切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (05) : 354 -358. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2017.05.006

所属专题: 文献

妇产科超声影像学

经腹胎儿颅脑正中矢状切面声窗的研究
张琴1, 盛文伟1,(), 王凤琴2   
  1. 1. 223300 南京医科大学附属淮安第一医院超声科
    2. 223300 南京医科大学附属淮安第一医院产科
  • 收稿日期:2017-02-24 出版日期:2017-05-01
  • 通信作者: 盛文伟

Study of transabdominal acoustic windows for the midsagittal plane of the fetal brain

Qin Zhang1, Wenwei Sheng1,(), Fengqin Wang2   

  1. 1. Department of ultrasound, Huaian No1 Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Huaian 223300, China
    2. Department of obstetrics and gynecology, Huaian No1 Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Huaian 223300, China
  • Received:2017-02-24 Published:2017-05-01
  • Corresponding author: Wenwei Sheng
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Sheng Wenwei, Email:
引用本文:

张琴, 盛文伟, 王凤琴. 经腹胎儿颅脑正中矢状切面声窗的研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2017, 14(05): 354-358.

Qin Zhang, Wenwei Sheng, Fengqin Wang. Study of transabdominal acoustic windows for the midsagittal plane of the fetal brain[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2017, 14(05): 354-358.

目的

探索经腹部超声采集胎儿正中矢状切面的声窗及其应用价值。

方法

通过12例引产胎儿前囟门、后囟门、矢状缝及前额缝分别获得颅脑正中矢状切面图,并将可行的声窗作为标准声窗对中孕期超声筛查的胎儿(头位组367例,非头位组384例)进行颅脑超声检查,并对两组胎儿获取正中矢状切面图的成功率进行比较。

结果

中孕期超声筛查的751例胎儿成功获取颅脑正中矢状切面图497例。其中头位组获取颅脑正中矢状切面图的成功率为32.7%(32.7%,120/367),低于非头位组(98.2%,377/384),两组胎儿获取颅脑正中矢状切面图的成功率比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。其中头位组采用前额、前囟门、矢状缝与后囟门4声窗联合检查采集颅脑正中矢状切面图的成功率为32.7%(32.7%,120/367),明显高于前额、前囟门、矢状缝与后囟门任何单一声窗采集图像的成功率(分别为17.2%、25.9%、1.6%、7.6%,P均<0.01);非头位组4声窗联合检查采集颅脑正中矢状切面图像的成功率(98.2%,377/384)亦明显高于任何单一声窗采集的成功率(分别为31.8%、61.2%、64.8%、62.0%,P均<0.01)。

结论

中孕期胎儿产前筛查经前额、前囟门、矢状缝、后囟门声窗均可获得颅脑正中矢状切面图,4声窗联合应用可增加颅脑正中矢状切面图的获得率。

Objective

This study intends to evaluate different acoustic windows that can be used to obtain the midsagittal plane of fetal brain during abdominal ultrasound scanning and the application of acoustic windows in practice.

Methods

The midsagittal planes were obtained respectively through anterior fontanel, posterior fontanel, sagittal suture and forehead seam of 12 aborted fetuses, and feasible acoustic windows were used as standard acoustic windows to obtain midsagittal planes of second trimester screening fetuses, which were divided into two groups according to the position of fetal brain, cephalic presentation group (367 cases) and non-cephalic presentation group (384 cases). The success rates were compared between groups.

Results

Of the second trimester fetuses, 497 midsagittal planes of 751 cases were successfully obtained. The success rate of the cephalic presentation fetuses (32.7%, 120/367) was statistically lower than that of the non-cephalic presentation fetuses (98.2%, 377/384, P<0.01). Of the cephalic presentation fetuses, the combined acoustic windows acquisition success rate of the forehead, anterior fontanelle, sagittal suture and posterior fontanel acoustic window was 32.7% (32.7%, 120/367), significantly higher than the single acquisition success rate of the forehead, anterior fontanelle, sagittal suture and posterior fontanel acoustic window (17.2%, 25.9%, 1.6% and 7.6%, all P<0.01). Of the non-cephalic presentation fetuses, the combined acoustic windows acquisition success rate of the forehead, sagittal suture and posterior fontanel acoustic window was 98.2% (98.2%, 377/384), significantly higher than the single acquisition success rate of the forehead, anterior fontanelle, sagittal suture and posterior fontanel acoustic window (31.8%, 61.2%, 64.8% and 62.0%, all P<0.01).

