切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (09) : 847 -853. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2021.09.006

妇产科超声影像学

二维超声联合实时剪切波弹性成像评估腹直肌分离
钟华1, 巫燕玲1, 陈英1, 周玉婷1, 曾梅青1, 骆婕1, 杨焰1,()   
  1. 1. 510080 广州,广东药科大学附属第一医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-27 出版日期:2021-09-01
  • 通信作者: 杨焰
  • 基金资助:
    广东省中医药管理局基金(20212109); 广东省医学科研基金(A20180560)

Evaluation of diastasis recti abdominis by two-dimensional ultrasound and shear wave elastography

Hua Zhong1, Yanling Wu1, Ying Chen1, Yuting Zhou1, Meiqing Zeng1, Jie Luo1, Yan Yang1,()   

  1. 1. Ultrasonic Diagnosis Department, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou 510080, China
  • Received:2020-03-27 Published:2021-09-01
  • Corresponding author: Yan Yang
  • About author:
    Zhong Hua,Wu Yanling,Chen Ying,et al.Evaluation of diastasis recti abdominis by two-dimensional ultrasound and shear wave elastography[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition),2021,18(09):847-853.
引用本文:

钟华, 巫燕玲, 陈英, 周玉婷, 曾梅青, 骆婕, 杨焰. 二维超声联合实时剪切波弹性成像评估腹直肌分离[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2021, 18(09): 847-853.

Hua Zhong, Yanling Wu, Ying Chen, Yuting Zhou, Meiqing Zeng, Jie Luo, Yan Yang. Evaluation of diastasis recti abdominis by two-dimensional ultrasound and shear wave elastography[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2021, 18(09): 847-853.

目的

探讨二维超声测量腹直肌间距(IRD)联合实时剪切波弹性成像(SWE)定量评估腹直肌弹性及其对腹直肌分离的评估价值。

方法

选取2019年3月至12月在广东药科大学附属第一医院进行产前检查并足月分娩的初产妇36人作为研究组,同时院内招募未育女性36人作为对照组。应用二维超声获取脐水平、脐上5 cm水平、脐下5 cm水平的IRD,应用SWE定量评估同一水平双侧腹直肌杨氏模量[平均值(Emean)、最大值(Emax)、最小值(Emin)]。对照组由3位超声检查工作年限分别为<10年、10~20年、>20年的医师完成,采用单因素方差分析比较不同工作年限超声医师获取IRD及SWE参数的差异。研究组于妊娠晚期及产后6~8周分别进行不同水平IRD测量及SWE评估,采用两独立样本t检验比较妊娠晚期及产后6~8周两者的差异。

结果

对照组中3位超声检查工作年限为<10年、10~20年及>20年的医师获取脐水平、脐上5 cm水平、脐下5 cm水平IRD及SWE参数比较,差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05);研究组IRD测值比较,妊娠晚期及产后IRD测量显示IRD0>IRD+5>IRD-5,妊娠晚期测量IRD0、IRD+5、IRD-5分别为(3.00±0.53)cm、(2.87±0.57)cm、(2.53±0.33)cm,产后6~8周测量IRD0、IRD+5、IRD-5分别为(2.39±0.54)cm、(2.09±0.31)cm、(1.96±0.25)cm,产后6~8周不同脐水平IRD测值均小于妊娠晚期相应水平IRD,差异均具有统计学意义(t=2.965、3.791、4.226,P均<0.001);研究组腹直肌SWE参数均值比较,左右双侧腹直肌脐水平、脐上5 cm及脐下5 cm的腹直肌SWE参数(Emean、Emax、Emin)比较,产后SWE参数均小于妊娠晚期,差异均具有统计学意义(P均<0.001)。

结论

二维超声测量腹直肌间距联合SWE评估腹直肌弹性,可提供腹直肌分离的多维度科学证据,其操作简单、便捷,可能成为妊娠晚期及产后早期综合评估腹直肌分离程度及评价腹直肌分离临床疗效的常规手段。

Objective

To evaluate the value of measurement of inter-rectus distance (IRD) by two-dimensional ultrasound and shear wave elastography (SWE) in quantitative evaluation of rectus abdominis elasticity in the diastasis recti abdominis.

Methods

Thirty-six parturients who underwent prenatal examination and full-term delivery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University from March to December 2019 were selected as a study group, and 36 infertile women were recruited as a control group. Two-dimensional ultrasound was used to obtain IRD at the umbilical level, 5 cm above the umbilical level, and 5 cm below the umbilical level. SWE was used to quantitatively evaluate Young's modulus of bilateral rectus abdominis at the same levels [average (Emean), maximum (Emax), and minimum (Emin)]. The control group was examined by three physicians who had experience of<10 years, 10~20 years, and>20 years, respectively. One-way ANOVA was used to analyze the differences of IRD and SWE parameters obtained by ultrasound doctors with different working years. In the study group, different levels of IRD and SWE were measured and evaluated in the third trimester and 6-8 weeks postpartum, and two independent samples t-test were used for statistical analysis to compare their differences in the third trimester and 6-8 weeks postpartum.

