切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (10) : 967 -974. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2021.10.012

妇产科超声影像学

胎儿心脏超声智能导航联合虚拟智能超声辅助技术在诊断胎儿法洛四联症中的应用
周超瑜1, 赵博文2,(), 李玉惠2, 赵蓓2, 黄超2, 庞海苏2, 狄敏2   
  1. 1. 310016 杭州,浙江大学医学院附属邵逸夫医院超声科 浙江省胎儿心脏超声诊断技术指导中心 浙江大学邵逸夫临床医学研究所;315040 宁波市医疗中心李惠利医院超声科
    2. 310016 杭州,浙江大学医学院附属邵逸夫医院超声科 浙江省胎儿心脏超声诊断技术指导中心 浙江大学邵逸夫临床医学研究所
  • 收稿日期:2020-06-12 出版日期:2021-10-01
  • 通信作者: 赵博文
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省基础公益研究计划项目(LGF18H180004,LGF18H180015)

Application of fetal intelligent navigation echocardiography combined with virtual intelligent sonographer assistance in diagnosis of fetal tetralogy of Fallot

Chaoyu Zhou1, Bowen Zhao2,(), Yuhui Li2, Bei Zhao2, Chao Huang2, Haisu Pang2, Min Di2   

  1. 1. Department of Diagnostic Ultrasound & Echocardiography, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University College of Medicine, Technical Guidance Center for Fetal Echocardiography of Zhejiang Province & Sir Run Run Shaw Institute of Clinical Medicine of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310016, China; Department of Ultrasonography, Ningbo Medical Center Li Huili Hospital, Ningbo 315040, China
    2. Department of Diagnostic Ultrasound & Echocardiography, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University College of Medicine, Technical Guidance Center for Fetal Echocardiography of Zhejiang Province & Sir Run Run Shaw Institute of Clinical Medicine of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310016, China
  • Received:2020-06-12 Published:2021-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Bowen Zhao
引用本文:

周超瑜, 赵博文, 李玉惠, 赵蓓, 黄超, 庞海苏, 狄敏. 胎儿心脏超声智能导航联合虚拟智能超声辅助技术在诊断胎儿法洛四联症中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2021, 18(10): 967-974.

Chaoyu Zhou, Bowen Zhao, Yuhui Li, Bei Zhao, Chao Huang, Haisu Pang, Min Di. Application of fetal intelligent navigation echocardiography combined with virtual intelligent sonographer assistance in diagnosis of fetal tetralogy of Fallot[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2021, 18(10): 967-974.

目的

探讨胎儿心脏超声智能导航技术(FINE或5D Heart)联合虚拟智能超声辅助技术(VIS-Assistance?)在诊断胎儿法洛四联症(TOF)中的价值。

方法

在2015年2月至2020年1月于浙江大学医学院附属邵逸夫医院接受胎儿超声心动图检查的孕妇中选取57例作为研究对象。胎儿超声心动图经验丰富的医师A负责采集每例胎儿心脏时间-空间相关成像(STIC)容积数据2~5个,经验不足的住院医师B和经验较为丰富的主治医师C筛选出每例胎儿中图像最佳的1个容积数据,应用5D Heart以及VIS-Assistance?技术进行在机后处理。按不同的脊柱位置,将57例TOF胎儿分成3个亚组:亚组A(脊柱2~4点钟)、亚组B(脊柱5~7点钟)、亚组C(脊柱8~10点钟)。分别对TOF胎儿的5个诊断切面(三血管气管切面、四腔心切面、左心室流出道切面、右心室流出道切面及胃泡切面)以及17个主要诊断要素进行评分。重点研究3个亚组5个诊断切面及17个诊断要素的显示率及亚组间的差异;2位不同年资医师分别两次对17个诊断要素显示率的比较;2位不同年资医师分别两次对5个诊断切面评分结果的重复性及一致性检验。

