切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (08) : 586 -591. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2019.08.007

所属专题: 乳腺超声 文献

浅表器官超声影像学

三维剪切波弹性成像技术在鉴别诊断乳腺良恶性结节中的应用价值
田洁1, 刘千琪1, 王希1, 吴长君,1   
  1. 1. 150000 哈尔滨医科大学附属第一医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2017-08-26 出版日期:2019-08-01
  • 通信作者: 吴长君
  • 基金资助:
    哈尔滨医科大学创新科学研究资助项目(31041180064); 哈尔滨医科大学附属第一医院科研创新基金项目(2019B20)

Application of three-dimensional quantitative elastography in differentiating benign and malignant breast masses

Jie Tian1, Qianqi Liu1, Xi Wang1, Changjun Wu,1   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150000, China
  • Received:2017-08-26 Published:2019-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Changjun Wu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wu Changjun, Email:
引用本文:

田洁, 刘千琪, 王希, 吴长君. 三维剪切波弹性成像技术在鉴别诊断乳腺良恶性结节中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2019, 16(08): 586-591.

Jie Tian, Qianqi Liu, Xi Wang, Changjun Wu. Application of three-dimensional quantitative elastography in differentiating benign and malignant breast masses[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2019, 16(08): 586-591.

目的

探讨三维剪切波弹性成像(SWE)技术在乳腺良恶性结节鉴别诊断中的应用价值。

方法

对2015年8月至2016年6月哈尔滨医科大学附属第一医院收治的128例乳腺占位性病变女性患者149个乳腺结节行常规超声、二维及三维SWE检查。所有病例均经病理证实。绘制SWE定量参数以及常规二维超声及常规二维超声联合SWE鉴别诊断乳腺良恶性结节的受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线,得出曲线下面积(AUC)并采用Z检验进行比较,得出相应的敏感度、特异度并采用McNemar比较。

结果

三维SWE中,灰阶图像上测量的标准差(ESDU)和弹性图像上测量的标准差(ESDE)鉴别诊断乳腺良恶性结节的AUC分别为0.887和0.909,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。三维SWE的ESDE鉴别诊断乳腺良恶性结节的特异度高于ESDU(90.2% vs 82.6%),且差异有统计学意义(P=0.023)。二维SWE的ESDE鉴别诊断乳腺良恶性结节的AUC大于ESDU(0.933 vs 0.908),且差异有统计学意义(P=0.04)。二维SWE的ESDE、ESDU与三维SWE的ESDE、ESDU鉴别诊断乳腺良恶性结节的AUC差异均无统计学意义。常规二维超声联合二维、三维SWE鉴别诊断乳腺良恶性结节的AUC均高于常规二维超声,且差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);除了三维SWE的ESDU,其余常规二维超声联合二维、三维SWE鉴别诊断乳腺良恶性结节的特异度均高于常规二维超声,且差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。

结论

三维SWE在乳腺良恶性结节的鉴别中显示了良好的诊断效能,其中ESDE较ESDU具有更高的临床应用价值。

Objective

To evaluate the application value of three-dimensional (3D) shear wave elastography (SWE) in differentiating benign and malignant breast masses, and compare it with two-dimensional (2D) SWE.

Methods

One hundred and forty-nine breast masses in 128 female patients admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University from August 2015 to June 2016 were examined by B-mode ultrasound (US), 2D and 3D SWE. All cases were confirmed by pathology. The diagnostic performance of SWE quantitative parameters, conventional 2D ultrasound, and conventional 2D ultrasound combined with SWE in diagnosing benign and malignant breast masses was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The calculated areas under the curves (AUCs) were compared using the Z-test, and sensitivities and specificities were calculated and compared using the McNemar test.

