切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (10) : 987 -992. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2020.10.010

所属专题: 文献

浅表器官超声影像学

多模态超声在颈部淋巴瘤诊断中的价值
张旭1, 刘丹2, 黄品同1,()   
  1. 1. 310009 杭州,浙江大学医学院附属第二医院超声医学科(现在杭州市红十字会医院工作)
    2. 310009 杭州,浙江大学医学院附属第二医院超声医学科
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-10 出版日期:2020-10-01
  • 通信作者: 黄品同
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No.81527803)

Value of multi-modal ultrasound in diagnosis of cervical lymphoma

Xu Zhang1, Dan Liu2, Pintong Huang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasonography, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310009, China
  • Received:2019-12-10 Published:2020-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Pintong Huang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Huang Pintong, Email:
引用本文:

张旭, 刘丹, 黄品同. 多模态超声在颈部淋巴瘤诊断中的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2020, 17(10): 987-992.

Xu Zhang, Dan Liu, Pintong Huang. Value of multi-modal ultrasound in diagnosis of cervical lymphoma[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2020, 17(10): 987-992.

目的

探讨多模态超声检查在颈部淋巴瘤诊断中的价值。

方法

回顾性分析杭州市红十字会医院2016年6月至2018年4月疑似颈部淋巴瘤的98例患者的超声声像图资料,包括二维超声、实时超声弹性成像及超声造影图像。所有患者均取得穿刺活检或手术病理结果。分析颈部淋巴瘤的超声图像特征,并以病理结果为"金标准",评价单一检查方式及多模态超声对颈部淋巴瘤的诊断价值。

结果

98例颈部淋巴结的病理结果为:淋巴瘤58例,转移性淋巴结14例,淋巴结结核13例,反应性增生淋巴结13例。二维超声诊断淋巴瘤的敏感度、特异度与准确性分别为63.8%、60.0%、62.2%。超声造影诊断淋巴瘤的敏感度、特异度与准确性分别为72.4%、72.5%、76.5%。应用二维超声、实时超声弹性成像及超声造影的多模态超声联合诊断淋巴瘤的敏感度、特异度与准确性分别为79.3%、82.5%、80.6%,高于单一检查方法。颈部淋巴瘤二维超声图像中低或极低回声背景下见条状、网格样回声(38/58,65.5%)及超声造影弥漫性增强(47/58,81.0%)、峰值时呈均匀增强(53/58,91.4%),与非淋巴瘤组比较差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。而淋巴瘤组实时弹性成像评分≤2分的占46.6%(27/58),弹性成像评分≥3分的占53.4%(31/58),与非淋巴瘤组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),弹性评分不能有效区分淋巴瘤。

结论

多模态超声检查的应用可为颈部淋巴瘤的诊断提供更多信息,避免了单一超声模式的局限性,尤其超声造影暴风雪样增强与二维超声淋巴结呈低回声背景下条状或网格状回声的特征,更有助于对颈部淋巴瘤的超声诊断。

Objective

To explore the value of multi-modal ultrasound in the diagnosis of cervical lymphoma.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on the ultrasonographic data of 98 patients with suspected cervical lymphoma at Hangzhou Red Cross Hospital from June 2016 to April 2018, including conventional ultrasound (US), real-time elastography (RTE), and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) data. Puncture biopsy or surgical pathological results were obtained in all patients. Pathologic results were used as the gold standard to evaluate the performance of multi-modal ultrasound in the diagnosis of cervical lymphoma.

Results

The pathologic results of 98 cases of cervical lymph nodes were: lymphoma in 58 cases, metastatic lymph nodes in 14, lymph node tuberculosis in 13, and hyperplasia of reactivity lymph nodes in 13. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of US, RTE, and CEUS for diagnosis of lymphoma were 63.80%, 60.00%, and 62.20%, 53.40%, 45.00%, and 50.00%, and 72.40%, 72.50%, and 76.50%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of multi-modal ultrasound in the diagnosis of lymphoma were 79.30%, 82.50%, and 80.60%, which were higher than those of either method alone. On conventional US, cervical lymphoma showed stripe- or grid-like echo (38/58, 65.5%); on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (47/58,81.0%), diffuse enhancement was observed, and homogeneous enhancement was noted at peak value (53/58, 91.4%), which was significantly different form that of the non-lymphoma group (P<0.05); on RTE, the elastic score ≤2 accounted for 46.6% (27/58), and the elastic score ≥3 accounted for 53.4% (31/58), and there was no significant difference compared with the non-lymphoma group (P>0.05). The elastic score could not effectively distinguish lymphoma.

