切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (05) : 354 -358. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2017.05.006

所属专题: 文献

妇产科超声影像学

经腹胎儿颅脑正中矢状切面声窗的研究
张琴1, 盛文伟1,(), 王凤琴2   
  1. 1. 223300 南京医科大学附属淮安第一医院超声科
    2. 223300 南京医科大学附属淮安第一医院产科
  • 收稿日期:2017-02-24 出版日期:2017-05-01
  • 通信作者: 盛文伟

Study of transabdominal acoustic windows for the midsagittal plane of the fetal brain

Qin Zhang1, Wenwei Sheng1,(), Fengqin Wang2   

  1. 1. Department of ultrasound, Huaian No1 Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Huaian 223300, China
    2. Department of obstetrics and gynecology, Huaian No1 Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Huaian 223300, China
  • Received:2017-02-24 Published:2017-05-01
  • Corresponding author: Wenwei Sheng
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Sheng Wenwei, Email:
引用本文:

张琴, 盛文伟, 王凤琴. 经腹胎儿颅脑正中矢状切面声窗的研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2017, 14(05): 354-358.

Qin Zhang, Wenwei Sheng, Fengqin Wang. Study of transabdominal acoustic windows for the midsagittal plane of the fetal brain[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2017, 14(05): 354-358.

目的

探索经腹部超声采集胎儿正中矢状切面的声窗及其应用价值。

方法

通过12例引产胎儿前囟门、后囟门、矢状缝及前额缝分别获得颅脑正中矢状切面图,并将可行的声窗作为标准声窗对中孕期超声筛查的胎儿(头位组367例,非头位组384例)进行颅脑超声检查,并对两组胎儿获取正中矢状切面图的成功率进行比较。

结果

中孕期超声筛查的751例胎儿成功获取颅脑正中矢状切面图497例。其中头位组获取颅脑正中矢状切面图的成功率为32.7%(32.7%,120/367),低于非头位组(98.2%,377/384),两组胎儿获取颅脑正中矢状切面图的成功率比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。其中头位组采用前额、前囟门、矢状缝与后囟门4声窗联合检查采集颅脑正中矢状切面图的成功率为32.7%(32.7%,120/367),明显高于前额、前囟门、矢状缝与后囟门任何单一声窗采集图像的成功率(分别为17.2%、25.9%、1.6%、7.6%,P均<0.01);非头位组4声窗联合检查采集颅脑正中矢状切面图像的成功率(98.2%,377/384)亦明显高于任何单一声窗采集的成功率(分别为31.8%、61.2%、64.8%、62.0%,P均<0.01)。

结论

中孕期胎儿产前筛查经前额、前囟门、矢状缝、后囟门声窗均可获得颅脑正中矢状切面图,4声窗联合应用可增加颅脑正中矢状切面图的获得率。

Objective

This study intends to evaluate different acoustic windows that can be used to obtain the midsagittal plane of fetal brain during abdominal ultrasound scanning and the application of acoustic windows in practice.

Methods

The midsagittal planes were obtained respectively through anterior fontanel, posterior fontanel, sagittal suture and forehead seam of 12 aborted fetuses, and feasible acoustic windows were used as standard acoustic windows to obtain midsagittal planes of second trimester screening fetuses, which were divided into two groups according to the position of fetal brain, cephalic presentation group (367 cases) and non-cephalic presentation group (384 cases). The success rates were compared between groups.

