切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (08) : 796 -800. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2022.08.012

所属专题: 妇产科超声影像学

妇产科超声影像学

产前超声在胎儿骶尾部畸胎瘤成熟性鉴别中的价值
张娟1, 吴青青1,(), 王莉1, 张铁娟1, 韩吉晶1   
  1. 1. 100026 首都医科大学附属北京妇产医院 北京妇幼保健院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2021-05-31 出版日期:2022-08-01
  • 通信作者: 吴青青

Value of prenatal ultrasound in differential diagnosis of mature and immature fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma

Juan Zhang1, Qingqing Wu1,(), Li Wang1, Tiejuan Zhang1, Jijing Han1   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing 100026, China
  • Received:2021-05-31 Published:2022-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Qingqing Wu
引用本文:

张娟, 吴青青, 王莉, 张铁娟, 韩吉晶. 产前超声在胎儿骶尾部畸胎瘤成熟性鉴别中的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(08): 796-800.

Juan Zhang, Qingqing Wu, Li Wang, Tiejuan Zhang, Jijing Han. Value of prenatal ultrasound in differential diagnosis of mature and immature fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2022, 19(08): 796-800.

目的

探讨不同病理类型胎儿骶尾部畸胎瘤(SCT)的临床及产前超声声像图特征,分析产前超声在胎儿SCT成熟性鉴别中的作用。

方法

回顾性分析2015年1月至2020年12月在首都医科大学附属北京妇产医院就诊的胎儿SCT病例34例,根据肿瘤不同病理类型将病例分为成熟型和未成熟型,分析不同病理类型组的母体年龄、孕周及肿瘤相关超声特征(生长方式、性质、血流情况)、合并症,并采用χ2检验、Fisher确切概率检验、t检验及Mann-Whitney U检验比较上述资料的组间差异。

结果

根据肿瘤的病理类型分为成熟型组23例和未成熟型组11例。在2组病例中,母体年龄、孕周、胎儿性别、肿瘤生长方式的组间差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。未成熟型组肿瘤体积明显大于成熟型组[16.19(8.47,34.03)cm3 vs 186.20(90.41,445.35)cm3],差异具有统计学意义(Z=-3.332,P=0.001);成熟型组肿瘤以囊性为主(56.5%,13/23),未成熟型组肿瘤均为囊实性(100%,11/11),差异具有统计学意义(P=0.002)。彩色多普勒超声显示成熟型组伴血流信号者有3例,未成熟组则有10例,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001)。对肿瘤周围组织以及胎儿其他器官系统扫查发现,成熟型组出现合并症者5例,未成熟型组为7例,组间差异具有统计学意义(P=0.026)。

结论

不同病理类型胎儿SCT的临床特征及产前超声表现不同,产前超声表现为囊实性肿瘤、体积较大、血流信号丰富、合并其他系统异常等是未成熟型SCT的重要鉴别征象,早期诊断可为后续产科管理提供诊疗依据。

Objective

To evaluate the clinical and ultrasonic features of fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma (SCT) of different histological types.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on a total of 34 patients with SCT that was diagnosed from January 2015 to December 2016 at Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University. These cases were divided into either a mature group or an immature group based on the histological type. Data (maternal age, gestational weeks, and tumorous sonographic features) were analyzed by the Fisher exact test, t-test, Chi-square, and Mann-Whitney U test.

Results

No statistical differences were observed in terms of maternal age, gestational week, fetal sex, and Altman's classification between the mature (n=23) and immature groups (n=11). Among all the ultrasonic features, mass volume of the immature group was significantly bigger than that of the mature group [16.19 (8.47, 34.03) cm3 vs 186.20 (90.41, 445.35) cm3, Z=-3.332, P=0.001]. The main manifestation of the mature group was cystic echo (56.5%, 13/23), while that of the immature group was cystic-solid echo (100%, 11/11); the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P=0.002). Color Doppler ultrasound showed that three cases in the mature group and ten cases in the immature group were detected with blood flow signal; the difference in the number of cases with blood flow signal was statistically significant between the two groups (P<0.001). Scanning of the tissues surrounding the mass and other fetal systems showed that five cases in the mature group and seven cases in the immature group suffered from complications; there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P=0.026).

Conclusion

The clinical features and prenatal ultrasonic images of fetal SCT vary with different pathological types. Cystic-solid echogenic masses, bigger mass volume, rich blood flow signals, and suffering from complications are important signs for the diagnosis of immature fetal SCT. Early diagnosis by using prenatal ultrasound can provide a good basis for perinatal management.

