切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (09) : 897 -902. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2020.09.014

所属专题: 超声医学质量控制 文献

超声医学质量控制

甲状腺结节超声引导细针穿刺初学者质量控制方法探讨
张琼1, 彭玉兰1,(), 罗燕1   
  1. 1. 610041 四川大学华西医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2019-05-14 出版日期:2020-09-01
  • 通信作者: 彭玉兰

Quality control of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of thyroid nodules for beginners

Qiong Zhang1, Yulan Peng1,(), Yan Luo1   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Sichuan 610041, China
  • Received:2019-05-14 Published:2020-09-01
  • Corresponding author: Yulan Peng
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Peng Yulan, Email: .
引用本文:

张琼, 彭玉兰, 罗燕. 甲状腺结节超声引导细针穿刺初学者质量控制方法探讨[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2020, 17(09): 897-902.

Qiong Zhang, Yulan Peng, Yan Luo. Quality control of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of thyroid nodules for beginners[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2020, 17(09): 897-902.

目的

通过分析超声科6名医师甲状腺结节超声引导下细针穿刺活组织检查(US-FNAB)的学习曲线,探讨US-FNAB初学者达到平均水平且相对稳定时所需的训练量,从而指导科室有效管控初学者甲状腺结节US-FNAB的穿刺质量。

方法

选取2011年3月至2014年11月四川大学华西医院超声科6名穿刺医师(Dr1~Dr6)行US-FNAB的甲状腺结节6147例(其中Dr1和Dr6为有经验穿刺医师;Dr2~Dr5为穿刺初学者),收集其细胞病理学结果。并按结节的穿刺时间排序,从第1例结节开始,每100例为一组,依次进行分组。根据Bethesda分类标准将结节细胞病理学结果分为穿刺无效和穿刺有效2类,统计每一位医师每一组的穿刺无效率,绘制学习曲线。统计6名医师6147例甲状腺结节穿刺无效率的平均值。按照甲状腺结节的穿刺时间排序,统计Dr2~Dr5每名初学者第一个100例(F100)和第二个100例(S100)的穿刺无效率。采用四格表的χ2检验,将Dr2~Dr5每名初学者的F100和S100的穿刺无效率分别与6147例甲状腺结节穿刺无效率的平均值进行比较。

结果

Dr1~Dr6每名医师每组穿刺无效率分别为:Dr1(17组):25%、23%、17%、17%、14%、15%、24%、14%、12%、7%、8%、9%、6%、10%、11%、16%、8%;Dr2(5组):40%、27%、24%、21%、13%;Dr3(10组):22%、9%、20%、23%、13%、17%、14%、11%、10%、15%;Dr4(15组):21%、22%、28%、26%、22%、29%、24%、19%、14%、20%、8%、11%、11%、9%、4%;Dr5(8组):39%、24%、13%、21%、12%、13%、8%、9%;Dr6(4组):13%、15%、5%、9%。由此绘制学习曲线。6名医师6147例甲状腺结节穿刺无效率的平均值为16.04%。Dr2~Dr5每名初学者F100和S100的穿刺无效率分别为:Dr2:40%,27%;Dr3:22%,9%;Dr4:21%,22%;Dr5:39%,24%。Dr2~Dr5每名初学者F100穿刺无效率和平均值的比较,差异有统计学意义的为Dr2(χ2=14.286,P<0.001)和Dr5(χ2=13.266,P<0.001),S100穿刺无效率和平均值的比较中,差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。

结论

绘制甲状腺结节US-FNAB初学者学习曲线,探讨其学习曲线规律,分析其达到平均穿刺水平且相对稳定时的训练量,从而准确判断初学者能够独立操作的时机,是初学者甲状腺结节US-FNAB质量控制的有效方法。

Objective

By analyzing the learning curve of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (US-FNAB) of thyroid nodules that was conducted by six doctors at the ultrasound department, we aimed to obtain the number of cases that beginners need to perform to achieve the average and stable level of US-FNAB, so as to effectively control the quality of US-FNAB of thyroid nodules.

