切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (09) : 957 -961. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2022.09.015

介入超声影像学

经腔道内超声造影在置管术后引流不畅中的应用
韩红1, 王文平2, 金赟杰2, 曹佳颖2, 方超3, 毛丽娟2, 季正标2,()   
  1. 1. 200032 上海,复旦大学附属中山医院超声科;200032 上海市影像医学研究所
    2. 200032 上海,复旦大学附属中山医院超声科
    3. 200031 上海市徐汇区中心医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2020-08-10 出版日期:2022-09-01
  • 通信作者: 季正标
  • 基金资助:
    上海市自然科学基金(19ZR1450700); 上海市临床重点专科项目(shslczdzk03501)

Application of intracavitary contrast-enhanced ultrasound in poor drainage after catheterization

Hong Han1, Wenping Wang2, Yunjie Jing2, Jiaying Chao2, Chao Fang3, Lijuan Mao2, Zhengbiao Ji2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai 200032, China
    2. Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
    3. Department of Ultrasound, the Central Hospital of Xuhui District, Shanghai 200031, China
  • Received:2020-08-10 Published:2022-09-01
  • Corresponding author: Zhengbiao Ji
引用本文:

韩红, 王文平, 金赟杰, 曹佳颖, 方超, 毛丽娟, 季正标. 经腔道内超声造影在置管术后引流不畅中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(09): 957-961.

Hong Han, Wenping Wang, Yunjie Jing, Jiaying Chao, Chao Fang, Lijuan Mao, Zhengbiao Ji. Application of intracavitary contrast-enhanced ultrasound in poor drainage after catheterization[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2022, 19(09): 957-961.

目的

探讨经腔道内超声造影在置管术后引流不畅患者中的应用价值。

方法

选择2019年12月至2020年6月在复旦大学附属中山医院行超声引导下置管引流且临床认为引流不畅的患者52例纳入研究。采用常规超声及经腔道内超声造影观察引流管体及引流管头端位置,同时评价引流管的引流区域。超声造影剂为SonoVue,以1∶200比例稀释。采用t检验比较经腔道内超声造影与常规超声显示引流管时间的差异,采用χ2检验比较2种方法显示引流管数目的差异。

结果

经腔道内超声造影显示引流管体及引流管头端的时间分别是(5.72±0.83)s及(13.4±1.12)s,明显短于常规超声显示时间:(69.94±7.06)s及(108.50±7.06)s,差异具有统计学意义(t=520.5、840.2,P均<0.001)。经腔道内超声造影显示的引流管体及引流管头端的比例分别是94.2%(49/52)及88.5%(46/52),优于常规超声的显示率:40.4%(21/52)及21.1%(11/52),差异具有统计学意义(χ2=33.28、47.55,P均<0.001)。经腔道内超声造影发现6例脓肿存在多脓腔改变,其中置管脓腔与其他脓腔不相交通者4例。

结论

经腔道内超声造影可提供准确的引流管位置及引流管头端信息,并可充分评估引流不畅的原因,从而指导临床调整引流管。

Objective

To investigate the value of intracavitary contrast-enhanced ultrasound in examination of drainage tube in patients with poor drainage.

Methods

From December 2019 to June 2020, patients who underwent ultrasound-guided percutaneous catheter drainage and were clinically considered to have poor drainage at our hospital were enrolled in the study. B-mode ultrasound and intracavitary contrast-enhanced ultrasound were used to observe the position and tip of the drainage catheter, and the effective drainage areas of the tube was evaluated. The contrast agent was SonoVue diluted 1:200 for intraluminal usage. SPSS statistical software was used for statistical analyses.