表1 不同病理类型骶尾部畸胎瘤胎儿孕妇一般临床资料的比较
图1 成熟型骶尾部畸胎瘤三维超声断层超声成像,肿瘤生长方式为Altman′s Ⅳ型
表2 骶尾部畸胎瘤不同病理类型组肿瘤参数及合并症的比较(例)
图2 未成熟型骶尾部畸胎瘤的超声表现。图a和图b分别为二维超声及彩色多普勒超声声像图,显示胎儿骶尾部外突的、血流信号较丰富的巨大肿物
1
Chen YH, Chang CH, Chen KC, et al. Malignant transformation of a well-organized sacrococcygeal fetiform teratoma in a newborn male [J]. J Formos Med Assoc, 2007, 106(5): 400-402.
2
Hu Q, Yan Y, Liao H, et al. Sacrococcygeal teratoma in one twin: a case report and literature review [J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2020, 20(1): 751.
3
Wohlmuth C, Bergh E, Bell C, et al. Clinical monitoring of sacrococcygeal teratoma [J]. Fetal Diagn Ther, 2019, 46(5): 333-340.
4
Penny SM. Sacrococcygeal teratoma: a literature review [J]. Radiol Technol, 2012, 84(1): 11-17.
5
Altman RP, Randolph JG, Lilly JR. Sacrococcygeal teratoma: American Academy of Pediatrics Surgical Section Survey-1973 [J]. J Pediatr Surg, 1974, 9: 389-398.
6
王琪, 卢朝祥, 陈晓峰, 等. 预测6月龄以下骶尾部畸胎瘤良恶性的列线图建立研究 [J]. 陕西医学杂志, 2020, 49(3): 313-316, 320.
7
Benachi A, Durin L, Vasseur Maurer S, et al. Prenatally diagnosed sacrococcygeal teratoma: a prognostic classification [J]. J Pediatr Surg, 2006, 41(9): 1517-1521.
8
Yoon HM, Byeon SJ, Hwang JY, et al. Sacrococcygeal teratomas in newborns: a comprehensive review for the radiologists [J]. Acta Radiol, 2018, 59(2): 236-246.
9
Fumino S, Tajiri T, Usui N, et al. Japanese clinical practice guidelines for sacrococcygeal teratoma, 2017 [J]. Pediatr Int, 2019, 61(7): 672-678.
10
Shue E, Bolouri M, Jelin EB, et al. Tumor metrics and morphology predict poor prognosis in prenatally diagnosed sacrococcygeal teratoma: a 25-year experience at a single institution [J]. J Pediatr Surg, 2013, 48: 1225-1231.
11
Coleman A, Kline-Fath B, Keswani S, et al. Prenatal solid tumor volume index: novel prenatal predictor of adverse outcome in sacrococcygeal teratoma [J]. J Surg Res, 2013, 184(1): 330-336.
12
Coleman A, Shaaban A, Keswani S, et al. Sacrococcygeal teratoma growth rate predicts adverse outcomes [J]. J Pediatr Surg, 2014, 49(6): 985-989.
13
Usui N, Kitano Y, Sago H, et al. Outcomes of prenatally diagnosed sacrococcygeal teratomas: the results of a Japanese nationwide survey [J]. J Pediatr Surg, 2012, 47(3): 441-447.
14
Mlčochová G, Kučerová L, Rousková B, et al. Sacrococcygeal teratoma [J]. Ceska Gynekol, 2019, 84(2): 140-144.
[1] 戴飞, 赵博文, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 陈冉, 田园诗, 狄敏. 胎儿心脏超声定量多参数对主动脉缩窄胎儿心脏结构及功能的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 950-958.
[2] 杜祖升, 赵博文, 张帧, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 陈冉, 毛彦恺. 应用二维斑点追踪成像技术评估孕周及心尖方向对中晚孕期正常胎儿左心房应变的影响[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 843-851.
[3] 杨忠, 时敬业, 邓学东, 姜纬, 殷林亮, 潘琦, 梁泓, 马建芳, 王珍奇, 张俊, 董姗姗. 产前超声在胎儿22q11.2 微缺失综合征中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 852-858.
[4] 张商迪, 赵博文, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 陈冉, 毛彦恺, 陈阳, 袁华, 陈燕. 中晚孕期胎儿心房内径定量评估心房比例失调胎儿心脏畸形的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 785-793.
[5] 王秋莲, 张莹, 李春敏, 徐树明, 张玉奇. 胎儿主动脉弓部梗阻伴发复杂心内畸形的产前超声诊断及漏误诊分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 718-725.
[6] 顾莉莉, 姜凡. 安徽省超声产前筛查切面图像质量现状调查情况及分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 671-674.
[7] 曾晴, 文华轩, 袁鹰, 廖伊梅, 秦越, 罗丹丹, 梁美玲, 李胜利. 经腹二维超声评价胎儿大脑外侧裂的新参数——外侧裂平台角度[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 454-459.
[8] 王水清, 赵博文, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 陈冉, 马明明, 狄敏. 16~40周正常胎儿左心房后间隙指数及其Z评分的定量研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 460-469.
[9] 罗刚, 泮思林, 孙玲玉, 李志新, 陈涛涛, 乔思波, 庞善臣. 一种新型语义网络分析模型对室间隔完整型肺动脉闭锁和危重肺动脉瓣狭窄胎儿右心发育不良程度的评价作用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(04): 377-383.
[10] 张帧, 赵博文, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 陈冉, 田园诗, 陈阳. 二维斑点追踪技术评价正常中晚孕期胎儿右心房功能的初步研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(04): 384-390.
[11] 张盼盼, 赵博文, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 陈冉, 田园诗, 林仙方, 惠姗姗, 沈婷婷. 胎儿左心房后间隙指数在胎儿肺动脉瓣缺如综合征中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(04): 391-398.
[12] 王濛, 王華麟, 王鉴, 孙锟. 先天性心脏病宫内诊疗现状与展望[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 481-485.
[13] 徐婷婷, 詹泳池, 王晓东, 刘兴会. 电子胎心监测结果出现正弦波形的胎母输血综合征围生期结局分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(04): 382-389.
[14] 吴少敏, 张世豪, 刘炳光, 李婵, 尹嘉敏, 郑昌业, 黄素然. 胎儿巨大蛛网膜囊肿并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(04): 390-397.
[15] 谭娟, 谭建新, 邵彬彬, 王艳, 许争峰. 胎儿单基因遗传病无创产前检测的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 245-250.
阅读次数
全文


摘要