Results

Of the second trimester fetuses, 497 midsagittal planes of 751 cases were successfully obtained. The success rate of the cephalic presentation fetuses (32.7%, 120/367) was statistically lower than that of the non-cephalic presentation fetuses (98.2%, 377/384, P<0.01). Of the cephalic presentation fetuses, the combined acoustic windows acquisition success rate of the forehead, anterior fontanelle, sagittal suture and posterior fontanel acoustic window was 32.7% (32.7%, 120/367), significantly higher than the single acquisition success rate of the forehead, anterior fontanelle, sagittal suture and posterior fontanel acoustic window (17.2%, 25.9%, 1.6% and 7.6%, all P<0.01). Of the non-cephalic presentation fetuses, the combined acoustic windows acquisition success rate of the forehead, sagittal suture and posterior fontanel acoustic window was 98.2% (98.2%, 377/384), significantly higher than the single acquisition success rate of the forehead, anterior fontanelle, sagittal suture and posterior fontanel acoustic window (31.8%, 61.2%, 64.8% and 62.0%, all P<0.01).

Conclusions

The midsagittal plane of fetal brain can be obtained through forehead seam, anterior fontanel, posterior fontanel and sagittal suture acoustic windows in transabdominal screening. The combination of four acoustic windows can increase the success rate of obtaining midsagittal planes.

