切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2016, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (01) : 26 -30. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2015.09.008

所属专题: 乳腺超声 文献

浅表器官超声影像学

实时剪切波弹性成像定量分析在乳腺良恶性病灶鉴别诊断中的应用价值
蔡珍玉1, 王宝华2, 蒋天安2,()   
  1. 1. 310022 杭州钢铁集团职工医院超声科
    2. 310003 杭州,浙江大学附属第一医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2015-12-07 出版日期:2016-01-01
  • 通信作者: 蒋天安

Real-time quantitative shear wave elastography for differentiating benign from malignant lesions of the breast

Zhenyu Cai1, Baohua Wang2, Tianan Jiang2,()   

  • Received:2015-12-07 Published:2016-01-01
  • Corresponding author: Tianan Jiang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Jiang Tianan, Email:
引用本文:

蔡珍玉, 王宝华, 蒋天安. 实时剪切波弹性成像定量分析在乳腺良恶性病灶鉴别诊断中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2016, 13(01): 26-30.

Zhenyu Cai, Baohua Wang, Tianan Jiang. Real-time quantitative shear wave elastography for differentiating benign from malignant lesions of the breast[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2016, 13(01): 26-30.

目的

分析实时剪切波弹性成像(SWE)技术在乳腺良、恶性病灶定性诊断中的应用价值。

方法

收集2014年10月至2015年2月浙江大学附属第一医院乳腺外科就诊的患者61例(63个病灶),术前行SWE检测,以手术或穿刺病理为金标准,绘制ROC曲线,分析其在乳腺良恶性病灶诊断方面的价值。

结果

61例患者中病理诊断良性38例(40个病灶),恶性23例(23个病灶)。恶性病灶的最大弹性模量Emax值为(82.26±41.37)kPa、良性病灶为(20.97±7.31)kPa;乳腺良、恶性病灶的Emax值比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。以病灶周边腺体为参照,良性病灶Eratio值为1.59±0.54,恶性病灶为5.26±2.19,良、恶性病灶Eratio值比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。SWE定量分析乳腺病灶的Emax界点值为55.8 kPa时,ROC曲线下面积为0.963,敏感度为91.3%,特异度为95.0%,准确性为93.%7;病灶的Eratio界点值为3.45时,ROC曲线下面积为0.948,敏感度为91.3%,特异度为92.5%,准确性为92.1%。

结论

SWE技术对乳腺病灶良、恶性病灶的诊断有较高的准确性。

Objective

To assess the value of real-time shear wave elastography (SWE) in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant lesions of the breast.

Methods

Sixty-one female patients (63 lesions) who underwent breast surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University were included. Elastic modulus was measured by SWE before surgery. Using pathological diagnosis as the golden standard, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of quantitative parameters of real-time SWE were plotted to assess their clinical value in distinguishing benign and malignant breast lesions.

Results

Pathology revealed 38 benign cases (40 lesions) and 23 malignant cases (23 lesions). Maximum elasticity (Emax) of malignant lesions was significantly higher than that of benign lesions [(82.26 ± 41.37) kPa vs (20.97 ± 7.31) kPa, P<0.01]. Mean lesion-to-gland elasticity ratio (Eratio) for benign lesions was significantly lower than that for malignant lesions (1.588±0.543 vs 5.260±2.190, P<0.01). Using 55.8 kPa as a threshold for Emax, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.963, with a sensitivity of 0.913, specificity of 0.950, and accuracy of 0.937. Using 3.45 as a threshold for Eratio, the AUC was 0.948, with a sensitivity of 0.913, specificity of 0.925, and accuracy of 0.921.

Conclusion

Quantitative elastic modulus can improve the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant breast lesions.

