切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (08) : 796 -800. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2022.08.012

妇产科超声影像学

产前超声在胎儿骶尾部畸胎瘤成熟性鉴别中的价值
张娟1, 吴青青1,(), 王莉1, 张铁娟1, 韩吉晶1   
  1. 1. 100026 首都医科大学附属北京妇产医院 北京妇幼保健院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2021-05-31 出版日期:2022-08-01
  • 通信作者: 吴青青

Value of prenatal ultrasound in differential diagnosis of mature and immature fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma

Juan Zhang1, Qingqing Wu1,(), Li Wang1, Tiejuan Zhang1, Jijing Han1   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing 100026, China
  • Received:2021-05-31 Published:2022-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Qingqing Wu
引用本文:

张娟, 吴青青, 王莉, 张铁娟, 韩吉晶. 产前超声在胎儿骶尾部畸胎瘤成熟性鉴别中的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(08): 796-800.

Juan Zhang, Qingqing Wu, Li Wang, Tiejuan Zhang, Jijing Han. Value of prenatal ultrasound in differential diagnosis of mature and immature fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2022, 19(08): 796-800.

目的

探讨不同病理类型胎儿骶尾部畸胎瘤(SCT)的临床及产前超声声像图特征,分析产前超声在胎儿SCT成熟性鉴别中的作用。

方法

回顾性分析2015年1月至2020年12月在首都医科大学附属北京妇产医院就诊的胎儿SCT病例34例,根据肿瘤不同病理类型将病例分为成熟型和未成熟型,分析不同病理类型组的母体年龄、孕周及肿瘤相关超声特征(生长方式、性质、血流情况)、合并症,并采用χ2检验、Fisher确切概率检验、t检验及Mann-Whitney U检验比较上述资料的组间差异。

结果

根据肿瘤的病理类型分为成熟型组23例和未成熟型组11例。在2组病例中,母体年龄、孕周、胎儿性别、肿瘤生长方式的组间差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。未成熟型组肿瘤体积明显大于成熟型组[16.19(8.47,34.03)cm3 vs 186.20(90.41,445.35)cm3],差异具有统计学意义(Z=-3.332,P=0.001);成熟型组肿瘤以囊性为主(56.5%,13/23),未成熟型组肿瘤均为囊实性(100%,11/11),差异具有统计学意义(P=0.002)。彩色多普勒超声显示成熟型组伴血流信号者有3例,未成熟组则有10例,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001)。对肿瘤周围组织以及胎儿其他器官系统扫查发现,成熟型组出现合并症者5例,未成熟型组为7例,组间差异具有统计学意义(P=0.026)。

结论

不同病理类型胎儿SCT的临床特征及产前超声表现不同,产前超声表现为囊实性肿瘤、体积较大、血流信号丰富、合并其他系统异常等是未成熟型SCT的重要鉴别征象,早期诊断可为后续产科管理提供诊疗依据。

Objective

To evaluate the clinical and ultrasonic features of fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma (SCT) of different histological types.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on a total of 34 patients with SCT that was diagnosed from January 2015 to December 2016 at Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University. These cases were divided into either a mature group or an immature group based on the histological type. Data (maternal age, gestational weeks, and tumorous sonographic features) were analyzed by the Fisher exact test, t-test, Chi-square, and Mann-Whitney U test.

Results

No statistical differences were observed in terms of maternal age, gestational week, fetal sex, and Altman's classification between the mature (n=23) and immature groups (n=11). Among all the ultrasonic features, mass volume of the immature group was significantly bigger than that of the mature group [16.19 (8.47, 34.03) cm3 vs 186.20 (90.41, 445.35) cm3, Z=-3.332, P=0.001]. The main manifestation of the mature group was cystic echo (56.5%, 13/23), while that of the immature group was cystic-solid echo (100%, 11/11); the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P=0.002). Color Doppler ultrasound showed that three cases in the mature group and ten cases in the immature group were detected with blood flow signal; the difference in the number of cases with blood flow signal was statistically significant between the two groups (P<0.001). Scanning of the tissues surrounding the mass and other fetal systems showed that five cases in the mature group and seven cases in the immature group suffered from complications; there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P=0.026).

Conclusion

The clinical features and prenatal ultrasonic images of fetal SCT vary with different pathological types. Cystic-solid echogenic masses, bigger mass volume, rich blood flow signals, and suffering from complications are important signs for the diagnosis of immature fetal SCT. Early diagnosis by using prenatal ultrasound can provide a good basis for perinatal management.

