切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (09) : 707 -712. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2018.09.012

所属专题: 文献

妇产科超声影像学

经会阴盆底超声检查定量评估子宫全切除术后不同时间段盆底结构及功能变化
杨丹1, 聂芳1,(), 卜岚1, 李琪1, 汪延芳1, 李静1   
  1. 1. 730030 兰州大学第二医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2017-09-25 出版日期:2018-09-01
  • 通信作者: 聂芳
  • 基金资助:
    兰州市科技计划项目(2016-2-71)

Study on the changes of pelvic floor structure in different time after hysterectomy by transperineal ultrasound

Dan Yang1, Fang Nie1,(), Lan Bu1, Qi Li1, Yanfang Wang1, Jing Li1   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Gansu 730030, China
  • Received:2017-09-25 Published:2018-09-01
  • Corresponding author: Fang Nie
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Nie Fang, Email:
引用本文:

杨丹, 聂芳, 卜岚, 李琪, 汪延芳, 李静. 经会阴盆底超声检查定量评估子宫全切除术后不同时间段盆底结构及功能变化[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2018, 15(09): 707-712.

Dan Yang, Fang Nie, Lan Bu, Qi Li, Yanfang Wang, Jing Li. Study on the changes of pelvic floor structure in different time after hysterectomy by transperineal ultrasound[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2018, 15(09): 707-712.

目的

经会阴盆底超声定量评估子宫全切除术后盆底结构、功能在不同时间段内的变化。

方法

收集2016年3月至2017年7月子宫全切除术后在兰州大学第二医院超声科复查的女性患者105例。其中40~49岁37例,50~59岁49例,≥60岁19例;术后≤1年29例,术后>1,≤5年33例,>5,≤10年28例,>10年15例。选取同期兰州大学第二医院体检且临床未诊断盆底功能障碍性疾病(PFD)的120名女性志愿者作为健康对照组,均未行子宫全切术及其他盆底手术。所有研究对象均行盆底超声检查,测量静息及Valsalva状态下膀胱颈距耻骨联合下缘距离(X)、尿道倾斜角(α)、膀胱尿道后角(β)、直肠壶腹最低点距耻骨联合后下缘距离(D)、膀胱逼尿肌厚度,计算尿道旋转角(Rα)及膀胱颈下降值(BND)。采用t检验比较子宫全切除术组患者与健康对照组受检者超声定量参数;采用χ2检验比较不同年龄段子宫全切除术组患者术后不同时间段PFD检出率差异。

结果

与健康对照组受检者比较,子宫全切除术组患者术后膀胱逼尿肌厚度增大,且差异有统计学意义(t=3.28,P<0.05)。静息状态下,与健康对照组受检者比较,子宫全切除术组患者β增大,X及D减小,且差异均有统计学意义(t=4.56、2.17、4.93,P均<0.05);子宫全切除术组患者α增大,但差异无统计学意义。最大Valsalva状态下,与健康对照组受检者比较,子宫全切除术组患者α、β、Rα、BND均增大,X、D均减小,差异均有统计学意义(t=3.37、3.44、3.36、5.06、5.79、5.76,P均<0.05)。105例子宫全切除术组患者术后PFD检出率为60.0%(63/105),其中压力性尿失禁(SUI)检出率为33.3%(35/105),盆腔脏器脱垂(POP)检出率为36.2%(38/105)。POP中,膀胱脱垂检出率为18.1%(19/105),直肠脱垂检出率为10.5%(11/105),肠疝检出率为6.7%(7/105)。子宫全切术后1年内发生PFD以SUI为主,检出率为48.3%(14/29);术后10年后发生PFD以POP为主,检出率为80.0%(12/15)。各年龄段子宫全切除术组患者术后不同时间段PFD检出率差异无统计学意义,表明术后不同时间段PFD检出率可能与子宫全切除术组患者年龄无密切关系。

结论

经会阴盆底超声检查能够动态观察子宫全切除术后盆底结构的变化,且可对术后PFD进行定量评估。

Objective

To evaluate the changes of pelvic floor structure and function quantitatively in different periods after taking total hysterectomy by transperineal pelvic ultrasound.