图2 患者,女性,乳腺浸润性癌超声弹性图,示病灶周边红色为主的红黄相间的"硬环征"
表1 乳腺良、恶性病灶的各项弹性模量值指标(±s)
图3 乳腺病灶弹性模量Emax和Eratio值的ROC曲线
表2 实时剪切波弹性成像对乳腺病灶良、恶性的诊断(个)
表3 实时剪切波弹性成像对乳腺病灶良、恶性的诊断(个)
[1]
Ophir J, Céspedes I, Ponnekanti H, et a1. Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues [J]. Ultrason Imaging, 1991, 13(2): 111-134.
[2]
Rizzatto GJ. Towards a more sophisticated use of breast ultrasound [J]. Eur Radiol, 2001, 11: 2425-2435.
[3]
Zhou J, Zhou C, Zhan W, et al. Elastography ultrasound for breast lesions: fat-to-lesion strain ratio vs gland-to-lesion strain ratio [J]. EUR Radiol, 2014, 24(12): 3171-3177.
[4]
Bercoff J, Tanter M, Muller M, et a1. The role of viscosity in the impulse diffraction field of elastic waves induced by the acoustic radiation force [J]. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control, 2004, 51(11): 1523-1536.
[5]
Bercoff J, Tanter M, Fink M. et a1. Supersonic shear imaging: a new technique for soft tissue elasticity mapping [J]. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control, 2004, 51(4): 396-409.
[6]
Wang Y, Jiang S, Wang H, et a1. CAD algorithms for solid breast masses discrimination: evaluation of the accuracy and interobserver variability [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2010, 36(8): 1273-1281.
[7]
Brinck U, Fischer U, Korabiowska M, et al. The variability of fibroadenoma in contrast-enhanced dynamic MR mammography [J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1997, 168(5): 1331-1334.
[8]
Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E, et a1. Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis [J]. Radiology, 2006, 239: 341-350.
[9]
Berg WA, Cosgrove DO, Doré CJ, et al. Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses [J]. Radiology, 2012, 262(2): 435-449.
[10]
Zhou J, Zhan W, Chang C, et al. Breast lesions: evaluation with shear wave elastography, with special emphasis on the ʺstiff rimʺ sign [J]. Radiology, 2014, 272(1): 63-72.
[11]
姚萌, 陈圆圆, 李智贤, 等. 实时剪切波弹性成像技术定量评价正常乳腺组织[J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2014, 30(12): 1074-1076.
[12]
陆敏华, 陈昕, 倪东, 等, 医学超声关键技术研究和进展(二)超声弹性成像技术、超声图像处理与分析[J]. 生物医学工程学进展, 2013, 34(2): 82-87.
[13]
Scaperrotta G, Ferranti C, Costa C, et al. Role of sonoelastography in non-palpable breast lesions [J]. Eur Radiol, 2008, 18(11): 2381-9.
[14]
Athanasiou A, Tardivon A, Tanter M, et a1. Breast lesions: quantitative elastography with supersonic shear imaging-preliminary results [J]. Radiology, 2010, 256(1): 297-303.
[15]
Krouskop TA, Wheeler TM, Kallel F, et a1. Elastic mouduli of breast and prostate tissues under compression [J]. Ultrason Imaging, 1998, 20(4): 260-274.
[16]
Garra BS, Cespedes El, Ophir J, et a1. Elastography of breast lesions: initial clinical results [J]. Radiology, 1997, 202(1): 79-86.
[1] 章建全, 程杰, 陈红琼, 闫磊. 采用ACR-TIRADS评估甲状腺消融区的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 966-971.
[2] 罗辉, 方晔. 品管圈在提高甲状腺结节细针穿刺检出率中的应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 972-977.
[3] 杨忠, 时敬业, 邓学东, 姜纬, 殷林亮, 潘琦, 梁泓, 马建芳, 王珍奇, 张俊, 董姗姗. 产前超声在胎儿22q11.2 微缺失综合征中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 852-858.
[4] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[5] 史学兵, 谢迎东, 谢霓, 徐超丽, 杨斌, 孙帼. 声辐射力弹性成像对不可切除肝细胞癌门静脉癌栓患者放射治疗效果的评价[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 778-784.
[6] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[7] 洪玮, 叶细容, 刘枝红, 杨银凤, 吕志红. 超声影像组学联合临床病理特征预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗完全病理缓解的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 571-579.
[8] 项文静, 徐燕, 茹彤, 郑明明, 顾燕, 戴晨燕, 朱湘玉, 严陈晨. 神经学超声检查在产前诊断胼胝体异常中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 470-476.
[9] 胡可, 鲁蓉. 基于多参数超声特征的中老年女性压力性尿失禁诊断模型研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 477-483.
[10] 张妍, 原韶玲, 史泽洪, 郭馨阳, 牛菁华. 小肾肿瘤超声漏诊原因分析新思路[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 500-504.
[11] 席芬, 张培培, 孝梦甦, 刘真真, 张一休, 张璟, 朱庆莉, 孟华. 乳腺错构瘤的临床与超声影像学特征分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 505-510.
[12] 侯中光, 詹韵韵, 毕玉, 王佳佳, 吴瑕璧, 彭梅. 三维反转成像技术在BI-RADS 4类乳腺肿块应用中的初步研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(04): 370-376.
[13] 钱警语, 郑明明. 《2024意大利妇产科学会非侵入性和侵入性产前诊断指南》解读[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 486-492.
[14] 张琛, 秦鸣, 董娟, 陈玉龙. 超声检查对儿童肠扭转缺血性改变的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 565-568.
[15] 陈秀晓, 隋文倩, 王珉鑫, 吴圆圆. 腹股沟斜疝并腹腔游离体超声表现一例[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 516-517.
阅读次数
全文


摘要