Conclusion

The application of multi-mode ultrasound can provide more information for the diagnosis of cervical lymphoma and avoid the limitation of single-mode ultrasound. Especially, the features of stripe- or grid-like echo under the background of low echo on conventional US and snowstorm enhancement on CEUS are more helpful for the ultrasonic diagnosis of cervical lymphoma.

表1 淋巴瘤组与非淋巴瘤组二维超声表现比较[例(%)]
表2 二维超声与病理结果诊断淋巴瘤的结果比较(例)
图1 颈部淋巴瘤二维超声图像。图a为常规二维超声示右侧颈部多发淋巴结增大,较大一枚位于Ⅳ区,皮质回声不均匀,低回声背景下见条状、网格样回声(箭头所示),淋巴门不清,边界清晰;图b为彩色多普勒超声示血流信号呈门型血供
表3 淋巴瘤组与非淋巴瘤组实时弹性成像评分比较[例(%)]
图2 颈部淋巴瘤实时超声弹性成像图。图示较大淋巴结整体呈蓝色,评分4分,提示质地硬
表4 淋巴瘤组与非淋巴瘤组超声造影成像比较[例(%)]
表5 超声造影与病理结果诊断淋巴瘤的结果比较(例)
图3 颈部淋巴瘤超声造影图像。图a为团注造影剂后6 s淋巴结内出现点状增强;图b为团注造影剂后8 s淋巴结内呈弥漫性增强,也称为暴风雪样增强;图c为团注造影剂后16 s淋巴结内呈均匀性高增强,未见明显无灌注区
表6 多模态超声与病理结果诊断淋巴瘤的结果比较(例)
表7 不同检查方法对颈部淋巴瘤的诊断价值比较(%)
1
Narkhede M, Yazdy MS, Cheson BD, et al. Targeting Biology in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma [J]. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am, 2019, 33(4): 727-738.
2
Mizia-Stec K, Elżbieciak M, Wybraniec MT, et al. Chemotherapy and echocardiographic indices in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the ONCO-ECHO study [J]. Med Oncol, 2017, 35(1): 14.
3
Pfau D, Smith DA, Beck R, et al. Primary Mediastinal Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Review for Radiologists [J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2019, 213(5): W194-W210.
4
王晓荣,刘霞,姚兰辉, 等. 颈部淋巴结淋巴瘤皮质回声及其病理基础的初步探讨 [J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2013(8): 676-680.
5
Poanta L, Serban O, Pascu I, et al. The place of CEUS in distinguishing benign from malignant cervical lymph nodes: a prospective study [J]. Med Ultrason, 2014, 16(1): 7-14.
6
Giovagnorio F, Galluzzo M, Andreoli C, et al. Color Doppler sonography in the evaluation of superficial lymphomatous lymph nodes [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2002, 21(4): 403-408.
7
Furukawa MK, Kubota A, Hanamura H, et al. Clinical application of real-time tissue elastography to head and neck cancer--evaluation of cervical lymph node metastasis with real-time tissue elastography [J]. Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho, 2007, 110(7): 503-505.
8
Hong YR, Luo ZY, Mo GQ, et al. Role of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Pre-operative Diagnosis of Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2017, 43(11): 2567-2575.
9
谭林,颜薇,施承松. 68例儿童恶性淋巴瘤临床病理分析 [J]. 山东医药, 2009(47): 56-57.
10
Ahuja AT, Ying M, Yuen HY, et al. 'Pseudocystic' Appearance of Non-Hodgkin's Lymphomatous Nodes: An Infrequent Finding with High-resolution Transducers [J]. Clin Radiol, 2001, 56(2): 111-115.
11
Dudau C, Hameed S, Gibson D, et al. Can Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Distinguish Malignant from Reactive Lymph Nodes in Patients with Head and Neck Cancers? [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2014, 40(4): 747-754.
12
Xin L, Yan Z, Zhang X, et al. Parameters for Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) of Enlarged Superficial Lymph Nodes for the Evaluation of Therapeutic Response in Lymphoma: A Preliminary Study [J]. Med Sci Monit, 2017, 23: 5430-5438.
