切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华医学超声杂志（电子版）

中华医学超声杂志（电子版） ›› 2020, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (05) : 473 -477. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2020.05.015

所属专题： 文献；

骨骼肌肉超声影像学

膝关节前外侧韧带的超声影像特征及损伤的诊断分析
余秋锦1, 冉海涛1,†(), 杨扬1, 聂茂2,†()   
  1. 1. 400010　重庆医科大学附属第二医院超声科　超声分子影像重庆市重点实验室
    2. 400010　重庆医科大学附属第二医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2019-10-27 出版日期:2020-05-01
  • 通信作者: 冉海涛, 聂茂

Ultrasonographic features and injured diagnosis

Qiujin Yu1, Haitao Ran1,†(), Yang Yang1, Mao Nie2,†()   

  1. 1. Ultrasound Department of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Ultrasound Molecular Imagine, Chongqing 400010, China
    2. Department of Orthopaedics, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China
  • Received:2019-10-27 Published:2020-05-01
  • Corresponding author: Haitao Ran, Mao Nie
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Nie Mao, Email: ;
    Ran Haitao, Email:
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

余秋锦, 冉海涛, 杨扬, 聂茂. 膝关节前外侧韧带的超声影像特征及损伤的诊断分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2020, 17(05): 473-477.

Qiujin Yu, Haitao Ran, Yang Yang, Mao Nie. Ultrasonographic features and injured diagnosis[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2020, 17(05): 473-477.

目的

分析正常及损伤的膝关节前外侧韧带在超声中的影像学表现。

方法

选取2018年1月至2019年7月在重庆医科大学附属第三医院的20例磁共振成像确诊的单膝急性前交叉韧带（ACL）损伤患者的双膝关节前外侧韧带（ALL）进行超声检查，获得高分辨率超声图像后对图像进行评估。Cohen的Kappa系数用于评估观察者之间的一致性。通过受试者工作特性曲线（ROC）获得ALL损伤的厚度阈值。

结果

在正常膝关节的超声影像中，ALL近股骨外侧髁附着处90%（18/20，Kappa=0.85）可显示，ALL胫骨平台插入处100% （20/20，Kappa=1）可显示，ALL半月板插入处无法显示（0/20，Kappa=1）。在合并ACL损伤的膝关节中，ALL损伤的发生率为45%（9/20，Kappa=0.80），其中胫骨平台插入处损伤有9例（Kappa=1），近股骨外侧髁附着处损伤有2例（Kappa=0.79）。ROC曲线法分析结果表明，超声下ALL近股骨外侧髁附着处厚度大于0.65 mm考虑为韧带损伤（敏感度100%，特异度40%），ALL胫骨平台插入处厚度大于1.25 mm考虑为韧带损伤（敏感度88%，特异度93%）。

结论

ALL损伤常与ACL撕裂伴随发生，并且损伤多发生在胫骨平台插入处，超声是检查ALL简单、快速的方法。

关键词: 前外侧韧带, 前交叉韧带, 超声检查
Objective

To analyze the ultrasonographic findings of normal and injured anterolateral ligament (ALL).

Methods

The ALLs of 20 patients with acute unilateral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, as diagnosed by MRI, were examined by ultrasonography and MRI. The injuries were evaluated after obtaining high-resolution images. The Cohen's Kappa coefficient was used to evaluate consistency between observers. The threshold of thickness for ALL injury was obtained by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Results

In the normal knee joints, the incidence of ALL in proximal femoral condyle attachment was 90% (18/20, Kappa=0.85) and the incidence of ALL in tibial plateau insertion was 100% (20/20, Kappa=1). The insertion of the meniscus of ALL cannot be displayed (0/20, Kappa=1). In knee joints with ACL injury, the incidence of ALL injury, as diagnosed by ultrasound, was 45% (9/20, Kappa=0.80), including nine cases with insertion tibial plateau injuries (Kappa=1) and two cases with lateral condyle of the femur attachment injuries (Kappa=0.79). The results of ROC curve analysis showed that a lateral femoral condyle attachment ALL thicker than 0.65 mm as measured by ultrasound was considered to be an injury (sensitivity: 100%; specificity: 40%), whereas an tibial plateau insertion ALL thicker than 1.25 mm was considered to be an injury (sensitivity: 88%; specificity: 93%).

