切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (11) : 1067 -1072. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2021.11.010

妇产科超声影像学

产后42~60 d腹直肌间距的超声参考值范围
江庆1, 顾军1, 冯冠男2, 郭建锋1, 郑凯1, 何秋娟2, 周轶群1, 邓学东1,()   
  1. 1. 215000 南京医科大学附属苏州医院/苏州市立医院超声科
    2. 215000 南京医科大学附属苏州医院/苏州市立医院妇产科
  • 收稿日期:2020-09-29 出版日期:2021-11-01
  • 通信作者: 邓学东

Reference range of inter-recti distance measured by ultrasonography at 42-60 days postpartum

Qing Jiang1, Jun Gu1, Guannan Feng2, Jianfeng Guo1, Kai Zheng1, Qiujuan He2, Yiqun Zhou1, Xuedong Deng1,()   

  1. 1. Ultrasonic Department, the Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Suzhou 21500, China
    2. Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, the Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Suzhou 21500, China
  • Received:2020-09-29 Published:2021-11-01
  • Corresponding author: Xuedong Deng
引用本文:

江庆, 顾军, 冯冠男, 郭建锋, 郑凯, 何秋娟, 周轶群, 邓学东. 产后42~60 d腹直肌间距的超声参考值范围[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2021, 18(11): 1067-1072.

Qing Jiang, Jun Gu, Guannan Feng, Jianfeng Guo, Kai Zheng, Qiujuan He, Yiqun Zhou, Xuedong Deng. Reference range of inter-recti distance measured by ultrasonography at 42-60 days postpartum[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2021, 18(11): 1067-1072.

目的

初步建立产后短期内(42~60 d)腹直肌间距的医学参考值范围,为产后腹直肌治疗给出建议。

方法

纳入2019年8月至2020年8月南京医科大学附属苏州医院产后42~60 d门诊回访产妇126名,超声测量产后42~60 d经产妇的腹直肌间距,测量位置为腹中线脐上缘、脐上3 cm、脐上5 cm和脐下3 cm处,测量体位包含平卧位、屈卧位和站立位。采用两独立样本秩和检验比较经阴道分娩组与剖宫产分娩组、第一胎与非第一胎组在不同体位的不同脐水平时腹直肌间距的差异,并以第20百分位数和第80百分位数定义腹直肌间距的参考值范围。

结果

产后42~60 d,经阴道分娩组(89例)和剖宫产组(37例)所有位点腹直肌间距的差异均具有统计学意义(P均<0.05),第一胎组(72例)和非第一胎组(54例)所有位点腹直肌间距的差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。以产后腹直肌间距第20~第80百分位数定义参考值范围,经阴道分娩组在平卧位4个测量点依次为:19.60~38.30 mm、15.10~28.80 mm、11.00~21.50 mm、2.70~15.50 mm;在屈卧位4个测量点依次为:16.70~30.90 mm、12.90~26.30 mm、9.20~19.90 mm、1.90~12.00 mm;站立位4个测量点依次为:19.00~39.10、15.90~35.50、11.20~28.50、0.00~8.60。剖宫产组平卧位4个测量点依次为:25.92~44.04 mm、19.78~32.44 mm、14.94~28.76 mm、7.78~24.88 mm;在屈卧位4个测量点依次为:20.12~36.68 mm、17.20~28.44 mm、13.38~26.24 mm、4.08~18.62 mm;站立位4个测量点依次为:28.80~45.68 mm、21.18~40.38 mm、18.04~33.70 mm、0.00~18.62 mm。

结论

鉴于超声测量时屈卧位腹直肌边缘最易识别,在产后40~60 d时屈卧位腹中线最大腹直肌间距超过30.90 mm(经阴道分娩)、36.68 mm(剖宫产分娩)时表明产妇的腹直肌间距已经超过80%的产妇,建议接受进一步的治疗或康复手段。

Objective

To evaluate the normal range of inter-recti distance (IRD) 42-60 days postpartum, and then make the preliminary decision when the treatment for postnatal diastasis recti abdominis should be given.

Methods

A total of 126 women at 42-60 days postpartum were continuously collected to perform transabdominal sonography from August 2019 to August 2020 at the Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. IRD measurements were made at the upper margin of the umbilicus, 3 cm above the umbilicus, 5 cm above the umbilicus, and 3 cm below the umbilicus in the supine, flexion, and standing positions. Two independent sample rank-sum tests were used to compare differences in rectus ventral spacing at different umbilical levels between the transvaginal delivery and cesarean delivery and between first and non-first birth groups. The 20th and 80th percentiles were used to define the reference range of postpartum IRD.

