切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (09) : 847 -853. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2021.09.006

妇产科超声影像学

二维超声联合实时剪切波弹性成像评估腹直肌分离
钟华1, 巫燕玲1, 陈英1, 周玉婷1, 曾梅青1, 骆婕1, 杨焰1,()   
  1. 1. 510080 广州,广东药科大学附属第一医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-27 出版日期:2021-09-01
  • 通信作者: 杨焰
  • 基金资助:
    广东省中医药管理局基金(20212109); 广东省医学科研基金(A20180560)

Evaluation of diastasis recti abdominis by two-dimensional ultrasound and shear wave elastography

Hua Zhong1, Yanling Wu1, Ying Chen1, Yuting Zhou1, Meiqing Zeng1, Jie Luo1, Yan Yang1,()   

  1. 1. Ultrasonic Diagnosis Department, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou 510080, China
  • Received:2020-03-27 Published:2021-09-01
  • Corresponding author: Yan Yang
  • About author:
    Zhong Hua,Wu Yanling,Chen Ying,et al.Evaluation of diastasis recti abdominis by two-dimensional ultrasound and shear wave elastography[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition),2021,18(09):847-853.
引用本文:

钟华, 巫燕玲, 陈英, 周玉婷, 曾梅青, 骆婕, 杨焰. 二维超声联合实时剪切波弹性成像评估腹直肌分离[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2021, 18(09): 847-853.

Hua Zhong, Yanling Wu, Ying Chen, Yuting Zhou, Meiqing Zeng, Jie Luo, Yan Yang. Evaluation of diastasis recti abdominis by two-dimensional ultrasound and shear wave elastography[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2021, 18(09): 847-853.

目的

探讨二维超声测量腹直肌间距(IRD)联合实时剪切波弹性成像(SWE)定量评估腹直肌弹性及其对腹直肌分离的评估价值。

方法

选取2019年3月至12月在广东药科大学附属第一医院进行产前检查并足月分娩的初产妇36人作为研究组,同时院内招募未育女性36人作为对照组。应用二维超声获取脐水平、脐上5 cm水平、脐下5 cm水平的IRD,应用SWE定量评估同一水平双侧腹直肌杨氏模量[平均值(Emean)、最大值(Emax)、最小值(Emin)]。对照组由3位超声检查工作年限分别为<10年、10~20年、>20年的医师完成,采用单因素方差分析比较不同工作年限超声医师获取IRD及SWE参数的差异。研究组于妊娠晚期及产后6~8周分别进行不同水平IRD测量及SWE评估,采用两独立样本t检验比较妊娠晚期及产后6~8周两者的差异。

结果

对照组中3位超声检查工作年限为<10年、10~20年及>20年的医师获取脐水平、脐上5 cm水平、脐下5 cm水平IRD及SWE参数比较,差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05);研究组IRD测值比较,妊娠晚期及产后IRD测量显示IRD0>IRD+5>IRD-5,妊娠晚期测量IRD0、IRD+5、IRD-5分别为(3.00±0.53)cm、(2.87±0.57)cm、(2.53±0.33)cm,产后6~8周测量IRD0、IRD+5、IRD-5分别为(2.39±0.54)cm、(2.09±0.31)cm、(1.96±0.25)cm,产后6~8周不同脐水平IRD测值均小于妊娠晚期相应水平IRD,差异均具有统计学意义(t=2.965、3.791、4.226,P均<0.001);研究组腹直肌SWE参数均值比较,左右双侧腹直肌脐水平、脐上5 cm及脐下5 cm的腹直肌SWE参数(Emean、Emax、Emin)比较,产后SWE参数均小于妊娠晚期,差异均具有统计学意义(P均<0.001)。

结论

二维超声测量腹直肌间距联合SWE评估腹直肌弹性,可提供腹直肌分离的多维度科学证据,其操作简单、便捷,可能成为妊娠晚期及产后早期综合评估腹直肌分离程度及评价腹直肌分离临床疗效的常规手段。

Objective

To evaluate the value of measurement of inter-rectus distance (IRD) by two-dimensional ultrasound and shear wave elastography (SWE) in quantitative evaluation of rectus abdominis elasticity in the diastasis recti abdominis.

Methods

Thirty-six parturients who underwent prenatal examination and full-term delivery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University from March to December 2019 were selected as a study group, and 36 infertile women were recruited as a control group. Two-dimensional ultrasound was used to obtain IRD at the umbilical level, 5 cm above the umbilical level, and 5 cm below the umbilical level. SWE was used to quantitatively evaluate Young's modulus of bilateral rectus abdominis at the same levels [average (Emean), maximum (Emax), and minimum (Emin)]. The control group was examined by three physicians who had experience of<10 years, 10~20 years, and>20 years, respectively. One-way ANOVA was used to analyze the differences of IRD and SWE parameters obtained by ultrasound doctors with different working years. In the study group, different levels of IRD and SWE were measured and evaluated in the third trimester and 6-8 weeks postpartum, and two independent samples t-test were used for statistical analysis to compare their differences in the third trimester and 6-8 weeks postpartum.

