切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (05) : 368 -372. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2017.05.008

所属专题: 文献

妇产科超声影像学

剖宫产瘢痕妊娠与植入性胎盘关系的研究
黄苑铭1, 黄冬平1,(), 涂艳萍1, 饶金1, 潘云祥1   
  1. 1. 510010 广州,广东省妇幼保健院暨广州医学院附属广东省妇儿医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2016-02-06 出版日期:2017-05-01
  • 通信作者: 黄冬平
  • 基金资助:
    广东省医学科学技术研究基金(C2014013)

The correlation of cesarean scar pregnancy and placenta accrete on ultrasound

Yuanming Huang1, Dongping Huang1,(), Yanping Tu1, Jin Rao1, Yunxiang Pan1   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Guangdong Women and Children's Hospital, Guangzhou 510010, China
  • Received:2016-02-06 Published:2017-05-01
  • Corresponding author: Dongping Huang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Huang Dongping, Email:
引用本文:

黄苑铭, 黄冬平, 涂艳萍, 饶金, 潘云祥. 剖宫产瘢痕妊娠与植入性胎盘关系的研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2017, 14(05): 368-372.

Yuanming Huang, Dongping Huang, Yanping Tu, Jin Rao, Yunxiang Pan. The correlation of cesarean scar pregnancy and placenta accrete on ultrasound[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2017, 14(05): 368-372.

目的

探讨超声监测下剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠声像图特点及其预后。

方法

对2013年1月至2015年8月经广东省妇幼保健院产前超声诊断为剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的8例孕妇均从早孕期至分娩前定期超声检查,并经孕期磁共振成像(6例)或剖宫产后检查证实为胎盘植入。追溯8例孕妇早孕期经阴道超声图像特征,观察其早孕期妊娠囊和丛密绒毛膜位置、记录超声随访结果、剖宫产次数、最终诊断结果及妊娠转归并进行分析。

结果

8例孕妇妊娠早期超声均诊断为瘢痕妊娠,超声诊断胎盘植入的孕周为11~24周。早孕期二维超声均显示丛密绒毛膜位置位于妊娠囊下缘,覆盖在剖宫产瘢痕上增殖的丛密绒毛回声高于平滑绒毛膜和包蜕膜,且增殖的丛密绒毛膜厚于周边平滑绒毛膜和包蜕膜。孕期超声随访中8例孕妇中原丛密绒毛膜所覆盖的位置与后期胎盘的位置大致相同,不随孕周增加而上移,呈现不同程度的前置胎盘状态,胎盘均覆盖于剖宫产瘢痕上。超声诊断剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠伴胎盘植入后3例经双侧髂内动脉球囊封堵术后引产终止妊娠;5例有生育意愿的孕妇选择继续妊娠,经双侧髂内动脉球囊封堵术后4例剖宫产分娩活婴,l例分娩一活婴并子宫切除。

结论

早孕期剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠在中晚孕期可发展为胎盘植入,如在早孕期观察到丛密绒毛膜覆盖在子宫瘢痕上,可诊断瘢痕妊娠,对有强烈生育意愿选择继续妊娠的孕妇,应高度警惕妊娠中晚期前置胎盘伴胎盘植入,密切随诊观察。

Objective

To explore ultrasonographic characteristics and prognosis of cesarean scar pregnancy in the ultrasound.

Methods

To conducted a retrospective study of 8 cases of diagnoses of cesarean scar pregnancy in ultrasound in our hospital from January 2013 to August 2015. All cases had ultrasonographic examinations regularly during the pregnancy and were confirmed placenta increta by cesarean section or prenatal MRI (6 cases). The imaging characteristics of 8 cases of pregnant women in early pregnancy by transvaginal ultrasound, and the positions of gestational sac and chorion frondosum were observed. Ultrasonic follow-up results, numbers of cesarean delivery, final diagnosis, and pregnancy outcome were analyzed.

Results

Eight cases of patients were diagnosed cesarean scar pregnancy, and all of ceses were diagnosed placenta increta by ultrasound from 11 weeks to 24 weeks of gestation. It was found that the positions of chorion frondosum were located in the lower edge of gestational sac in Two-dimensional ultrasound and the chorion frondosum was covered in cesarean section scar. The echoes of proliferous chorion frondosum were stronger than the rest of chorion leve and decidua reflexa, and the thickness of proliferous chorion frondosum were thicker than the rest of chorion leve and decidua reflexa. In the follow-up ultrasound of 8 cases in the second trimester, the original position of chorion frondosum which covered and the position of placenta were roughly similar. The position of placenta did not move up with the gestational weeks, in addition, appeared as placenta previa and covered in cesarean section scar. Five patients had strong childbearing willing of continue to conceive, one case of which needed hysterectomy, four of which underwent cesarean section delivery with alive births after using bilateral iliac arteries balloon occlusion. The rest 3 cases underwent induction of labor after using bilateral iliac arteries balloon cclusion.

