切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (11) : 1150 -1157. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-1537.2023.11.008

妇产科超声影像学

葡萄胎与胎儿共存的早期超声诊断
陈欣, 李雷, 罗红()   
  1. 610041 成都,四川大学华西第二医院超声科/出生缺陷与相关妇儿疾病教育部重点实验室
    610041 成都,四川大学华西第二医院病理科
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-25 出版日期:2023-11-01
  • 通信作者: 罗红
  • 基金资助:
    四川省科技厅重点研发项目(2022YES0086); 成都市科技局(2021-YF05-02096-SN)

Early ultrasonic diagnosis of hydatidiform mole with coexistent live fetus

Xin Chen, Lei Li, Hong Luo()   

  1. Department of Ultrasound/Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Ministry of Education, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
    Department of Pathology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
  • Received:2022-08-25 Published:2023-11-01
  • Corresponding author: Hong Luo
引用本文:

陈欣, 李雷, 罗红. 葡萄胎与胎儿共存的早期超声诊断[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(11): 1150-1157.

Xin Chen, Lei Li, Hong Luo. Early ultrasonic diagnosis of hydatidiform mole with coexistent live fetus[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2023, 20(11): 1150-1157.

目的

探讨双胎之一完全性葡萄胎(CHMCF)、部分性葡萄胎合并胎儿存活(PHMF)的超声图像诊断与鉴别诊断要点,提高诊断正确率,为临床处理提供依据。

方法

回顾2016年1月至2021年6月于四川大学华西第二医院诊治,并经病理证实为葡萄胎与胎儿共存的16例病例,其中CHMCF 7例,PHMF 9例,对其临床表现、超声诊断孕周、超声图像特征及预后进行分析。

结果

CHMCF的所有孕妇均有阴道出血症状,而PHMF仅有3例孕妇有阴道出血。孕早期(孕6~10周)两者的超声图像并未表现为典型的葡萄样水泡状回声,但所有CHMCF病例的孕囊旁均可见无回声、絮状稍强回声、杂乱回声或似另一孕囊的异常回声。孕11周后,CHMCF病例的葡萄样水泡状回声较局限,多与胎盘间分界较清楚,或与正常胎儿间可见隔膜样回声。PHMF病例的葡萄样水泡回声多位于胎盘内,散在分布或几乎占据整个胎盘。16例中仅有1例CHMCF患者在行染色体检查后继续妊娠至足月分娩,余因阴道持续出血、咯血或患者不愿继续妊娠等原因行引产术。有1例PHMF病例发展为滋养细胞肿瘤(GTN),余病例随访12个月均未发现GTN。

结论

孕6~10周CHMCF与PHMF的超声图像表现不典型,很难做出诊断。孕11周后,可根据葡萄状水泡回声的位置、与胎盘关系及与存活胎儿间是否有隔膜样回声对两者进行诊断和鉴别诊断,为临床处理提供依据。

Objective

To investigate the ultrasonoimagedata diagnosis and differential diagnosis of twin pregnancy with one complete hydatidiform mole and coexistent live fetus (CHMCF) and partial hydatidiform mole with live fetus (PHMF), so as to improve the diagnostic accuracy and provide a basis for clinical management of this condition.

Methods

Sixteen cases of hydatidiform mole with coexistent live fetus were diagnosed and treated at West China Second University Hospital from January 2016 to June 2021, including 7 cases of CHMCF and 9 cases of PHMF. The clinical manifestations, gestational weeks at ultrasonic diagnosis, ultrasonoimagedata features, and prognosis were analyzed.

Results

All pregnant women with CHMCF had vaginal bleeding, while only 3 pregnant women with PHMF had vaginal bleeding. There was no typical grape-like vesicular echo in the ultrasound images in early pregnancy (6-10 weeks), but no echo, flocculent echo, disorderly echo, or abnormal echo like another gestational sac could be seen near the gestational sac in all CHMCF cases. At 11 weeks of pregnancy, in the cases of CHMCF, the grape-like vesicular echo was limited, and the boundary between the grape-like vesicular echo and the placenta was clear, or the diaphragm-like echo could be seen between the grape-like vesicular echo and the normal fetus. In the case of PHMF, the grape-like vesicular echo was mostly located in the placenta, scattered, or almost occupied the whole placenta. Of all 13 cases of CHMCF, only one patient continued pregnancy to full-term delivery after chromosome examination, and the rest underwent induced labor because of continuous vaginal bleeding, hemoptysis, patient's unwillingness to continue pregnancy, and so on. One case of PHMF developed into gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN), and no GTN or distant metastasis was found in the remaining 12 months of follow-up.