Conclusion

ALL injury is often accompanied by ACL tear, and the injury usually occurs at the insertion of the tibial plateau. Ultrasound is a simple and rapid method for the examination of ALL.

Key words: Anterolateral ligament, Anterior cruciate ligament, Ultrasound
图1 超声下正常受检者的膝关节髂胫束图像
图2 超声下正常受检者的膝关节前外侧韧带图像。示正常ALL为一带状低回声结构，一端附着于腓骨头（箭头所示）加彩后位于ALL深面的LIGA
图3 超声下前交叉韧带损伤的受检者的膝关节前外侧韧带图像。示损伤的前外侧韧带，胫骨附着处回声减低，增厚伴周围软组织积液（白箭头）
图4 胫骨平台插入处前外侧韧带损伤的受试者工作特征曲线（曲线下面积0.849）
图5 近股骨外侧髁处前外侧韧带损伤阈值的受试者工作特征曲线（曲线下面积0.764）
1
Coquart B, Le Corroller T, Laurent PE, et al. Anterolateral ligament of the knee: myth or reality? [J]. Surg Radiol Anat, 2016, 38(8): 955-962.
2
余秋锦, 冉海涛, 聂茂. 膝关节前外侧韧带的临床研究进展 [J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2019, 37(2): 234-235.
3
Woods GW, Stanley RF, Tullos HS. Lateral capsular sign: x-ray clue to a significant knee instability [J]. Am J Sports Med, 1979, 7(1): 27-33.
4
Claes S, Vereecke E, Maes M, et al. The Anterolateral Ligament of the Knee: Anatomy, Radiology, Biomechanics and Clinical Implications [J]. Clinica Chimica Acta, 2013, 334(1-2): 95-106.
5
Dodds AL, Halewood C, Gupte CM, et al. The anterolateral ligament: Anatomy, length changes and association with the Segond fracture [J]. Bone Joint J, 2014. 96-B(3): 325-331.
6
Claes S, Bartholomeeusen S, Bellemans J. Bellemans, High prevalence of anterolateral ligament abnormalities in magnetic resonance images of anterior cruciate ligament-injured knees [J]. Acta Orthop Belg, 2014, 80(1): 45-49.
7
Caterine S, Litchfield R, Johnson M. A cadaveric study of the anterolateral ligament: re-introducing the lateral capsular ligament [J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2015, 23(11): 3186-3195.
8
Helito CP, Helito PVP, Costa HP, et al. MRI evaluation of the anterolateral ligament of the knee: assessment in routine 1.5-T scans [J]. Skeletal Radiol, 2014, 43(10): 1421-1427.
9
Claes S, Vereecke E, Maes M, et al. Anatomy of the anterolateral ligament of the knee [J]. J Anat, 2013, 223(4): 321-328.
10
Cianca J, John J, Pandit S, et al. Musculoskeletal ultrasound imaging of the recently described anterolateral ligament of the knee [J]. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 2014. 93(2): 186.
11
Oshima T, Nakase J, Numata H, et al. Ultrasonography imaging of the anterolateral ligament using real-time virtual sonography [J]. Knee, 2016, 23(2): 198-202.
12
Helito CP, Demange MK, Bonadio MB, et al. Radiographic landmarks for locating the femoral origin and tibial insertion of the knee anterolateral ligament [J]. Am J Sports Med, 2014, 42(10): 2356-2362.
13
Cavaignac E, Faruch M, Wytrykowski K, et al. Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Anterolateral Ligament Injuries: Correlation With Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Pivot-Shift Testing [J]. Arthroscopy, 2017, 33(7): 1384-1390.
14
Zein AMN, Elshafie M, Elsaid ANS, et al. Combined Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Double Bundle Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction [J]. Arthrosc Tech, 2017, 6(4): e1229-e1238.
15
Faruch Bilfeld M, Cavaignac E, Wytrykowski K, et al. Anterolateral ligament injuries in knees with an anterior cruciate ligament tear: Contribution of ultrasonography and MRI [J]. Eur Radiol, 2018, 28(1): 58-65.
16
