切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (10) : 993 -998. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2020.10.011

所属专题: 乳腺超声 文献

浅表器官超声影像学

高频超声联合弹性应变率比值与磁共振成像诊断乳腺癌的临床价值比较
施海建1, 丁洁2,(), 姥义1   
  1. 1. 214044 无锡,解放军联勤保障部队第九〇四医院超声科
    2. 214000 南京医科大学附属无锡市妇幼保健院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-08 出版日期:2020-10-01
  • 通信作者: 丁洁

Comparison of high frequency ultrasound combined with elastography strain rate ratio versus magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of breast cancer

Haijian Shi1, Jie Ding2,(), Yi Mu1   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, the 904th Hospital of the PLA Joint Service Support Force, Wuxi 214044, China
    2. Department of Ultrasound, Wuxi Maternal and Child Health-Care Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi 214000, China
  • Received:2019-12-08 Published:2020-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Jie Ding
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Ding Jie, Email:
引用本文:

施海建, 丁洁, 姥义. 高频超声联合弹性应变率比值与磁共振成像诊断乳腺癌的临床价值比较[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2020, 17(10): 993-998.

Haijian Shi, Jie Ding, Yi Mu. Comparison of high frequency ultrasound combined with elastography strain rate ratio versus magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of breast cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2020, 17(10): 993-998.

目的

比较高频超声联合弹性应变率比值与磁共振成像(MRI)诊断乳腺癌的临床应用价值。

方法

回顾性选取2016年5月至2017年4月因乳腺肿块在中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九〇四医院甲乳外科就诊的65例患者,共84个病灶。所有病灶均经穿刺或手术取得病理结果。所有患者穿刺或手术前均行高频超声及弹性成像检查,且行增强MRI扫描。以病理结果为"金标准",绘制ROC曲线,得出高频超声联合弹性应变率比值诊断乳腺癌的敏感度、特异度、准确性,利用四格表计算MRI诊断乳腺癌的敏感度、特异度、准确性,对二者的诊断效能进行分析比较。

结果

病理结果显示,84个病灶中,良性肿块47个,乳腺癌病灶37个。高频超声结合弹性应变率比值诊断乳腺癌的ROC曲线下面积为0.892,弹性应变率比值最佳截断值为3.01,诊断敏感度、特异度、准确性分别为91.9%、89.4%、90.5%。MRI诊断乳腺癌的敏感度、特异度、准确性分别为94.6%、89.4%、91.7%。高频超声联合弹性应变率比值与MRI诊断效能均较高,差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。

结论

弹性应变率比值是反映乳腺肿块硬度的重要指标,结合高频超声对乳腺癌具有良好的诊断效能;与MRI相比,其具有便捷、高效、费用低等优点,更适用于乳腺癌的早期筛查。

Objective

To compare the clinical application value of high frequency ultrasound combined with elastography strain rate ratio (SRR) versus magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of breast cancer.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on 65 patients with 84 breast lesions at The 904th Hospital of the PLA Joint Service Support from May 2016 to April 2017. Pathological results were obtained through puncture or surgery for all lesions. High frequency ultrasound and elastography were performed in all patients before puncture or operation, and enhanced MRI scanning was performed. ROC analysis was performed with pathological results as the "gold standard" to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of high frequency ultrasound combined with elastic SRR in the diagnosis of breast cancer. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MRI for diagnosis of breast cancer were also calculated using the four-fold table.

Results

The pathological results showed 47 benign masses and 37 breast cancer lesions. The area under ROC curve of high frequency ultrasound combined with SRR was 0.892. With an SRR threshold of 3.01, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of SRR for diagnosis of breast cancer were 91.9%, 89.4%, and 90.5%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MRI in the diagnosis of breast cancer were 94.6%, 89.4%, and 91.7%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of high frequency ultrasound combined with elastic SRR and MRI in the diagnosis of breast cancer were both high, and there was no significant difference between them (P>0.05).

Conclusion

The elastic SRR is an important index to reflect the hardness of breast lesions. Combining two-dimensional ultrasound and color Doppler blood flow characteristics has good diagnostic efficacy for breast cancer. Compared with MRI, high frequency ultrasound combined with SRR has the advantages of quickness, high efficiency, and low cost, and is more suitable for early screening of breast neoplasms.