结果

应用5D Heart联合VIS-Assistance?技术,57例TOF胎儿三亚组之间5个诊断切面、17个诊断要素的显示率差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。2位不同年资医师各诊断要素的显示率如下:三血管气管切面中,诊断要素(扩张的主动脉、狭窄的肺动脉主干、气管、上腔静脉)的显示率分别为94.7%~96.5%,93.0%~98.2%,70.2%~84.2%,86.0%~91.2%。四腔心切面中,诊断要素(4个房室腔、房室瓣、房室瓣距离、卵圆孔瓣、十字交叉、室间隔、调节束)的显示率分别为100.0%,100.0%,93.0%~96.5%,78.9%~82.5%,94.7%~96.5%,100.0%,100.0%。左心室流出道切面中,诊断要素(室间隔缺损、主动脉扩张、主动脉骑跨室间隔缺损)的显示率分别为96.5%~100.0%,100.0%,96.5%~98.2%。右心室流出道切面中,狭窄的肺动脉主干显示率为80.7%~91.2%。胃泡切面中,诊断要素(胃泡、降主动脉)的显示率均为100.0%。2位不同年资医师之间比较及同一位医师前后两次比较,5个诊断切面评分结果差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。

结论

5D Heart联合VIS-Assistance?技术对胎儿TOF各诊断切面及诊断要素的显示率高,且具有良好的重复性及一致性,其应用有助于提高TOF的产前诊断率。一定范围内的胎儿脊柱位置不影响TOF的图像显示率。

Objective

To evaluate the application value of fetal intelligent navigation echocardiography (FINE, 5D Heart) combined with virtual intelligent sonographer assistance (VIS-Assistance?) in the diagnosis of fetal tetralogy of Fallot (TOF).

Methods

From February to January 2020, 57 pregnant women who received echocardiography examination for fetuses at Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital were selected as subjects in this study. Doctor A with rich fetal echocardiography experience collected two to five spatio-temporal image correlation (STIC) volume datasets for each fetal heart. The inexperienced doctor B and the more experienced doctor C screened out the best volume dataset in each fetus, and applied 5D Heart and VIS-Assistance? for post-processing. According to different spine positions, 57 TOF fetuses were divided into three subgroups: A (spine 2-4 o'clock), B (spine 5-7 o'clock), and C (spine 8-10 o'clock). Five diagnostic views (three-vessel tracheal view, four-chamber view, left ventricular outflow view, right ventricular outflow view, and abdomen/stomach view) and 17 main diagnostic elements of TOF fetuses were scored, and in particular the following parameters were investigated: the display rates of five diagnostic views and 17 diagnostic elements in the three subgroups and the differences between subgroups; comparison of the display rates of 17 diagnostic elements twice by two doctors with different experience; and repeatability and consistency test of two different senior doctors' scoring results in five diagnostic views.

Results

With the application of 5D Heart and VIS-Assistance?, there was no significant differences in the display rates of five diagnostic views and 17 diagnostic elements between the three subgroups (P>0.05). The display rates of the diagnostic elements of two different senior doctors are as follows: in the three-vessel tracheal view, the display rates of diagnostic elements (dilated aorta, stenosis of pulmonary artery, trachea, and superior vena cava) were 94.7%-96.5%, 93.0%-98.2%, 70.2%-84.2%, and 86.0%-91.2%, respectively. In the four-chamber view, the display rates of the diagnostic elements (four chambers, atrioventricular valves, mitral valve-tricuspid valve distance, ovale foramen, cardiac cross, ventricular septum, and moderator band) were 100.0%, 100.0%, 93.0%-96.5%, 78.9%-82.5%, 94.7%-96.5%, 100.0%, and 100.0%, respectively. In the left ventricular outflow view, the display rates of diagnostic elements (ventricular septal defect, dilated aorta, and the aorta overriding ventricular septal defect) were 96.5%-100.0%, 100.0%, and 96.5%-98.2%, respectively. In the right ventricular outflow view, the display rates of stenosis of the pulmonary artery was 80.7%-91.2%. In the abdomen/stomach view, the display rate of the diagnostic elements (stomach and descending aorta) was 100.0%. There was no statistical differences for the results between two doctors with different experience, and for scores of the five diagnostic views by the same doctor 1 month before and after (P>0.05).

Conclusion

5D Heart combined with VIS-Assistance? has high display rates in various diagnostic views and diagnostic elements in fetal TOF, and has good repeatability and consistency. It has relatively less dependence on the experience of the operating physician, which may has potentials in the prenatal diagnosis of TOF. Using 5D Heart, the fetal spine position within a certain range seems not to affect the TOF image display rate.

