancer according to the tumor size [J]. J Korean Med Sci, 2016, 31(3): 397-402.
4
Tessler FN, Middleton WD, Grant EG, et al. ACR thyroid imaging, reporting and data system (TI-RADS): white paper of the ACR TI-RADS committee [J]. J Am Coll Radiol, 2017, 14(5): 587-595.
5
Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, et al. 2015 American thyroid association management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: the American thyroid association guidelines task force on thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer [J]. Thyroid, 2016, 26(1): 1-133.
6
张蕾, 吴美娟, 蒋荣泉. 甲状腺滤泡型乳头状癌的超声表现与病理对照研究 [J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2015, 11(6): 469-473.
7
刘志艳. 具有乳头样核特征的非浸润性甲状腺滤泡性肿瘤及其诊断标准 [J]. 中华病理学杂志, 2017, 46(3): 205-208.
8
Nikiforov YE, Seethala RR, Tallini G, et al. Nomenclature revision for encapsulated follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma: a paradigm shift to reduce overtreatment of indolent tumors [J]. JAMA Oncol, 2016, 2(8): 1023-1029.
9
高健, 高明, 于洋, 等. 甲状腺乳头状癌滤泡亚型临床病理特征分析 [J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2014, 29(3): 199-202.
10
Giani C, Torregrossa L, Piaggi P, et al. Outcome of classical (CVPTC) and follicular (FVPTC) variants of papillary thyroid cancer: 15 years of follow-up [J]. Endocrine, 2020, 68(3): 607-616.
11
Lee JH, Shin JH, Lee HW, et al. Sonographic and cytopathologic correlation of papillary thyroid carcinoma variants [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2015, 34(1): 1-15.
12
Horvath E, Majlis S, Rossi R, et al. An ultrasonogram reporting system for thyroid nodules stratifying cancer risk for clinical management [J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2009, 94(5): 1748-1751.
13
Xu SY, Zhan WW, Wang WH. Evaluation of thyroid nodules by a scoring and categorizing method based on sonographic features [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2015, 34(12): 2179-2185.
14
Kwak JY, Han KH, Yoon JH, et al. Thyroid imaging reporting and data system for US features of nodules: a step in establishing better stratification of cancer risk [J]. Radiology, 2011, 260(3): 892-899.
15
Yang GCH, Fried KO. Pathologic basis of the sonographic differences between thyroid cancer and noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features [J]. Ultrasonography, 2018, 37(2): 157-163.
16
美)阿里▪赛巴斯. 甲状腺细胞病理学Bethesda报告系统: 定义、标准和注释 [M]. 杨斌, 薛德彬, 译. 北京: 北京科学技术出版社, 2010: 92-102.
17
Baloch ZW, Livolsi VA. Follicular-patterned lesions of the thyroid: the bane of the pathologist [J]. Am J Clin Pathol, 2002, 117(1): 143-150.
[1] 王亚红, 蔡胜, 葛志通, 杨筱, 李建初. 颅骨骨膜窦的超声表现一例[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(11): 1089-1091.
[2] 李晓妮, 卫青, 孟庆龙, 牛丽莉, 田月, 吴伟春, 朱振辉, 王浩. 超声心动图在孤立性左心室心尖发育不良疾病中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 937-942.
[3] 陈慧, 姚静, 张宁, 刘磊, 马秀玲, 王小贤, 方爱娟, 管静静. 超声心动图在多发性骨髓瘤心脏淀粉样变中的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 943-949.
[4] 戴飞, 赵博文, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 陈冉, 田园诗, 狄敏. 胎儿心脏超声定量多参数对主动脉缩窄胎儿心脏结构及功能的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 950-958.
[5] 章建全, 程杰, 陈红琼, 闫磊. 采用ACR-TIRADS评估甲状腺消融区的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 966-971.
[6] 罗辉, 方晔. 品管圈在提高甲状腺结节细针穿刺检出率中的应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 972-977.
[7] 杨忠, 时敬业, 邓学东, 姜纬, 殷林亮, 潘琦, 梁泓, 马建芳, 王珍奇, 张俊, 董姗姗. 产前超声在胎儿22q11.2 微缺失综合征中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 852-858.
[8] 包艳娟, 杨小红, 张涛, 赵胜, 张莉. 阴道斜隔综合征的超声诊断与临床分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 859-864.
[9] 汪洪斌, 张红霞, 何文, 杜丽娟, 程令刚, 张雨康, 张萌. 低级别阑尾黏液性肿瘤与阑尾黏液腺癌超声及超声造影特征分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 865-871.
[10] 农云洁, 黄小桂, 黄裕兰, 农恒荣. 超声在多重肺部感染诊断中的临床应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 872-876.
[11] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[12] 吴晖, 佴永军, 施雪松, 魏晓为. 两种解剖入路下行直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 40-43.
[13] 周世振, 朱兴亚, 袁庆港, 刘理想, 王凯, 缪骥, 丁超, 汪灏, 管文贤. 吲哚菁绿荧光成像技术在腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫中的应用效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 44-47.
[14] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[15] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
阅读次数
全文


摘要