Conclusions

The midsagittal plane of fetal brain can be obtained through forehead seam, anterior fontanel, posterior fontanel and sagittal suture acoustic windows in transabdominal screening. The combination of four acoustic windows can increase the success rate of obtaining midsagittal planes.

图1~3 妊娠23周引产胎儿,经前囟门(图1)、矢状缝(图2)、后囟门(图3)声窗分别获得的颅脑正中矢状切面的声像图(红色、黄色和绿色箭头分别标示胼胝体、中脑和小脑)
图4,5 妊娠24周胎儿经前囟门(图4)和矢状缝(图5)声窗分别获得的正中矢状切面声像图(红色、黄色和绿色箭头分别标示胼胝体、中脑和小脑)
表1 不同胎头位置产前超声获得胎儿颅脑正中矢状切面图及检查声窗(例数)
表2 两组胎儿不同声窗采集颅脑正中矢状切面成功率的比较[例数(%)]
[1]
Chitty LS, Pilu G. The challenge of imaging the fetal central nervous system: an aid to prenatal diagnosis, management and prognosis [J]. Prenat Diagn, 2009, 29(4):301-302.
[2]
Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A. Transvaginal fetal neurosonography: standardization of the planes and sections by anatomic landmarks [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 1996, 8(1):42-47.
[3]
D′Addario V, Pinto V, Di Cagno L, et al. The midsagittal view of the fetal brain: a useful landmark in recognizing the cause of fetal cerebral ventriculomegaly [J]. J Perinat Med, 2005, 33(5):423-427.
[4]
Achiron R, Achiron A. Development of the human fetal corpus callosum: a high-resolution, cross-sectional sonographic study [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2001, 18(4):343-347.
[5]
Achiron R, Kivilevitch Z, Lipitz S, et al. Development of the human fetal pons: in utero ultrasonographic study [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2004, 24(5):506-510.
[6]
Visentin A, Pilu G, Falco P, et al. The transfrontal view: a new approach to the visualization of the fetal midline cerebral structures [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2001, 20(4):329-333.
[7]
Correa FF, Lara C, Bellver J, et al. Examination of the fetal brain by transabdominal three-dimensional ultrasound: potential for routine neurosonographic studies [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 27(5):503-508.
[8]
Pilu G, Segata M, Ghi T, et al. Diagnosis of midline anomalies of the fetal brain with the three-dimensional median view [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 27(5):522-529.
[9]
Viñals F, Muñoz M, Naveas R, et al. Transfrontal three-dimensional visualization of midline cerebral structures [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2007, 30(2):162-168.
[10]
Paladini D, Volpe P. Posterior fossa and vermian morphometry in the characterization of fetal cerebellar abnormalities: a prospective three-dimensional ultrasound study [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 27(5):482-489.
[11]
Maertens P. Imaging through the posterior fontanelle [J]. J Child Neurol, 1989(4 Suppl):S62-S67.
[12]
Luna JA, Goldstein RB. Sonographic visualization of neonatal posterior fossa abnormalities through the posterolateral fontanelle [J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2000, 174(2):561-567.
[13]
