切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (09) : 875 -879. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2021.09.011

重症超声影像学

超声评估右心功能预测机械通气患者撤机效果
谈媛媛1, 丁振兴1, 张丹1, 俞凤1,()   
  1. 1. 230022 合肥,安徽医科大学第一附属医院急诊科
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-23 出版日期:2021-09-01
  • 通信作者: 俞凤

Right heart function measured by ultrasonography for predication of withdrawal result in patients on mechanical ventilation

Yuanyuan Tan1, Zhenxing Ding1, Dan Zhang1, Feng Yu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230022, China
  • Received:2020-11-23 Published:2021-09-01
  • Corresponding author: Feng Yu
引用本文:

谈媛媛, 丁振兴, 张丹, 俞凤. 超声评估右心功能预测机械通气患者撤机效果[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2021, 18(09): 875-879.

Yuanyuan Tan, Zhenxing Ding, Dan Zhang, Feng Yu. Right heart function measured by ultrasonography for predication of withdrawal result in patients on mechanical ventilation[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2021, 18(09): 875-879.

目的

探讨超声评估右心功能预测机械通气患者撤机的效果。

方法

选择2018年1月至2020年11月在安徽医科大学第一附属医院收治的机械通气患者,通过撤机筛查后采用T管模式进行自主呼吸试验的患者100例,观察其撤机效果,并采用超声检测撤机成功与撤机失败组患者的右心功能指标。采用t检验比较2组患者基本临床特征、生命体征及右心功能指标的差异,通过受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)评价各心功能指标对撤机结果的预测价值。

结果

本研究中撤机成功者78例,失败者22例,撤机成功率为78.0%(78/100)。2组患者撤机前各项指标比较,撤机失败组患者中心静脉压水平明显高于撤机成功组[(10.1±2.9)mmHg vs(7.3±2.8)mmHg;1 mmHg=0.133 kPa],差异具有统计学意义(t=7.871,P=0.002);性别、年龄、急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分系统Ⅱ评分、心率、呼吸频率、平均动脉压、动脉血氧分压/吸入氧浓度、乳酸浓度比较,差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。与撤机成功组比较,撤机失败组的三尖瓣环根部侧壁收缩期位移(TAPSE)、三尖瓣舒张早期血流峰速度/舒张晚期血流峰速度(E/A)均较低[(13.3±6.8)mm vs(25.2±6.4)mm;(1.0±0.4)vs(1.6±0.6)],右心室舒张末期面积/左心室舒张末期面积、呼气末下腔静脉内径则升高明显[(0.9±0.1)vs(0.5±0.2);(19.0±4.8)mm vs(14.3±4.5)mm],差异具有统计学意义(t=18.825、8.733,-9.221、-17.955,P=0.001、=0.024、<0.001、=0.001)。心脏超声检查各指标对患者撤机结果均有预测价值,其中TAPSE和三尖瓣E/A预测撤机结果的AUC较大(0.87和0.75)。

结论

机械通气患者的右心功能可预测撤机结果,并指导液体管理,可通过床旁自主呼吸试验前超声对其进行评估。

Objective

To assess the clinical value of right heart function measured by ultrasonography in predicting the withdrawal result in patients on mechanical ventilation.

Methods

One hundred patients on mechanical ventilation who were treated at the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from January 2018 to November 2020 were enrolled. T tube model was used to perform spontaneous breathing trial in these patients after machine withdrawal screening. The withdrawal result was observed, and ultrasonography was used to compare the right heart function indexes between withdrawal success and withdrawal failure groups. The area under the curve of each heart function index in predicting the withdrawal result was assessed.

Results

Of the 100 patients included, 78 had successful withdrawal and 22 had failed withdrawal, with a success rate of 78.0% (78/100). Before withdrawal, the central venous pressure was significantly higher in the failure group than in the success group [(10.1±2.9) mmHg vs (7.3±2.8) mmHg; t=7.871, P=0.002], while sex, age, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ score, heart rate, respiratory frequency, mean arterial pressure, central venous pressure, pressure of oxygen in arterial blood/fraction of inspired oxygen, and lactate concentration were comparable between the two groups (P>0.05). Compared with the successful withdrawal group, systolic displacement of the tricuspid annulus and the ratio of the blood flow peak velocity in the early diastole to the blood flow peak velocity in the late diastole were significantly lower [(13.3±6.8) mm vs (25.2±6.4) mm, t=18.825, P=0.001; (1.0±0.4) vs (1.6±0.6), t=8.733, P=0.024], and right ventricular end diastolic area/left ventricular end diastolic area ratio and end expiratory inferior vena cava diameter were significantly higher [(0.9±0.1) vs (0.5±0.2), t=-9.221, P<0.001; (19.0±4.8) mm vs (14.3±4.5) mm, t=-17.955, P=0.001 in the failure group. The cardiac ultrasound index TAPSE, mitral E/A, RVarea/LVarea, dIVC has predictive value for patient withdrawal results, with TAPSE (0.87) and mitral E/A (0.75) predicting large AUC of withdrawal results.

Conclusion

Right heart function assessed by ultrasonography can predict the withdrawal result and guide fluid management in patients on mechanical ventilation.