Patel RM, Brophy RH. Brophy, Anterolateral Ligament of the Knee: Anatomy, Function, Imaging, and Treatment [J]. Am J Sports Med, 2018, 46(1): 217-223.
17
Helito CP, Demange MK, Partezani Helito PV, et al. Evaluation of the anterolateral ligament of the knee by means of magnetic resonance examination [J]. Rev Bras Ortop, 2015. 50(2): 214-219.
18
Kosy JD, Mandalia VI, Anaspure R. Anaspure, Characterization of the anatomy of the anterolateral ligament of the knee using magnetic resonance imaging [J]. Skeletal Radiol, 2015, 44(11): 1647-1653.
19
Porrino Jr J, Maloney E, Richardson M, et al. The anterolateral ligament of the knee: MRI appearance, association with the Segond fracture, and historical perspective [J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2015, 204(2): 367-373.
20
Taneja AK, Miranda FC, Braga CA, et al. MRI features of the anterolateral ligament of the knee [J]. Skeletal Radiol, 2015, 44(3): 403-410.
21
Argento G, Vetrano M, Cristiano L, et al. Ultrasonographic assessment of the anterolateral ligament of the knee in healthy subjects [J]. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J, 2017, 7(3): 485-490.
22
Parsons EM, Gee AO, Spiekerman C, et al. The biomechanical function of the anterolateral ligament of the knee [J]. Am J Sports Med, 2015, 43(3): 669-674.
23
Van Dyck P, Clockaerts S, Vanhoenacker FM, et al. Anterolateral ligament abnormalities in patients with acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture are associated with lateral meniscal and osseous injuries [J]. Eur Radiol, 2016, 26(10): 3383-3391.
[1] 章建全, 程杰, 陈红琼, 闫磊. 采用ACR-TIRADS评估甲状腺消融区的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2024, 21(10): 966-971.
[2] 罗辉, 方晔. 品管圈在提高甲状腺结节细针穿刺检出率中的应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2024, 21(10): 972-977.
[3] 杨忠, 时敬业, 邓学东, 姜纬, 殷林亮, 潘琦, 梁泓, 马建芳, 王珍奇, 张俊, 董姗姗. 产前超声在胎儿22q11.2 微缺失综合征中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2024, 21(09): 852-858.
[4] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[5] 史学兵, 谢迎东, 谢霓, 徐超丽, 杨斌, 孙帼. 声辐射力弹性成像对不可切除肝细胞癌门静脉癌栓患者放射治疗效果的评价[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2024, 21(08): 778-784.
[6] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[7] 洪玮, 叶细容, 刘枝红, 杨银凤, 吕志红. 超声影像组学联合临床病理特征预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗完全病理缓解的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2024, 21(06): 571-579.
[8] 项文静, 徐燕, 茹彤, 郑明明, 顾燕, 戴晨燕, 朱湘玉, 严陈晨. 神经学超声检查在产前诊断胼胝体异常中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2024, 21(05): 470-476.
[9] 胡可, 鲁蓉. 基于多参数超声特征的中老年女性压力性尿失禁诊断模型研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2024, 21(05): 477-483.
[10] 张妍, 原韶玲, 史泽洪, 郭馨阳, 牛菁华. 小肾肿瘤超声漏诊原因分析新思路[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2024, 21(05): 500-504.
[11] 席芬, 张培培, 孝梦甦, 刘真真, 张一休, 张璟, 朱庆莉, 孟华. 乳腺错构瘤的临床与超声影像学特征分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2024, 21(05): 505-510.
[12] 钱警语, 郑明明. 《2024意大利妇产科学会非侵入性和侵入性产前诊断指南》解读[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 486-492.
[13] 高广涵, 张耀南, 石磊, 王林, 王飞, 郑子天, 王鸿禹, 郭民政, 薛庆云. 膝骨关节炎患者前交叉韧带功能影像学影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 301-307.
[14] 张琛, 秦鸣, 董娟, 陈玉龙. 超声检查对儿童肠扭转缺血性改变的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 565-568.
[15] 陈秀晓, 隋文倩, 王珉鑫, 吴圆圆. 腹股沟斜疝并腹腔游离体超声表现一例[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 516-517.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号