切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (12) : 909 -913. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2017.12.007

所属专题: 乳腺超声 文献

浅表器官超声影像学

声触诊组织成像定量技术鉴别诊断乳腺病灶良恶性及评价其异质性的应用价值
王颖1, 周玮珺1, 孔文韬1, 吴敏1,()   
  1. 1. 210008 南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院超声诊断科
  • 收稿日期:2017-06-01 出版日期:2017-12-01
  • 通信作者: 吴敏

Application of virtual touch tissue imaging quantification technology in differentiating benign or malignant breast lesions and evaluating the heterogeneity of breast lesions

Ying Wang1, Weijun Zhou1, Wentao Kong1, Min Wu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Drum Tower Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing 210008, China
  • Received:2017-06-01 Published:2017-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Min Wu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wu Min, Email:
引用本文:

王颖, 周玮珺, 孔文韬, 吴敏. 声触诊组织成像定量技术鉴别诊断乳腺病灶良恶性及评价其异质性的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2017, 14(12): 909-913.

Ying Wang, Weijun Zhou, Wentao Kong, Min Wu. Application of virtual touch tissue imaging quantification technology in differentiating benign or malignant breast lesions and evaluating the heterogeneity of breast lesions[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2017, 14(12): 909-913.

目的

探讨声触诊组织成像定量(VTIQ)技术鉴别诊断乳腺病灶良恶性及评价其异质性的应用价值。

方法

选择2016年10月至2017年3月于南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院行乳腺超声检查的患者149例,共155个病灶。所有患者均经手术病理证实。所有患者先行乳腺常规超声检查,记录乳腺病灶常规超声表现特征,并根据乳腺影像学报告及数据系统(BI-RADS)对乳腺病灶进行分类。然后在VTIQ模式下,测量病灶剪切波速度(SWV),获得SWV最大值、平均值,并计算SWV离散系数。以术后病理结果作为金标准,绘制SWV最大值、平均值及离散系数鉴别诊断乳腺良恶性病灶的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线。

结果

手术病理证实,155个乳腺病灶中,恶性病灶48个,良性病灶107个。乳腺恶性病灶SWV最大值、平均值及离散系数均大于乳腺良性病灶[(6.85±2.26) cm/s vs (3.95±1.54) cm/s,(4.74±1.36) cm/s vs (3.10±0.94) cm,(0.30±0.15) vs (0.17±0.10)],且差异均有统计学意义(t=8.085、7.583、5.366,P值均<0.001)。ROC曲线显示,SWV最大值、平均值及离散系数鉴别诊断乳腺病灶良恶性的曲线下面积分别为0.842、0.826、0.759,阈值分别为5.51 cm/s、4.28 cm/s、0.25。SWV最大值、平均值及离散系数鉴别诊断乳腺病灶良恶性的敏感度、特异度、准确性分别为72.92%、85.98%、81.93%,64.58%、87.85%、80.65%,64.58%、84.11%、78.06%。SWV最大值和SWV平均值分别联合SWV离散系数后,其鉴别诊断乳腺病灶良恶性的敏感度提高到81.25%。

结论

VTIQ技术在鉴别诊断乳腺病灶良恶性及评价其异质性中有重要价值。

Objective

To investigate virtual touch tissue imaging quantification shear wave elastography in the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant breast lesions and the value of heterogeneity.

Methods

A total of 149 patients with 155 breast lesions by ultrasonography were selected from October 2016 to March 2017 in Drum Tower Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University Medical School. All patients were confirmed by surgical pathology. The breast lesions were first examined by conventional ultrasound and the conventional ultrasonography features were recorded. The lesions were classified by breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). Then the shear wave velocity (SWV) values were measured under the virtual touch tissue imaging quantification (VTIQ) speed mode. The SWV maximum, average were obtained and coefficient of variation was calculated. According to pathological results, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of SWV maximum, average and coefficient of variation in differentiating benign or malignant breast lesions were drawn.

Results

The surgical pathology confirmed that there were 48 malignant lesions and 107 benign lesions in 155 breast lesions. The SWV maximum, average and coefficient of variation in malignant lesions were all higher than those of benign lesions [(6.85±2.26) cm/s vs (3.95±1.54) cm/s, (4.74±1.36) cm/s vs (3.10±0.94) cm, (0.30±0.15) vs (0.17±0.10)], and the difference was all statistically significant (t=8.085, 7.583, 5.366, all P<0.001). According to ROC curve, the areas under the curves of SWV maximum, average and coefficient of variation in differentiating benign or malignant breast lesions were 0.842, 0.826 and 0.759 and the cutoff values were 5.51 cm/s, 4.28 cm/s and 0.25 respectively. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of SWV maximum, average and coefficient of variation were 72.92%, 85.98% and 81.93%, 64.58%, 87.85% and 80.65%, 64.58%, 84.11% and 78.06%, respectively. And the combined diagnostic sensitivity of coefficient of variation with SWV maximum and SWV average were 81.25%.

Conclusion

VTIQ technology plays an important role in the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant breast lesions and the value of heterogeneity.