Correa F, Enríquez G, Rosselló J, et al. Posterior fontanelle sonography: an acoustic window into the neonatal brain [J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2004, 25(7):1274-1282.
[14]
Monteagudo A, Timor-Tritsch IE, Mayberry P. Three-dimensional transvaginal neurosonography of the fetal brain: ′navigating′ in the volume scan [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2000, 16(4):307-313.
[15]
Pooh RK, Pooh K. Transvaginal 3D and Doppler ultrasonography of the fetal brain [J]. Semin Perinatol, 2001, 25(1):38-43.
[16]
Monteagudo A, Timor-Tritsch IE. Normal sonographic development of the central nervous system from the second trimester onwards using 2D, 3D and transvaginal sonography [J]. Prenat Diagn, 2009, 29(4):326-339.
[17]
Faro C, Benoit B, Wegrzyn P, et al. Three-dimensional sonographic description of the fetal frontal bones and metopic suture [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2005, 26(6):618-621.
[1] 武玺宁, 欧阳云淑, 张一休, 孟华, 徐钟慧, 张培培, 吕珂. 胎儿心脏超声检查在抗SSA/Ro-SSB/La抗体阳性妊娠管理中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1056-1060.
[2] 杨水华, 何桂丹, 覃桂灿, 梁蒙凤, 罗艳合, 李雪芹, 唐娟松. 胎儿孤立性完全型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图特征及高分辨率血流联合时间-空间相关成像的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1061-1067.
[3] 张梅芳, 谭莹, 朱巧珍, 温昕, 袁鹰, 秦越, 郭洪波, 侯伶秀, 黄文兰, 彭桂艳, 李胜利. 早孕期胎儿头臀长正中矢状切面超声图像的人工智能质控研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 945-950.
[4] 赵红娟, 赵博文, 潘美, 纪园园, 彭晓慧, 陈冉. 应用多普勒超声定量分析正常中晚孕期胎儿左心室收缩舒张时间指数[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 951-958.
[5] 张璟璟, 赵博文, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 毛彦恺, 潘陈可, 朱玲艳, 朱琳琳, 蓝秋晔. 胎儿超声心动图测量McGoon指数在评价胎儿肺血管发育中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 860-865.
[6] 旺久, 陈军, 朱霞, 米玛央金, 赵胜, 陈欣林, 李建华, 王双. 山南市妇幼保健院开展胎儿系统超声筛查的效果分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 728-733.
[7] 徐鹏, 李军, 高巍伦, 王峥, 庞珅, 李春妮, 朱霆. 快速旋转扫查法在胎儿超声心动图检查中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 761-766.
[8] 谭芳, 杨娇娇, 沈玉琴, 李炎菲海, 王海蕊, 范思涵, 纪学芹. 胎儿心脏定量分析技术对正常胎儿心脏形态及收缩功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 598-604.
[9] 罗刚, 泮思林, 陈涛涛, 许茜, 纪志娴, 王思宝, 孙玲玉. 超声心动图在胎儿心脏介入治疗室间隔完整的肺动脉闭锁中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 605-609.
[10] 黄佳, 石华, 张玉国, 胡佳琪, 陈茜. 胎儿左头臂静脉正常与异常超声图像特征及其临床意义[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 610-617.
[11] 袁泽, 庄丽. 超声检测胎儿脐动脉和大脑中动脉血流对胎儿宫内窘迫的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 618-621.
[12] 刘镭, 杨昕, 许晓华, 林胜谋, 熊初琴, 农丽录, 董振宇, 李胜利. 中孕期胎儿鼻前皮肤厚度及鼻骨长度筛查胎儿染色体病的临床价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(05): 506-510.
[13] 李飞翔, 段虎斌, 李晋虎, 吴昊, 王永红, 范益民. 急性颅脑损伤继发下肢静脉血栓的相关危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 277-282.
[14] 潘立, 谢理政, 程宏伟, 茆翔. 创伤性颅脑损伤后垂体功能减退[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 308-312.
[15] 王景景, 符锋, 李建伟, 任党利, 陈翀, 刘慧, 孙洪涛, 涂悦. 针刺对中型创伤性颅脑损伤后BDNF/TrkB信号通路的影响[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 199-205.
阅读次数
全文


摘要