切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (03) : 262 -266. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2022.03.013

超声医学质量控制

孕期宫颈超声报告的质量现况分析
陈程1, 韦瑶1, 戴晴1, 朱庆莉1, 李建初1, 姜玉新1, 张青1,()   
  1. 1. 100730 中国医学科学院 北京协和医学院 北京协和医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-29 出版日期:2022-03-01
  • 通信作者: 张青
  • 基金资助:
    北京协和医学院2021年度校级本科教育教学改革立项(2021zlgc0129)

Quality analysis of cervical ultrasound reports for pregnant women

Cheng Chen1, Yao Wei1, Qing Dai1, Qingli Zhu1, Jianchu Li1, Yuxin Jiang1, Qing Zhang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
  • Received:2021-04-29 Published:2022-03-01
  • Corresponding author: Qing Zhang
引用本文:

陈程, 韦瑶, 戴晴, 朱庆莉, 李建初, 姜玉新, 张青. 孕期宫颈超声报告的质量现况分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(03): 262-266.

Cheng Chen, Yao Wei, Qing Dai, Qingli Zhu, Jianchu Li, Yuxin Jiang, Qing Zhang. Quality analysis of cervical ultrasound reports for pregnant women[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2022, 19(03): 262-266.

目的

评估不同年资以及是否有专业背景的超声医师孕期宫颈超声检查的报告质量。

方法

从超声医学影像工作站导出并选择2019年1月1日至12月31日北京协和医院经会阴与经阴道超声孕期检查宫颈的超声报告624份。检查医师分为第1年住院医师(G1组)、第2~3年住院医师(G2组)和专业医师(G3组)。参考加拿大妇产科医师协会母胎医学专业委员会指南,由2位工作经验>10年的超声医师对上述图文报告进行评估,分为符合、不符合,通过χ2检验或Fisher精确检验进行组间比较。

结果

满足入选标准与排除标准的624份宫颈超声检查报告中,经会阴超声检查507份(81.2%,507/624),经阴道超声检查117份(18.8%,117/624)。G1组、G2组、G3组检查医师人数分别为:16名、33名、13名。经会阴超声检查,G1组、G2组、G3组的总报告数分别为90份、326份、91份,其符合率分别为74.4%(67/90)、85.9%(280/326)、86.8%(79/91),G1与G2组、G1与G3组比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=6.678,P=0.010;χ2=4.438,P=0.035),G2与G3组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。经阴道超声检查,G1+G2组、G3组的总报告数分别为44份、73份,其符合率分别为75.0%(33/44)、91.8%(67/73),2组比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=6.225,P=0.013)。相同年资医师经会阴与经阴道宫颈超声检查的符合率之间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

经阴道超声宫颈检查专业组医师符合率较高,经会阴超声检查符合率随着年资增高而增高。病例积累和标准化专业培训是提高孕期宫颈超声检查的有效途径。

Objective

To analyze the quality of cervical ultrasound during pregnancy among ultrasound physicians with different working experience and professional training.

Methods

All 624 cervical ultrasound reports [transperineal ultrasound (TPU) and transvaginal ultrasound (TVU)] from January 1 to December 31, 2019 at Peking Union Medical College Hospital were derived from the ultrasound medical imaging workstation. The examiners were divided into first-year residents (G1), second- or third-year residents (G2), and professional doctors (G3). According to the guidelines published by the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada Maternal-Fetal Medicine Committee, the above reports were evaluated and classified as true or false by two ultrasound physicians with more than 10 years of experience. Chi-square test or Fisher's test was used to compare the difference between groups.

Results

A total of 624 cervical examinations were recruited, 507 (81.2%, 507/624) by TPU and 117 (18.8%, 117/624) by TVU. The number of physicians in G1, G2, and G3 was 16, 33, and 13, respectively. By TPU, the total number of reports in G1, G2, and G3 was 90, 326, and 91, and the accuracy was 74.4% (67/90), 85.9% (280/326), and 86.8% (79/91), respectively; the difference between G1 and G2 and between G1 and G3 was significant (χ2=6.678, P=0.010; χ2=4.438, P=0.035), but the difference between G2 and G3 was not significant (P>0.05). By TVU, the total number of reports in G1+G2 and G3 was 44 and 73, and the accuracy was 75.0% (33/44) and 91.8% (67/73), respectively; the difference was significant (χ2=6.225, P=0.013). The difference between TPU and TVU was not significant (P>0.05).

Conclusion

The accuracy of TVU among physicians in the professional group is higher, and the accuracy of TPU increases with the increase of seniority. Case accumulation and standardized professional training are effective ways to improve pregnant cervical ultrasonography.

