切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (09) : 713 -718. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2018.09.013

所属专题: 文献

浅表器官超声影像学

甲状腺影像报告和数据系统联合甲状腺细胞病理学Bethesda报告系统对甲状腺结节的应用价值
宋琳琳1, 周贵明1,(), 朱莉1, 孟召伟2, 仇晓菲3, 陈冬玥1   
  1. 1. 300052 天津医科大学总医院超声科
    2. 300052 天津医科大学总医院核医学科
    3. 300070 天津医科大学病理教研室
  • 出版日期:2018-09-01
  • 通信作者: 周贵明
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81571709)

Application value of The Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System and The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology in thyroid nodules

Linlin Song1, Guiming Zhou1,(), Li Zhu1, Zhaowei Meng2, Xiaofei Qiu3, Dongyue Chen1   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasonography, Tianjing Medical University General Hospital, Tianjing 300052, China
    2. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Tianjing Medical University General Hospital, Tianjing 300052, China
    3. Pathological Teaching and Research Office, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjing 300070, China
  • Published:2018-09-01
  • Corresponding author: Guiming Zhou
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhou Guiming, Email:
引用本文:

宋琳琳, 周贵明, 朱莉, 孟召伟, 仇晓菲, 陈冬玥. 甲状腺影像报告和数据系统联合甲状腺细胞病理学Bethesda报告系统对甲状腺结节的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2018, 15(09): 713-718.

Linlin Song, Guiming Zhou, Li Zhu, Zhaowei Meng, Xiaofei Qiu, Dongyue Chen. Application value of The Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System and The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology in thyroid nodules[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2018, 15(09): 713-718.

目的

探讨甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(TI-RADS)与甲状腺细胞病理学Bethesda报告系统(TBSRTC)对甲状腺结节的应用价值。

方法

收集2013年11月至2015年4月于天津医科大学总医院行超声引导下细针穿刺活检(US-FNAB)的207例甲状腺结节患者,共216个甲状腺结节。其中170个结节经天津医科大学总医院及天津医科大学肿瘤医院手术病理证实,46个结节超声随访6个月以上。对所有甲状腺结节进行TI-RADS及TBSRTC分类。以手术病理结果及超声随访结果作为"金"标准,计算超声TI-RADS与细胞学TBSRTC鉴别诊断甲状腺结节良恶性的敏感度、特异度、准确性、阳性预测值及阴性预测值。

结果

170个甲状腺结节经手术病理证实,其中恶性146个,均为甲状腺乳头状癌;良性24个,其中结节性甲状腺肿16个,桥本甲状腺炎6个,滤泡性腺瘤2个。46个甲状腺结节细胞学评估为TBSRTC II类,超声评估为TI-RADS 3类,且超声随访6~15个月结节大小、形态无明显变化视为良性。216个甲状腺结节中TI-RADS 3类8个,4a类19个,4b类55个,4c类130个,5类4个;其中甲状腺恶性结节分别为0个、5个、23个、114个、4个。TI-RADS鉴别诊断甲状腺结节良恶性的敏感度、特异度、准确性、阳性预测值及阴性预测值分别为100%、11.4%、71.3%、70.2%、100%。216个甲状腺结节中TBSRTC Ⅱ类57个,Ⅲ类24个,Ⅳ类3个,Ⅴ类83个,Ⅵ类49个;其中甲状腺恶性结节分别为2个、16个、2个、77个、49个。TBSRTC鉴别诊断甲状腺结节良恶性的敏感度、特异度、准确性、阳性预测值及阴性预测值分别为98.4%、90.2%、95.8%、95.5%、96.5%。本组细胞学TBSRTC为恶性的甲状腺结节,超声TI-RADS分类均为4a-5类。

结论

TI-RADS的建立有助于穿刺目标结节的选择,TBSRTC具有很高的诊断能力,为甲状腺结节临床处理提供了重要依据,二者联合应用能进一步提高对甲状腺恶性结节的诊断能力。

Objective

To investigate the value of Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) and The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) for thyroid nodules.

Methods

A total of 216 thyroid nodules were obtained from 207 patients with thyroid nodules under ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy (US-FNAB) from November 2013 to April 2015 at the General Hospital of Tianjin Medical University. 170 nodules were confirmed by surgical pathology of Tianjin Medical University General Hospital and Tianjin Medical University Cancer Hospital, and 46 nodules were followed up for more than 6 months. The classifications of TI-RADS and TBSRTC were performed for all thyroid nodules. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of ultrasound TI-RADS and cytology TBSRTC in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules were calculated using surgical pathological results and ultrasound follow-up results as the ″gold″ standard.