Conclusion

From 6 to 10 weeks of gestation, the ultrasonoimagedata findings of CHMCF and PHMF are not typical, so it is difficult to make a diagnosis. After 11 weeks of pregnancy, a diagnosis or differential diagnosis can be made according to the location of grape-like vesicular echo, its relationship with placenta, and whether there is diaphragm-like echo with the surviving fetus, so as to provide a basis for clinical treatment.

表1 CHMCF病例的临床表现、超声特征及妊娠结局
图1 病例1,孕妇38岁,体外受精-胚胎移植术后,移植2枚胚胎,孕22周超声检查显示胎盘(P)位于子宫前壁,葡萄状水泡回声(M)位于子宫后壁,与胎盘分界清楚 注:F为胎儿
图2 病例3,孕妇27岁,体外受精-胚胎移植术后,移植2枚胚胎,孕12+1周超声检查见胎盘(P)旁葡萄状水泡回声(M),两者间见隔膜样回声(箭头),分界清楚
图3~4 病例1早孕期超声图像。孕8周(图3)宫内见孕囊(GS),其内可见卵黄囊及胚胎回声,其旁见另一孕囊样回声(箭头),内未见确切胚胎及卵黄囊;孕9周(图4)宫内见孕囊(GS)及其内的胚胎回声,其旁见稍强回声(箭头),内可见少许无回声区,怀疑葡萄胎
图5~8 病例3,引产后可见正常胎盘(图5)及明显广泛的水泡样胎盘(图6);病理镜下可见绒毛间质明显水肿,滋养细胞增生,水池形成(图7,HE×100);免疫组化(图8,En Vision×200):绒毛的细胞滋养细胞及绒毛间质p57 Kip2(-)
表2 PHMF病例的临床表现、超声特征及妊娠结局
图9~12 病例12,部分性葡萄胎合并胎儿存活。孕妇32岁,孕12+2周(图9)超声检查羊膜腔内有存活胎儿(F),胎盘内见多个大小不等、互不相通的水泡样无回声;引产后可见胎盘呈部分水泡样改变(图10);病理镜下可见正常绒毛与水肿绒毛混合存在,水肿绒毛轮廓不规则,部分增大绒毛可见中央水池,滋养细胞轻度增生(图11,HE×100);免疫组化示绒毛的细胞滋养细胞及绒毛间质细胞p57 Kip2(+)(图12,En Vision×200)
表3 CHMCF和PHMF的临床表现、超声特征的比较
1
Block MF, Merrill JA. Hydatidiform mole with coexistent fetus [J]. Obstet Gynecol, 1982, 60(1): 129-134.
2
Vejerslev LO. Clinical management and diagnostic possibilities in hydatidiform mole with coexistent fetus [J]. Obstet Gynecol Surv, 1991, 46(9): 577-588.
3
Lipi LB, Philp L, Goodman AK. A challenging case of twin pregnancy with complete hydatidiform mole and co-existing normal live fetus - a case report and review of the literature [J]. Gynecol Oncol Rep, 2020, 31: 100519.
4
中国抗癌协会妇科肿瘤专业委员会. 妊娠滋养细胞疾病诊断与治疗指南(2021年版) [J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2021, 31(6): 520-532.
5
Stevens FT, Katzorken N, Tempfer C, et al. Gestational trophoblastic disorders: an update in 2015 [J]. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd, 2015, 75(10): 1043-1050.
6
杨婧, 王雪燕, 周玮. 妊娠合并滋养细胞疾病临床研究进展 [J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2017, 33(2): 225-228.
7
Sun SY, Melamed A, Joseph NT, et al. Clinical presentation of complete hydatidiform mole and partial hydatidiform mole at a regional trophoblastic disease center in the united states over the past 2 decades [J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2016, 26(2): 367-370.
8
Suksai M, Suwanrath C, Kor-anantakul O, et al. Complete hydatidiform mole with co-existing fetus: predictors of live birth [J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2017, 212: 1-8.
9
Lin LH, Maesta I, Braga A, et al. Multiple pregnancies with complete mole and coexisting normal fetus in North and South America: a retrospective multicenter cohort and literature review [J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2017, 145(1): 88-95.
10
Johnson C, Davitt C, Harrison R, et al. Expectant management of a twin pregnancy with complete hydatidiform mole and coexistent normal fetus [J]. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol, 2019, 2019: 8737080.
11
Massardier J, Golfier RF, Journet D, et al. Twin pregnancy with complete hydatidiform mole and coexistent fetus: obstetrical and oncological outcomes in a series of 14 cases [J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2009, 143(2): 84-87.
12
Sebire NJ, Foskett M, Paradinas FJ, et al. Outcome of twin pregnancies with complete hydatidiform mole and healthy co-twin [J]. Lancet, 2002, 359(9324): 2165-2166.
13
