切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (04) : 360 -365. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2022.04.014

小儿超声影像学

盆腔超声在女童性早熟评估中的价值
夏斌1, 魏华星1, 潘陈可1, 骆云凯1, 何慧灵1, 许寿星1, 郑哲岚2,()   
  1. 1. 322000 义乌,浙江大学医学院附属第四医院超声科
    2. 310003 杭州,浙江大学医学院附属第一医院心血管超声中心
  • 收稿日期:2021-09-13 出版日期:2022-04-01
  • 通信作者: 郑哲岚

Value of pelvic ultrasound in evaluating precocious puberty in girls

Bin Xia1, Huaxing Wei1, Chenke Pan1, Yunkai Luo1, Huiling He1, Shouxing Xu1, Zhelan Zheng2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University Medical College, Yiwu 322000, China
    2. Echocardiography and Vascular Ultrasound Center, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Hangzhou 310003, China
  • Received:2021-09-13 Published:2022-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Zhelan Zheng
引用本文:

夏斌, 魏华星, 潘陈可, 骆云凯, 何慧灵, 许寿星, 郑哲岚. 盆腔超声在女童性早熟评估中的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(04): 360-365.

Bin Xia, Huaxing Wei, Chenke Pan, Yunkai Luo, Huiling He, Shouxing Xu, Zhelan Zheng. Value of pelvic ultrasound in evaluating precocious puberty in girls[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2022, 19(04): 360-365.

目的

探讨盆腔超声在女童性早熟及其不同类型评估中的价值。

方法

选取2019年8月至2021年8月在浙江大学医学院附属第四医院生长发育门诊临床诊断为中枢性性早熟(CPP)和外周性性早熟(PPP)的女童各30例,并选取同期30例正常女童作为对照组。所有纳入对象均行盆腔超声检查,比较3组女童的年龄、体质量指数、宫体厚度、宫体长径/宫颈长径、子宫体积、卵巢体积、最大卵泡长径的差异,并绘制3组比较有差异的超声参数鉴别CPP、PPP及正常者的ROC曲线,评估各项参数的效能。

结果

CPP组宫体厚度、子宫体积、卵巢体积、最大卵泡长径均大于对照组和PPP组(P均<0.05)。PPP组宫体厚度、子宫体积、卵巢体积、最大卵泡长径均大于对照组(P均<0.05)。以促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)激发试验结果为金标准,宫体厚度、子宫体积、卵巢体积、最大卵泡长径鉴别CPP与PPP的ROC曲线下面积为0.900、0.849、0.843、0.755;鉴别CPP与正常女童的ROC曲线下面积为0.941、0.887、0.926、0.769;鉴别PPP与正常女童的ROC曲线下面积为0.814、0.811、0.706、0.813。其中宫体厚度的ROC曲线下面积最大,以宫体厚度>1.39 cm为截断值,其鉴别女童CPP与PPP的敏感度86.7%,特异度90.0%;以宫体厚度>1.07 cm为截断值,其鉴别CPP与正常女童的敏感度96.7%,特异度90.0%;以宫体厚度>0.96 cm为截断值,其鉴别PPP与正常女童的敏感度80.0%,特异度86.7%。

结论

盆腔超声多项参数对女童性早熟评估及不同类型的鉴别有较好的临床应用价值,宫体厚度作为一项新的评估参数值得进一步关注,可将这些参数作为性早熟的初筛方法,为临床明确诊断提供可靠依据。

Objective

To explore the value of pelvic ultrasound in evaluating precocious puberty in girls and different types of precocious puberty.

Methods

Thirty girls with central precocious puberty (CPP) and 30 girls with peripheral precocious puberty (PPP) diagnosed clinically from August 2019 to August 2021 were selected, and 30 girls with no significant abnormalities in pelvic ultrasound, gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) stimulation test, and bone age measurement were selected as a normal control group. All the children underwent pelvic ultrasound examination. The differences in age, body mass index, uterine thickness, uterine length diameter/cervical length diameter, uterine volume, ovarian volume, and maximum follicular length diameter were compared among the three groups of girls, and the ROC curves of different ultrasound parameters for CPP, PPP, and normal subjects were drawn to evaluate the evaluation efficiency of each parameter.