Conclusions

Cesarean scar pregnancy in first pregnancy may be develop as placenta accreta in second and third trimester pregnancy. If chorion frondosum was observed to cover cesarean section scar by ultrasound in early pregnancy, scar pregnancy diagnosis was established. Pregnant women who have strong willing to continue their pregnancy should be pay more attentin to thiers placenta previa and placenta percreta in second and third trimester pregnancy. Close follow-up are needed.

表1 8例剖宫产瘢痕妊娠孕妇早中孕期超声表现及诊断结果
图1~4 孕妇,30岁,剖宫产瘢痕妊娠经阴道彩色多普勒超声声像图。图1孕6+2周经阴道彩色多普勒超声诊断瘢痕妊娠,超声显示增殖的丛密绒毛膜回声偏高,位于子宫前壁、覆盖剖宫产瘢痕(白色箭头所示)后壁及宫内口上方(绿色箭头所示);图2 孕10周超声随访显示妊娠囊向宫腔生长,胎盘位于子宫下段的前壁、后壁及宫内口上;图3 孕13+6周经腹部彩色多普勒超声疑诊胎盘植入,超声显示胎盘位于子宫下段的前壁、后壁及宫内口上,胎盘后间隙消失,子宫下段前壁肌层菲薄,与胎盘分界不清;图4 孕26+4周,经腹部彩色多普勒超声诊断胎盘植入伴中央性前置胎盘,超声显示胎盘后间隙消失,少量胎盘内漩涡形成,子宫下段前壁肌层菲薄,与胎盘分界不清
图5,6 孕妇,孕34周,前置胎盘、胎盘植入磁共振成像。图5 矢状面快速翻转恢复运动抑制序列(SSFSE)图像示子宫肌层与胎盘底蜕膜分界线消失,肌层T2低信号带明显变薄、中断(黄色箭头所示);胎盘与子宫肌层交界处可见长条状低信号影(短箭头所示)图6 矢状面快速平衡稳定采集序列(FIESTA)图像示胎盘与子宫肌层交界处较高信号影(短箭头所示),结合SSFSE观察,可明确该信号影为血管
[1]
宋蕾,王一凡,张丽, 等. 彩色多普勒超声在诊治剖宫产子宫疤痕妊娠中的价值[J]. 医学影像学杂志, 2012, 22(9):1541-1543.
[2]
宋巧丽,郑晓春,林亚. 胎盘植入的研究进展 [J]. 护理研究, 2010, 24(4):1042-1044.
[3]
谢红宁. 妇产科超声诊断学[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2005: 73-74.
[4]
Godin PA, Bassil S, Donnez J. Anectopic pregnancy developing in a prvious caesarean section scar [J]. Fertil Steril, 1997, 67(2):398-400.
[5]
罗卓琼,周平,高峰, 等. 腔内彩超诊断剖宫产术后子宫下段早期疤痕妊娠的临床价值 [J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2008, 24(5):65-67.
[6]
Vial Y, Petignat P, Hohlfeld P. Pregnancy in a cesarean scar [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2000, 16(6):592-593.
[7]
El-Matary A, Akinlade R, Jolaoso A. Caesarean scar pregnancy with expectant management to full term [J]. J Obstet Gynaecol, 2007, 27(6):624-625.
[8]
Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Cali G, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy and early placenta accreta share common histology [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2014, 43(4):383-395.
[9]
Dare FO, Oboro VO. Risk factors of placenta accreta in Ile-Ife, Nigeria [J]. Niger Postgrad Med J, 2003, 10(1):42-45.
[10]
Callen PW. Ultrasonography in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 妇产科超声学 [M]. 常才, 戴晴, 谢晓燕, 等, 译. 5版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2010: 647, 153-163.
[11]
Fylstra DL. Ectopic pregnancy within a cesarean scar: a review [J]. Obstet Gynecol Surv, 2002, 57(8):537-543.
[12]
Coniglio C, Dickinson JE. Pregnancy following prior Caesarean scar pregnancy rupture: Lessons for modern obstetric practice [J]. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 2004, 44(2):162-166.
[13]
Calì G, Giambanco L, Puccio G, et al. Morbidly adherent placenta: evaluation of ultrasound diagnostic criteria and differentiation of placenta accreta from percreta [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2013, 41(4):406-412.
[14]