Results

The times to detect the drain body and the drain tip by intracavitary contrast-enhanced ultrasound were (5.72±0.83) s and (13.4±1.12) s, respectively, which were significantly shorter than those spent by conventional ultrasonography [(69.94±7.06) s and (108.50±7.06) s, t=520.5 and 840.2, respectively, P<0.001]. The detection rates of the drain body and drain head by intracavitary contrast-enhanced ultrasound were 94.2% (49/52) and 88.5% (46/52), respectively, which were significantly better than the corresponding rates [40.4% (21/52) and 21.1% (11/52)] achieved by using conventional ultrasound (χ2=33.28 and 47.55, respectively, P<0.001). Intracavitary contrast-enhanced ultrasound revealed multiple lacunae in six abscesses, including four cases in which the part of the drainage catheter placed in the abscess did not communicate with other abscess parts.

Conclusion

Intracavitary contrast-enhanced ultrasound can provide accurate information about the position of the drainage tube and tip, and can fully evaluate the cause of poor drainage, so as to guide clinicians to adjust the drainage tube.

表1 52例患者常规超声检查置管引流原因及引流管放置部位
图1 38岁男性患者右上臂脓肿置管后影像图。图a灰阶超声可显示引流管(箭头),但引流管头端位置不明确;图b经腔道内超声造影清晰显示引流管体及引流管头端,引流管头端可见造影剂弥散(箭头)
表2 52例置管引流不畅患者经腔道内超声造影后引流管的处理措施
图2 56岁男性患者肾造瘘术后引流不畅。图a灰阶超声引流管显示不清;图b 经腔道内超声造影显示引流管体及头端脱出,位于肾包膜之外(粗箭),肾中部见通过原瘘管途径少量造影剂进入肾盂内(箭头),予以拔除引流管;图c为重新置管后,再次腔内造影显示引流管位于肾盂内,造影剂弥散佳(粗箭)
1
Francica G. Intracavitary contrast-enhanced ultrasound in ultrasound-guided percutaneous management of abdominal fluid collections/abscesses by a single clinician: an example of point-of-care ultrasound [J]. J Ultrasound, 2020, 23(2): 175-181.
2
郑荣琴, 许尔蛟. 超声造影在胆道系统的应用新进展 [J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2012, 9(3): 191-194.
3
Nolsøe CP, Nolsøe AB, Klubien J, et al. Use of ultrasound contrast agents in relation to percutaneous interventional procedures: a systematic review and pictorial essay [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2018, 37(6): 1305-1324.
4
Yusuf GT, Fang C, Huang DY, et al. Endocavitary contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS): a novel problem solving technique [J]. Insights Imaging, 2018, 9(3): 303-311.
5
Ignee A, Cui X, Schuessler G, et al. Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography and drainage using extravascular contrast enhanced ultrasound [J]. Z Gastroenterol, 2015, 53(5): 385-390.
6
Liu BX, Huang GL, Xie XH, et al. Contrast-enhanced US-assisted percutaneous nephrostomy: a technique to increase success rate for patients with nondilated renal collecting system [J]. Radiology, 2017, 285(1): 293-301.
7
Zhou L, Zhang X, Chen X, et al. Value of three-dimensional hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography with SonoVue in the assessment of tubal patency [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2012, 40(1): 93-98.
8
Xu EJ, Zheng RQ, Su ZZ, et al. Intra-biliary contrast-enhanced ultrasound for evaluating biliary obstruction during percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage: a preliminary study [J]. Eur J Radiol, 2012, 81(12): 3846-3850.
