切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (01) : 42 -48. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2024.01.006

妇产科超声影像学

孕11~13+6周子宫动脉与左心室参数对子痫前期的预测模型构建与验证
梁越1, 董晓秋1,(), 李奇默1, 李岩1, 姚金来1, 朴雪梅2   
  1. 1. 150000 哈尔滨医科大学附属第四医院超声医学科
    2. 150000 哈尔滨医科大学附属第四医院产科
  • 收稿日期:2023-01-13 出版日期:2024-01-01
  • 通信作者: 董晓秋

Construction and validation of a prediction model for pre-eclampsia based on uterine artery and left ventricular parameters at 11-13+6 weeks of pregnancy

Yue Liang1, Xiaoqiu Dong1,(), Qimo Li1, Yan Li1, Jinlai Yao1, Xuemei Piao2   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150000, China,
    2. Department of Obstetrics, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150000, China
  • Received:2023-01-13 Published:2024-01-01
  • Corresponding author: Xiaoqiu Dong
引用本文:

梁越, 董晓秋, 李奇默, 李岩, 姚金来, 朴雪梅. 孕11~13+6周子宫动脉与左心室参数对子痫前期的预测模型构建与验证[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(01): 42-48.

Yue Liang, Xiaoqiu Dong, Qimo Li, Yan Li, Jinlai Yao, Xuemei Piao. Construction and validation of a prediction model for pre-eclampsia based on uterine artery and left ventricular parameters at 11-13+6 weeks of pregnancy[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(01): 42-48.

目的

探讨孕11-13+6周孕妇子宫动脉血流及左心室参数与子痫前期的相关性及其预测价值。

方法

选取2020年1月至2022年9月于哈尔滨医科大学附属第四医院首次产检的孕11~13+6周孕妇,收集孕妇临床资料,包括年龄、收缩压、舒张压、平均动脉压(MAP)等参数,应用超声检测子宫动脉搏动指数(PI)、阻力指数(RI)、收缩期/舒张期血流速度(S/D)、左心室二尖瓣环舒张早期平均峰值速度(e')、二尖瓣舒张早期峰值流速/二尖瓣环舒张早期平均峰值速度(E/e')等参数,随访获得子痫前期组108例,随机选取同期符合标准正常孕妇110例作为对照组,采用t检验或U检验比较2组间各参数的差异。通过Logistic回归法筛选出子痫前期的独立影响因素并构建预测子痫前期的诺曼模型,通过受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线对预测模型的准确性进行评估,绘制校准曲线分析预测模型的校准度。

结果

与对照组比较,子痫前期组孕妇年龄[(30.07±5.03)岁vs(29.35±6.49)岁]、收缩压[(111.75±5.20)mmHg vs(109.62±8.19)mmHg]、舒张压[(70.06±6.37)mmHg vs(68.62±6.35)mmHg]、MAP[(82.30±7.54)mmHg vs(81.06±7.27)mmHg]、子宫动脉PI[(1.85±0.64)vs(1.64±0.57)]、RI[(0.71±0.12)vs(0.69±0.11)]、S/D[(4.33±1.64)vs(4.25±1.70)]和左心室E/e'[(8.32±0.91)vs(7.54±0.84)]比较均高,左心室e'小于对照组[(9.81±1.74)cm/s vs(10.63±1.82)cm/s],差异均具有统计学意义(t=0.923、2.309、1.601、1.167、2.441、1.240、0.937、6.301、3.256;P=0.034、0.008、0.010、0.014、0.005、0.013、0.025、0.001、0.002)。Logistic回归法筛选得出孕妇MAP[比值比(OR)=1.08,P=0.002]、子宫动脉PI(OR=2.54,P=0.004)、RI(OR=1.56,P=0.012)、左心室e'(OR=0.71,P=0.004)、E/e'(OR=1.68,P=0.013)是子痫前期的独立影响因素。诺曼模型预测子痫前期的ROC曲线下面积为0.81(95%CI:0.75~0.87),敏感度为73.14%,特异度为77.82%,预测模型校准度良好,对子痫前期的预测具有较好的准确性。

结论

孕11~13+6周孕妇的MAP、子宫动脉PI、RI以及左心室e'、E/e'对子痫前期的预测具有一定的临床参考价值;基于早孕期孕妇MAP、子宫动脉PI、RI以及左心室e'、E/e'构建的诺曼模型预测子痫前期具有较好的准确性,对子痫前期患者的早期管理具有重要意义,可在一定程度上提高临床诊断效能。

Objective

To assess the predictive value of uterine artery and left ventricular parameters for pre-eclampsia in women at 11-13+6 weeks of pregancy.