Results

170 thyroid nodules were confirmed by operational pathology, including 146 malignant nodules, all of which were papillary thyroid carcinoma; and 24 benign nodules, which were 16 nodular goiters, 6 Hashimoto′s thyroiditis, and 2 follicular adenomas. The thyroid nodules were cytologically evaluated as TBSRTC class Ⅱ, and ultrasonically evaluated as TI-RADS class 3, and no significant changes in the size and morphology of the nodules at 6 to 15 months , which were considered benign. Among the 216 thyroid nodules, 8 were TI-RADS class 3, 19 were TI-RADS class 4a, 55 were TI-RADS class 4b, 130 were TI-RADS class 4c, 4 were TI-RADS class 5. Among them, there were 0, 5, 23, 114, and 4 malignant thyroid nodules, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of TI-RADS for differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules were 100%, 11.4%, 71.3%, 70.2%, and 100%, respectively. Of the 216 thyroid nodules, 57 were TBSRTC classⅡ, 24 were TBSRTC class Ⅲ, 3 were TBSRTC class Ⅳ, 83 were TBSRTC class Ⅴ, and 49 were TBSRTC class Ⅵ. Among them, there were 2, 16, 2, 77, 49 thyroid malignant nodules, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of TBSRTC for differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules were 98.4%, 90.2%, 95.8%, 95.5%, and 96.5%, respectively. In the subgroup of nodules with malignant classification on cytology TBSRTC, their ultrasound classifications were all TI-RADS 4a-5.

Conclusions

TI-RADS contribute to select the target nodule to puncture. TBSRTC has a high diagnostic capability, and provides an important basis for clinical treatment of nodules. The combination of the two methods will further improve the diagnosis of malignant nodules.