Methods

A total of 105 female patients who underwent ultrasound examination after hysterectomy at the Second Hospital of Lanzhou University from March 2016 to July 2017 were enrolled. Among them, 37 cases were 40-49 years old, 49 cases were 50-59 years old, 19 cases were over 60 years old; 29 cases were less than 1 years after hysterectomy, 33 cases were>1,≤5 years after hysterectomy, 28 cases were>5,≤10 years after hysterectomy, and 15 cases were over 10 years after hysterectomy. A total of 120 female volunteers from the Second Hospital of Lanzhou University who had not been diagnosed with pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) were selected as the healthy control group without total hysterectomy or other pelvic floor surgery. All subjects were examined by pelvic floor ultrasound. The distance from the bladder neck to the lower edge of pubic symphysis (X), urethral angle (α), retrovesical angle (β), the distance from the lowest point from the rectal ampulla to the lower edge of pubic symphysis (D) and detrusor thickness under resting state and maximal Valsalva state were measured. And the urethral rotation angle (Rα) and bladder neck descent value (BND) were calculated. T test was used to compare the ultrasonic quantitative parameters between the total hysterectomy group and the healthy control group, and the detection rate of PFD was compared by Chi-square test between the patients of different age groups at different time after hysterectomy.

Results

The thickness of bladder detrusor in total hysterectomy group was significantly higher than that in healthy control group. The age of patients in the total hysterectomy group was older than that in the healthy control group, and the difference was statistically significant. At rest, compared with the subjects in the healthy control group, the βincreased, the X and D decreased in patients with total hysterectomy. The differences were significant. The α increased after hysterectomy, but the difference was not statistically significant. At maximum Valsalva state, compared with the subjects in the healthy control group, the α, β, Rα and BND all increased in the group of total hysterectomy, and the X and D decreased. The difference was statistically significant. The detection rate of PFD in 105 cases of total hysterectomy group was 60% (63/105), the detection rate of stress incontinence (SUI) was 33.3% (35/105), and the detection rate of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) was 36.2% (38/105). In POP, the detection rate of bladder prolapse, rectal prolapse and intestinal hernia was 18.1% (19/105), 10.5% (11/105) and 6.7% (7/105). SUI was the main occurrence of PFD within 1 year after total hysterectomy, and the detection rate was 48.3% (14/29). 10 years after operation, POP was the predominant occurrence of PFD, and the detection rate was 80.0% (12/15). There was no significant difference in the detection rate of PFD between different age groups after hysterectomy, indicating that the detection rate of PFD at different times after hysterectomy may not be closely related to the age of patients.

Conclusion

Transperineal pelvic floor ultrasonography can dynamically observe the changes of pelvic floor structure after total hysterectomy, and can evaluate PFD quantitatively after operation.