图1 应用5D Heart联合 VIS-Assistance?技术显示孕23周正常胎儿心脏的9个诊断切面。图a为三血管气管切面;图b为四腔心切面;图c为五腔心切面;图d为左心室流出道切面;图e为右心室流出道切面;图f为胃泡水平腹部横切面;图g为动脉导管弓切面;图h为主动脉弓切面;图i为上下腔静脉右心房切面
图2 应用5D Heart联合 VIS-Assistance?技术显示孕24周法洛四联症胎儿心脏的9个诊断切面。图a为三血管气管切面,可见狭窄的肺动脉、扩张的主动脉,正常的上腔静脉和气管;图b为四腔心切面,未见明显异常;图c为五腔心切面,可见室间隔缺损及主动脉骑跨;图d为左心室流出道切面,可见明显的室间隔缺损及主动脉骑跨;图e为右心室流出道切面,可见狭窄的肺动脉主干;图f为胃泡水平腹部横切面,未见明显异常;图g为动脉导管弓切面,未见明显异常;图h为主动脉弓切面,未见明显异常;图i为上下腔静脉右心房切面,未见明显异常
表1 不同亚组法洛四联症患儿5D Heart联合VIS-Assistance?技术对各诊断切面的显示率[例(%)]
表2 不同亚组法洛四联症患儿5D Heart联合VIS-Assistance?技术对各诊断要素的显示率[例(%)]
表3 医师B、C应用5D Heart联合VIS-Assistance?技术分别两次评价法洛四联症患儿各诊断要素的显示率[例(%)]
表4 医师B应用5D Heart联合VIS-Assistance?技术对法洛四联症患儿各诊断切面进行两次评分的结果[MP25P75)]
表5 医师C应用5D Heart联合VIS-Assistance?技术对法洛四联症患儿各诊断切面进行两次评分的结果[MP25P75)]
表6 医师B、C应用5D Heart联合VIS-Assistance?技术对法洛四联症患儿各诊断切面的第一次评分结果[MP25P75)]
1
Boneva RS, Botto LD, Moore CA, et al. Mortality associated with congenital heart defects in the United States: trends and racial disparities, 1979-1997 [J]. 2001, 103(19): 2376-2381.
2
Palatnik A, Grobman WA, Cohen LS, et al. Role of the 3-Vessel and Trachea View in Antenatal Detection of Tetralogy of Fallot [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2016, 35(8): 1799-1809.
3
Apitz C, Webb GD, Redington AN. Tetralogy of Fallot [J]. Lancet, 2009, 374(9699): 1462-1471.
4
Yeo L, Luewan S, Romero R. Fetal Intelligent Navigation Echocardiography (FINE) Detects 98% of Congenital Heart Disease [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2018, 37(11): 2577-2593.
5
Yeo L, Romero R. Fetal Intelligent Navigation Echocardiography (FINE): a novel method for rapid, simple, and automatic examination of the fetal heart [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2013, 42(3): 268-284.
6
Veronese P, Bogana G, Cerutti A, et al. A Prospective Study of the Use of Fetal Intelligent Navigation Echocardiography (FINE) to Obtain Standard Fetal Echocardiography Views [J]. Fetal Diagn Ther, 2017, 41(2): 89-99.
7
Yeo L, Luewan S, Markush D, et al. Prenatal Diagnosis of Dextrocardia with Complex Congenital Heart Disease Using Fetal Intelligent Navigation Echocardiography (FINE) and a Literature Review [J]. Fetal Diagn Ther, 2018, 43(4): 304-316.
8
Yeo L, Markush D, Romero R. Prenatal diagnosis of tetralogy of Fallot with pulmonary atresia using: Fetal Intelligent Navigation Echocardiography (FINE) [J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2019, 32(21): 3699-3702.
9
Yeo L, Romero R. How to Acquire Cardiac Volumes for Sonographic Examination of the Fetal Heart: Part 2 [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2016, 35(5): 1043-1066.
10
庞海苏, 赵博文, 黄超, 等. 胎儿心脏超声智能导航技术显示胎儿完全型大动脉转位诊断切面的应用价值 [J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2020, 17(9): 866-873.
11
阿尔弗莱德.阿布汗默德, 拉宾.查欧里. 胎儿超声心动图实用指南: 正常和异常心脏 [M]. 李志安, 译. 2版. 天津:天津科技翻译出版公司, 2011.
12
ISoUiOaGynecology, Carvalho JS, Allan LD, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): sonographic screening examination of the fetal heart [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2013, 41(3): 348-359.
13