Results

In the control group, there was no significant difference in IRD or SWE parameters at the umbilical level, 5 cm above the umbilical level, and 5 cm below the umbilical level among the three doctors whose had experience of<10 years, 10~20 years, and>20 years (P>0.05). Measurement of late pregnancy and postpartum IRD in the study group showed the following: IRD0>IRD+5>IRD-5, IRD0 (3.00±0.53) cm, IRD+5 (2.87±0.57) cm, and IRD-5 (2.53±0.33) cm at late pregnancy; and IRD0 (2.39±0.54) cm, IRD+5 (2.09±0.31) cm, and IRD-5 (1.96±0.25) cm at 6-8 weeks postpartum. The results showed that the measured values of IRD at different umbilical levels at 6-8 weeks postpartum were significantly lower than those at late pregnancy (t=2.965, 3.791, and 4.226, respectively; P<0.001). Comparison of the mean values of SWE parameters of rectus abdominis muscle in the study group showed that the SWE parameters (Emean, Emax, and Emin) of the left and right bilateral rectus abdominis at late pregnancy were significantly lower than those at 6-8 weeks postpartum (P<0.001).

Conclusion

Two-dimensional ultrasonic measurement of the distance between the rectus abdominis and real-time SWE can provide multi-dimensional scientific evidence for diastasis recti abdominis. Two-dimensional ultrasound combined with real-time SWE is simple and convenient to operate, and may become a routine method for comprehensive evaluation of the degree of abdominis separation and the clinical effect of abdominis separation in the late pregnancy and early postpartum.

