切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (07) : 532 -537. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2017.07.010

所属专题: 文献

浅表器官超声影像学

甲状腺富血供病灶的超声造影诊断价值
张艳1, 罗渝昆1,(), 杨明1, 张明博1, 张颖1, 李杰2   
  1. 1. 100853 北京,解放军总医院超声诊断科
    2. 100853 北京,解放军总医院病理科
  • 收稿日期:2017-03-24 出版日期:2017-07-01
  • 通信作者: 罗渝昆
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(81471681); 解放军总医院扶持基金特色优势项目(2015PC-TSYS-2022)

The diagnostic value of thyroid rich blood supply lesions by using contrast-enhanced ultrasound

Yan Zhang1, Yukun Luo1,(), Ming Yang1, Mingbo Zhang1, Ying Zhang1, Jie Li2   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Chinese People′s Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
    2. Department of Pathology, Chinese People′s Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
  • Received:2017-03-24 Published:2017-07-01
  • Corresponding author: Yukun Luo
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Luo Yukun, Email:
引用本文:

张艳, 罗渝昆, 杨明, 张明博, 张颖, 李杰. 甲状腺富血供病灶的超声造影诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2017, 14(07): 532-537.

Yan Zhang, Yukun Luo, Ming Yang, Mingbo Zhang, Ying Zhang, Jie Li. The diagnostic value of thyroid rich blood supply lesions by using contrast-enhanced ultrasound[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2017, 14(07): 532-537.

目的

探讨超声造影(CEUS)对甲状腺富血供病灶的良恶性鉴别诊断价值。

方法

选取2016年2月至2017年1月在解放军总医院行常规超声及CEUS检查且病灶呈高增强表现的患者62例,所有患者均行甲状腺结节穿刺活检,分析病灶内部及周边的CEUS增强模式,并将高增强范围与常规超声显示病灶大小进行比较。以病理结果为"金标准",39例为甲状腺良性病灶组,23例为甲状腺恶性病灶组。采用χ2检验比较良、恶性病灶CEUS特征的差异。

结果

高增强的均匀程度在良、恶性组间比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=9.78,P=0.002)。不均匀高增强类型中,高增强伴灌注缺损及强弱分布不均在良、恶性组间的比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=10.77,P=0.001),前者主要见于良性。病灶高增强范围扩大全部见于恶性,差异有统计学意义(χ2=6.52,P=0.01)。CEUS诊断高增强病灶性质的敏感度、特异度、准确性分别为95.83%、78.95%、85.48%,均高于常规超声(87.5%、68.42%、75.81%)。

结论

甲状腺良恶性高增强病灶的CEUS表现有差异,病灶内强弱分布不均、周边不规则环状增强及高增强范围扩大均提示恶性。

Objective

To investigate the differential diagnostic value for thyroid rich blood supply lesions by contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS).

Methods

From February 2016 to January 2015, patients who suffered with thyroid nodules underwent conventional ultrasound and CEUS before biopsy. Sixty-two lesions with high-enhancement features were included in the final data. The enhancement patterns within and around lesions of CEUS were analyzed, and the high-enhancement ranges were compared with lesions sizes displayed on conventional ultrasound imaging. When pathology was regarded as the golden standard, 39 nodules of 62 were benign, and 23 were malignant. The difference of CEUS characteristics between benign and malignant lesion was compared using χ2 test.

Results

The homogeneity or not had significant difference between benign and malignant lesions with high-enhancement features (χ2=9.78, P=0.002). The features of high-enhancement with cystic area and uneven distribution of high-enhancement area had significant difference between benign and malignant lesions (χ2=10.77, P=0.001), and the former were frequently seen in benign lesions. Peripheral regular and irregular rings had significant difference between the benign and malignant lesions (χ2=24.33, P<0.001). All lesions showed large high-enhancement area were malignant (χ2=6.52, P=0.01). The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of CEUS were 95.83%, 78.95% and 85.48% for thyroid rich blood supply lesions, which were better than those of conventional ultrasound (87.5%, 68.42%, 75.81%).

Conclusions

There are different features in CEUS between the benign and malignant thyroid lesions with rich blood supply. Heterogeneous high-enhancement, peripheral irregular rings and extensive high-enhancement area were malignant features.