Results

The differences of IRDs between the vaginal delivery group (n=89) and the cesarean section group (n=89) were statistically significant (P<0.05), but there were no significant differences in IRDs between the first (n=72) and non-first birth groups (n=54) (P>0.05). The postpartum IRDs had a skewed distribution in the vaginal delivery group, with a percentile interval of 20%-80%; the IRDs at the four measurement points (3 cm above the umbilicus, 3 cm above the umbilicus, 5 cm above the umbilicus, and 3 cm below the umbilicus) in different positions were as follows: supine position (mm): 19.60-38.30, 15.10-28.80, 11.00-21.50, and 2.70-15.50; flexion position (mm):16.70-30.90, 12.90-26.30, 9.20-19.90, and 1.90-12.00; standing position (mm): 19.00-39.10, 15.90-35.50, 11.20-28.50, and 0.00-8.60, respectively. In the cesarean section group, there was a percentile interval of 20%-80%, and the IRDs at the four measurement points in different positions were: supine position (mm): 25.92-44.04, 19.78-32.44, 14.94-28.76, and 7.78-24.88; flexion position (mm): 20.12-36.68, 17.20-28.44, 13.38-26.24, and 4.08-18.62; standing position (mm): 28.80-45.68, 21.18-40.38, 18.04-33.70, and 0.00-18.62, respectively.

Conclusion

As the inner edge of the rectus abdominis is the easiest to be distinguished in the flexion position, it is suggested that the maximum space between the rectus abdominis in flexion position be more than 30.90 mm (vaginal delivery) and 36.68 mm (caesarean delivery), and when the measured value exceeds the postpartum IRD of 80% women, a treatment is suggested.

图1 一名35岁产后42 d女性3个体位4个测量点的腹直肌超声测量声像图。图a为平卧位脐上缘;图b为平卧位脐上3 cm;图c为平卧位脐上5 cm;图d为平卧位脐下3 cm;图e为屈卧位脐上缘;图f为屈卧位脐上3 cm;图g为屈卧位脐上5 cm;图h为屈卧位脐下3 cm;图i为站立位脐上缘;图j为站立位脐上3 cm;图k为站立位脐上5 cm;图l为站立位脐下3 cm
表1 不同分娩方式组产妇不同体位的不同脐水平腹直肌间距的比较[mm,MQR)]
表2 不同胎次组产妇不同体位的不同脐水平腹直肌间距的比较[mm,MQR)]
表3 不同分娩方式产后腹直肌间距的不同百分位数数值(mm)
组别 第5百分位数 第10百分位数 第20百分位数 第50百分位数 第80百分位数 第90百分位数 第95百分位数
经阴道分娩组