Tripodi E, Tripodi A, Sturlese E. Fetal echocardiography: a comparison of different techniques [J]. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol, 2000, 27(3-4): 225-226.
14
Donofrio MT, Moon-Grady AJ, Hornberger LK, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of fetal cardiac disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association [J]. Circulation, 2014, 129(21):2183-2242.
15
Tegnander E, Eik-Nes SH. The examiner's ultrasound experience has a significant impact on the detection rate of congenital heart defects at the second-trimester fetal examination [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 28(1): 8-14.
16
赵博文. 胎儿动脉圆锥干畸形的超声心动图诊断与进展 [J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2017, 14(3): 167-173.
17
Huang C, Zhao BW, Chen R, et al. Is Fetal Intelligent Navigation Echocardiography Helpful in Screening for d-Transposition of the Great Arteries? [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2020, 39(4): 775-784.
[1] 何金梅, 尹立雪, 谭静, 张文军, 王锐, 任梅, 廖明娇. 超声心肌做功技术对2型糖尿病患者潜在左心室心肌收缩功能损伤的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1029-1035.
[2] 薛艳玲, 马小静, 谢姝瑞, 何俊, 夏娟, 何亚峰. 左心声学造影在急性心肌梗死合并室间隔穿孔中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1036-1039.
[3] 武玺宁, 欧阳云淑, 张一休, 孟华, 徐钟慧, 张培培, 吕珂. 胎儿心脏超声检查在抗SSA/Ro-SSB/La抗体阳性妊娠管理中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1056-1060.
[4] 杨水华, 何桂丹, 覃桂灿, 梁蒙凤, 罗艳合, 李雪芹, 唐娟松. 胎儿孤立性完全型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图特征及高分辨率血流联合时间-空间相关成像的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1061-1067.
[5] 张宝富, 俞劲, 叶菁菁, 俞建根, 马晓辉, 刘喜旺. 先天性原发隔异位型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图诊断[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1074-1080.
[6] 赵红娟, 赵博文, 潘美, 纪园园, 彭晓慧, 陈冉. 应用多普勒超声定量分析正常中晚孕期胎儿左心室收缩舒张时间指数[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 951-958.
[7] 刘丹妮, 敖梦, 冉海涛, 李世玉, 秦芳. 三维超声心动图及二维斑点追踪成像对持续性心房颤动复律后双心房逆向重构的评估[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 827-835.
[8] 张璟璟, 赵博文, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 毛彦恺, 潘陈可, 朱玲艳, 朱琳琳, 蓝秋晔. 胎儿超声心动图测量McGoon指数在评价胎儿肺血管发育中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 860-865.
[9] 旺久, 陈军, 朱霞, 米玛央金, 赵胜, 陈欣林, 李建华, 王双. 山南市妇幼保健院开展胎儿系统超声筛查的效果分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 728-733.
[10] 徐鹏, 李军, 高巍伦, 王峥, 庞珅, 李春妮, 朱霆. 快速旋转扫查法在胎儿超声心动图检查中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 761-766.
[11] 应康, 杨璨莹, 刘凤珍, 陈丽丽, 刘燕娜. 左心室心肌应变对无症状重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的预后评估价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 581-587.
[12] 吴赤球, 韦曙东, 张辉, 严许清, 梅朵卓嘎, 余丹. 驻不同海拔高度高原人员习服后心脏结构和功能变化的超声心动图评估[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 588-593.
[13] 谭芳, 杨娇娇, 沈玉琴, 李炎菲海, 王海蕊, 范思涵, 纪学芹. 胎儿心脏定量分析技术对正常胎儿心脏形态及收缩功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 598-604.
[14] 罗刚, 泮思林, 陈涛涛, 许茜, 纪志娴, 王思宝, 孙玲玉. 超声心动图在胎儿心脏介入治疗室间隔完整的肺动脉闭锁中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 605-609.
[15] 薛念余, 张盛敏, 吴凌恒, 沙蕾, 童揽月, 沈崔琴, 李朝军, 杜联芳. 研究血清胆红素对2型糖尿病患者心脏结构发生改变前心肌功能的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1004-1009.
阅读次数
全文


摘要