图1 超声检查机械通气患者三尖瓣环根部侧壁收缩期位移提示右心室收缩功能障碍
图2 超声检查机械通气患者聚焦于右心室的心尖四腔心切面
表1 2组机械通气患者基本临床特征及生命体征比较
表2 2组机械通气患者心脏超声检查指标比较(
xˉ
±s
表3 不同心脏超声检查指标对机械通气患者撤机结果的预测价值
1
Mayo P, Volpicelli G, Lerolle N, et al. Ultrasonography evaluation during the weaning process:the heart, the diaphragm, the pleura and the lung [J]. Intensive Care Med, 2016, 42(7): 1107-1117.
2
Béduneau G, Pham T, Schortgen F, et al. Epidemiology of weaning outcome according to a new definition. The WIND study [J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2016, 195(6): 772-783.
3
王小亭, 刘大为, 于凯江, 等. 中国重症超声专家共识 [J]. 临床荟萃, 2017, 55(5): 369-383.
4
Routsi C, Stanopoulos I, Kokkoris SA, et al. Weaning failure of cardiovascular origin: how to suspect, detect and treat a review of the literature [J]. Ann Intensive Care, 2019, 9(1): 6.
5
Roche-Campo F, Bedet A, Vivier EA, et al. Cardiac function during weaning failure:the role of diastolic dysfunction [J]. Ann Intensive Care, 2018, 8(1): 2.
6
Vieillard-Baron A, Mayo P. Lung ultrasonography and echocardiography in the intensive care unit:a combined and practical approach [J]. Minerva Anestesiol, 2018, 84(3): 398-408.
7
de Meirelles Almeida CA, Nedel WL, Morais VD, et al. Diastolic dysfunction as a predictor of weaning failure:a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. J Crit Care, 2016, 34: 135-141.
8
Liu J, Shen F, Teboul JL, et al. Cardiac dysfunction induced by weaning from mechanical ventilation:incidence, risk factors,and effects of fluid removal [J]. Critical Care, 2016, 20(1): 369.
9
Levitov A, Frankel HL, Blaivas MA, et al. Guidelines for the appropriate use of bedside general and cardiac ultrasonography in the evaluation of critically ill patients-part Ⅱ:cardiac ultrasonography [J]. Crit Care Med, 2016, 44(6): 1206-1227.
10
Chiumello D, Brochard L, Marini JJ, et al. Respiratory support in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome:an expert opinion [J]. Critical Care, 2017, 21(1): 240.
11
Venkatachalam S, Wu G, Ahmad M. Echocardiographic assessment of the right ventricle in the current era:application in clinical practice [J]. Echocardiography, 2017, 34(12): 1930-1947.
12
Thille AW, Boissier F, Ben Ghezala H, et al. Risk factors for and prediction by caregivers of extubation failure in ICU patients:a prospective study [J]. Crit Care Med, 2015, 43(3): 613-620.
13
Repesse X, Charron C, Vieillard-Baron A. Assessment of the effects of inspiratory load on right ventricular function [J]. Curr Opin Crit Care, 2016, 22(3): 254-259.
14
Pinsky MR. Cardiopulmonary interactions:physiologic basis and clinical applications [J]. Ann Am Thorac Soc, 2018, 15(1): S45-S48.
15
Repessé X, Vieillard-Baron A. Right heart function during acute respiratory distress syndrome [J]. Ann Transl Med, 2017, 5(14): 295.
[1] 王亚红, 蔡胜, 葛志通, 杨筱, 李建初. 颅骨骨膜窦的超声表现一例[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(11): 1089-1091.
[2] 李晓妮, 卫青, 孟庆龙, 牛丽莉, 田月, 吴伟春, 朱振辉, 王浩. 超声心动图在孤立性左心室心尖发育不良疾病中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 937-942.
[3] 陈慧, 姚静, 张宁, 刘磊, 马秀玲, 王小贤, 方爱娟, 管静静. 超声心动图在多发性骨髓瘤心脏淀粉样变中的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 943-949.
[4] 戴飞, 赵博文, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 陈冉, 田园诗, 狄敏. 胎儿心脏超声定量多参数对主动脉缩窄胎儿心脏结构及功能的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 950-958.
[5] 章建全, 程杰, 陈红琼, 闫磊. 采用ACR-TIRADS评估甲状腺消融区的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 966-971.
[6] 罗辉, 方晔. 品管圈在提高甲状腺结节细针穿刺检出率中的应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 972-977.
[7] 杨忠, 时敬业, 邓学东, 姜纬, 殷林亮, 潘琦, 梁泓, 马建芳, 王珍奇, 张俊, 董姗姗. 产前超声在胎儿22q11.2 微缺失综合征中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 852-858.
[8] 包艳娟, 杨小红, 张涛, 赵胜, 张莉. 阴道斜隔综合征的超声诊断与临床分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 859-864.
[9] 汪洪斌, 张红霞, 何文, 杜丽娟, 程令刚, 张雨康, 张萌. 低级别阑尾黏液性肿瘤与阑尾黏液腺癌超声及超声造影特征分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 865-871.
[10] 农云洁, 黄小桂, 黄裕兰, 农恒荣. 超声在多重肺部感染诊断中的临床应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 872-876.
[11] 刘思锐, 赵辰阳, 张睿, 张一休, 杨萌. 多普勒超声对孕鼠子宫动脉不同节段血流动力学参数的评估[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 877-883.
[12] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[13] 宋勇, 李东炫, 王翔, 李锐. 基于数据挖掘法分析3 种超声造影剂不良反应信号[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 890-898.
[14] 奚玲, 仝瀚文, 缪骥, 毛永欢, 沈晓菲, 杜峻峰, 刘晔. 基于肌少症构建的造口旁疝危险因素预测模型[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 48-51.
[15] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
阅读次数
全文


摘要