Methods

A total of 6147 thyroid nodules that underwent US-FNAB (performed by 6 doctors; Dr1 and Dr6 were experienced doctors, and Dr2-Dr5 were inexperienced doctors) were retrospectively studied between March 2011 and November 2014 at West China Hospital, Sichuan University. To evaluate the operator's diagnostic inadequacy over time, the procedures were chronologically subdivided into several consecutive groups of 100 cases each. Yields of US-FNAB were divided into two levels according to the classification standard of the Bethesda system: adequacy and inadequacy. The learning curve was plotted based on the inadequate diagnostic rate of US-FNAB according to every group data of each doctor. The average rate of diagnostic inadequacy for the 6147 thyroid nodules was analyzed. Then, the inadequate diagnostic rates for the first 100 (F100) and second 100 cases (S100) for each doctor from Dr2 to Dr5 was analyzed, respectively. Pearson Chi-Square test was used to compare the inadequate diagnostic rate between the average rate of diagnostic inadequacy for the 6147 thyroid nodules and the F100 and S100 of four doctors (Dr2-Dr5), respectively.

Results

The rates of non-diagnostic procedures for each group from Dr1 to Dr6 were: Dr1 (17 groups): 25%, 23%, 17%, 17%, 14%, 15%, 24%, 14%, 12%, 7%, 8%, 9%, 6%, 10%, 11%, 16%, and 8%; Dr2 (5 groups): 40%, 27%, 24%, 21%, and 13%; Dr3 (10 groups): 22%, 9%, 20%, 23%, 13%, 17%, 14%, 11%, 10%, and 15%; Dr4 (15 groups): 21%, 22%, 28%, 26%, 22%, 29%, 24%, 19%, 14%, 20%, 8%, 11%, 11%, 9%, and 4%; Dr5 (8 groups): 39%, 24%, 13%, 21%, 12%, 13%, 8%, and 9%; Dr6 (4 groups): 13%, 15%, 5%, and 9%. The average rate of diagnostic inadequacy for the 6147 thyroid nodules was 16.04%. The inadequate diagnostic rates of the F100 cases and the S100 cases for each doctor from Dr2 to Dr5 were: Dr2: 40% and 27%; Dr3: 22% and 9%; Dr4: 21% and 22%; Dr5: 39% and 24%. The inadequacy rate of the F100 cases in Dr2 and Dr5 was significantly higher than the average rate of diagnostic inadequacy for the 6147 thyroid nodules (Dr2: χ2=14.286, P<0.001; Dr5: χ2=13.266, P<0.001). There was no difference in inadequate diagnostic rates between the S100 cases in each doctor from Dr2 to Dr5 and the average rate of diagnostic inadequacy for the 6147 thyroid nodules (P>0.05).

Conclusion

The learning curve of US-FNAB of thyroid nodules for beginners has been drawn and observed. According to the training amount that beginners require to achieve the average and stable level of US-FNAB, we can determine the time accurately when beginners could perform US-FNAB of thyroid nodules independently. In this way, we can get an effective method to manage the quality of US-FNAB of thyroid nodules.

