切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (02) : 159 -163. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2021.02.007

所属专题: 乳腺超声 文献

浅表器官超声影像学

SonoVue及Sonazoid在早期乳腺癌患者前哨淋巴结定位中的初步研究
孙彦1, 雷玉涛2,(), 郝云霞1, 王淑敏1, 谭石1, 崔立刚1   
  1. 1. 100191 北京大学第三医院超声科
    2. 100191 北京大学第三医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-05-19 出版日期:2021-02-01
  • 通信作者: 雷玉涛
  • 基金资助:
    北京大学第三医院临床重点项目孵育项目A类(Y78480-02)

Comparison of SonoVue and Sonazoid in localization of sentinel lymph nodes in early breast cancer patients

Yan Sun1, Yutao Lei2,(), Yunxia Hao1, Shumin Wang1, Shi Tan1, Ligang Cui1   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, the Third Hospital of Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
    2. Department of General Surgery, the Third Hospital of Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
  • Received:2020-05-19 Published:2021-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Yutao Lei
引用本文:

孙彦, 雷玉涛, 郝云霞, 王淑敏, 谭石, 崔立刚. SonoVue及Sonazoid在早期乳腺癌患者前哨淋巴结定位中的初步研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2021, 18(02): 159-163.

Yan Sun, Yutao Lei, Yunxia Hao, Shumin Wang, Shi Tan, Ligang Cui. Comparison of SonoVue and Sonazoid in localization of sentinel lymph nodes in early breast cancer patients[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2021, 18(02): 159-163.

目的

探讨SonoVue及Sonazoid在早期乳腺癌患者前哨淋巴结(SLN)定位中的应用。

方法

纳入2018年1月1日至2020年1月30日于北京大学第三医院就诊的临床诊断为乳腺癌T1~2期的患者204例。所有患者均行腋窝淋巴结清扫术或SLN活检术取得病理结果,术前均行超声造影检查。依据超声造影剂选用类型的不同,将204例患者分为SonoVue组135例(男性1例),Sonazoid组69例。观察2组SLN显影的数量、持续时间等,并分别与美蓝染色方法进行对比分析。

结果

SonoVue组135例患者,超声造影检出SLN共210个,美蓝染色检出297个,差异有统计学意义(t=6.964,P<0.001);Sonazoid组69例患者,超声造影检出SLN共102个,美蓝染色检出139个,差异有统计学意义(t=3.763,P<0.001)。SonoVue组135例患者中1例造影定位未成功,美蓝染色定位显影失败4例;Sonazoid组68例患者全部成功定位,美蓝染色定位显影失败3例,2组显影成功率分别与美蓝染色比较,差异均无统计学意义(P=0.370、0.244)。SonoVue组与Sonazoid组之间的显影成功率比较(99.3% vs 100.0%),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。造影剂注射后60、120 min时,SonoVue组SLN内均未见淋巴结显影,而Sonazoid组切除的蓝染淋巴结在生理盐水中均持续显影。

结论

Sonazoid在定位早期乳腺癌患者SLN中的应用价值不低于SonoVue,其在SLN中持续显影的特性有望用于术中检验切除SLN的准确性及完整性。

Objective

To compare the application of SonoVue and Sonazoid in the localization of sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) in early breast cancer patients.

Methods

A total of 204 patients with T1-2 breast cancer diagnosed at Peking University Third Hospital from January 1, 2018 to January 30, 2020 were included. All patients underwent axillary lymph node dissection or sentinel lymph node biopsy to obtain the pathological results, and all patients underwent contrast-enhanced ultrasound examination before operation. According to the type of contrast agent used, the patients were divided into either a SonoVue group (135 cases, including 1 male case) or a Sonazoid group (69 cases). The number and time of enhancement of SLN in the two groups were observed, and the two contrast agents were then compared with methylene blue staining.

Results

Among the 135 patients in the SonoVue group, 210 SLNs were detected by CEUS and 297 by methylene blue staining, and the difference was statistically significant (t=6.964, P=0.000); among 69 patients in the Sonazoid group, 102 SLNs were detected by CEUS and 139 by methylene blue staining, and the difference was also statistically significant (t=3.763, P=0.000). Among the 135 patients in the SonoVue group, 1 failed in angiography localization, and 4 failed in methylene blue staining localization; all the 68 patients in the Sonazoid group all succeeded in localization, but 3 cases failed in methylene blue staining localization, with no significant difference (P=0.370, 0.244).The success rate of enhancement between in the SonoVue and Sonazoid groups was 99.3% vs 100%, and the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05).There was no SLN enhancement in the SonoVue group at 60 and 120 min after injection of the contrast medium. The blue stained lymph nodes in the Sonazoid group had continued enhancement in saline.

Conclusion

The diagnostic value of Sonazoid in sentinel lymph nodes in early breast cancer patients is not lower than that of SonoVue,and its ability of continuous enhancement of SLN is expected to be used for intraoperative confirmation of the accuracy and completeness of SLN removal.