Methods

Pregnant women at 11-13+6 weeks of gestation who had their first prenatal examination at the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University from January 2020 to September 2022 were selected, and their clinical data were collected, including age, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and other parameters.Ultrasound was applied to detect the uterine artery pulsatility index (PI), resistance index (RI), systolic/diastolic velocity ratio (S/D), left ventricular mean early diastolic mitral annular velocity (e'), mitral early diastolic peak velocity/mean early diastolic mitral annular velocity (E/e'), and other parameters. Pregnancy outcomes were recorded, based on which 108 cases of pre-eclampsia were identified, and 110 normal pregnant women were randomly selected as a control group. The t test or U test was used to compare the differences in the above parameters between the two groups. The independent influencing factors of pre-eclampsia were screened out by Logistic regression analysis, and a prediction model was constructed based on these factors. The accuracy of the prediction model was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, and the calibration curve was drawn to analyze the calibration degree of the prediction model.

Results

Age [(30.07±5.03) vs (29.35±6.49)], systolic blood pressure [(111.75±5.20) mmHg vs (109.62±8.19) mmHg], diastolic blood pressure [(70.06±6.37) mmHg vs (68.62±6.35) mmHg], MAP [(82.30±7.54) mmHg vs (81.06±7.27) mmHg], uterine artery PI [(1.85±0.64) vs (1.64±0.57)], RI [(0.71±0.12) vs (0.69±0.11)], S/D [(4.33±1.64) vs (4.25±1.70)], and left ventricular E/e' [(8.32±0.91) vs (7.54±0.84)] of pregnant women in the pre-eclampsia group were significantly greater than those of the control group (t=0.923, 2.309, 1.601, 1.167, 2.441, 1.240, 0.937, and 6.301; P=0.034, 0.008, 0.010, 0.014, 0.005, 0.013, 0.025, and 0.001, respectively), while the e' [(9.81±1.74) vs (10.63±1.82)] of the left ventricle was smaller than that of the control group (t=3.256, P=0.002). Logistic regression analysis identified that MAP, uterine artery PI and RI, and left ventricular e' and E/e' were independent influencing factors of pre-eclampsia (odds ratio=1.08, 2.54, 1.56, 0.71, and 1.68; P=0.002, 0.004, 0.012, 0.004, and 0.013, respectively). The area under the curve of the nomogram model based on the above independent influencing factors for predicting pre-eclampsia was 0.81 (95% confidence interval: 0.75-0.87), with a sensitivity of 73.14% and specificity of 77.82%. The prediction model was well calibrated and had a high predictive accuracy for pre-eclampsia.

Conclusion

MAP, uterine artery PI and RI, and left ventricular e' and E/e' of pregnant women at 11-13+6 weeks of pregnancy have appreciated value for the prediction of pre-eclampsia. The nomogram model constructed based on MAP, uterine artery PI and RI, and left ventricular e' and E/e' of pregnant women in early pregnancy has good accuracy in predicting pre-eclampsia, is of great significance for the early management of patients with pre-eclampsia, and can improve the efficiency of clinical diagnosis.