Results

In the control group, there was no significant difference in IRD or SWE parameters at the umbilical level, 5 cm above the umbilical level, and 5 cm below the umbilical level among the three doctors whose had experience of<10 years, 10~20 years, and>20 years (P>0.05). Measurement of late pregnancy and postpartum IRD in the study group showed the following: IRD0>IRD+5>IRD-5, IRD0 (3.00±0.53) cm, IRD+5 (2.87±0.57) cm, and IRD-5 (2.53±0.33) cm at late pregnancy; and IRD0 (2.39±0.54) cm, IRD+5 (2.09±0.31) cm, and IRD-5 (1.96±0.25) cm at 6-8 weeks postpartum. The results showed that the measured values of IRD at different umbilical levels at 6-8 weeks postpartum were significantly lower than those at late pregnancy (t=2.965, 3.791, and 4.226, respectively; P<0.001). Comparison of the mean values of SWE parameters of rectus abdominis muscle in the study group showed that the SWE parameters (Emean, Emax, and Emin) of the left and right bilateral rectus abdominis at late pregnancy were significantly lower than those at 6-8 weeks postpartum (P<0.001).

Conclusion

Two-dimensional ultrasonic measurement of the distance between the rectus abdominis and real-time SWE can provide multi-dimensional scientific evidence for diastasis recti abdominis. Two-dimensional ultrasound combined with real-time SWE is simple and convenient to operate, and may become a routine method for comprehensive evaluation of the degree of abdominis separation and the clinical effect of abdominis separation in the late pregnancy and early postpartum.