表1 乳腺良恶性病灶SWV及离散系数比较(±s
图4 将感兴趣区放置于病灶内部剪切波速度最高区域、最低区域、中央区域及周围正常乳腺组织区域,测量剪切波速度
图5 剪切波速度最大值、平均值及离散系数鉴别诊断乳腺良恶性病灶的受试者工作特征曲线。剪切波速度最大值、平均值及离散系数鉴别诊断乳腺病灶良恶性的曲线下面积分别为0.842、0.826、0.759,阈值分别为5.51 cm/s、4.28 cm/s、0.25
表2 SWV及离散系数鉴别诊断乳腺病灶良恶性与手术病理结果对比(个)
1
Michael G, Mirjam SM, Aba H, et al. Evaluation of virtual touch tissue imaging quantification, a new shear wave velocity imaging method, for breast lesion assessment by ultrasound [J]. Biomed Res Int, 2014:960262.
2
Liu H, Zhao LX, Xu G, et al. Diagnostic value of virtual touch tissue imaging quantification for benign and malignant breast lesions with different sizes [J]. Clin Exp Med, 2015, 8(8):13118-13126.
3
Bryne M. Prognostic value of various molecular and cellular features in oral squamous cell carcinomas:a review [J]. Oral Pathol Med, 1991, 20(9):413-420.
4
罗安泰. 病理学 [M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 1979: 263.
5
Wang ZL, Sun L, Li Y, et al. Relationship between elasticity and collagen fiber content in breast disease: A preliminary report [J]. Ultrasonics, 2015, 57(57):44-49.
6
王敏,崔可飞,司彩风. 定量剪切波弹性成像对乳腺癌假阴性诊断的分析 [J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2014, 30(11):974-976.
7
王志远,杨通明,吴泽惠, 等. 超声弹性成像鉴别乳腺微小良恶性肿块 [J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2010, 26(10):1901-1903.
8
Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E, et al. Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis [J]. Radiology, 2006, 239(2):341-350.
9
Chamming′s F, Latorre OH, Frère-Belda MA, et al. Shear wave elastography of tumour growth in a human breast cancer model with pathological correlation [J]. Eur Radiol, 2013, 23(8):2079-2086.
10
江琼超,曾弘,罗葆明, 等. 乳腺纤维腺瘤超声弹性评分与病理分型的相关性分析 [J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2011, 27(10):897-899.
11
徐光,吴蓉,姚明华, 等. 声辐射力脉冲弹性成像技术结合三维超声检查鉴别诊断乳腺肿块良恶性的价值 [J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志:电子版, 2013, 10(12):984-988.
12
郝少云,欧冰,钟文景, 等. 超声弹性成像在BI-RADS 4类乳腺肿物中的诊断价值 [J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2014, 30(4):303-306.
13
张倩倩,王学梅,李银燕, 等.剪切波弹性成像在乳腺良恶性病变鉴别诊断中的价值 [J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志, 2012, 23(6):385-388.
14
罗葆明,欧冰,智慧, 等. 乳腺肿块超声弹性成像误诊原因分析及对策 [J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2007, 23(4):259-261.
15
Kuijper A, Mommers EC, van der Wall E, et al. Histopathology of fibroadenoma of breast [J]. Am J Clin Pathol, 2001, 115:736-742.
16
Bai M, Zhang HP, Xing JF, et al. Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Technology in The Differential Diagnosis of Solid Breast Masses With Different Sizes: Which Features Are Most Efficient? [J]. Biomed Res Int, 2015:410560.
[1] 赵枫, 肖际东. PDCA循环法在自动乳腺全容积成像诊断乳腺疾病中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(01): 51-54.
[2] 颜红菊, 黄安茜, 谭艳娟, 朱罗茜, 许晓静, 戴超超, 项爱斋, 刘坚, 包凌云. 超声与纤维乳管镜对病理性乳头溢液的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2021, 18(08): 800-805.
[3] 江宇轩, 刘文丽, 武会娟, 方晨, 钱嘉林. 神经动态超声弹性成像的三维有限元分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2021, 18(06): 583-589.
[4] 张君, 沈素红, 刘春龙, 张志杰. 剪切波弹性成像技术量化评估健康人斜方肌弹性模量的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2021, 18(03): 307-312.
[5] 王洁, 丁泊文, 尹健. 糖尿病性乳腺病52例临床分析[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 285-289.
[6] 刘荫华. 中国乳腺外科临床实践——共识与争议[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 262-262.
[7] 邓韫洁, 陆慧敏, 黄梅, 黄佳榕. 糖尿病相关的乳房坏疽一例[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(02): 128-130.
[8] 杨壹羚, 张恒. 乳腺癌人表皮生长因子受体2瘤内异质性的研究进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(01): 44-46.
[9] 刘晓雁, 徐飚, 林欢, 别凤杰, 陈前军. 腔镜技术在乳腺外科中的应用进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(04): 229-234.
[10] 王冰, 盛健, 姚利, 戴希勇. 乳腺结核诊断方法的回顾性研究[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(04): 223-228.
[11] 强坤坤, 罗红. 杜氏肌营养不良症患儿的高频超声与剪切波弹性成像诊断研究现状及前景[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(02): 162-167.
[12] 王珏, 胡晓红, 贺伟峰. 成纤维细胞的异质性及其在创面愈合和瘢痕形成中的作用[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2021, 16(04): 353-357.
[13] 蔡霖, 龚秋源, 王伟, 田恒力. 单细胞测序分析技术在小胶质细胞表型异质性研究中的最新进展[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2021, 07(03): 156-160.
[14] 王苏贵, 皇立媛, 姜福金, 吴自余, 张先云, 李强, 严大理. 异质性细胞核核糖蛋白A2B1在前列腺癌中的作用及其靶向中药活性成分筛选研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 731-736.
[15] 陈捷, 周峰, 刘金波, 王宏宇. 基于聚类的冠心病患者药物治疗模式及人群异质性研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(10): 1012-1018.
阅读次数
全文


摘要