表1 Dr1~Dr6每名医师甲状腺结节Bethesda细胞学分类结果[例(%)]
图1 6位医师甲状腺结节超声引导下细针穿刺活检的学习曲线
表2 Dr2~Dr5 4名初学者甲状腺结节超声引导下细针穿刺活检的F100例和S100例甲状腺结节穿刺无效率与平均值的比较(个)
1
Redman R, Zalaznick H, Mazzaferri EL, et al. The impact of assessing specimen adequacy and number of needle passes for fine-needle aspiration biopsy of thyroid nodules [J]. Thyroid, 2006, 16(1): 55-60.
2
Onal ED, Saglam F, Sacikara M, et al. "The diagnostic accuracy of thyroid nodule fine-needle aspiration cytology following thyroid surgery: a case-control Study" [J]. Endocr Pathol, 2014, 25(3): 297-301.
3
De Fiori E, Rampinelli C, Turco F, et al. Role of operator experience in ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the thyroid [J]. Radiol Med, 2010, 115(4): 612-618.
4
Bhatki AM, Brewer B, Robinson-Smith T, et al. Adequacy of surgeon-performed ultrasound-guided thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsy [J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2008, 139(1): 27-31.
5
Cibas ES, Ali SZ. The bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology [J]. Thyroid, 2009, 19(11): 1159-1165.
6
Ravetto C, Columbo L, Dottorini ME. Usefulness of fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of thyroid carcinoma: a retrospective study in 37,895 patients [J]. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol), 2000, 90(6): 357-363.
7
Ko HM, Jhu IK, Yang SH, et al. Clinicopathologic analysis of fine needle aspiration cytology of the thyroid. A review of 1,613 cases and correlation with histopathologic diagnoses [J]. Acta Cytol, 2003, 47(5): 727-732.
8
Alexander EK, Heering JP, Benson CB, et al. Assessment of nondiagnostic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspirations of thyroid nodules [J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2002, 87(11): 4924-4927.
9
Chow LS, Gharib H, Goellner JR, et al. Nondiagnostic thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology: management dilemmas [J]. Thyroid, 2001, 11(12): 1147-1151.
10
Marqusee E, Benson CB, Frates MC, et al. Usefulness of ultrasonography in the management of nodular thyroid disease [J]. Ann Intern Med, 2000, 133(9): 696-700.
11
Fadda G, Basolo F, Bondi A, et al. Cytological classification of thyroid nodules. Proposal of the SIAPEC-IAP Italian Consensus Working Group [J]. Pathologica, 2010, 102(5): 405-408.
12
Choi SH, Han KH, Yoon JH, et al. Factors affecting inadequate sampling of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of thyroid nodules [J]. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf), 2011, 74(6): 776-782.
13
Baloch ZW, Cibas ES, Clark DP, et al. The National Cancer Institute Thyroid fine needle aspiration state of the science conference: a summation [J]. Cytojournal, 2008, 5: 6.
14
Lee J, Lee SY, Cha SH, et al. Fine-needle aspiration of thyroid nodules with macrocalcification [J]. Thyroid, 2013, 23(9): 1106-1112.
15
Cooper DS, Doherty GM, Haugen BR, et al. Revised American Thyroid Association management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer [J]. Thyroid, 2009, 19(11): 1167-1214.
[1] 章建全, 程杰, 陈红琼, 闫磊. 采用ACR-TIRADS评估甲状腺消融区的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 966-971.
[2] 罗辉, 方晔. 品管圈在提高甲状腺结节细针穿刺检出率中的应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 972-977.
[3] 杨忠, 时敬业, 邓学东, 姜纬, 殷林亮, 潘琦, 梁泓, 马建芳, 王珍奇, 张俊, 董姗姗. 产前超声在胎儿22q11.2 微缺失综合征中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 852-858.
[4] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[5] 史学兵, 谢迎东, 谢霓, 徐超丽, 杨斌, 孙帼. 声辐射力弹性成像对不可切除肝细胞癌门静脉癌栓患者放射治疗效果的评价[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 778-784.
[6] 刘畅, 蒋洁, 胥雪冬, 崔立刚, 王淑敏, 陈文. 北京市海淀区医疗机构甲状腺超声检查及TIRADS分类基线调查[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 693-697.
[7] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[8] 洪玮, 叶细容, 刘枝红, 杨银凤, 吕志红. 超声影像组学联合临床病理特征预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗完全病理缓解的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 571-579.
[9] 项文静, 徐燕, 茹彤, 郑明明, 顾燕, 戴晨燕, 朱湘玉, 严陈晨. 神经学超声检查在产前诊断胼胝体异常中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 470-476.
[10] 胡可, 鲁蓉. 基于多参数超声特征的中老年女性压力性尿失禁诊断模型研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 477-483.
[11] 张妍, 原韶玲, 史泽洪, 郭馨阳, 牛菁华. 小肾肿瘤超声漏诊原因分析新思路[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 500-504.
[12] 席芬, 张培培, 孝梦甦, 刘真真, 张一休, 张璟, 朱庆莉, 孟华. 乳腺错构瘤的临床与超声影像学特征分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 505-510.
[13] 钱警语, 郑明明. 《2024意大利妇产科学会非侵入性和侵入性产前诊断指南》解读[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 486-492.
[14] 江东根, 依力夏提·艾力, 依布拉音江·阿布力克木, 依力盼·依拉木, 冯瑶, 艾尼玩·木拉克, 艾克拜尔江·阿里木. 基层医院单一术者改良单通道腹腔镜下鞘状突环扎术学习曲线及体会[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 560-565.
[15] 张琛, 秦鸣, 董娟, 陈玉龙. 超声检查对儿童肠扭转缺血性改变的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 565-568.
阅读次数
全文


摘要