图1 孕妇子宫动脉血流频谱图 注:PI为搏动指数;RI为阻力指数;S/D为收缩期/舒张期流速
图2 孕妇超声心动图。图a为左心室长轴切面取样图;图b为心尖四腔切面脉冲多普勒取样图;图c为心尖四腔切面组织多普勒取样图 注:E为二尖瓣舒张早期峰值流速;A为二尖瓣舒张晚期峰值流速;e'为二尖瓣环舒张早期平均峰值速度
表1 2组孕妇一般临床特征参数比较(
表2 2组孕妇子宫动脉血流参数比较(
表3 2组孕妇左心室形态与功能参数比较
表4 孕妇临床特征参数、子宫动脉参数及左心室参数对子痫前期影响的多因素分析
图3 各指标预测子痫前期的诺曼模型 注:MAP为平均动脉压;PI为搏动指数;RI为阻力指数;e'为二尖瓣环舒张早期平均峰值速度;E/e'为二尖瓣舒张早期峰值流速/二尖瓣环舒张早期平均峰值速度
图4 诺曼模型预测子痫前期的受试者操作特征曲线
图5 预测子痫前期的诺曼模型的校准曲线
1
中华医学会妇产科学分会妊娠期高血压疾病学组. 妊娠期高血压疾病诊治指南(2020) [J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2020, 55(4): 227-238.
2
王伽略, 杨孜. 子痫前期发生和发展过程中的预防 [J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2021, 10(3): 133-137.
3
ACOG Practice Bulletin No.202: Gestational Hypertension and Pre-eclampsia [J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2020, 135(6): e237-e260.
4
Webster K, Fishburn S, Maresh M, et al. Diagnosis and management of hypertension in pregnancy: summary of updated NICE guidance [J]. BMJ, 2019, 366: 5119.
5
储倩倩, 张羽. 再谈子痫前期的预测 [J/OL].中华产科急救电子杂志, 2021, 10(4): 201-205.
6
Salvesen K, Lees C, Abramowicz J, et al. ISUOG statement on the safe use of Doppler in the 11 to 13+6-week fetal ultrasound examination [J]. Ultrasound in Obstet Gynecol, 2011, 37(6): 628.
7
Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging [J]. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2015, 16(3): 233-270.
8
Poon LC, Kametas NA, Valencia C, et al. Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: screening by systolic diastolic and mean arterial pressure at 11-13 weeks [J]. Hypertens Pregnancy, 2011, 30(1): 93-107.
9
Zhu J, Zhang J, Syaza RN, et al. Mean arterial pressure for predicting pre-eclampsia in Asian women: a longitudinal cohort study [J]. BMJ Open, 2021, 11(8): e046161.
10
Khaw A, Kametas NA, Turan OM, et al. Maternal cardiac function and uterine artery Doppler at 11-14 weeks in the prediction of pre-eclampsia in nulliparous women [J]. BJOG, 2008, 115(3): 369-376.
11
Nicolaides KH, Wright D. Re: Prediction of pre-eclampsia: review of reviews [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2019, 54(4): 564-565.
12
李晓菲, 吴青青, 马玉庆, 等. 妊娠早期子宫动脉血流频谱与不良妊娠结局的相关性研究 [J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2011, 8(4): 786-793.
13
Melchiorre K, Leslie K, Prefumo F, et al. First-trimester uterine artery Doppler indices in the prediction of small-for-gestational age pregnancy and intrauterine growth restriction [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2009, 33(5): 524-529.
14
Bamfo JE, Kametas NA, Chambers JB, et al. Maternal cardiac function in normotensive and pre-eclamptic intrauterine growth restriction [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2008, 32(5): 682-686.
15
寿列军, 解左平, 孙雪东, 等. 运用超声心动图评价妊娠期高血压疾病患者左室形态和功能变化及其与N端脑利钠肽前体的相关性研究 [J/CD]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2017, 10(2): 103-108.
16
Yue CY, Gao JP, Zhang CY, et al. Development and validation of a nomogram for the early prediction of pre-eclampsia in pregnant Chinese women [J]. Hypertens Res, 2021, 44(4): 417-425.
[1] 肖莉莉, 吴道珠, 陈晓乐, 李秀云, 寇红菊. 胎儿心脏参数对胎儿宫内生长受限的预测价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(01): 24-31.
[2] 谭芳, 杨娇娇, 范思涵, 叶彩玲, 纪学芹. 产前超声心动图在先天性血管环诊断中的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(01): 37-41.
[3] 陈丽娟, 李晓琴, 施燕芸, 段彤彤. 胎儿左头臂静脉异常的超声特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(12): 1260-1265.
[4] 王德辉, 邓学东. 胎儿室间隔完整型肺动脉闭锁的超声心动图评估及预后分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(12): 1266-1270.
[5] 王秋莲, 张莹, 李春敏, 耿斌. 儿童先天性右肺动脉异常的超声心动图诊断及漏误诊分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(12): 1271-1275.
[6] 孟庆国, 唐艺加, 王斯佳, 周杰, 冯天航, 刘学兵, 舒庆兰, 邓燕, 尹立雪, 李春梅. 斑点追踪成像和组织多普勒同步成像对不同起搏模式下左心室心肌同步性的评估[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(12): 1223-1230.
[7] 陈佳易, 袁帅, 胡胜男, 步笑辉, 牟芸, 郑哲岚. 左心室压力-应变环联合Tei指数评价慢性中重度主动脉瓣反流患者左心功能的初步研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(12): 1231-1236.
[8] 何雪威, 谷美玉, 吴亭亭. 超声子宫动脉及子宫内膜血流参数对不明原因复发性流产患者妊娠结局的影响[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(11): 1158-1163.
[9] 张婉微, 秦芸芸, 蔡绮哲, 林明明, 田润雨, 金姗, 吕秀章. 心肌收缩早期延长对非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者冠状动脉严重狭窄的预测价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1016-1022.
[10] 任书堂, 刘晓程, 张亚东, 孙佳英, 陈萍, 周建华, 龙进, 黄云洲. 左心室辅助装置支持下单纯收缩期主动脉瓣反流的超声心动图特征[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1023-1028.
[11] 何金梅, 尹立雪, 谭静, 张文军, 王锐, 任梅, 廖明娇. 超声心肌做功技术对2型糖尿病患者潜在左心室心肌收缩功能损伤的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1029-1035.
[12] 薛艳玲, 马小静, 谢姝瑞, 何俊, 夏娟, 何亚峰. 左心声学造影在急性心肌梗死合并室间隔穿孔中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1036-1039.
[13] 刘笑笑, 张小杉, 刘群, 马岚, 赵海玥, 王雅晳. 超声心动图在围生期心肌病中的应用价值研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(11): 1196-1201.
[14] 刘光华, 欧阳强, 俞炬明, 范国平, 欧敬民, 邱明科, 林霏开, 孙会贞, 张惠, 汪希鹏, 金敏菲. 双侧髂内动脉球囊阻断序贯子宫动脉栓塞辅助下剖宫产的临床应用[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 33-38.
[15] 王梦卉, 王梦茹, 骆秦, 朱晴, 李南方. 高血压及原发性醛固酮增多症患者血清钾及低钾血症与心电图左心室肥大的关系[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 18-24.
阅读次数
全文


摘要