9
Ignee A, Jenssen C, Cui XW, et al. Intracavitary contrast-enhanced ultrasound in abscess drainage--feasibility and clinical value [J]. Scand J Gastroenterol, 2016, 51(1): 41-47.
10
Huang DY, Yusuf GT, Daneshi M, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in abdominal intervention [J]. Abdom Radiol, 2018, 43(4): 960-976.
11
张艳玲, 李凯, 郭欢仪, 等. 经引流管腔道内超声造影在引流不畅肝脓肿中的应用 [J/CD]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2017, 6(5): 401-404
12
Müller T, Blank W, Leitlein J, et al. Endocavitary contrast-enhanced ultrasound: a technique whose time has come? [J]. J Clin Ultrasound, 2015, 43(2): 71-80.
13
Cui XW, Ignee A, Baum U, et al. Feasibility and usefulness of using swallow contrast-enhanced ultrasound to diagnose Zenker's diverticulum: preliminary results [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2015, 41(4): 975-981.
[1] 张婉微, 秦芸芸, 蔡绮哲, 林明明, 田润雨, 金姗, 吕秀章. 心肌收缩早期延长对非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者冠状动脉严重狭窄的预测价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1016-1022.
[2] 任书堂, 刘晓程, 张亚东, 孙佳英, 陈萍, 周建华, 龙进, 黄云洲. 左心室辅助装置支持下单纯收缩期主动脉瓣反流的超声心动图特征[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1023-1028.
[3] 何金梅, 尹立雪, 谭静, 张文军, 王锐, 任梅, 廖明娇. 超声心肌做功技术对2型糖尿病患者潜在左心室心肌收缩功能损伤的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1029-1035.
[4] 薛艳玲, 马小静, 谢姝瑞, 何俊, 夏娟, 何亚峰. 左心声学造影在急性心肌梗死合并室间隔穿孔中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1036-1039.
[5] 吕琦, 惠品晶, 丁亚芳, 颜燕红. 颈动脉斑块易损性的超声造影评估及与缺血性卒中的相关性研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1040-1045.
[6] 魏淑婕, 惠品晶, 丁亚芳, 张白, 颜燕红, 周鹏, 黄亚波. 单侧颈内动脉闭塞患者行颞浅动脉-大脑中动脉搭桥术的脑血流动力学评估[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1046-1055.
[7] 武玺宁, 欧阳云淑, 张一休, 孟华, 徐钟慧, 张培培, 吕珂. 胎儿心脏超声检查在抗SSA/Ro-SSB/La抗体阳性妊娠管理中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1056-1060.
[8] 杨水华, 何桂丹, 覃桂灿, 梁蒙凤, 罗艳合, 李雪芹, 唐娟松. 胎儿孤立性完全型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图特征及高分辨率血流联合时间-空间相关成像的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1061-1067.
[9] 张璇, 马宇童, 苗玉倩, 张云, 吴士文, 党晓楚, 陈颖颖, 钟兆明, 王雪娟, 胡淼, 孙岩峰, 马秀珠, 吕发勤, 寇海燕. 超声对Duchenne肌营养不良儿童膈肌功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1068-1073.
[10] 张宝富, 俞劲, 叶菁菁, 俞建根, 马晓辉, 刘喜旺. 先天性原发隔异位型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图诊断[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1074-1080.
[11] 丁雷, 罗文, 杨晓, 庞丽娜, 张佩蒂, 刘海静, 袁佳妮, 刘瑾. 高帧频超声造影在评价C-TIRADS 4-5类甲状腺结节成像特征中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 887-894.
[12] 张茜, 陈佳慧, 高雪萌, 赵傲雪, 黄瑛. 基于高帧频超声造影的影像组学特征鉴别诊断甲状腺结节良恶性的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 895-903.
[13] 冯冰, 邹秋果, 梁振波, 卢艳明, 曾奕, 吴淑苗. 老年非特殊型浸润性乳腺癌超声征象与分子生物学指标的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 48-51.
[14] 赵文毅, 邹冰子, 蔡冠晖, 刘永志, 温红. 超声应变力弹性成像联合MRI-DWI靶向引导穿刺在前列腺病变诊断中的应用[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 988-994.
[15] 薛念余, 张盛敏, 吴凌恒, 沙蕾, 童揽月, 沈崔琴, 李朝军, 杜联芳. 研究血清胆红素对2型糖尿病患者心脏结构发生改变前心肌功能的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1004-1009.
阅读次数
全文


摘要