图1 孕期宫颈超声检查。图a为经会阴超声检查,图b为经阴道超声检查
表1 相同年资医师经会阴与经阴道超声宫颈检查
1
Sotiriadis A, Papatheodorou S, Kavvadias A, et al. Transvaginal cervical length measurement for prediction of preterm birth in women with threatened preterm labor: a meta-analysis [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2010, 35(1): 54-64.
2
Kagan KO, Sonek J. How to measure cervical length [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2015, 45(3): 358-362.
3
Kagan KO, To M, Tsoi E, et al. Preterm birth: the value of sonographic measurement of cervical length [J]. BJOG, 2006, 113 Suppl 3: 52-56.
4
国家超声医学质量控制中心(筹), 中华医学会超声医学分会. 超声医学专业质量管理控制指标专家共识(2018年版) [J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2018, 27(11): 921-923.
5
Lim K, Butt K, Nevo O, et al. Guideline No. 401: sonographic cervical length in singleton pregnancies: techniques and clinical applications [J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2020, 42(11): 1394-1413. e1391.
6
Uquillas K, Fox N, Rebarber A, et al. A comparison of cervical length measurement techniques for the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth [J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2017, 30(1): 50-53.
7
Wulff C, Rode L, Rosthøj S, et al. Transvaginal sonographic cervical length in first and second trimesters in a low-risk population: a prospective study [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2018, 51(5): 604-613.
8
Feng Q, Duan H, Ju X, et al. Prediction of spontaneous preterm birth by cervical length in the first trimester of pregnancy: comparison of two measurement methods [J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2021. Online ahead of print.
9
常才, 戴晴, 谢晓燕. 妇产科超声学[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2020: 608-626.
10
Abuhamad A, Minton K, Benson CB, et al. Obstetric and gynecologic ultrasound curriculum and competency assessment in residency training programs: consensus report [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2018, 218(1): 29-67.
11
So S, Patel R, Orebaugh S. Ultrasound imaging in medical student education: impact on learning anatomy and physical diagnosis [J]. Anat Sci Educ, 2017, 10(2): 176-189.
[1] 王亚红, 蔡胜, 葛志通, 杨筱, 李建初. 颅骨骨膜窦的超声表现一例[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(11): 1089-1091.
[2] 李晓妮, 卫青, 孟庆龙, 牛丽莉, 田月, 吴伟春, 朱振辉, 王浩. 超声心动图在孤立性左心室心尖发育不良疾病中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 937-942.
[3] 陈慧, 姚静, 张宁, 刘磊, 马秀玲, 王小贤, 方爱娟, 管静静. 超声心动图在多发性骨髓瘤心脏淀粉样变中的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 943-949.
[4] 戴飞, 赵博文, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 陈冉, 田园诗, 狄敏. 胎儿心脏超声定量多参数对主动脉缩窄胎儿心脏结构及功能的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 950-958.
[5] 章建全, 程杰, 陈红琼, 闫磊. 采用ACR-TIRADS评估甲状腺消融区的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 966-971.
[6] 罗辉, 方晔. 品管圈在提高甲状腺结节细针穿刺检出率中的应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 972-977.
[7] 杜祖升, 赵博文, 张帧, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 陈冉, 毛彦恺. 应用二维斑点追踪成像技术评估孕周及心尖方向对中晚孕期正常胎儿左心房应变的影响[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 843-851.
[8] 杨忠, 时敬业, 邓学东, 姜纬, 殷林亮, 潘琦, 梁泓, 马建芳, 王珍奇, 张俊, 董姗姗. 产前超声在胎儿22q11.2 微缺失综合征中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 852-858.
[9] 包艳娟, 杨小红, 张涛, 赵胜, 张莉. 阴道斜隔综合征的超声诊断与临床分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 859-864.
[10] 汪洪斌, 张红霞, 何文, 杜丽娟, 程令刚, 张雨康, 张萌. 低级别阑尾黏液性肿瘤与阑尾黏液腺癌超声及超声造影特征分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 865-871.
[11] 农云洁, 黄小桂, 黄裕兰, 农恒荣. 超声在多重肺部感染诊断中的临床应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 872-876.
[12] 刘思锐, 赵辰阳, 张睿, 张一休, 杨萌. 多普勒超声对孕鼠子宫动脉不同节段血流动力学参数的评估[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 877-883.
[13] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[14] 宋勇, 李东炫, 王翔, 李锐. 基于数据挖掘法分析3 种超声造影剂不良反应信号[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 890-898.
[15] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
阅读次数
全文


摘要