表1 不同病理类型骶尾部畸胎瘤胎儿孕妇一般临床资料的比较
图1 成熟型骶尾部畸胎瘤三维超声断层超声成像,肿瘤生长方式为Altman′s Ⅳ型
表2 骶尾部畸胎瘤不同病理类型组肿瘤参数及合并症的比较(例)
图2 未成熟型骶尾部畸胎瘤的超声表现。图a和图b分别为二维超声及彩色多普勒超声声像图,显示胎儿骶尾部外突的、血流信号较丰富的巨大肿物
1
Chen YH, Chang CH, Chen KC, et al. Malignant transformation of a well-organized sacrococcygeal fetiform teratoma in a newborn male [J]. J Formos Med Assoc, 2007, 106(5): 400-402.
2
Hu Q, Yan Y, Liao H, et al. Sacrococcygeal teratoma in one twin: a case report and literature review [J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2020, 20(1): 751.
3
Wohlmuth C, Bergh E, Bell C, et al. Clinical monitoring of sacrococcygeal teratoma [J]. Fetal Diagn Ther, 2019, 46(5): 333-340.
4
Penny SM. Sacrococcygeal teratoma: a literature review [J]. Radiol Technol, 2012, 84(1): 11-17.
5
Altman RP, Randolph JG, Lilly JR. Sacrococcygeal teratoma: American Academy of Pediatrics Surgical Section Survey-1973 [J]. J Pediatr Surg, 1974, 9: 389-398.
6
王琪, 卢朝祥, 陈晓峰, 等. 预测6月龄以下骶尾部畸胎瘤良恶性的列线图建立研究 [J]. 陕西医学杂志, 2020, 49(3): 313-316, 320.
7
Benachi A, Durin L, Vasseur Maurer S, et al. Prenatally diagnosed sacrococcygeal teratoma: a prognostic classification [J]. J Pediatr Surg, 2006, 41(9): 1517-1521.
8
Yoon HM, Byeon SJ, Hwang JY, et al. Sacrococcygeal teratomas in newborns: a comprehensive review for the radiologists [J]. Acta Radiol, 2018, 59(2): 236-246.
9
Fumino S, Tajiri T, Usui N, et al. Japanese clinical practice guidelines for sacrococcygeal teratoma, 2017 [J]. Pediatr Int, 2019, 61(7): 672-678.
10
Shue E, Bolouri M, Jelin EB, et al. Tumor metrics and morphology predict poor prognosis in prenatally diagnosed sacrococcygeal teratoma: a 25-year experience at a single institution [J]. J Pediatr Surg, 2013, 48: 1225-1231.
11
Coleman A, Kline-Fath B, Keswani S, et al. Prenatal solid tumor volume index: novel prenatal predictor of adverse outcome in sacrococcygeal teratoma [J]. J Surg Res, 2013, 184(1): 330-336.
12
Coleman A, Shaaban A, Keswani S, et al. Sacrococcygeal teratoma growth rate predicts adverse outcomes [J]. J Pediatr Surg, 2014, 49(6): 985-989.
13
Usui N, Kitano Y, Sago H, et al. Outcomes of prenatally diagnosed sacrococcygeal teratomas: the results of a Japanese nationwide survey [J]. J Pediatr Surg, 2012, 47(3): 441-447.
14
Mlčochová G, Kučerová L, Rousková B, et al. Sacrococcygeal teratoma [J]. Ceska Gynekol, 2019, 84(2): 140-144.
[1] 武玺宁, 欧阳云淑, 张一休, 孟华, 徐钟慧, 张培培, 吕珂. 胎儿心脏超声检查在抗SSA/Ro-SSB/La抗体阳性妊娠管理中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1056-1060.
[2] 杨水华, 何桂丹, 覃桂灿, 梁蒙凤, 罗艳合, 李雪芹, 唐娟松. 胎儿孤立性完全型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图特征及高分辨率血流联合时间-空间相关成像的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1061-1067.
[3] 赵红娟, 赵博文, 潘美, 纪园园, 彭晓慧, 陈冉. 应用多普勒超声定量分析正常中晚孕期胎儿左心室收缩舒张时间指数[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 951-958.
[4] 张璟璟, 赵博文, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 毛彦恺, 潘陈可, 朱玲艳, 朱琳琳, 蓝秋晔. 胎儿超声心动图测量McGoon指数在评价胎儿肺血管发育中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 860-865.
[5] 旺久, 陈军, 朱霞, 米玛央金, 赵胜, 陈欣林, 李建华, 王双. 山南市妇幼保健院开展胎儿系统超声筛查的效果分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 728-733.
[6] 徐鹏, 李军, 高巍伦, 王峥, 庞珅, 李春妮, 朱霆. 快速旋转扫查法在胎儿超声心动图检查中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 761-766.
[7] 谭芳, 杨娇娇, 沈玉琴, 李炎菲海, 王海蕊, 范思涵, 纪学芹. 胎儿心脏定量分析技术对正常胎儿心脏形态及收缩功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 598-604.
[8] 罗刚, 泮思林, 陈涛涛, 许茜, 纪志娴, 王思宝, 孙玲玉. 超声心动图在胎儿心脏介入治疗室间隔完整的肺动脉闭锁中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 605-609.
[9] 黄佳, 石华, 张玉国, 胡佳琪, 陈茜. 胎儿左头臂静脉正常与异常超声图像特征及其临床意义[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 610-617.
[10] 袁泽, 庄丽. 超声检测胎儿脐动脉和大脑中动脉血流对胎儿宫内窘迫的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 618-621.
[11] 刘镭, 杨昕, 许晓华, 林胜谋, 熊初琴, 农丽录, 董振宇, 李胜利. 中孕期胎儿鼻前皮肤厚度及鼻骨长度筛查胎儿染色体病的临床价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(05): 506-510.
[12] 李博, 孔德璇, 彭芳华, 吴文瑛. 超声在胎儿肺静脉异位引流诊断中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(04): 437-441.
[13] 薛超, 张烨, 赵映, 韩建成, 谷孝艳, 孙琳, 刘晓伟, 宋伟, 何怡华. 胎儿先天性肺动脉瓣缺如综合征的超声特征及预后分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 410-418.
[14] 刘磊, 王优, 黄锐斌, 张丽娜, 宋一丹, 雷婷缨. 染色体微阵列分析技术在股骨长度偏短胎儿遗传学诊断中的应用[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 437-445.
[15] 邹艳丽, 栾文杰, 王淑娟, 刘亚琴, 初桂芝, 李松洋, 王好玲, 张锦婷, 姜鑫, 栾泽东. 早孕期胎儿右位主动脉弓的产前超声诊断学特征[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 227-232.
阅读次数
全文


摘要