Okumura M, Fushida K, Francisco RP, et al. Massive necrosis of a complete hydatidiform mole in a twin pregnancy with a surviving coexistent fetus [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2014, 33(1): 177-179.
14
Gupta K, Venkatesan B, Kumaresan M, et al. Early detection by ultrasound of partial hydatidiform mole with a coexistent live fetus [J]. WMJ, 2015, 114(5): 208-211.
15
Ronnett BM, Descipio C, Murphy KM. Hydatidiform moles: ancillary techniques to refine diagnosis [J]. Int J Gynecol Pathol, 2011, 30(2): 101-116.
16
Nayeri UA, West AB, Grossetta Nardini HK, et al. Systematic review of sonoimagedata findings of placental mesenchymal dysplasia and subsequent pregnancy outcome [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2013, 41(4): 366-374.
17
Minekawa-mehandjiev R, Masuda K, Yamamoto K, et al. Placental mesenchymal dysplasia differentially diagnosed from molar pregnancy by 3-D inversion mode rendering: a case report [J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2014, 40(1): 284-287.
18
Zeng C, Chen Y, Zhao L, et al. Partial hydatidiform mole and coexistent live fetus: a case report and review of the literature [J]. Open Med (Wars), 2019, 14: 843-846.
19
Gajewsk AM, Zygula A, Wielgos M, et al. Twin pregnancy with a partial hydatidiform mole and a coexistent live fetus. Diagnostic and therapeutic dilemmas. A case report and the review of literature [J]. Ginekol Pol, 2020, 91(10): 589-594.
20
Rohilla M, Singh P, Kaur J, et al. Individualistic approach to the management of complete hydatidiform mole with coexisting live fetus [J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2015, 191: 39-42.
[1] 武玺宁, 欧阳云淑, 张一休, 孟华, 徐钟慧, 张培培, 吕珂. 胎儿心脏超声检查在抗SSA/Ro-SSB/La抗体阳性妊娠管理中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1056-1060.
[2] 杨水华, 何桂丹, 覃桂灿, 梁蒙凤, 罗艳合, 李雪芹, 唐娟松. 胎儿孤立性完全型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图特征及高分辨率血流联合时间-空间相关成像的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1061-1067.
[3] 赵红娟, 赵博文, 潘美, 纪园园, 彭晓慧, 陈冉. 应用多普勒超声定量分析正常中晚孕期胎儿左心室收缩舒张时间指数[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 951-958.
[4] 张璟璟, 赵博文, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 毛彦恺, 潘陈可, 朱玲艳, 朱琳琳, 蓝秋晔. 胎儿超声心动图测量McGoon指数在评价胎儿肺血管发育中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 860-865.
[5] 旺久, 陈军, 朱霞, 米玛央金, 赵胜, 陈欣林, 李建华, 王双. 山南市妇幼保健院开展胎儿系统超声筛查的效果分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 728-733.
[6] 徐鹏, 李军, 高巍伦, 王峥, 庞珅, 李春妮, 朱霆. 快速旋转扫查法在胎儿超声心动图检查中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 761-766.
[7] 谭芳, 杨娇娇, 沈玉琴, 李炎菲海, 王海蕊, 范思涵, 纪学芹. 胎儿心脏定量分析技术对正常胎儿心脏形态及收缩功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 598-604.
[8] 罗刚, 泮思林, 陈涛涛, 许茜, 纪志娴, 王思宝, 孙玲玉. 超声心动图在胎儿心脏介入治疗室间隔完整的肺动脉闭锁中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 605-609.
[9] 黄佳, 石华, 张玉国, 胡佳琪, 陈茜. 胎儿左头臂静脉正常与异常超声图像特征及其临床意义[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 610-617.
[10] 袁泽, 庄丽. 超声检测胎儿脐动脉和大脑中动脉血流对胎儿宫内窘迫的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 618-621.
[11] 刘镭, 杨昕, 许晓华, 林胜谋, 熊初琴, 农丽录, 董振宇, 李胜利. 中孕期胎儿鼻前皮肤厚度及鼻骨长度筛查胎儿染色体病的临床价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(05): 506-510.
[12] 李博, 孔德璇, 彭芳华, 吴文瑛. 超声在胎儿肺静脉异位引流诊断中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(04): 437-441.
[13] 薛超, 张烨, 赵映, 韩建成, 谷孝艳, 孙琳, 刘晓伟, 宋伟, 何怡华. 胎儿先天性肺动脉瓣缺如综合征的超声特征及预后分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 410-418.
[14] 刘磊, 王优, 黄锐斌, 张丽娜, 宋一丹, 雷婷缨. 染色体微阵列分析技术在股骨长度偏短胎儿遗传学诊断中的应用[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 437-445.
[15] 邹艳丽, 栾文杰, 王淑娟, 刘亚琴, 初桂芝, 李松洋, 王好玲, 张锦婷, 姜鑫, 栾泽东. 早孕期胎儿右位主动脉弓的产前超声诊断学特征[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 227-232.
阅读次数
全文


摘要