13
孔晶,张波,李建初. 超声造影在颈部良、恶性淋巴结鉴别诊断中的应用 [J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2015, 12(2): 108-111.
14
Khanna R, Sharma AD, Khanna S, et al. Usefulness of ultrasonography for the evaluation of cervical lymphadenopathy [J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2011, 9: 29.
15
Jin Y, He YS, Zhang MM, et al. Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in the Differential Diagnosis of Enlarged Lymph Nodes: a Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies [J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2015, 16(6): 2361-2368.
16
杨高怡,张莹,赵丹, 等. 颈部淋巴结结核超声造影分析 [J]. 中华临床感染病杂志, 2010, 3(5): 277-279.
17
Yu M, Liu Q, Song HP, et al. Clinical application of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in diagnosis of superficial lymphadenopathy [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2010, 29(5): 735-740.
18
Teng DK, Wang H, Lin YQ, et al. Value of Ultrasound Elastography in Assessment of Enlarged Cervical Lymph Nodes [J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2012, 13(5): 2081-2085.
19
Ying M, Bhatia KSS, Lee YP, et al. Review of ultrasonography of malignant neck nodes: greyscale, Doppler, contrast enhancement and elastography [J]. Cancer Imaging, 2013, 13(4): 658-669.
20
Rubaltelli L, Stramare R, Tregnaghi A, et al. The role of sonoelastography in the differential diagnosis of neck nodules [J]. J Ultrasound, 2009, 12(3): 93-100.
21
孟君,杨高怡,倪卫东, 等. 非钙化型颈部淋巴结结核的弹性成像联合超声造影表现分析 [J]. 浙江中西医结合杂志, 2015, 25(12): 1158-1159.
[1] 章建全, 程杰, 陈红琼, 闫磊. 采用ACR-TIRADS评估甲状腺消融区的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 966-971.
[2] 罗辉, 方晔. 品管圈在提高甲状腺结节细针穿刺检出率中的应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 972-977.
[3] 杨忠, 时敬业, 邓学东, 姜纬, 殷林亮, 潘琦, 梁泓, 马建芳, 王珍奇, 张俊, 董姗姗. 产前超声在胎儿22q11.2 微缺失综合征中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 852-858.
[4] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[5] 史学兵, 谢迎东, 谢霓, 徐超丽, 杨斌, 孙帼. 声辐射力弹性成像对不可切除肝细胞癌门静脉癌栓患者放射治疗效果的评价[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 778-784.
[6] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[7] 洪玮, 叶细容, 刘枝红, 杨银凤, 吕志红. 超声影像组学联合临床病理特征预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗完全病理缓解的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 571-579.
[8] 项文静, 徐燕, 茹彤, 郑明明, 顾燕, 戴晨燕, 朱湘玉, 严陈晨. 神经学超声检查在产前诊断胼胝体异常中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 470-476.
[9] 胡可, 鲁蓉. 基于多参数超声特征的中老年女性压力性尿失禁诊断模型研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 477-483.
[10] 张妍, 原韶玲, 史泽洪, 郭馨阳, 牛菁华. 小肾肿瘤超声漏诊原因分析新思路[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 500-504.
[11] 席芬, 张培培, 孝梦甦, 刘真真, 张一休, 张璟, 朱庆莉, 孟华. 乳腺错构瘤的临床与超声影像学特征分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 505-510.
[12] 钱警语, 郑明明. 《2024意大利妇产科学会非侵入性和侵入性产前诊断指南》解读[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 486-492.
[13] 张龙, 孙善柯, 徐伟, 李文柱, 李俊达, 池涌泉, 何广胜, 成峰, 王学浩, 饶建华. 腹腔镜脾切除治疗血液系统疾病的临床疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 870-875.
[14] 张琛, 秦鸣, 董娟, 陈玉龙. 超声检查对儿童肠扭转缺血性改变的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 565-568.
[15] 陈秀晓, 隋文倩, 王珉鑫, 吴圆圆. 腹股沟斜疝并腹腔游离体超声表现一例[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 516-517.
阅读次数
全文


摘要