Ben Nagi J, Ofili-Yebovi D, Sawyer E, et al. Successful treatment of a recurrent Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy by surgical repair of the uterine defect [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 28(6):855-856.
[15]
El-Matary A, Akinlade R, Jolaoso A. Caesarean scar pregnancy with expectant management to full term [J]. J Obstet Gynaecol, 2007, 27(6):624-625.
[16]
Sinha P, Mishra M. Caesarean scar pregnancy: a precursor of placenta percreta/accrete [J]. J Obstet Gynaecol, 2012, 32(7):621-623.
[17]
Ballas J, Pretorius D, Hull AD, et al. Identifying sonographic markers for placenta accreta in the first trimester [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2012, 31(11):1835-1841.
[18]
Wong HS, Zuccollo J, Tait J, et al. Placenta accreta in the first trimester of pregnancy: sonographic findings[J]. J Clin Ultrasound, 2009, 37(2):100-103.
[19]
Sinha P, Oniya O, Bewley S. Coping with placenta praevia and accreta in a DGH setting and words of caution [J]. J Obstet Gynaecol, 2005, 25(4):334-338.
[20]
李康宁,戴晴.超声在剖宫产瘢痕评估中的临床应用 [J/CD].中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2014, 11(4):307-310.
[1] 魏淑婕, 惠品晶, 丁亚芳, 张白, 颜燕红, 周鹏, 黄亚波. 单侧颈内动脉闭塞患者行颞浅动脉-大脑中动脉搭桥术的脑血流动力学评估[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1046-1055.
[2] 张璇, 马宇童, 苗玉倩, 张云, 吴士文, 党晓楚, 陈颖颖, 钟兆明, 王雪娟, 胡淼, 孙岩峰, 马秀珠, 吕发勤, 寇海燕. 超声对Duchenne肌营养不良儿童膈肌功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1068-1073.
[3] 朱连华, 费翔, 韩鹏, 姜波, 李楠, 罗渝昆. 高帧频超声造影在胆囊息肉样病变中的鉴别诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 904-910.
[4] 张梅芳, 谭莹, 朱巧珍, 温昕, 袁鹰, 秦越, 郭洪波, 侯伶秀, 黄文兰, 彭桂艳, 李胜利. 早孕期胎儿头臀长正中矢状切面超声图像的人工智能质控研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 945-950.
[5] 陈舜, 薛恩生, 叶琴. PDCA在持续改进超声危急值管理制度中的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 974-978.
[6] 周钰菡, 肖欢, 唐毅, 杨春江, 周娟, 朱丽容, 徐娟, 牟芳婷. 超声对儿童髋关节暂时性滑膜炎的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 795-800.
[7] 刘欢颜, 华扬, 贾凌云, 赵新宇, 刘蓓蓓. 颈内动脉闭塞病变管腔结构和血流动力学特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 809-815.
[8] 郏亚平, 曾书娥. 含鳞状细胞癌成分的乳腺化生性癌的超声与病理特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 844-848.
[9] 张丽丽, 陈莉, 余美琴, 聂小艳, 王婧玲, 刘婷. PDCA循环法在超声浅表器官亚专科建设中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 717-721.
[10] 罗刚, 泮思林, 陈涛涛, 许茜, 纪志娴, 王思宝, 孙玲玉. 超声心动图在胎儿心脏介入治疗室间隔完整的肺动脉闭锁中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 605-609.
[11] 黄佳, 石华, 张玉国, 胡佳琪, 陈茜. 胎儿左头臂静脉正常与异常超声图像特征及其临床意义[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 610-617.
[12] 袁泽, 庄丽. 超声检测胎儿脐动脉和大脑中动脉血流对胎儿宫内窘迫的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 618-621.
[13] 蒋佳纯, 王晓冰, 陈培荣, 许世豪. 血清学指标联合常规超声及超声造影评分诊断原发性干燥综合征的临床价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 622-630.
[14] 武壮壮, 张晓娟, 史泽洪, 史瑶, 原韶玲. 超声联合乳腺X线摄影及PR、Her-2预测高级别与中低级别乳腺导管原位癌的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 631-635.
[15] 孔博, 张璟, 吕珂. 超声技术在复杂腹壁疝诊治中的作用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 670-673.
阅读次数
全文


摘要