图1 前哨淋巴结的灰阶超声与Sonazoid超声造影图像。左图灰阶超声淋巴结显示不满意;右图为Sonazoid超声造影可清晰显示前哨淋巴结及引流淋巴管走行
图2 术前Sonazoid超声造影定位的前哨淋巴结切除术后大体标本肉眼观及置于生理盐水中的超声造影图像。图a示术前超声造影显影的前哨淋巴结与术中蓝染淋巴结相符(箭头所示为引流蓝染的小段淋巴管及淋巴结),周围为淋巴结周围少量脂肪组织;图b为已切除的前哨淋巴结置于生理盐水中,Sonazoid超声造影可清晰显示淋巴结及引流的小段淋巴管(箭头所示),周围脂肪组织未见造影剂显影
1
Kuwajerwala NK, Feczko C, Dekhne N, et al. Comparison of lymphedema in patients with axillary lymph node dissections to those with sentinel lymph node biopsy followed by immediate and delayed ALND[J]. Am J Clin Oncol, 2013, 36(1): 20-23.
2
王俊力, 蒋宇, 郑齐超. 超声造影诊断乳腺癌前哨淋巴结的Meta分析[J]. 湖北科技学院学报(医学版), 2019, 33(1): 19-22, 封2.
3
Zhai HY, Liang P, Yu J, et al. Comparison of Sonazoid and SonoVue in the diagnosis of focal liver lesions: a preliminary study[J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2019, 38(9): 2417-2425.
4
van la Parra RFD, Peer PGM, Ernst MF, et al. Meta-analysis of predictive factors for non-sentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients with a positive SLN[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2011, 37(4): 290-299.
5
Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Viale G, et al. A randomized comparison of sentinel-node biopsy with routine axillary dissection in breast cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2003, 349(6): 546-553.
6
梁舒媛, 罗渝昆, 费翔, 等. 高帧频超声造影在鉴别浅表淋巴结性质中的应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2020, 17(9): 841-847.
7
Nielsen Moody A, Bull J, Culpan AM, et al. Preoperative sentinel lymph node identification, biopsy and localisation using contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in patients with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Clin Radiol, 2017, 72(11): 959-971.
8
康莉, 吕庆, 孙卫健, 等. 超声造影和美蓝染色法定位乳腺癌前哨淋巴结[J]. 中国中西医结合影像学杂志, 2013, 11(5): 555-556.
9
Omata M, Cheng AL, Kokudo N, et al. Asia-Pacific clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: a 2017 update[J]. Hepatol Int, 2017,11(4): 317-370.
10
郭辉, 李安华, 刘隆忠, 等. 高频条件下(7MHz)SonoVue与Sonazoid剂量变化对兔肝造影效能的比较[J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2011, 8(3): 482-489.
11
何蒙娜, 姜玉新, 吕珂. 超声造影剂Sonazoid与SonoVue的物理特征及临床特点比较[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2015, 31(2): 306-309.
12
Yanagisawa K, Moriyasu F, Miyahara T, et al. Phagocytosis of ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles by Kupffer cells[J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2007, 33(2): 318-325.
13
Machado P, Stanczak M, Liu JB, et al. Subdermal ultrasound contrast agent injection for sentinel lymph node identification: an analysis of safety and contrast agent dose in healthy volunteers[J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2018, 37(7): 1611-1620.
14
Xie F, Zhang D, Cheng L, et al. Intradermal microbubbles and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a feasible approach for sentinel lymph node identification in early-stage breast cancer[J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2015, 13: 319.
[1] 章建全, 程杰, 陈红琼, 闫磊. 采用ACR-TIRADS评估甲状腺消融区的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 966-971.
[2] 罗辉, 方晔. 品管圈在提高甲状腺结节细针穿刺检出率中的应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 972-977.
[3] 杨忠, 时敬业, 邓学东, 姜纬, 殷林亮, 潘琦, 梁泓, 马建芳, 王珍奇, 张俊, 董姗姗. 产前超声在胎儿22q11.2 微缺失综合征中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 852-858.
[4] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[5] 宋勇, 李东炫, 王翔, 李锐. 基于数据挖掘法分析3 种超声造影剂不良反应信号[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 890-898.
[6] 史学兵, 谢迎东, 谢霓, 徐超丽, 杨斌, 孙帼. 声辐射力弹性成像对不可切除肝细胞癌门静脉癌栓患者放射治疗效果的评价[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 778-784.
[7] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[8] 洪玮, 叶细容, 刘枝红, 杨银凤, 吕志红. 超声影像组学联合临床病理特征预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗完全病理缓解的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 571-579.
[9] 刘伟, 牛云峰, 安杰. LINC01232 通过miR-516a-5p/BCL9 轴促进三阴性乳腺癌的恶性进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 330-338.
[10] 陈意志. 核磁共振钆造影剂导致的肾源性系统性纤维化[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 358-358.
[11] 张琛, 秦鸣, 董娟, 陈玉龙. 超声检查对儿童肠扭转缺血性改变的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 565-568.
[12] 刘琦, 王守凯, 王帅, 苏雨晴, 马壮, 陈海军, 司丕蕾. 乳腺癌肿瘤内微生物组的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 841-845.
[13] 王誉英, 刘世伟, 王睿, 曾娅玲, 涂禧慧, 张蒲蓉. 老年乳腺癌新辅助治疗病理完全缓解的预测因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 641-646.
[14] 王帅, 张志远, 苏雨晴, 李雯雯, 王守凯, 刘琦, 李文涛. 孟德尔随机化及其在乳腺癌研究中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 671-676.
[15] 崔军威, 蔡华丽, 胡艺冰, 胡慧. 亚甲蓝联合金属定位夹及定位钩针标记在乳腺癌辅助化疗后评估腋窝转移淋巴结的临床应用价值探究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 625-632.
阅读次数
全文


摘要