Results

The uterine thickness, uterine volume, ovarian volume, and maximum follicular length diameter in the CPP group were significantly higher than those in the control group and PPP group (P<0.05). The uterine thickness, uterine volume, ovarian volume, and maximum follicular length diameter in the PPP group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). Taking the GnRH stimulation test as the gold standard, the areas under the ROC curves of uterine thickness, uterine volume, ovarian volume, and maximum follicle length diameter to distinguish CPP and PPP were 0.900, 0.849, 0.843, and 0.755; the areas under the ROC curves to distinguish CPP from normal girls were 0.941, 0.887, 0.926, and 0.769; and the areas under the ROC curves to distinguish PPP from normal girls were 0.814, 0.811, 0.706, and 0.813, respectively. The area under the ROC curve of uterine thickness was the largest, and the cut-off value of uterine thickness>1.39 cm yielded an 86.7% sensitivity and 90.0% specificity in identifying girls with CPP and PPP. Taking the uterine thickness>1.07 cm as the cut-off value, the sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing CPP from normal girls were 96.7% and 90.0%, respectively. Taking the uterine thickness>0.96 cm as the cut-off value, the sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing PPP from normal girls were 80.0% and 86.7%.

Conclusion

Multiple parameters of pelvic ultrasound have good clinical application value in the evaluation of girls' precocious puberty and the identification of different types. As a new evaluation parameter, uterine body thickness deserves further attention. These parameters can be used as the primary screening method for precocious puberty to provide a reliable basis for clinical diagnosis.