图1~3 妊娠23周引产胎儿,经前囟门(图1)、矢状缝(图2)、后囟门(图3)声窗分别获得的颅脑正中矢状切面的声像图(红色、黄色和绿色箭头分别标示胼胝体、中脑和小脑)
图4,5 妊娠24周胎儿经前囟门(图4)和矢状缝(图5)声窗分别获得的正中矢状切面声像图(红色、黄色和绿色箭头分别标示胼胝体、中脑和小脑)
表1 不同胎头位置产前超声获得胎儿颅脑正中矢状切面图及检查声窗(例数)
表2 两组胎儿不同声窗采集颅脑正中矢状切面成功率的比较[例数(%)]
[1]
Chitty LS, Pilu G. The challenge of imaging the fetal central nervous system: an aid to prenatal diagnosis, management and prognosis [J]. Prenat Diagn, 2009, 29(4):301-302.
[2]
Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A. Transvaginal fetal neurosonography: standardization of the planes and sections by anatomic landmarks [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 1996, 8(1):42-47.
[3]
D′Addario V, Pinto V, Di Cagno L, et al. The midsagittal view of the fetal brain: a useful landmark in recognizing the cause of fetal cerebral ventriculomegaly [J]. J Perinat Med, 2005, 33(5):423-427.
[4]
Achiron R, Achiron A. Development of the human fetal corpus callosum: a high-resolution, cross-sectional sonographic study [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2001, 18(4):343-347.
[5]
Achiron R, Kivilevitch Z, Lipitz S, et al. Development of the human fetal pons: in utero ultrasonographic study [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2004, 24(5):506-510.
[6]
Visentin A, Pilu G, Falco P, et al. The transfrontal view: a new approach to the visualization of the fetal midline cerebral structures [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2001, 20(4):329-333.
[7]
Correa FF, Lara C, Bellver J, et al. Examination of the fetal brain by transabdominal three-dimensional ultrasound: potential for routine neurosonographic studies [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 27(5):503-508.
[8]
Pilu G, Segata M, Ghi T, et al. Diagnosis of midline anomalies of the fetal brain with the three-dimensional median view [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 27(5):522-529.
[9]
Viñals F, Muñoz M, Naveas R, et al. Transfrontal three-dimensional visualization of midline cerebral structures [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2007, 30(2):162-168.
[10]
Paladini D, Volpe P. Posterior fossa and vermian morphometry in the characterization of fetal cerebellar abnormalities: a prospective three-dimensional ultrasound study [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 27(5):482-489.
[11]
Maertens P. Imaging through the posterior fontanelle [J]. J Child Neurol, 1989(4 Suppl):S62-S67.
[12]
Luna JA, Goldstein RB. Sonographic visualization of neonatal posterior fossa abnormalities through the posterolateral fontanelle [J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2000, 174(2):561-567.
[13]
Correa F, Enríquez G, Rosselló J, et al. Posterior fontanelle sonography: an acoustic window into the neonatal brain [J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2004, 25(7):1274-1282.
[14]
Monteagudo A, Timor-Tritsch IE, Mayberry P. Three-dimensional transvaginal neurosonography of the fetal brain: ′navigating′ in the volume scan [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2000, 16(4):307-313.
[15]
Pooh RK, Pooh K. Transvaginal 3D and Doppler ultrasonography of the fetal brain [J]. Semin Perinatol, 2001, 25(1):38-43.
[16]
Monteagudo A, Timor-Tritsch IE. Normal sonographic development of the central nervous system from the second trimester onwards using 2D, 3D and transvaginal sonography [J]. Prenat Diagn, 2009, 29(4):326-339.
[17]
Faro C, Benoit B, Wegrzyn P, et al. Three-dimensional sonographic description of the fetal frontal bones and metopic suture [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2005, 26(6):618-621.
[1] 戴飞, 赵博文, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 陈冉, 田园诗, 狄敏. 胎儿心脏超声定量多参数对主动脉缩窄胎儿心脏结构及功能的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 950-958.
[2] 杨忠, 时敬业, 邓学东, 姜纬, 殷林亮, 潘琦, 梁泓, 马建芳, 王珍奇, 张俊, 董姗姗. 产前超声在胎儿22q11.2 微缺失综合征中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 852-858.
[3] 杜祖升, 赵博文, 张帧, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 陈冉, 毛彦恺. 应用二维斑点追踪成像技术评估孕周及心尖方向对中晚孕期正常胎儿左心房应变的影响[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 843-851.
[4] 张商迪, 赵博文, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 陈冉, 毛彦恺, 陈阳, 袁华, 陈燕. 中晚孕期胎儿心房内径定量评估心房比例失调胎儿心脏畸形的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 785-793.
[5] 顾莉莉, 姜凡. 安徽省超声产前筛查切面图像质量现状调查情况及分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 671-674.
[6] 王秋莲, 张莹, 李春敏, 徐树明, 张玉奇. 胎儿主动脉弓部梗阻伴发复杂心内畸形的产前超声诊断及漏误诊分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 718-725.
[7] 曾晴, 文华轩, 袁鹰, 廖伊梅, 秦越, 罗丹丹, 梁美玲, 李胜利. 经腹二维超声评价胎儿大脑外侧裂的新参数——外侧裂平台角度[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 454-459.
[8] 王水清, 赵博文, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 陈冉, 马明明, 狄敏. 16~40周正常胎儿左心房后间隙指数及其Z评分的定量研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 460-469.
[9] 项文静, 徐燕, 茹彤, 郑明明, 顾燕, 戴晨燕, 朱湘玉, 严陈晨. 神经学超声检查在产前诊断胼胝体异常中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 470-476.
[10] 罗刚, 泮思林, 孙玲玉, 李志新, 陈涛涛, 乔思波, 庞善臣. 一种新型语义网络分析模型对室间隔完整型肺动脉闭锁和危重肺动脉瓣狭窄胎儿右心发育不良程度的评价作用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(04): 377-383.
[11] 张帧, 赵博文, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 陈冉, 田园诗, 陈阳. 二维斑点追踪技术评价正常中晚孕期胎儿右心房功能的初步研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(04): 384-390.
[12] 王濛, 王華麟, 王鉴, 孙锟. 先天性心脏病宫内诊疗现状与展望[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 481-485.
[13] 王守森, 傅世龙, 鲜亮, 林珑. 深入理解控制性减压技术对创伤性颅脑损伤术中脑膨出的预防机制与效果[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 257-262.
[14] 吴东阳, 林向丹, 石佐林, 赵玉龙, 王振, 文安国, 纪鑫, 李俊之, 赵明光. NF-L、NLRP3、S100B 蛋白在颅脑损伤严重程度及预后评估中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 279-285.
[15] 罗磊, 熊建平, 郑宏伟, 王嗣嵩, 柴祥, 吴青, 潘海鹏. 静脉留置针穿刺引流治疗颅骨修补术后硬膜外积液一例报道[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 315-317.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?