Results

In 3D SWE, the AUC of the standard deviation (ESDU) measured on the grayscale image and the standard deviation (ESDE) measured on the elastic image for diagnosing benign and malignant breast masses were 0.887 and 0.909, respectively, which had no significant difference (P>0.05). In 3D SWE, the specificity of ESDE for diagnosing benign and malignant breast masses was significantly higher than that of ESDU (90.2% vs 82.6%, P=0.023). In 2D SWE, the AUC of ESDE in diagnosing benign and malignant breast masses was significantly higher than that of ESDU (0.933 vs 0.908, P=0.04). In comparison of 2D and 3D SWE data, no significant differences were found in AUCs for either ESDE or ESDU. The AUCs of conventional 2D ultrasound combined with 2D and 3D SWE in diagnosing benign and malignant breast masses were significantly higher than that of conventional 2D ultrasound (P<0.05). Except for the ESDU in 3D SWE, the specificities of other conventional 2D ultrasound data combined with 2D and 3D SWE in diagnosing benign and malignant breast masses were significantly higher than that of conventional 2D ultrasound (P<0.05).

Conclusion

3D SWE has good diagnostic performance in differentiating benign and malignant breast masses, and the measurement of ESDE has better clinical value than ESDU.

图1 剪切波弹性成像图记录弹性参数。图a为二维剪切波弹性成像图,小的圆形感兴趣区尽可能包含灰阶勾勒出病变区域,且不超过病变的轮廓,测得的标准差记录为ESDE,大的圆形感兴趣区尽可能包含弹性勾勒出的病变区域边缘,测得的标准差记录为ESDU,上图为剪切波弹性成像图,下图为对应的灰阶图;图b为三维剪切波弹性成像图。左上图为断层示意图,其余图为对应的断层切面弹性图
表1 乳腺良恶性结节二维和三维SWE弹性值比较[kPa,MQR)]
图2 二维和三维剪切波弹性成像定量参数诊断乳腺良恶性结节的受试者操作特征曲线
表2 二维和三维SWE定量参数鉴别诊断乳腺良恶性结节的效能比较
图3 常规二维超声及常规二维超声联合剪切波弹性成像定量参数诊断乳腺良恶性结节的受试者操作特性曲线
表3 常规二维超声与常规二维超声联合SWE鉴别诊断乳腺良恶性结节的效能比较
1
Seo M, Ahn HS, Park SH, et al. Comparison and Combination of Strain and Shear Wave Elastography of Breast Masses for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Lesions by Quantitative Assessment: Preliminary Study [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2018, 37(1): 99-109.
2
Choi HJ, Ko KH, Jung HK. Shear Wave Elastography for Surgically Verified Breast Papillary Lesions: Is It Effective for Differentiation Between Benign and Malignant Lesions? [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2017, 36(10): 2007-2014.
3
Fujioka T, Mori M, Kubota K, et al. Simultaneous comparison between strain and shear wave elastography of breast masses for the differentiation of benign and malignant lesions by qualitative and quantitative assessments [J]. Breast Cancer, 2019. [Epub ahead of print]
4
Xue Y, Yao S, Li X, et al. Value of shear wave elastography in discriminating malignant and benign breast lesions: A meta-analysis [J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2017, 96(42): e7412.
5
Hong S, Woo OH, Shin HS, et al. Reproducibility and diagnostic performance of shear wave elastography in evaluating breast solid mass [J]. Clin Imaging, 2017, 44: 42-45.
6
Youk JH, Gweon HM, Son EJ, et al. Three-dimensional shear-wave elastography for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions: comparison with two-dimensional shear-wave elastography [J]. Eur Radiol, 2013, 23(6): 1519-1527.
7
Lee SH, Chang JM, Kim WH, et al. Differentiation of benign from malignant solid breast masses: comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional shear-wave elastography [J]. Eur Radiol, 2013, 23(4): 1015-1026.
8
Evans A, Whelehan P, Thomson K, et al. Quantitative shear wave ultrasound elastography: initial experience in solid breast masses [J]. Breast Cancer Res, 2010, 12(6): R104.
9
Zhou J, Zhan W, Chang C, et al. Breast lesions: evaluation with shear wave elastography, with special emphasis on the ″stiff rim″ sign [J]. Radiology, 2014, 272(1): 63-72.
10