平卧位脐上缘

13.45 16.60 19.60 25.00 38.30 43.20 49.90

平卧位脐上3 cm

8.70 10.80 15.10 20.00 28.80 34.20 40.10

平卧位脐上5 cm

6.60 8.80 11.00 14.70 21.50 30.80 38.85

平卧位脐下3 cm

0.00 0.00 2.70 9.10 15.50 17.90 23.25

屈卧位脐上缘

10.25 12.30 16.70 21.40 30.90 33.70 43.20

屈卧位脐上3 cm

8.50 9.70 12.90 17.10 26.30 32.20 34.10

屈卧位脐上5 cm

5.20 7.60 9.20 13.70 19.90 25.00 32.50

屈卧位脐下3 cm

0.00 0.00 1.90 6.60 12.00 18.80 22.45

站立位脐上缘

10.30 14.30 19.00 30.90 39.10 46.30 51.75

站立位脐上3 cm

9.85 13.10 15.90 24.10 35.50 40.40 48.20

站立位脐上5 cm

8.20 9.40 11.20 18.20 28.50 34.80 40.60

站立位脐下3 cm

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.60 12.30 13.55
剖宫产分娩组

平卧位脐上缘

20.02 21.94 25.92 32.80 44.04 47.78 49.90

平卧位脐上3 cm

14.18 15.98 19.78 26.60 32.44 39.60 43.72

平卧位脐上5 cm

10.70 11.86 14.94 20.20 28.76 32.52 34.44

平卧位脐下3 cm

0.00 0.00 7.78 17.00 24.88 28.34 39.49

屈卧位脐上缘

14.04 16.36 20.12 26.90 36.68 40.10 43.88

屈卧位脐上3 cm

13.76 16.26 17.2 23.40 28.44 30.50 30.90

屈卧位脐上5 cm

8.65 11.98 13.38 18.80 26.24 29.72 31.44

屈卧位脐下3 cm

0.00 0.00 4.08 9.80 18.62 21.34 25.61

站立位脐上缘

18.82 23.30 28.80 37.90 45.68 54.52 59.81

站立位脐上3 cm

16.11 16.62 21.18 31.40 40.38 46.80 51.76

站立位脐上5 cm

12.47 12.80 18.04 23.60 33.70 37.20 41.59

站立位脐下3 cm

0.00 0.00 0.00 8.70 18.62 22.62 28.20
1
Nahabedian MY. Management Strategies for Diastasis Recti [J]. Semin Plast Surg, 2018, 32(3): 147-154.
2
Keshwani N, Mathur S, McLean L. Relationship between interrectus distance and symptom severity in women with diastasis recti abdominis in the early postpartum period [J]. Phys Ther, 2018, 98(3): 182-190.
3
Kamel DM, Yousif AM. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation and strength recovery of postnatal diastasis recti abdominis muscles [J]. Ann Rehabil Med, 2017, 41(3): 465-474.
4
王影, 张洁, 冯艳霞, 等. 电刺激治疗产后腹直肌分离的效果观察 [J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2017, 13(2): 218-221.
5
Keshwani N, McLean L. Ultrasound imaging in postpartum women with diastasis recti: intrarater between-session reliability [J]. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther, 2015, 45(9): 713-718.
6
Keshwani N, Hills N, McLean L. Inter-rectus distance measurement using ultrasound imaging: does the rater matter? [J]. Physiother Can, 2016, 68(3): 223-229.
7
Beer GM, Schuster A, Seifert B, et al. The normal width of the linea alba in nulliparous women [J]. Clin Anat, 2009, 22(6): 706-711.
8
Rath AM, Attali P, Dumas JL, et al. The abdominal linea alba: an anatomo-radiologic and biomechanical study [J]. Surg Radiol Anat, 1996, 18(4): 281-288.
9
Nahabedian M, Brooks DC. Rectus abdominis diastasis [EB/OL]. (2017-03-22)

URL    
10
Sperstad JB, Tennfjord MK, Hilde G, et al. Diastasis recti abdominis during pregnancy and 12 months after childbirth: prevalence, risk factors and report of lumbopelvic pain [J]. Br J Sport Med, 2016, 50(17): 1092-1096.
11
竺佳晟, 李金辉. 产后腹直肌分离的评估与治疗研究进展 [J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2019, 41(10): 793-794.
12
van de Water ATM, Benjamin DR. Measurement methods to assess diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscle (DRAM): a systematic review of their measurement properties and meta-analytic reliability generalisation [J]. Man Ther, 2016, 21: 41-53.
13
Reinpold W, Köckerling F, Bittner R, et al. Classification of rectus diastasis-a proposal by the German Hernia Society (DHG) and the International Endohernia Society (IEHS) [J]. Front Surg, 2019, 6: 1.
14
Gillard S, Ryan CG, Stokes M, et al. Effects of posture and anatomical location on inter-recti distance measured using ultrasound imaging in parous women [J]. Musculoskel Sci Prac, 2018, 34: 1-7.
15
Gitta S, Magyar Z, Tardi P, et al. [Prevalence, potential risk factors and sequelae of diastasis recti abdominis] [J]. Orv Hetil, 2017, 158(12): 454-460.
16
王青, 于晓杰, 杨欣, 等. 产后腹直肌分离发生的影响因素研究 [J]. 现代妇产科进展, 2019, 28(12): 913-916.
17
付鹏, 江凌, 崔立刚. 高频超声在产后女性腹直肌分离评估中的应用价值 [J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2021, 18(1): 79-83.
18
Mota P, Pascoal AG, Sancho F, et al. Reliability of the inter-rectus distance measured by palpation. Comparison of palpation and ultrasound measurements [J]. Manual Ther, 2012, 18(4): 294-298.
[1] 王亚红, 蔡胜, 葛志通, 杨筱, 李建初. 颅骨骨膜窦的超声表现一例[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(11): 1089-1091.
[2] 李晓妮, 卫青, 孟庆龙, 牛丽莉, 田月, 吴伟春, 朱振辉, 王浩. 超声心动图在孤立性左心室心尖发育不良疾病中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 937-942.
[3] 陈慧, 姚静, 张宁, 刘磊, 马秀玲, 王小贤, 方爱娟, 管静静. 超声心动图在多发性骨髓瘤心脏淀粉样变中的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 943-949.
[4] 戴飞, 赵博文, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 陈冉, 田园诗, 狄敏. 胎儿心脏超声定量多参数对主动脉缩窄胎儿心脏结构及功能的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 950-958.
[5] 章建全, 程杰, 陈红琼, 闫磊. 采用ACR-TIRADS评估甲状腺消融区的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 966-971.
[6] 罗辉, 方晔. 品管圈在提高甲状腺结节细针穿刺检出率中的应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 972-977.
[7] 杨忠, 时敬业, 邓学东, 姜纬, 殷林亮, 潘琦, 梁泓, 马建芳, 王珍奇, 张俊, 董姗姗. 产前超声在胎儿22q11.2 微缺失综合征中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 852-858.
[8] 包艳娟, 杨小红, 张涛, 赵胜, 张莉. 阴道斜隔综合征的超声诊断与临床分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 859-864.
[9] 汪洪斌, 张红霞, 何文, 杜丽娟, 程令刚, 张雨康, 张萌. 低级别阑尾黏液性肿瘤与阑尾黏液腺癌超声及超声造影特征分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 865-871.
[10] 农云洁, 黄小桂, 黄裕兰, 农恒荣. 超声在多重肺部感染诊断中的临床应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 872-876.
[11] 刘思锐, 赵辰阳, 张睿, 张一休, 杨萌. 多普勒超声对孕鼠子宫动脉不同节段血流动力学参数的评估[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 877-883.
[12] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[13] 宋勇, 李东炫, 王翔, 李锐. 基于数据挖掘法分析3 种超声造影剂不良反应信号[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 890-898.
[14] 张晓燕, 武玺宁, 张一休, 刘真真, 孝梦甦, 李建初. 超声医学科人文素养教育提升医患沟通能力的调查分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 899-903.
[15] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
阅读次数
全文


摘要