表1 甲状腺病灶内部及周边增强模式与病理结果
图1~4 甲状腺腺瘤常规超声及超声造影图像。图1常规超声示甲状腺左叶可见一中等偏低回声结节,边界清楚,形态规则,内回声不均匀;图2 CDFI示结节周边及内部均可见血流信号;图3超声造影示结节内呈不均匀高增强表现,边界清楚,周边可见规则环状高增强;图4示甲状腺腺瘤灰阶图像
图5~8 甲状腺乳头状癌常规超声及超声造影图像。图5常规超声示甲状腺右叶可见一低回声结节,部分边界不清,形态不规则;图6CDFI示结节内可见丰富血流信号;图7超声造影显示结节内呈均匀高增强表现,形态不规则,高增强范围为1.0 cm×0.8 cm;图8灰阶超声示结节大小0.8 cm×0.7 cm
[1]
杨雷,孙婷婷,袁延楠, 等. 1995-2010年北京城区甲状腺癌发病趋势及病理特征分析 [J]. 中华预防医学杂志, 2013, 47(2):109-112.
[2]
Zhang B, Jiang YX, Liu JB, et al. Utility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for evaluation of thyroid nodules [J]. Thyroid, 2010, 20(1):51-57.
[3]
Ma JJ, Ding H, Xu BH, et al. Diagnostic performances of various gray-scale, color Doppler, and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography findings in predicting malignant thyroid nodules [J]. Thyroid, 2014, 24(2):355-363.
[4]
Schleder S, Janke M, Agha A, et al. Preoperative differentiation of thyroid adenomas and thyroid carcinomas using high resolution contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) [J]. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc, 2015, 61(1):13-22.
[5]
Zhang Y, Luo YK, Zhang MB, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound enhancement patterns for thyroid nodules [J]. Med Sci Monit, 2016, 22:4755-4764.
[6]
Kim JY, Kim SY, Yang KR. Ultrasonographic criteria for fine needle aspiration of nonpalpable thyroid nodules 1–2 cm in diameter [J]. Eur J Radiol, 2013, 82(2):321-326.
[7]
Kwak JY, HanKH, Yoon JH, et al. Thyroid imaging reporting and data system for US features of nodules: A step in establishing better stratification of cancer risk [J]. Radiology, 2011, 260(3):892-899.
[8]
Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The American Thyroid Association GuidelinesTask Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer [J]. Thyroid, 2016, 26(1):1-133.
[9]
Gharib H, Papini E, Garber JR, et al. AACE/ACE/AME Task Force on Thyroid Nodules.American association of clinical endocrinologists, American college of endocrinology, and associazion medici endocrinology medical guidelines for clinical practice for the diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules-2016 update [J]. Endocr Pract, 2016, 22(5):622-639.
[10]
Jiang J, Shang X, Zhang H, et al. Correlation between maximum intensity and microvessel density for differentiation of malignant from benign thyroid nodules on contrast-enhanced sonography [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2014, 33(7):1257-1263.
[11]
Zhou Q, Jiang J, Shang X, et al. Correlation of contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic features with microvessel density in papillary thyroid carcinomas [J]. Asia Pac J Cancer Prev, 2014, 15(17):7449-7452.
[12]
张渊,江泉,陈剑, 等. 甲状腺癌实时超声造影增强特征与肿瘤大小的关系 [J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2012, 28(1):82-85.
[13]
Jain RK. Normalizing tumor vasculature with anti-angiogenic therapy: a new paradigm for combination therapy [J]. Nat Med, 2001, 7(9):987-989.
[14]
Averkious M, Powers J, Skyba D, et al. Ultrasound contrast imaging research [J]. Ultrasound Q, 2003, 19(1):27-37.
[15]
Chen H, Yang WW, Wen QT, et al. TGF- beta induces fibroblast activation protein expression; fibroblast activation protein expression increases the proliferation, adhesion, and migration of HO-8910PM [J]. Exp Mol Pathol, 2009, 87(3):189-194.
[16]
张艳,罗渝昆,张明博, 等. 超声造影周边环状增强对甲状腺结节鉴别诊断的意义[J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2016, 13(1):31-35.
[1] 魏淑婕, 惠品晶, 丁亚芳, 张白, 颜燕红, 周鹏, 黄亚波. 单侧颈内动脉闭塞患者行颞浅动脉-大脑中动脉搭桥术的脑血流动力学评估[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1046-1055.
[2] 张璇, 马宇童, 苗玉倩, 张云, 吴士文, 党晓楚, 陈颖颖, 钟兆明, 王雪娟, 胡淼, 孙岩峰, 马秀珠, 吕发勤, 寇海燕. 超声对Duchenne肌营养不良儿童膈肌功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1068-1073.
[3] 朱连华, 费翔, 韩鹏, 姜波, 李楠, 罗渝昆. 高帧频超声造影在胆囊息肉样病变中的鉴别诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 904-910.
[4] 张梅芳, 谭莹, 朱巧珍, 温昕, 袁鹰, 秦越, 郭洪波, 侯伶秀, 黄文兰, 彭桂艳, 李胜利. 早孕期胎儿头臀长正中矢状切面超声图像的人工智能质控研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 945-950.
[5] 陈舜, 薛恩生, 叶琴. PDCA在持续改进超声危急值管理制度中的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 974-978.
[6] 周钰菡, 肖欢, 唐毅, 杨春江, 周娟, 朱丽容, 徐娟, 牟芳婷. 超声对儿童髋关节暂时性滑膜炎的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 795-800.
[7] 刘欢颜, 华扬, 贾凌云, 赵新宇, 刘蓓蓓. 颈内动脉闭塞病变管腔结构和血流动力学特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 809-815.
[8] 郏亚平, 曾书娥. 含鳞状细胞癌成分的乳腺化生性癌的超声与病理特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 844-848.
[9] 张丽丽, 陈莉, 余美琴, 聂小艳, 王婧玲, 刘婷. PDCA循环法在超声浅表器官亚专科建设中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 717-721.
[10] 江振剑, 蒋明, 黄大莉. TK1、Ki67蛋白在分化型甲状腺癌组织中的表达及预后价值研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 623-626.
[11] 黄汇, 朱信强. 131I治疗45岁以下分化型甲状腺癌的疗效及影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 627-630.
[12] 樊丽超, 郭瑾瑛, 陈鑫. 野生型RET与RET/PTC融合基因检测对甲状腺乳头状癌中央区淋巴结清扫的指导意义[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 631-635.
[13] 徐成, 王璐璐, 王少华. 洗脱液甲状腺球蛋白在甲状腺乳头状癌转移淋巴结中的应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 701-704.
[14] 廖梅, 张红君, 金洁玚, 吕艳, 任杰. 床旁超声造影对肝移植术后早期肝动脉血栓的诊断价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 630-634.
[15] 杨天池, 韩威, 邱枫, 祁佳慧. 术中胰腺超声弹性成像在胰腺质地评估中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 646-650.
阅读次数
全文


摘要