切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (12) : 1178 -1182. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2020.12.006

所属专题: 文献

浅表器官超声影像学

超声联合BRAFV600E检测对BSRTC Ⅲ类甲状腺结节的诊断价值
王剑翔1, 俞飞虹1,(), 叶新华1, 杭菁1, 戎荣2, 李霄2   
  1. 1. 210029 南京医科大学第一附属医院超声医学科
    2. 210029 南京医科大学第一附属医院病理科
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-02 出版日期:2020-12-01
  • 通信作者: 俞飞虹

Value of TIRADS combined with BRAFV600E testing for diagnosis of Bethesda category Ⅲ thyroid nodules

Jianxiang Wang1, Feihong Yu1,(), Xinhua Ye1, Jing Hang1, Rong Rong2, Xiao Li2   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing
    2. Department of Pathology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing
  • Received:2020-04-02 Published:2020-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Feihong Yu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Yu Feihong, Email:
引用本文:

王剑翔, 俞飞虹, 叶新华, 杭菁, 戎荣, 李霄. 超声联合BRAFV600E检测对BSRTC Ⅲ类甲状腺结节的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2020, 17(12): 1178-1182.

Jianxiang Wang, Feihong Yu, Xinhua Ye, Jing Hang, Rong Rong, Xiao Li. Value of TIRADS combined with BRAFV600E testing for diagnosis of Bethesda category Ⅲ thyroid nodules[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2020, 17(12): 1178-1182.

目的

探讨超声甲状腺影像报告与数据系统(TIRADS)联合BRAFV600E检测对甲状腺细胞病理学Bethesda报告系统(BSRTC)Ⅲ类结节的诊断价值。

方法

选取2016年1月至2019年6月在南京医科大学第一附属医院行超声引导下甲状腺FNA的患者125例,共125个BSRTC Ⅲ类结节。所有结节同时行TIRADS分类和BRAFV600E检测,并经手术病理证实。以手术病理结果为金标准,比较TIRADS、BRAFV600E检测及两者联合对BSRTC Ⅲ类甲状腺结节的诊断价值。

结果

125例患者共计纳入125个甲状腺结节,术后病理结果提示:良性结节76个;恶性结节49个。TIRADS 4c~5鉴别诊断BSRTC Ⅲ类结节良恶性的敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及准确性分别为73.5%、89.5%、81.8%、84.0%、83.2%。BRAFV600E突变检测鉴别BSRTC Ⅲ类结节良恶性的敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及准确性分别为75.5%、100.0%、100.0%、86.4%、90.4%。以TIRADS 4c~5类或BRAFV600E突变型为BSRTC Ⅲ类结节恶性的联合诊断标准,其敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及准确性分别为93.9%、89.5%、85.2%、95.8%、91.2%,联合诊断较TIRADS、联合诊断较BRAFV600E具有较高的敏感度(P=0.002,P=0.004)、阴性预测值(P=0.018,P=0.044)。

结论

TIRADS和BRAFV600E检测联合对于BSRTC Ⅲ类结节具有良好的诊断效能,尤其诊断敏感度和阴性预测值高于单独应用TIRADS或BRAFV600E检测。

Objective

To assess the diagnostic value of the thyroid imaging reporting and data system (TIRADS) combined with BRAFV600E testing in Bethesda system category Ⅲ thyroid nodules.

Methods

A total of 125 patients who underwent ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from January 2016 to June 2019 were selected. Each nodule underwent TIRADS classification and BRAFV600E testing and was confirmed by histopathology. The diagnostic efficacy of TIRADS, BRAFV600E testing, and their combination were assessed according to histopathology findings.

Results

A total of 125 nodules from 125 patients were enrolled. According to histopathology findings, 76 nodules were benign and 49 were malignant. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of TIRADS 4c or 5 were 73.5%, 89.5%, 81.8%, 84.0%, and 83.2%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of BRAFV600E mutation were 75.5%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 86.4%, and 90.4%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of the combination of TIRADS 4c or 5 and BRAFV600E mutation were 93.9%, 89.5%, 85.2%, 95.8%, and 91.2%, respectively. The combination of TIRADS 4c or 5 and BRAFV600E mutation significantly increased the sensitivity (P=0.002, P=0.004) and NPV (P=0.018, P=0.044) when compared with either TIRADS or BRAFV600E mutation alone.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that the combination method has improved sensitivity and NPV and may have great value in differentiating Bethesda system category Ⅲ nodules.

