切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (04) : 310 -313. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2017.04.015

所属专题: 文献

介入超声影像学

融合成像在初次前列腺穿刺活检中的应用价值
白文坤1, 张蔚1, 黄云霞1, 陈磊1, 胡兵,1   
  1. 1. 200233 上海市第六人民医院 上海交通大学附属第六人民医院超声医学科 上海超声医学研究所
  • 收稿日期:2016-07-07 出版日期:2017-04-01
  • 通信作者: 胡兵
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81271597,81401421); 上海市申康中心临床辅助科室能力建设项目(超声医学)(SHDC22015001)

The application of fusion imaging in patients who received initial prostate biopsy

Wenkun Bai1, Wei Zhang1, Yunxia Huang1, Lei Chen1, Bing Hu,1   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound in Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated 6th People′s Hospital, Shanghai Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, Shanghai 200233, China
  • Received:2016-07-07 Published:2017-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Bing Hu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Hu Bing, Email:
引用本文:

白文坤, 张蔚, 黄云霞, 陈磊, 胡兵. 融合成像在初次前列腺穿刺活检中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2017, 14(04): 310-313.

Wenkun Bai, Wei Zhang, Yunxia Huang, Lei Chen, Bing Hu. The application of fusion imaging in patients who received initial prostate biopsy[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2017, 14(04): 310-313.

目的

探讨融合成像在初次前列腺穿刺活检中的应用价值。

方法

回顾性分析2014年8月至2015年5月上海市第六人民医院初次行超声引导下前列腺穿刺活检的患者40例。所有患者术前1周均行磁共振检查(MRI)且MRI发现阳性可疑前列腺癌病灶,但相同部位超声无阳性发现。所有患者均经穿刺活检病理证实。采用图像融合技术,首先对MRI可疑前列腺癌病灶进行穿刺,然后行超声引导下10针法系统性前列腺穿刺。采用行×列表资料的χ2检验比较系统性穿刺、融合成像穿刺及两者联合穿刺诊断阳性率;采用四格表资料的χ2检验比较融合成像穿刺与系统性穿刺对前列腺癌的漏检率;采用Fisher确切概率法比较融合成像穿刺与系统性穿刺对Gleason评分≥7分前列腺癌的检出率。

结果

本组40例行前列腺穿刺的患者中,系统性穿刺诊断14例(35.0%),融合成像穿刺诊断19例(47.5%),两者联合穿刺诊断22例(55.0%),诊断阳性率联合穿刺>融合成像穿刺>系统性穿刺,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。融合成像穿刺漏检前列腺癌3例(13.6%,3/22),系统性穿刺漏检前列腺癌8例(36.4%,8/22),系统性穿刺对前列腺癌的漏检率高于融合成像穿刺,且差异有统计学意义(χ2=8.338,P=0.005)。融合成像穿刺诊断的19例前列腺癌中,15例(78.9%,15/22)Gleason评分≥7分;系统性穿刺诊断的14例前列腺癌中,6例(42.9%,6/14)Gleason评分≥7分。融合成像穿刺对Gleason评分≥7分前列腺癌的检出率要高于系统性穿刺,且差异有统计学意义(P=0.039,Fisher确切概率法)。

结论

融合成像穿刺能减少前列腺癌的漏检率,提高高级别前列腺癌的检出率。

Objective

To investigate the application of fusion imaging in the initial prostate biopsy.

Methods

Retrospective analysis was made on 40 patients who underwent initial ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated 6th Peoples Hospital from August 2014 to May 2015. All patients underwent preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans one week prior to surgery and the results showed that all patients had suspicious positive prostate cancer lesions, while there were no positive findings in the same area in sonography. All patients with prostate cancer have been confirmed by pathologic examination. Image fusion technology was used to guide the biopsy of lesions which were suspected as prostate cancer by MRI, and then the prostate underwent systematic biopsy by 10 needles under the guide of ultrasound. R×C Chi-square test was used to compare the positive ratio among imaging fusion biopsy, systematic biopsy and combined method in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Fourfold table Chi-square test was used to compare to undetected rate between fusion imaging biopsy and systematic biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. The differences of detection rate in the Gleason score more than 7 points of prostate cancer between fusion imaging biopsy and systematic biopsy was compared by Fisher exact test.