图1,2 定量参数测量。图1虚线为耻骨联合后下缘水平线,X为膀胱颈距耻骨联合后下缘距离,D为直肠壶腹最低点距耻骨联合后下缘距离,α为尿道倾斜角,β为膀胱尿道后角;图2示膀胱逼尿肌厚度测量:垂直于黏膜,测量內缘到外缘距离(箭头所示),测量3次取平均值
表1 子宫全切除术组患者与健康对照组受检者超声定量参数比较(±s
图3~5 子宫切除术后盆腔脏器脱垂超声声像图。图3示膀胱脱垂;图4示直肠膨出(箭头所示);图5示肠疝(箭头所示)
表2 105例子宫全切除术组患者术后不同时间段PFD检出情况[例(%)]
表3 不同年龄段子宫全切除术组患者术后不同时间段PFD检出情况[%(例/例)]
1
Ridgeway BM. Does prolapse equal hysterectomy? The role of uterine conservation in women with uterovaginal prolapse [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2015, 213(6): 802-809.
2
Dietz HP,Kamisan Atan I,Salita A. Association between ICS POP-Q coordinates and translabial ultrasound findings: implications for definition of ′normal pelvic organ support′ [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2016, 47(3): 363-368.
3
覃艳玲,蒋江帆,潘素丽, 等. 经会阴超声对女性盆底功能障碍性疾病的观察和评估 [J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2013, 29(12): 1130-1132.
4
Dietz HP. 盆底超声学图谱 [M]. 王慧芳, 谢红宁, 译. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2011: 63.
5
彭玉,吴一彬,何光智, 等. 经会阴二维超声对子宫全切术后患者盆底功能的评估 [J]. 实用医学影像杂志, 2015, 16(6): 542-543.
6
谢琼,胡孟彩. 经会阴盆底超声在宫颈癌患者子宫全切除术后盆底功能评估中的应用分析 [J]. 山西医药杂志, 2016, 45(11):1277-1279.
7
Tunn R,Goldammer K,Gauruder-Burmester A, et al. Pathogenesis of urethral funneling in women with stress urinary incontinence assessed by introital ultrasound [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2005, 26(3): 287-292.
8
Sendag F,Vidinli H,Kazandi M, et al. Role of perineal sonography in the evaluation of patients with stress urinary incontinence [J]. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 2003, 43(1): 54-57.
9
马懿,卢漫,刘芸, 等. 老年子宫全切术后患者盆底功能的超声评估价值 [J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2016, 36(7): 1659-1660, 1661.
10
孙立倩,王宏桥,付青, 等. 经会阴盆底超声对子宫全切术后患者盆底功能的评估 [J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2015, 12(3): 228-232.
11
周艳. 132例子宫肌瘤患者手术方式及其对盆底功能的影响 [J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2014, 15(29): 2349-2352.
12
Persson P,Brynhildsen J,Kjolhede P, et al. Pelvic organ prolapse after subtotal and total hysterectomy: a long-term follow-up of an open randomised controlled multicentre study [J]. BJOG, 2013, 120(12): 1556-1565.
13
Vitton V,Vignally P,Barthet M, et al. Dynamic anal endosonography and MRI defecography in diagnosis floor disorders: comparison with conventional defecography [J]. Dis Colon Rectm, 2011, 54(11): 1398-1404.
14
张步蕊,褚鑫,张红梅, 等. 经会阴超声对女性盆底功能障碍性疾病的观察和评估 [J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2015, 30(14): 2242-2244.
15
邓彦东,李林,陈江红, 等. 经会阴实时超声在评价产后盆底康复治疗中的应用 [J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2016, 25(12): 1060-1063.
16
耿京,谢冰,马彧, 等. 三维盆底超声评估盆腔器官脱垂的初步研究 [J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2014, 30(8): 733-736.
[1] 章建全, 程杰, 陈红琼, 闫磊. 采用ACR-TIRADS评估甲状腺消融区的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 966-971.
[2] 罗辉, 方晔. 品管圈在提高甲状腺结节细针穿刺检出率中的应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 972-977.
[3] 杨忠, 时敬业, 邓学东, 姜纬, 殷林亮, 潘琦, 梁泓, 马建芳, 王珍奇, 张俊, 董姗姗. 产前超声在胎儿22q11.2 微缺失综合征中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 852-858.
[4] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[5] 史学兵, 谢迎东, 谢霓, 徐超丽, 杨斌, 孙帼. 声辐射力弹性成像对不可切除肝细胞癌门静脉癌栓患者放射治疗效果的评价[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 778-784.
[6] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[7] 洪玮, 叶细容, 刘枝红, 杨银凤, 吕志红. 超声影像组学联合临床病理特征预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗完全病理缓解的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 571-579.
[8] 项文静, 徐燕, 茹彤, 郑明明, 顾燕, 戴晨燕, 朱湘玉, 严陈晨. 神经学超声检查在产前诊断胼胝体异常中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 470-476.
[9] 钱警语, 郑明明. 《2024意大利妇产科学会非侵入性和侵入性产前诊断指南》解读[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 486-492.
[10] 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 压力性尿失禁阶梯治疗的项目介绍[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 125-125.
[11] 刘柏隆. 女性压力性尿失禁阶梯治疗之手术治疗方案选择[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 126-126.
[12] 屈勤芳, 束方莲. 盆腔器官脱垂患者盆底重建手术后压力性尿失禁发生的影响因素及列线图预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 606-612.
[13] 黄俊龙, 李文双, 李晓阳, 刘柏隆, 陈逸龙, 丘惠平, 周祥福. 基于盆底彩超的人工智能模型在女性压力性尿失禁分度诊断中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 597-605.
[14] 李宜璐, 曹永丽, 杨阳, 王思远, 张远耀, 杨维维, 王信琛, 陈俊, 魏东. 腹腔镜盆底修复联合PPH 术治疗直肠内脱垂的手术疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 394-401.
[15] 张琛, 秦鸣, 董娟, 陈玉龙. 超声检查对儿童肠扭转缺血性改变的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 565-568.
阅读次数
全文


摘要