表1 不同TIRADS分类的甲状腺结节的恶性率
图1 甲状腺影像报告与数据系统(TIRADS)分类诊断BSRTC Ⅲ类结节良恶性的ROC曲线
表2 BRAFV600E突变检测与术后病理诊断BSRTC Ⅲ类结节良恶性的结果(例)
表3 TIRADS与BRAFV600E检测联合诊断BSRTC Ⅲ类结节良恶性的结果(例)
表4 TIRADS、BRAFV600E检测和联合诊断对BSRTC Ⅲ类结节良、恶性的诊断效能比较(%)
1
Straccia P, Rossi ED, Bizzarro T, et al. A meta-analytic review of the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology: has the rate of malignancy in indeterminate lesions been underestimated ? [J]. Cancer Cytopathol, 2015, 123(12): 713-722.
2
Kwak JY, Han KH, Yoon JH, et al. Thyroid imaging reporting and data system for US features of nodules: a step in establishing better stratification of cancer risk [J]. Radiology, 2011, 260(3): 892-899.
3
Kim M, Park HJ, Min HS, et al. The use of the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology in Korea: a nationwide multicenter survey by the Korean society of endocrine pathologists [J]. J Pathol Transl Med, 2017, 51(4): 410-417.
4
Yoo WS, Ahn HY, Ahn HS, et al. Malignancy rate of Bethesda category Ⅲ thyroid nodules according to ultrasound risk stratification system and cytological subtype [J]. Medicine(Baltimore), 2020, 99(2): e18780.
5
Cibas ES, Ali SZ. The 2017 Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology [J]. Thyroid, 2017, 6(6): 217-222.
6
Ho AS, Sarti EE, Jain KS, et al. Malignancy rate in thyroid nodules classified as Bethesda category Ⅲ (AUS/FLUS) [J]. Thyroid, 2014, 24(5): 832-839.
7
Onder S, Firat P, Ates D. The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology: an institutional experience of the outcome of indeterminate categories [J]. Cytopathology, 2014, 25(3): 177-184.
8
Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, et al. 2015 American thyroid association management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: the American thyroid association guidelines task force on thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer [J]. Thyroid, 2016, 26(1): 1-133.
9
章晶, 徐辉雄, 张一峰, 等. 甲状腺影像报告和数据系统在甲状腺结节分类中的前瞻性验证[J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2014, 11(2): 167-171.
10
Moses W, Weng J, Sansano I, et al. Molecular testing for somatic mutations improves the accuracy of thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsy [J]. World J Surg, 2010, 34(11): 2589-2594.
11
Musholt TJ, Fottner C, Weber MM, et al. Detection of papillary thyroid carcinoma by analysis of BRAF and RET/PTC1 mutations in fine-needle aspiration biopsies of thyroid nodules [J]. World J Surg, 2010, 34(11): 2595-2603.
12
Marchetti I, Iervasi G, Mazzanti CM, et al. Detection of the BRAF(V600E) mutation in fine needle aspiration cytology of thyroid papillary microcarcinoma cells selected by manual macrodissection: an easy tool to improve the preoperative diagnosis [J]. Thyroid, 2012, 22(3): 292-298.
13
Rodrigues HG, DE PAA, Adan LF. Contribution of the BRAF oncogene in the pre-operative phase of thyroid carcinoma [J]. Oncol Lett, 2013, 6(1): 191-196.
14
Zhang B, Liu S, Zhang Z, et al. Analysis of BRAF(V600E) mutation and DNA methylation improves the diagnostics of thyroid fine needle aspiration biopsies [J]. Diagn Pathol, 2014, 9: 45.
15
Liu S, Gao A, Zhang B,et al. Assessment of molecular testing in fine-needle aspiration biopsy samples: an experience in a Chinese population [J]. Exp Mol Pathol, 2014, 97(2): 292-297.
16
Seo JY, Choi JR, Moon HJ, et al. Clinical implication of highly sensitive detection of the BRAFV600E mutation in fine-Needle aspirations according to the thyroid Bethesda system in patients with conventional papillary thyroid carcinoma [J]. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 2015, 124(5): 392-399.
17
Jinih M, Foley N, Osho O, et al. BRAFV600E mutation as a predictor of thyroid malignancy in indeterminate nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2017, 43(7): 1219-1227.
18
王超君, 秦勇, 程颢, 等. 超声造影联合BRAF V600E 基因在甲状腺细针穿刺意义不明确类型结节中的应用 [J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2019, 28(1): 49-54.
19
Helmi K, Ahmed D, Khuzema M, et al. Can Suspicious Ultrasound Features Predict BRAFV600E Status in Papillary Thyroid Cancer? [J]. Thyroid, 2018, 7(4): 205-210.
[1] 章建全, 程杰, 陈红琼, 闫磊. 采用ACR-TIRADS评估甲状腺消融区的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 966-971.
[2] 罗辉, 方晔. 品管圈在提高甲状腺结节细针穿刺检出率中的应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 972-977.
[3] 杨忠, 时敬业, 邓学东, 姜纬, 殷林亮, 潘琦, 梁泓, 马建芳, 王珍奇, 张俊, 董姗姗. 产前超声在胎儿22q11.2 微缺失综合征中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 852-858.
[4] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[5] 史学兵, 谢迎东, 谢霓, 徐超丽, 杨斌, 孙帼. 声辐射力弹性成像对不可切除肝细胞癌门静脉癌栓患者放射治疗效果的评价[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 778-784.
[6] 刘畅, 蒋洁, 胥雪冬, 崔立刚, 王淑敏, 陈文. 北京市海淀区医疗机构甲状腺超声检查及TIRADS分类基线调查[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 693-697.
[7] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[8] 洪玮, 叶细容, 刘枝红, 杨银凤, 吕志红. 超声影像组学联合临床病理特征预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗完全病理缓解的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 571-579.
[9] 项文静, 徐燕, 茹彤, 郑明明, 顾燕, 戴晨燕, 朱湘玉, 严陈晨. 神经学超声检查在产前诊断胼胝体异常中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 470-476.
[10] 胡可, 鲁蓉. 基于多参数超声特征的中老年女性压力性尿失禁诊断模型研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 477-483.
[11] 张妍, 原韶玲, 史泽洪, 郭馨阳, 牛菁华. 小肾肿瘤超声漏诊原因分析新思路[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 500-504.
[12] 刘文竹, 唐窈, 刘付臣. 诱导多潜能干细胞在神经肌肉疾病研究中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 367-373.
[13] 张琛, 秦鸣, 董娟, 陈玉龙. 超声检查对儿童肠扭转缺血性改变的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 565-568.
[14] 陈秀晓, 隋文倩, 王珉鑫, 吴圆圆. 腹股沟斜疝并腹腔游离体超声表现一例[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 516-517.
[15] 李玺, 蔡芸莹, 张永红, 苏恒. 假性软骨发育不全合并1型糖尿病一例[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 518-520.
阅读次数
全文


摘要