Mendelson EB, Bohm-Velez M, Berg WA, et al. ACR breast imaging reporting and data system, breast imaging atlas [M]. 5th ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2013.
11
Huang Y, Li F, Han J, et al. Shear Wave Elastography of Breast Lesions: Quantitative Analysis of Elastic Heterogeneity Improves Diagnostic Performance [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2019, 45(8): 1909-1917.
12
Choi HY, Sohn YM, Seo M. Comparison of 3D and 2D shear-wave elastography for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses: focus on the diagnostic performance [J]. Clin Radiol, 2017, 72(10): 878-886.
13
Ng WL, Rahmat K, Fadzli F, et al. Shearwave Elastography Increases Diagnostic Accuracy in Characterization of Breast Lesions [J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2016, 95(12): e3146.
14
Berg WA, Cosgrove DO, Dore CJ, et al. Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses [J]. Radiology, 2012, 262(2): 435-449.
15
Wang ZL, Li JL, Li M, et al. Study of quantitative elastography with supersonic shear imaging in the diagnosis of breast tumours [J]. Radiol Med, 2013, 118(4): 583-590.
16
Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, et al. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions [J]. Radiology, 1995, 196(1): 123-134.
17
Barr RG. Sonographic breast elastography: a primer [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2012, 31(5): 773-783.
18
Garra BS, Cespedes EI, Ophir J, et al. Elastography of breast lesions: initial clinical results [J]. Radiology, 1997, 202(1): 79-86.
19
Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E, et al. Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis [J]. Radiology, 2006, 239(2): 341-350.
20
Tozaki M, Fukuma E. Pattern classification of ShearWave Elastography images for differential diagnosis between benign and malignant solid breast masses [J]. Acta Radiol, 2011, 52(10): 1069-1075.
[1] 章建全, 程杰, 陈红琼, 闫磊. 采用ACR-TIRADS评估甲状腺消融区的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 966-971.
[2] 罗辉, 方晔. 品管圈在提高甲状腺结节细针穿刺检出率中的应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 972-977.
[3] 杨忠, 时敬业, 邓学东, 姜纬, 殷林亮, 潘琦, 梁泓, 马建芳, 王珍奇, 张俊, 董姗姗. 产前超声在胎儿22q11.2 微缺失综合征中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 852-858.
[4] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[5] 史学兵, 谢迎东, 谢霓, 徐超丽, 杨斌, 孙帼. 声辐射力弹性成像对不可切除肝细胞癌门静脉癌栓患者放射治疗效果的评价[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 778-784.
[6] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[7] 洪玮, 叶细容, 刘枝红, 杨银凤, 吕志红. 超声影像组学联合临床病理特征预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗完全病理缓解的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 571-579.
[8] 项文静, 徐燕, 茹彤, 郑明明, 顾燕, 戴晨燕, 朱湘玉, 严陈晨. 神经学超声检查在产前诊断胼胝体异常中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 470-476.
[9] 胡可, 鲁蓉. 基于多参数超声特征的中老年女性压力性尿失禁诊断模型研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 477-483.
[10] 张妍, 原韶玲, 史泽洪, 郭馨阳, 牛菁华. 小肾肿瘤超声漏诊原因分析新思路[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 500-504.
[11] 席芬, 张培培, 孝梦甦, 刘真真, 张一休, 张璟, 朱庆莉, 孟华. 乳腺错构瘤的临床与超声影像学特征分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 505-510.
[12] 钱警语, 郑明明. 《2024意大利妇产科学会非侵入性和侵入性产前诊断指南》解读[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 486-492.
[13] 张琛, 秦鸣, 董娟, 陈玉龙. 超声检查对儿童肠扭转缺血性改变的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 565-568.
[14] 陈秀晓, 隋文倩, 王珉鑫, 吴圆圆. 腹股沟斜疝并腹腔游离体超声表现一例[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 516-517.
[15] 张芳芳, 李军, 赵玉洁, 于彤, 宁春平. 侵袭性血管黏液瘤的影像学特征并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 254-259.
阅读次数
全文
2
HTML PDF
最新录用 在线预览 正式出版 最新录用 在线预览 正式出版
0 0 1 0 0 1

  来源 本网站 其他网站
  次数 1 1
  比例 50% 50%

摘要
233
最新录用 在线预览 正式出版
0 0 233
  来源 本网站 其他网站
  次数 113 120
  比例 48% 52%