表1 CPP组、PPP组与正常对照组年龄、BMI比较(
xˉ
±s
表2 CPP组、PPP组与正常对照组盆腔超声参数比较(
xˉ
±s
图1 中枢性性早熟女童盆腔超声参数图像。图a为子宫体纵切面图像;图b为子宫颈纵切面图像;图c为测量卵泡长径图像;图d为测量卵巢径线图像
图2 外周性性早熟女童盆腔超声参数图像。图a为子宫颈纵切面图像;图b为子宫体纵切面图像;图c为测量卵巢径线图像,图d为测量卵泡长径图像
图3 盆腔超声参数鉴别中枢性性早熟组与正常对照组的ROC 曲线
表3 超声参数鉴别CPP与正常女童的ROC曲线结果
图4 盆腔超声参数鉴别外周性性早熟组与正常对照组的ROC曲线
表4 超声参数鉴别PPP与正常女童的ROC曲线结果
图5 盆腔超声参数鉴别CPP组与PPP组的ROC曲线
表5 超声参数鉴别CPP与PPP的ROC曲线结果
1
中华预防医学会妇女保健分会青春期学组. 女性性早熟的诊治共识 [J]. 中国妇幼健康研究, 2018, 29(2): 7-10.
2
Ogawa E, Isojima T, Sato Y, et al. Sexual precocity in a girl with early-onset Graves' disease [J]. Clin Pediatr Endocrinol, 2018, 27(3): 165-169.
3
袁博, 皮亚雷, 张亚男, 等. 特发性中枢性性早熟和单纯乳房早发育女童乳腺和盆腔超声比对研究 [J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2020, 41(11): 1311-1316.
4
Yu HK, Liu X, Chen JK, et al. Pelvic ultrasound in diagnosing and evaluating the efficacy of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist therapy in girls with idiopathic central precocious puberty [J]. Front Pharmacol, 2019, 10: 104.
5
Binay C, Simsek E, Bal C. The correlation between GnRH stimulation testing and obstetric ultrasonographic parameters in precocious puberty [J]. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab, 2014, 27(11-12): 1193-1199.
6
Wen X, Wen D, Zhang H, et al. Observational study pelvic ultrasound a useful tool in the diagnosis and differentiation of precocious puberty in Chinese girls [J]. Medicine, 2018, 97(10): e0092.
7
中华医学会儿科学分会内分泌遗传代谢学组,《中华儿科杂志》编辑委员会. 中枢性性早熟诊断与治疗共识(2015) [J]. 中华儿科杂志, 2015, 53(6): 412-418.
8
Calcaterra V, Klersy C, Vinci F, et al. Rapid progressive central precocious puberty: diagnostic and predictive value of basal sex hormone levels and pelvic ultrasound [J]. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab, 2020, 33(6): 785-791.
9
周美侠, 周浩. 超声检查对女童特发性性早熟早期诊断的临床价值 [J]. 中国中西医结合儿科学, 2020, 5(12): 430-433.
10
Catli G, Erdem P, Anik A, et al. Clinical and laboratory findings in the differential diagnosis of central precocious puberty and premature thelarche [J]. Turk Pediatri Arsivi, 2015, 50(1): 20-26.
11
Calcaterra V, Sampaolo P, Klersy C, et al. Utility of breast ultrasonography in the diagnostic work-up of precocious puberty and proposal of a prognostic index for identifying girls with rapidly progressive central precocious puberty [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2009, 33(1): 85-91.
12
Talarico V, Rodio MB, Viscomi A, et al. The role of pelvic ultrasound for the diagnosis and management of central precocious puberty: An update [J]. Acta Biomed, 2021, 92(5): e2021480.
13
Yu J, Shin HY, Lee SH, et al. Usefulness of pelvic ultrasonography for the diagnosis of central precocious puberty in girls [J]. Korean J Pediatr, 2015, 58(8): 294-300.
14
De Vries L, Horev G, Schwartz M, et al. Ultrasonographic and clinical parameters for early differentiation between precocious puberty and premature thelarche [J]. Eur J Endocrinol, 2006, 154(6): 891-898.
[1] 章建全, 程杰, 陈红琼, 闫磊. 采用ACR-TIRADS评估甲状腺消融区的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 966-971.
[2] 罗辉, 方晔. 品管圈在提高甲状腺结节细针穿刺检出率中的应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 972-977.
[3] 杨忠, 时敬业, 邓学东, 姜纬, 殷林亮, 潘琦, 梁泓, 马建芳, 王珍奇, 张俊, 董姗姗. 产前超声在胎儿22q11.2 微缺失综合征中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 852-858.
[4] 包艳娟, 杨小红, 张涛, 赵胜, 张莉. 阴道斜隔综合征的超声诊断与临床分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 859-864.
[5] 刘思锐, 赵辰阳, 张睿, 张一休, 杨萌. 多普勒超声对孕鼠子宫动脉不同节段血流动力学参数的评估[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 877-883.
[6] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[7] 史学兵, 谢迎东, 谢霓, 徐超丽, 杨斌, 孙帼. 声辐射力弹性成像对不可切除肝细胞癌门静脉癌栓患者放射治疗效果的评价[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 778-784.
[8] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[9] 洪玮, 叶细容, 刘枝红, 杨银凤, 吕志红. 超声影像组学联合临床病理特征预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗完全病理缓解的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 571-579.
[10] 王真真, 谢佳翊, 余涵, 沈雪. 隐匿性乳腺癌子宫转移一例[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 317-319.
[11] 胡启明, 鄢潇, 尤志学, 黄骁昊. 经瘢痕处单孔腹腔镜下切除多病灶腹壁子宫内膜异位症[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 314-317.
[12] 芦煜, 李振宇, 吴承东, 周仲伍. 肛周子宫内膜异位症一例报告[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 431-434.
[13] 张琛, 秦鸣, 董娟, 陈玉龙. 超声检查对儿童肠扭转缺血性改变的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 565-568.
[14] 徐靖亭, 孔璐. PARP抑制剂治疗卵巢癌的耐药机制及应对策略[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 584-588.
[15] 陈秀晓, 隋文倩, 王珉鑫, 吴圆圆. 腹股沟斜疝并腹腔游离体超声表现一例[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 516-517.
阅读次数
全文


摘要