图1 22岁未育女性,脐上5 cm水平双侧腹直肌间距为0 cm
图2 35岁初产妇产后43 d,脐上5 cm水平双侧腹直肌间距为2.3 cm
图3 22岁未育女性,脐上5 cm水平左侧腹直肌剪切波弹性成像(SWE)定量测量,Emean=7.38 kPa,Emax=13.66 kPa,Emin=2.70 kPa(图a);右侧腹直肌SWE定量测量,Emean=8.28 kPa,Emax=13.9 kPa,Emin=4.0 kPa(图b)
图4 28岁初产妇妊娠37+3周,脐上5 cm水平左侧腹直肌剪切波弹性成像(SWE)参数:Emean=15.78 kPa,Emax=31.39 kPa,Emin=7.47 kPa(图a);右侧腹直肌SWE参数:Emean=18.82 kPa,Emax=42.66 kPa,Emin=4.32 kPa(图b)
表1 不同工作年限超声医师测量未育组女性腹直肌间距的差异(cm,
xˉ
±s)
表2 不同工作年限超声医师测量未育组女性不同脐水平双侧腹直肌SWE参数的差异(kPa,
xˉ
±s)
表3 妊娠晚期及产后6~8周初产妇腹直肌间距的差异
(cm,xˉ±s)
表4 妊娠晚期及产后6~8周初产妇不同脐水平双侧腹直肌SWE参数的差异(kPa,
xˉ
±s)
1
Mota P, Pascoal AG, Carita AI, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of diastasis recti abdominis from late pregnancy to 6 months postpartum,and relationship with lumbo-pelvic pain [J]. Man Ther, 2015, 20(1): 200-205.
2
Sperstad JB, Tennfjord MK, Hilde G, et al. Diastasis recti abdominis during pregnancy and 12 months after childbirth: prevalence, risk factors and report of lumbopelvic pain [J]. Br J Sports Med, 2016, 50(17): 1092-1096.
3
Keshwani N, Mathur S, McLean L. Validity of inter-rectus distance measurement in postpartum women using extended field-of-view ultrasound imaging techniques [J]. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 2015, 45(10): 808-813.
4
Michalska A, Rokita W, Wolder D, et al. Diastasis recti abdominis—a review of treatment methods [J]. Ginekol Pol, 2018, 89(2): 97-101.
5
Sozer SO, Agullo FJ. Triple plication in miniabdominoplasty [J]. Aesthetic Plast Surg, 2006, 30(3): 263-268.
6
Villegas FJ. A novel approach to abdominoplasty: TULUA modifications (transverse plication, no undermining, full liposuction, neoumbilicoplasty, and low transverse abdominal scar) [J]. Aesthetic Plast Surg, 2014, 38(3): 511-520.
7
Gama LJM, Barbosa MVJ, Czapkowski A, et al. Single-layer plication for repair of diastasis recti: the most rapid and efficient technique [J]. Aesthet Surg J, 2017, 37(6): 698-705.
8
Keshwani N, McLean L. Ultrasound imaging in postpartum women with diastasis recti:in trarater between-session reliablity [J]. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 2015, 45(9): 713-718.
9
Keshwani N, Mathur S, McLean L. Relationship between interrectus distance and symptom severity in women with diastasis recti in the early post partum period [J]. Phys Ther, 2018, 98(3): 182-190.
10
王影, 张洁, 冯艳霞, 等. 电刺激治疗产后腹直肌分离的效果观察 [J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2017, 13 (2): 218-221.
11
张荣, 卢洁, 林萍. 电刺激联合核心肌群训练治疗产后腹直肌分离的效果观察 [J]. 临床合理用药, 2018, 12(34): 157-158.
12
Mota P, Pascoal AG, Sancho F, et al. Testeretest and intrarater reliability of 2-dimensional ultrasound measurements of distance between rectus abdominis in women [J]. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 2012, 42(11): 940-946.
13
Taljanovic MS, Gimber LH, Becker GW, et al. Shear-wave elastography: basic physics and musculoskeletal applications [J]. Radiographics, 2017, 37(3): 855-870.
14
Barr RG. Shear wave liver elastography [J]. Abdom Radiol (NY), 2018, 43(4): 800-807.
15
乔晓慧, 邢晋放. 剪切波超声弹性成像的原理及临床应用现状 [J]. 中国介入影像与治疗学, 2015, 12(8): 512-515.
16
吴若愚, 朱新建, 陆彦邑, 等. 基于动态孔径控制的剪切波传播速度检测方法 [J]. 北京生物医学工程, 2016, 35(5): 476-482.
17
Moraes PHM, Sigrist R, Takahashi MS, et al. Ultrasound elastography in the evaluation of thyroid nodules: evolution of a promising diagnostic tool for predicting the risk of malignancy [J]. Radiol Bras, 2019, 52(4): 247-253.
18
李文学, 朱家安. 超声弹性成像在肌肉骨骼中的应用 [J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2015, 12(4): 263-265.
[1] 张婉微, 秦芸芸, 蔡绮哲, 林明明, 田润雨, 金姗, 吕秀章. 心肌收缩早期延长对非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者冠状动脉严重狭窄的预测价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1016-1022.
[2] 任书堂, 刘晓程, 张亚东, 孙佳英, 陈萍, 周建华, 龙进, 黄云洲. 左心室辅助装置支持下单纯收缩期主动脉瓣反流的超声心动图特征[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1023-1028.
[3] 何金梅, 尹立雪, 谭静, 张文军, 王锐, 任梅, 廖明娇. 超声心肌做功技术对2型糖尿病患者潜在左心室心肌收缩功能损伤的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1029-1035.
[4] 薛艳玲, 马小静, 谢姝瑞, 何俊, 夏娟, 何亚峰. 左心声学造影在急性心肌梗死合并室间隔穿孔中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1036-1039.
[5] 吕琦, 惠品晶, 丁亚芳, 颜燕红. 颈动脉斑块易损性的超声造影评估及与缺血性卒中的相关性研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1040-1045.
[6] 魏淑婕, 惠品晶, 丁亚芳, 张白, 颜燕红, 周鹏, 黄亚波. 单侧颈内动脉闭塞患者行颞浅动脉-大脑中动脉搭桥术的脑血流动力学评估[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1046-1055.
[7] 武玺宁, 欧阳云淑, 张一休, 孟华, 徐钟慧, 张培培, 吕珂. 胎儿心脏超声检查在抗SSA/Ro-SSB/La抗体阳性妊娠管理中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1056-1060.
[8] 杨水华, 何桂丹, 覃桂灿, 梁蒙凤, 罗艳合, 李雪芹, 唐娟松. 胎儿孤立性完全型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图特征及高分辨率血流联合时间-空间相关成像的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1061-1067.
[9] 张璇, 马宇童, 苗玉倩, 张云, 吴士文, 党晓楚, 陈颖颖, 钟兆明, 王雪娟, 胡淼, 孙岩峰, 马秀珠, 吕发勤, 寇海燕. 超声对Duchenne肌营养不良儿童膈肌功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1068-1073.
[10] 张宝富, 俞劲, 叶菁菁, 俞建根, 马晓辉, 刘喜旺. 先天性原发隔异位型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图诊断[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1074-1080.
[11] 丁雷, 罗文, 杨晓, 庞丽娜, 张佩蒂, 刘海静, 袁佳妮, 刘瑾. 高帧频超声造影在评价C-TIRADS 4-5类甲状腺结节成像特征中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 887-894.
[12] 张茜, 陈佳慧, 高雪萌, 赵傲雪, 黄瑛. 基于高帧频超声造影的影像组学特征鉴别诊断甲状腺结节良恶性的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 895-903.
[13] 冯冰, 邹秋果, 梁振波, 卢艳明, 曾奕, 吴淑苗. 老年非特殊型浸润性乳腺癌超声征象与分子生物学指标的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 48-51.
[14] 赵文毅, 邹冰子, 蔡冠晖, 刘永志, 温红. 超声应变力弹性成像联合MRI-DWI靶向引导穿刺在前列腺病变诊断中的应用[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 988-994.
[15] 薛念余, 张盛敏, 吴凌恒, 沙蕾, 童揽月, 沈崔琴, 李朝军, 杜联芳. 研究血清胆红素对2型糖尿病患者心脏结构发生改变前心肌功能的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1004-1009.
阅读次数
全文


摘要