图1 22岁未育女性,脐上5 cm水平双侧腹直肌间距为0 cm
图2 35岁初产妇产后43 d,脐上5 cm水平双侧腹直肌间距为2.3 cm
图3 22岁未育女性,脐上5 cm水平左侧腹直肌剪切波弹性成像(SWE)定量测量,Emean=7.38 kPa,Emax=13.66 kPa,Emin=2.70 kPa(图a);右侧腹直肌SWE定量测量,Emean=8.28 kPa,Emax=13.9 kPa,Emin=4.0 kPa(图b)
图4 28岁初产妇妊娠37+3周,脐上5 cm水平左侧腹直肌剪切波弹性成像(SWE)参数:Emean=15.78 kPa,Emax=31.39 kPa,Emin=7.47 kPa(图a);右侧腹直肌SWE参数:Emean=18.82 kPa,Emax=42.66 kPa,Emin=4.32 kPa(图b)
表1 不同工作年限超声医师测量未育组女性腹直肌间距的差异(cm,
xˉ
±s)
表2 不同工作年限超声医师测量未育组女性不同脐水平双侧腹直肌SWE参数的差异(kPa,
xˉ
±s)
表3 妊娠晚期及产后6~8周初产妇腹直肌间距的差异
(cm,xˉ±s)
表4 妊娠晚期及产后6~8周初产妇不同脐水平双侧腹直肌SWE参数的差异(kPa,
xˉ
±s)
1
Mota P, Pascoal AG, Carita AI, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of diastasis recti abdominis from late pregnancy to 6 months postpartum,and relationship with lumbo-pelvic pain [J]. Man Ther, 2015, 20(1): 200-205.
2
Sperstad JB, Tennfjord MK, Hilde G, et al. Diastasis recti abdominis during pregnancy and 12 months after childbirth: prevalence, risk factors and report of lumbopelvic pain [J]. Br J Sports Med, 2016, 50(17): 1092-1096.
3
Keshwani N, Mathur S, McLean L. Validity of inter-rectus distance measurement in postpartum women using extended field-of-view ultrasound imaging techniques [J]. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 2015, 45(10): 808-813.
4
Michalska A, Rokita W, Wolder D, et al. Diastasis recti abdominis—a review of treatment methods [J]. Ginekol Pol, 2018, 89(2): 97-101.
5
Sozer SO, Agullo FJ. Triple plication in miniabdominoplasty [J]. Aesthetic Plast Surg, 2006, 30(3): 263-268.
6
Villegas FJ. A novel approach to abdominoplasty: TULUA modifications (transverse plication, no undermining, full liposuction, neoumbilicoplasty, and low transverse abdominal scar) [J]. Aesthetic Plast Surg, 2014, 38(3): 511-520.
7
Gama LJM, Barbosa MVJ, Czapkowski A, et al. Single-layer plication for repair of diastasis recti: the most rapid and efficient technique [J]. Aesthet Surg J, 2017, 37(6): 698-705.
8
Keshwani N, McLean L. Ultrasound imaging in postpartum women with diastasis recti:in trarater between-session reliablity [J]. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 2015, 45(9): 713-718.
9
Keshwani N, Mathur S, McLean L. Relationship between interrectus distance and symptom severity in women with diastasis recti in the early post partum period [J]. Phys Ther, 2018, 98(3): 182-190.
10
王影, 张洁, 冯艳霞, 等. 电刺激治疗产后腹直肌分离的效果观察 [J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2017, 13 (2): 218-221.
11
张荣, 卢洁, 林萍. 电刺激联合核心肌群训练治疗产后腹直肌分离的效果观察 [J]. 临床合理用药, 2018, 12(34): 157-158.
12
Mota P, Pascoal AG, Sancho F, et al. Testeretest and intrarater reliability of 2-dimensional ultrasound measurements of distance between rectus abdominis in women [J]. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 2012, 42(11): 940-946.
13
Taljanovic MS, Gimber LH, Becker GW, et al. Shear-wave elastography: basic physics and musculoskeletal applications [J]. Radiographics, 2017, 37(3): 855-870.
14
Barr RG. Shear wave liver elastography [J]. Abdom Radiol (NY), 2018, 43(4): 800-807.
15
乔晓慧, 邢晋放. 剪切波超声弹性成像的原理及临床应用现状 [J]. 中国介入影像与治疗学, 2015, 12(8): 512-515.
16
吴若愚, 朱新建, 陆彦邑, 等. 基于动态孔径控制的剪切波传播速度检测方法 [J]. 北京生物医学工程, 2016, 35(5): 476-482.
17
Moraes PHM, Sigrist R, Takahashi MS, et al. Ultrasound elastography in the evaluation of thyroid nodules: evolution of a promising diagnostic tool for predicting the risk of malignancy [J]. Radiol Bras, 2019, 52(4): 247-253.
18
李文学, 朱家安. 超声弹性成像在肌肉骨骼中的应用 [J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2015, 12(4): 263-265.
[1] 王亚红, 蔡胜, 葛志通, 杨筱, 李建初. 颅骨骨膜窦的超声表现一例[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(11): 1089-1091.
[2] 李晓妮, 卫青, 孟庆龙, 牛丽莉, 田月, 吴伟春, 朱振辉, 王浩. 超声心动图在孤立性左心室心尖发育不良疾病中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 937-942.
[3] 陈慧, 姚静, 张宁, 刘磊, 马秀玲, 王小贤, 方爱娟, 管静静. 超声心动图在多发性骨髓瘤心脏淀粉样变中的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 943-949.
[4] 戴飞, 赵博文, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 陈冉, 田园诗, 狄敏. 胎儿心脏超声定量多参数对主动脉缩窄胎儿心脏结构及功能的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 950-958.
[5] 章建全, 程杰, 陈红琼, 闫磊. 采用ACR-TIRADS评估甲状腺消融区的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 966-971.
[6] 罗辉, 方晔. 品管圈在提高甲状腺结节细针穿刺检出率中的应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 972-977.
[7] 杜祖升, 赵博文, 张帧, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 陈冉, 毛彦恺. 应用二维斑点追踪成像技术评估孕周及心尖方向对中晚孕期正常胎儿左心房应变的影响[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 843-851.
[8] 杨忠, 时敬业, 邓学东, 姜纬, 殷林亮, 潘琦, 梁泓, 马建芳, 王珍奇, 张俊, 董姗姗. 产前超声在胎儿22q11.2 微缺失综合征中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 852-858.
[9] 包艳娟, 杨小红, 张涛, 赵胜, 张莉. 阴道斜隔综合征的超声诊断与临床分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 859-864.
[10] 汪洪斌, 张红霞, 何文, 杜丽娟, 程令刚, 张雨康, 张萌. 低级别阑尾黏液性肿瘤与阑尾黏液腺癌超声及超声造影特征分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 865-871.
[11] 农云洁, 黄小桂, 黄裕兰, 农恒荣. 超声在多重肺部感染诊断中的临床应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 872-876.
[12] 刘思锐, 赵辰阳, 张睿, 张一休, 杨萌. 多普勒超声对孕鼠子宫动脉不同节段血流动力学参数的评估[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 877-883.
[13] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[14] 宋勇, 李东炫, 王翔, 李锐. 基于数据挖掘法分析3 种超声造影剂不良反应信号[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 890-898.
[15] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
阅读次数
全文


摘要