Results

In this group of 40 patients with prostate biopsy, 14 cases (35.0%) were diagnosed prostate cancer by systematic biopsy, 19 cases (47.5%) were diagnosed prostate cancer by image fusion biopsy, and 22 cases (55.0%) were diagnosed prostate cancer by systematic biopsy combined with image fusion. The difference of diagnostic positive rate among combined method of biopsy, image fusion biopsy and systematic biopsy had not statistically significant (P>0.05). Three cases (13.6%, 3/22) of prostate cancer patients were missed in image fusion method group, and 8 cases (36.4%, 8/22) of prostate cancer patients have not been diagnosed by systematic biopsy, which indicated the undetected rate of systematic biopsy is higher than that of image fusion biopsy in prostate cancer diagnosis, and there was a statistical difference between the two groups (χ2=8.338, P=0.005). Among 19 cases of prostate cancer patients who were diagnosed by image fusion biopsy method, Gleason score were greater than 7 points in 15 cases (78.9%, 15/22). Among 14 cases of prostate cancer patients who were diagnosed by systematic biopsy method, Gleason score were greater than 7 points in 6 cases (42.9%, 6/14). The positive rate of Gleason score ≥ 7 points in fusion imaging biopsy was higher than that of systematic biopsy, which had a statistical difference (Fisher exact probability method, P=0.039).

Conclusion

Image fusion method can be used to reduce the undetected rate of prostate cancer and improve the detection rate of the high-grade prostate cancer.