图1 乳腺癌高频超声二维图像及弹性应变率比值测量。图a为乳腺癌高频超声表现为形态不规则,边界不清,呈低回声,边缘呈毛刺状;图b为超声弹性成像示乳腺癌与同深度周围正常组织的弹性应变率比值为3.84
图2 乳腺癌MRI图像及时间-信号强度曲线。图a为增强后脂肪抑制的快速自旋回波加强序列T1加权成像显示病灶边缘呈毛刺状,动态增强时,呈边缘性强化;图b示时间-信号强度曲线表现为III型(流出型,信号强度早期增强达高峰后快速下降)
图3 高频超声结合弹性应变率比值诊断乳腺癌的ROC曲线
表1 乳腺良恶性肿块的MRI检查与病理诊断结果对比(个)
1
李贺,郑荣寿,张思维, 等. 2014年中国女性乳腺癌发病与死亡分析 [J]. 中华肿瘤杂志, 2018, 40(3): 166-171.
2
乌拉木·玉努斯,周娜,柳紫阳, 等. 超声筛查乳腺癌模式在基层医院应用的研究 [J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2019, 29(2): 73-77.
3
罗葆明,曾婕,欧冰, 等. 乳腺超声弹性成像检查感兴趣区域大小对诊断结果影响 [J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2007, 23(9): 1330-1332.
4
American College of Radiology(ACR). Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS), ultrasound. 4th ed. [M]. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2013.
5
Kuhl CK, Mielearek P, Klasehik S, et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: Are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing Lesions [J]. Radiology, 1999, 211(1): 101-110.
6
Meladze NV, Ternovoi SK, Sharia MA, et al. Comprehensive magnetic resonance imaging for breast cancer [J]. Ter Arkh, 2013, 85(4): 29-33.
7
Allemani C, Matsuda T, Di Carlo V, et al. Global surveillance of trends in cancer survival: analysis of individual records for 37,513,025 patients diagnosed with one of 18 cancers during 2000-2014 from 322 population-based registries in 71 countries [J]. Lancet, 2018, 391(1125): 1027-1075.
8
徐玲,叶京明,朱赛楠, 等. HER-2阳性早期乳腺癌TCH方案新辅助治疗疗效分析 [J]. 中华医学杂志, 2018, 98(12): 907-911.
9
Krouskop TA, Wheeler TM, Kallel F, et al. Elastic moduli of breast and prostate tissues under compression [J]. Ultrason Imaging, 1998, 20(4): 260-274.
10
张明琼,凌云,李芳, 等. 超声弹性成像技术在肝良恶性肿瘤鉴别诊断和穿刺活检中的应用研究 [J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2016, 32(3): 231-233.
11
刘丹青,张伟,王慧颖, 等. 青年女性乳腺癌特征及影像检查手段效能评价 [J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志, 2017, 28(5): 331-336.
12
王利芳,何岩莉. 声辐射力脉冲成像对乳腺肿块诊断价值的研究 [J]. 中医临床研究, 2016, 8(3): 134-135.
13
李小康,徐熠琳,刘佩芳, 等. 乳腺MRI在X线检查乳腺阴性腋淋巴结转移癌阳性患者中的应用价值 [J]. 中华放射学杂志, 2011, 45(4): 348-352.
14
Han M, Kim TH, Kang DK, et al. Prognostic role of MRI enhancement features in patients with breast cancer: Value of adjacent vessel sign and increased ipsilateral whole-breast vascularity [J]. Am J Roentgenol, 2012, 199(4): 921-928.
15
Rakoczy M, Mcgaughey D, Korenberg MJ, et al. Feature selection in computer-aided breast cancer diagnosis via dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images [J]. J Digit Imaging, 2013, 26(2): 198-208.
16
Ojeda-Fournier H, Choe KA, Mahoney MC. Recognizing and interpreting artifacts and pitfalls in MR imaging of the breast [J]. Radio Graphics, 2007, 27(Suppl 1): 147-164.
17
尹华,林彬,王大成, 等. 磁共振多技术鉴别乳腺良恶性病变的价值研究 [J]. 实用医学影像杂志, 2016, 17(1): 16-20.
[1] 魏淑婕, 惠品晶, 丁亚芳, 张白, 颜燕红, 周鹏, 黄亚波. 单侧颈内动脉闭塞患者行颞浅动脉-大脑中动脉搭桥术的脑血流动力学评估[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1046-1055.
[2] 张璇, 马宇童, 苗玉倩, 张云, 吴士文, 党晓楚, 陈颖颖, 钟兆明, 王雪娟, 胡淼, 孙岩峰, 马秀珠, 吕发勤, 寇海燕. 超声对Duchenne肌营养不良儿童膈肌功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1068-1073.
[3] 朱连华, 费翔, 韩鹏, 姜波, 李楠, 罗渝昆. 高帧频超声造影在胆囊息肉样病变中的鉴别诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 904-910.
[4] 高建松, 陈晓晓, 冯婷, 包剑锋, 魏淑芳, 潘林. 基于超声瞬时弹性成像的多参数决策树模型评估慢性乙型肝炎患者肝纤维化等级[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 923-929.
[5] 丁建民, 秦正义, 张翔, 周燕, 周洪雨, 王彦冬, 经翔. 超声造影与普美显磁共振成像对具有高危因素的≤3 cm肝结节进行LI-RADS分类诊断的前瞻性研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 930-938.
[6] 张梅芳, 谭莹, 朱巧珍, 温昕, 袁鹰, 秦越, 郭洪波, 侯伶秀, 黄文兰, 彭桂艳, 李胜利. 早孕期胎儿头臀长正中矢状切面超声图像的人工智能质控研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 945-950.
[7] 陈舜, 薛恩生, 叶琴. PDCA在持续改进超声危急值管理制度中的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 974-978.
[8] 周钰菡, 肖欢, 唐毅, 杨春江, 周娟, 朱丽容, 徐娟, 牟芳婷. 超声对儿童髋关节暂时性滑膜炎的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 795-800.
[9] 刘欢颜, 华扬, 贾凌云, 赵新宇, 刘蓓蓓. 颈内动脉闭塞病变管腔结构和血流动力学特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 809-815.
[10] 张莲莲, 惠品晶, 丁亚芳. 颈部血管超声在粥样硬化斑块易损性评估中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 816-821.
[11] 郏亚平, 曾书娥. 含鳞状细胞癌成分的乳腺化生性癌的超声与病理特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 844-848.
[12] 张丽丽, 陈莉, 余美琴, 聂小艳, 王婧玲, 刘婷. PDCA循环法在超声浅表器官亚专科建设中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 717-721.
[13] 晏晴艳, 雍晓梅, 罗洪, 杜敏. 成都地区老年转移性乳腺癌的预后及生存因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 636-638.
[14] 李智铭, 郭晨明, 庄晓晨, 候雪琴, 高军喜. 早期乳腺癌超声造影定性及定量指标的对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 639-643.
[15] 赵文毅, 邹冰子, 蔡冠晖, 刘永志, 温红. 超声应变力弹性成像联合MRI-DWI靶向引导穿刺在前列腺病变诊断中的应用[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 988-994.
阅读次数
全文


摘要