图4 甲状腺影像报告和数据系统4c类结节病理图示核呈卵圆形或不规则形,出现核构、染色质细腻和微小核仁(HE,×200)
表1 TI-RADS分类鉴别诊断甲状腺结节良恶性的价值(个)
表2 TBSRTC分类鉴别诊断甲状腺结节良恶性的价值(个)
1
Bongiovanni M,Spitale A,Faquin WC, et al. The bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology: A meta-analysis [J]. Acta Cytol, 2012, 56(4): 333-339.
2
Kapila K,Qadan L,Ali RH, et al. The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Fine-needle Aspiration Cytology: A Kuwaiti Experience-A Cytohistopathological Study of 374 Cases [J]. Acta Cytol, 2015, 59(2): 133-138.
3
黄丽平. Bethesda分类联合甲状腺超声影像报告与数据系统(TIRADS)对甲状腺结节恶性风险的评估价值 [J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2016, 25(8): 710-714.
4
Kwak JY,Han KH,Yoon JH, et al. Thyroid imaging reporting and data system for us features of nodules: A step in establishing better stratification of cancer risk [J]. Radiology, 2011, 260(3): 892-899.
5
徐上妍,詹维伟,周建桥. 甲状腺微小结节的超声影像报告与数据系统的建立 [J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2016, 13(6): 453-458.
6
Baloch ZW,LiVolsi VA,Asa SL, et al. Diagnostic terminology and morphologic criteria for cytologic diagnosis of thyroid lesions: A synopsis of the national cancer institute thyroid fine-needle aspiration state of the science conference [J]. Diagn Cytopathol,2008, 36(6): 425-437.
7
Brito JP,Gionfriddo MR,Al Nofal A, et al. The accuracy of thyroid nodule ultrasound to predict thyroid cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2014, 99(4): 1253-1263.
8
中华医学会内分泌学分会, 中华医学会外科学分会内分泌学组, 中国抗癌协会头颈肿瘤专业委员会, 等. 甲状腺结节和分化型甲状腺癌诊治指南 [J]. 中华内分泌代谢杂志, 2012, 28(10): 779-797.
9
Gharib H,Papini E,Paschke R, et al. American association of clinical endocrinologists, associazione medici endocrinologi, and european thyroid association medical guidelines for clinical practice for the diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules: Executive summary of recommendations [J]. J Endocrinol Invest, 2010, 33(5 Suppl): 51-56.
10
Cooper DS,Doherty GM,Haugen BR, et al. Revised american thyroid association management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer [J]. Thyroid, 2009, 19(11): 1167-1214.
11
候雪琴,范雪,杨凌菲, 等. 甲状腺影像报告和数据系统分类诊断甲状腺结节良恶性的准确性 [J]. 中国医学影像学杂志, 2015, 23(7): 489-493.
12
Guo A,Kaminoh Y,Forward T, et al. Fine Needle Aspiration of Thyroid Nodules Using the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology: An Institutional Experience in A Rural Setting [J]. Int J Endocrinol, 2017: 9601735.
13
Layfield LJ,Morton MJ,Cramer HM, et al. Implications of the proposed thyroid fine-needle aspiration category of ″follicular lesion of undetermined significance″: A five-year multi-institutional analysis [J]. Diagn Cytopathol, 2009, 37(10): 710-714.
14
Mehta RS,Carty SE,Ohori NP, et al. Nodule size is an independent predictor of malignancy in mutation-negative nodules with follicular lesion of undetermined significance cytology [J]. Surgery, 2013, 154(4): 730-736.
15
Kim M,Park HJ,Min HS, et al. The use of the bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology in korea: A nationwide multicenter survey by the korean society of endocrine pathologists [J]. J Pathol Transl Med, 2017, 51(4): 410-417.
16
McElroy MK,Mahooti S,Hasteh F. A single institution experience with the new bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology: Correlation with existing cytologic, clinical, and histological data [J]. Diagn Cytopathol, 2014, 42(7): 564-569.
17
Faquin WC,Baloch ZW. Fine-needle aspiration of follicular patterned lesions of the thyroid: Diagnosis, management, and follow-up according to National Cancer Institute (NCI) recommendations [J]. Diagn Cytopathol, 2010, 38(10): 731-739.
18
Gao LY,Wang Y,Jiang YX, et al. Ultrasound is helpful to differentiate Bethesda Class Ⅲ thyroid nodules: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2017, 96(16): e6564.
19
Lee S,Shin JH,Oh YL, et al. Subcategorization of Bethesda System Category Ⅲ by ultrasonography [J]. Thyroid, 2016, 26(6): 836-842.
20
Yang J,Schnadig V,Logrono R, et al. Fine-needle aspiration of thyroid nodules: A study of 4703 patients with histologic and clinical correlations [J]. Cancer, 2007, 111(5): 306-315.
21
Elsheikh TM,Asa SL,Chan JK, et al. Interobserver and intraobserver variation among experts in the diagnosis of thyroid follicular lesions with borderline nuclear features of papillary carcinoma [J]. Am J Clin Pathol, 2008, 130(5): 736-744.
[1] 章建全, 程杰, 陈红琼, 闫磊. 采用ACR-TIRADS评估甲状腺消融区的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 966-971.
[2] 罗辉, 方晔. 品管圈在提高甲状腺结节细针穿刺检出率中的应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 972-977.
[3] 杨忠, 时敬业, 邓学东, 姜纬, 殷林亮, 潘琦, 梁泓, 马建芳, 王珍奇, 张俊, 董姗姗. 产前超声在胎儿22q11.2 微缺失综合征中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 852-858.
[4] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[5] 史学兵, 谢迎东, 谢霓, 徐超丽, 杨斌, 孙帼. 声辐射力弹性成像对不可切除肝细胞癌门静脉癌栓患者放射治疗效果的评价[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 778-784.
[6] 刘畅, 蒋洁, 胥雪冬, 崔立刚, 王淑敏, 陈文. 北京市海淀区医疗机构甲状腺超声检查及TIRADS分类基线调查[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 693-697.
[7] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[8] 洪玮, 叶细容, 刘枝红, 杨银凤, 吕志红. 超声影像组学联合临床病理特征预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗完全病理缓解的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 571-579.
[9] 项文静, 徐燕, 茹彤, 郑明明, 顾燕, 戴晨燕, 朱湘玉, 严陈晨. 神经学超声检查在产前诊断胼胝体异常中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 470-476.
[10] 胡可, 鲁蓉. 基于多参数超声特征的中老年女性压力性尿失禁诊断模型研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 477-483.
[11] 张妍, 原韶玲, 史泽洪, 郭馨阳, 牛菁华. 小肾肿瘤超声漏诊原因分析新思路[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 500-504.
[12] 席芬, 张培培, 孝梦甦, 刘真真, 张一休, 张璟, 朱庆莉, 孟华. 乳腺错构瘤的临床与超声影像学特征分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 505-510.
[13] 杨敬武, 周美君, 陈雨凡, 李素淑, 何燕妮, 崔楠, 刘红梅. 人工智能超声结合品管圈活动对低年资超声医师甲状腺结节风险评估能力的作用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 522-526.
[14] 张琛, 秦鸣, 董娟, 陈玉龙. 超声检查对儿童肠扭转缺血性改变的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 565-568.
[15] 陈秀晓, 隋文倩, 王珉鑫, 吴圆圆. 腹股沟斜疝并腹腔游离体超声表现一例[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 516-517.
阅读次数
全文


摘要