图2 融合穿刺过程。红色所示为磁共振成像检查发现的可疑病灶。完成对位后,实时超声引导下,对红色标记的磁共振成像检查发现的可疑病灶进行穿刺
[1]
Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, et al. Cancer statistics, 2014 [J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2014, 64(1):9-29.
[2]
Maxeiner A, Stephan C, Durmus T, et al. Added Value of Multiparametric Ultrasonography in Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ultrasonography Fusion-guided Biopsy of the Prostate in Patients With Suspicion for Prostate Cancer [J]. Urology, 2015, 86(1):108-114.
[3]
Rud E, Baco E, Eggesbø HB. MRI and ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy using soft image fusion [J]. Anticancer Res, 2012, 32(8):3383-3389.
[4]
白文坤,张蔚,黄云霞, 等. 融合成像在超声阴性患者前列腺穿刺活检中的应用 [J]. 肿瘤影像学, 2015, 25(4):15-18.
[5]
Heidenreich A, Bastian PJ, Bellmunt J, et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent-update 2013 [J]. Eur Urol, 2014, 65(1):124-137.
[6]
Valerio M, Donaldson I, Emberton M, et al. Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsy: A Systematic Review [J]. Eur Urol, 2015, 68(1):8-19.
[7]
Djavan B, Margreiter M. Biopsy standards for detection of prostate cancer [J]. World J Urol, 2007, 25(1):11-17.
[8]
Pallwein L, Mitterberger M, Pelzer A, et al. Ultrasound of prostate cancer: recent advances [J]. Eur Radiol, 2008, 18(4):707-715.
[9]
Cooperberg MR, Broering JM, Kantoff PW, et al. Contemporary trends in low risk prostate cancer: risk assessment and treatment [J]. J Urol, 2007, 178(3 Pt 2):S14-S19.
[10]
Epstein JI, Walsh PC, Carmichael M, et al. Pathologic and clinical findings to predict tumor extent of nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostate cancer [J]. JAMA, 1994, 271(5):368-374.
[11]
Mouraviev V, Verma S, Kalyanaraman B, et al. The feasibility of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for targeted biopsy using novel navigation systems to detect early stage prostate cancer: the preliminary experience [J]. J Endourol, 2013, 27(7):820-825.
[12]
Itatani R, Namimoto T, Atsuji S, et al. Negative predictive value ofmultiparametricMRI for prostate cancer detection: outcome of 5-year follow-up in men with negative findings on initial MRI studies [J]. Eur J Radiol, 2014, 83(10):1740-1745.
[13]
Singh AK, Kruecker J, Xu S, et al. Initial clinical experience with real-time transrectal ultrasonography-magnetic resonance imaging fusion-guided prostate biopsy [J]. BJU Int, 2008, 101(7):841-845.
[14]
Haffner J, Lemaitre L, Puech P, et al. Role of magnetic resonance imaging before initial biopsy: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging-targeted and systematic biopsy for significant prostate cancer detection [J]. BJU Int, 2011, 108(8 Pt 2):E171-E178.
[15]
芦志华,朱生才,朱刚, 等. 经会阴和经直肠途径前列腺穿刺活检并发症的比较分析 [J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2008, 23(5):363-364.
[1] 章建全, 程杰, 陈红琼, 闫磊. 采用ACR-TIRADS评估甲状腺消融区的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 966-971.
[2] 罗辉, 方晔. 品管圈在提高甲状腺结节细针穿刺检出率中的应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 972-977.
[3] 杨忠, 时敬业, 邓学东, 姜纬, 殷林亮, 潘琦, 梁泓, 马建芳, 王珍奇, 张俊, 董姗姗. 产前超声在胎儿22q11.2 微缺失综合征中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 852-858.
[4] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[5] 史学兵, 谢迎东, 谢霓, 徐超丽, 杨斌, 孙帼. 声辐射力弹性成像对不可切除肝细胞癌门静脉癌栓患者放射治疗效果的评价[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 778-784.
[6] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[7] 洪玮, 叶细容, 刘枝红, 杨银凤, 吕志红. 超声影像组学联合临床病理特征预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗完全病理缓解的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 571-579.
[8] 项文静, 徐燕, 茹彤, 郑明明, 顾燕, 戴晨燕, 朱湘玉, 严陈晨. 神经学超声检查在产前诊断胼胝体异常中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 470-476.
[9] 胡可, 鲁蓉. 基于多参数超声特征的中老年女性压力性尿失禁诊断模型研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 477-483.
[10] 张妍, 原韶玲, 史泽洪, 郭馨阳, 牛菁华. 小肾肿瘤超声漏诊原因分析新思路[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 500-504.
[11] 刘晨鹭, 刘洁, 张帆, 严彩英, 陈倩, 陈双庆. 增强MRI 影像组学特征生境分析在预测乳腺癌HER-2 表达状态中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 339-345.
[12] 郑俊, 吴杰英, 谭海波, 郑安全, 李腾成. EGFR-MEK-TZ三联合分子的构建及其对去势抵抗性前列腺癌细胞增殖与凋亡的影响[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 503-508.
[13] 张立俊, 孙存杰, 胡春峰, 孟冲, 张辉. MSCT、DCE-MRI 评估术前胃癌TNM 分期的准确性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 519-523.
[14] 张琛, 秦鸣, 董娟, 陈玉龙. 超声检查对儿童肠扭转缺血性改变的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 565-568.
[15] 陈秀晓, 隋文倩, 王珉鑫, 吴圆圆. 腹股沟斜疝并腹腔游离体超声表现一例[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 516-517.
阅读次数
全文
0
HTML PDF
最新录用 在线预览 正式出版 最新录用 在线预览 正式出版
0 0 0 0 0 0


摘要
136
最新录用 在线预览 正式出版
0 0 136
  来源 本网站 其他网站
  次数 58 78
  比例 43% 57%